Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

We don't want the government to lurch to the left

579 replies

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 13:57

I am absolutely astounded that Labour think it's democratic to decide that they can lurch to the left despite being elected with a very clear promise to not tax and spend. I believe this is absolutely not what the general public want and I am really worried that the economy isn't going to survive this and we will end up with an IMF bailout that will lead to very painful spending cuts for our most vulnerable.

Please vote:
YABU :I want Labour to lurch to the left in order to increase taxation and spending
YANBU: I don't want Labour to lurch to the left and would be against further tax and spending rises

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
Sesma · 10/02/2026 14:42

StripyShirt · 10/02/2026 14:27

Very happy to pay more tax and have more public spending.

Pay more then, no one is stopping you

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 14:43

IamnotSethRogan · 10/02/2026 14:40

Ok but say people vote for something and then it turns out it doesn't work, is making things worse. Does the government that was elected have to do the same thing that isn't working regardless of there being some other options that take them away from exactly what they promised to do ?

No, you can always call another election and get a new mandate. Obviously this isn't necessary for smaller policies but if you want a complete change of direction then of course that's what should happen.

Imagine a party doing the converse and getting in saying that they would tax people more and spend it on public services. They then lower taxes and drastically cut spending. Would this be democratic?

OP posts:
timetogoandstop · 10/02/2026 14:43

MidnightPatrol · 10/02/2026 14:12

I agree it doesn’t look good for the Labour Party to win an election on a centrist mandate - then replace the leader following that philosophy with someone far more left wing.

Burnham or Rayner wouldn’t win an election as leaders on the kind of mandate they would prefer…

We will be getting some sort of reform coalition next anyway.

The whole thing is diabolical either way - no good alternatives either.

I think Burnham is very popular and charismatic with a good record of success and delivery. Why Labour aren’t crawling over broken glass to get him as leader is baffling. Rayner has the whiff of sleaze against her now.

SleeplessInWherever · 10/02/2026 14:43

Yep, more tax and spend works for me.

I also happen to like Andy Burnham. I liked him when he was an MP, and he’s done some really good things for Greater Manchester.

NanFlanders · 10/02/2026 14:43

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 14:38

Exactly. We can't spend more now without crashing the economy. An IMF bailout is a very real prospect with the amount of money we are in debt and our reliance on financial markets. Nobody can tax Amazon etc properly. Wealth taxes don't work. Tax rises on businesses cripple the economy. We have run out of options.

Nah. The IMF’s World Economic Outlook (Jan 2026) (decidedly NOT a left wing periodical) predicts that advanced economies like the UK are still projected to grow, albeit modestly. There is no indication of the UK losing the ability to borrow or facing a sudden-stop event. [imf.org] Also KPMG’s 2025–2026 forecasts expect UK interest rates to fall toward 3.25% in 2026, with inflation also cooling. This reduces the risk of a debt‑financing spiral. [kpmg.com]

UK Economic outlook

Our latest UK economic outlook examines the potential impact of US tariffs and the implications for the public finances

https://kpmg.com/uk/en/insights/economics/uk-economic-outlook.html

Echobelly · 10/02/2026 14:43

ChoccieCornflake · 10/02/2026 14:34

I'm merely stating the facts, not my preferences. And to say Labour going left would be responsible for whatever Reform does is insane. Reform will go as far to the right as they can whoever was in power - that's the whole point of Reform

Yes, Reform have literally been saying at today that they'd like to Trump-style withdraw funding from universities that criticise them, and that working from home shouldn't be allowed. They're just doing what their US billionaire paymasters want, regardless of what the UK government does

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 14:44

doonnaKay · 10/02/2026 14:41

What is your solution? They inherited a mess that needs money to fix. You dont want taxes, you dont want borrowing? Where do you want to cut spending.

Dont be shy, be explicit.

I think we need to cut spending in most areas to be honest. Obviously I would really rather not but I don't see what alternative we actually have. There is no magic money tree.

