Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

We don't want the government to lurch to the left

579 replies

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 13:57

I am absolutely astounded that Labour think it's democratic to decide that they can lurch to the left despite being elected with a very clear promise to not tax and spend. I believe this is absolutely not what the general public want and I am really worried that the economy isn't going to survive this and we will end up with an IMF bailout that will lead to very painful spending cuts for our most vulnerable.

Please vote:
YABU :I want Labour to lurch to the left in order to increase taxation and spending
YANBU: I don't want Labour to lurch to the left and would be against further tax and spending rises

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
EasternStandard · 10/02/2026 14:58

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 14:56

Read the content for goodness sake! It was the first article I found that state the current position outlined by the BoE. This supercedes the IMflF report from January

@NanFlandersyou’ll find the same in The Guardian if you prefer that one, the BoE statement was widely reported.

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 14:58

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 10/02/2026 14:57

Christ, I’m beyond sick of people whingeing about paying tax.

If we want services we pay tax. End of.

Let me guess, you are a huge net beneficiary of the state?

OP posts:
ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 10/02/2026 14:59

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 14:58

Let me guess, you are a huge net beneficiary of the state?

No, I’ve paid tax for 40 years.

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 14:59

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 10/02/2026 14:59

No, I’ve paid tax for 40 years.

Are you and your household net contributors or beneficiaries?

OP posts:
Mishmosher · 10/02/2026 15:00

TallulahBetty · 10/02/2026 14:35

Well, we need to tax SOMETHING more. The upcoming increase in the welfare bill needs to be paid for, as well as the ever-aging population needing more social care. However, as a working person, I am already taxed to the hilt. Where else can we raid apart from the rich?

The options - if you want to increase spending are, as ever:

Cut spending elsewhere
Raise raxes
Borrow more
Grow the economy

The bottom two aren’t going to happen. Who are you going to tax? Because anyone over £50k is already being hammered and aren’t going to pay more to fund a benefits bill they don’t benefit from. There is no magic money tree here. It does not exist. There are no handy billionaires siphoning off millions.

Dorisbonson · 10/02/2026 15:01

Summerhillsquare · 10/02/2026 14:48

Do have a listen to yourself.

Does your employer say the same? We must cut or freeze your pay or the markets will revolt and we'll have to lay you off...you meekly accept it of course? Crawl away so as not to be a burden?

If markets say my employer is fucked then I'm out of a job. It doesn't really matter what I say. Country is subject to the same discipline.

You must be living in Dreamland if you think anything different. It's literally the economics of Mugabe and Zimbabwe if you think you can print money and ignore bond markets.

Who is mad enough to lend money to a country when they know it's value will go down?

Who invests money on behalf of pensioners in a country that prints money and makes that investment worth less?

Can I take your pension and invest it in something that will lose 5% of it's value a year please? That seems to be your policy.

IamnotSethRogan · 10/02/2026 15:01

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 14:59

Are you and your household net contributors or beneficiaries?

I don't think that's any of your business and it doesn't make the posters comments any less worthy of being taken seriously either way.

whiteroseredrose · 10/02/2026 15:01

I voted Labour with the expectation that Kier Starmer would be PM. I wasn’t expecting his back benchers to stab him in the back at the first opportunity. And I definitely wouldn’t have voted Labour with Angela Rayner as leader. So no, I am not happy at the idea of a different leader.

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 15:02

IamnotSethRogan · 10/02/2026 15:01

I don't think that's any of your business and it doesn't make the posters comments any less worthy of being taken seriously either way.

Turkeys generally don't vote for Christmas.

OP posts:
SleeplessInWherever · 10/02/2026 15:02

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 10/02/2026 14:57

Christ, I’m beyond sick of people whingeing about paying tax.

If we want services we pay tax. End of.

Same.

Everyone wants improvement but not to have to pay for it.

schooloflostsocks · 10/02/2026 15:03

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 14:23

It's a whinge because it is so undemocratic. Would Labour have got into power with this left wing agenda? Judging by Jeremy Corbyn's performance I would wager no.

Jeremy Corbyn was incredibly popular if you remember! Before the antisemitism nonsense

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 10/02/2026 15:04

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 14:59

Are you and your household net contributors or beneficiaries?

wtf?

Net contributors. Is that OK? Worked all our lives.

Gestapo or what.

Mishmosher · 10/02/2026 15:04

NanFlanders · 10/02/2026 14:39

Yes. Higher rate taxpayer. Full-time employment, and also have own consultancy business. You can't have Scandinavian-level services with American-level taxes and I want shorter NHS waiting lists, a decent transport system, young people not to face crippling levels of student debt and care for the elderly to be properly funded.

Me too. The higher rate of tax is already similar to Scandinavia. It’s the lower waged that are paying far, far less than in Scandinavia. Are you going to tell them or am I?

Dorisbonson · 10/02/2026 15:04

IamnotSethRogan · 10/02/2026 15:01

I don't think that's any of your business and it doesn't make the posters comments any less worthy of being taken seriously either way.

It absolutely makes a difference.

So you are basically saying I don't pay my way and expect higher earners to subsidise me.

The top 25% of earners are on course to contribute 75% of income tax! Isnt that enough?

In Europe lower earners pay a lot more tax. In Belgium the 40% band kicks in at 2000 euros. Find me a country in Western Europe where lower earners pay less tax than in the UK?

EasternStandard · 10/02/2026 15:05

SleeplessInWherever · 10/02/2026 15:02

Same.

Everyone wants improvement but not to have to pay for it.

The tax burden is the highest in 70 odd years so some people are paying for it. The demands for more keep going up though, especially on here. And it’s usually someone else paying up anyway to increase the state.

In a way let the left of Labour go for it, see how it pans out. We can see how higher taxes work out and people can decide.

IamnotSethRogan · 10/02/2026 15:05

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 15:02

Turkeys generally don't vote for Christmas.

It's not turkeys voting for Christmas. There are plenty of people who are happy to contribute more because they think the benefits are worth it.

notquiteruralbliss · 10/02/2026 15:05

Mishmosher · 10/02/2026 14:28

You obviously have enough spare cash to pay more tax. Others don’t.

Which is why I said I'd close loopholes first. Anyone PAYE is an easy target.

ChoccieCornflake · 10/02/2026 15:06

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 15:02

Turkeys generally don't vote for Christmas.

I'm a net contributor. I would pay more taxes. And to those that said we're welcome to - I'm already contributing to charities that fill the gap that the state should support

DrPrunesqualer · 10/02/2026 15:07

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 14:34

Just to guage on a relatively left wing forum how many would actually support this lurch to the left. Nobody on here ever really admits to wanting to vote Reform but we know they are miles ahead in the polls. If there is no real appetite even on here for a lurch to the left then one can reasonably conclude that this is totally and wholly undemocratic and doesn't represent the will of the people.

I certainly wouldn’t want any more lurching to the left and the thought of Raynor and the likes being PM fills me with absolute horror. We can’t run a country on bitterness and hate

But let’s not ignore OP that the current Labour Government have done many things that have taken away our rights
Planning- calling in planning applications when it looks like public opinion is against them in order to rush them through
Organisations- naming PA a terrorist organisation when it does not come within those parameters
Prison- imprisoning without bail and before trial for long periods of time
Free speech- Labour paused and then significantly changed the Higher Education Act on free speech

So what are Labour really up to anyway.
Right, Left, Centre. They are currently no more than headless chickens
the hens of which have penises

treeowl · 10/02/2026 15:07

In Europe lower earners pay a lot more tax. In Belgium the 40% band kicks in at 2000 euros. Find me a country in Western Europe where lower earners pay less tax than in the UK?

This is true that lower and middle earners pay less tax vs other European countries but the issue is housing costs.

NanFlanders · 10/02/2026 15:09

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 14:56

Read the content for goodness sake! It was the first article I found that state the current position outlined by the BoE. This supercedes the IMflF report from January

You can read the original Bank of England report that this is presumably based on here: Monetary Policy Report – February 2026 (PDF. It's a lot more nuanced that the Mail's This is Money implies. Essentially it says that we are subject to the global instability i referenced earlier, but inflation is expected to fall back towards 2%. There was a narrow vote on cutting the interest rate, but they eventually went for keeping monetary policy tight enough to ensure inflation returns to target sustainable, not prematurely.

https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/monetary-policy-report/2026/february/monetary-policy-report-february-2026.pdf

treeowl · 10/02/2026 15:09

Our benefits are not linked to how much tax you pay which is another element different in many European countries and we don’t pay enough tax for our NHS model.

We have an ageing population which is a huge part of the problem.

SleeplessInWherever · 10/02/2026 15:10

EasternStandard · 10/02/2026 15:05

The tax burden is the highest in 70 odd years so some people are paying for it. The demands for more keep going up though, especially on here. And it’s usually someone else paying up anyway to increase the state.

In a way let the left of Labour go for it, see how it pans out. We can see how higher taxes work out and people can decide.

I know - I’m one of them. My projected tax for next year is eye watering, a real significant increase.

Where else people think the money is going to come from otherwise is beyond me, and cutting already struggling services isn’t the answer.

People talk about “not paying it” like they’re only optionally paying tax to begin with. I always laugh at the petulant “I’m not paying more!” people…. you are.

If you don’t like it, you can either choose to earn less or choose to leave. Don’t let the door hit you on the way out.

treeowl · 10/02/2026 15:11

The tax burden is the highest in 70 odd years so some people are paying for it

Are the Tories not responsible for some
of this burden? They froze the income tax bands.

timetogoandstop · 10/02/2026 15:11

We cannot cut public services anymore. At some point we need a fair tax system to give us all the services we need. I don’t bother with the NHS for so many things now and choose to go private, just small stuff but I know the service can’t cope. You end up paying one way or another so I don’t mind tax if it’s enough across everyone to get services up. I’m a higher tax payer in Scotland so already higher than most on here probably