OP posts:
Happyjoe · 10/02/2026 14:45

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 14:07

What do you mean? I don't think I was hiding my agenda. People are struggling under the crushing weight of the tax burden. Businesses are closing or moving abroad. It all leads to one place which is an IMF bailout unless we tread very very carefully

If it was only a tax burden at fault, you may have a valid reason to be really pissed off.
But.. why are businesses really struggling?

Happyjoe · 10/02/2026 14:47

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 14:44

I think we need to cut spending in most areas to be honest. Obviously I would really rather not but I don't see what alternative we actually have. There is no magic money tree.

Austerity doesn't work as a general rule. It certainly didn't work under the tories did it? They broke everything and left us in more debt since the end of the war.. You need to invest into a country and it's people, not cut it to the bone imo.

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 14:47

NanFlanders · 10/02/2026 14:43

Nah. The IMF’s World Economic Outlook (Jan 2026) (decidedly NOT a left wing periodical) predicts that advanced economies like the UK are still projected to grow, albeit modestly. There is no indication of the UK losing the ability to borrow or facing a sudden-stop event. [imf.org] Also KPMG’s 2025–2026 forecasts expect UK interest rates to fall toward 3.25% in 2026, with inflation also cooling. This reduces the risk of a debt‑financing spiral. [kpmg.com]

Interest rates are less likely to be cut now due to the increased unemployment. GDP predictions are being downgraded

https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/article-15532927/Cost-Labour-laid-bare-Bank-England-slashes-growth-outlook-holds-rates-warns-job-losses.html

OP posts:
Summerhillsquare · 10/02/2026 14:48

Mishmosher · 10/02/2026 14:35

It’s not going to happen though. If or Burnham get in and start frittering money away to the parents that can’t be bothered to work, the bond markets will go mental, debt interest will become totally unaffordable and there will be a general election before an IMF bail out, Reform will get in and those parents will get much less than they get now. Poverty will soar.

Starmer is walking a tightrope here. Do you not think that if there was an economically feasible way to eradicate poverty he’d be doing it??? There is no magic money tree.

Do have a listen to yourself.

Does your employer say the same? We must cut or freeze your pay or the markets will revolt and we'll have to lay you off...you meekly accept it of course? Crawl away so as not to be a burden?

Dorisbonson · 10/02/2026 14:48

doonnaKay · 10/02/2026 14:41

What is your solution? They inherited a mess that needs money to fix. You dont want taxes, you dont want borrowing? Where do you want to cut spending.

Dont be shy, be explicit.

The government spends 1.3 trillion a year. You don't think there are things that can be cut?

Perhaps amongst the 1.5m NHS workers there are opportunities to do things more cheaply and quickly and still achieve good patient outcomes.

Or maybe some of the extra 100,000 civil servants they have hired in the last 5 years aren't all necessary? Perhaps civil servants work hard on things which don't need doing and we can do without?

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 14:48

Happyjoe · 10/02/2026 14:45

If it was only a tax burden at fault, you may have a valid reason to be really pissed off.
But.. why are businesses really struggling?

A lot is to do with taxation. Look at hospitality. Look at manufacturing businesses. If you think tax rises aren't having an impact then you're wrong. It's crippling then

OP posts:
Nanalovesnature · 10/02/2026 14:50

I think the IMF coming in and sorting out this shit show would be the best thing those of us who work and pay taxes can hope for.

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 14:51

Happyjoe · 10/02/2026 14:47

Austerity doesn't work as a general rule. It certainly didn't work under the tories did it? They broke everything and left us in more debt since the end of the war.. You need to invest into a country and it's people, not cut it to the bone imo.

Invest with what money? We are heavily in debt as a nation.

OP posts:
wishingonastar101 · 10/02/2026 14:51

My DP and I will probably leave the country if taxes go up anymore... so that's two £100k salaries gone elsewhere... I think a lot of people will do this.

Just get fed up of paying for everyone else after a while....

IamnotSethRogan · 10/02/2026 14:51

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 14:44

I think we need to cut spending in most areas to be honest. Obviously I would really rather not but I don't see what alternative we actually have. There is no magic money tree.

So you dont think we should tax those who can afford it more in order to improve services?

You think the services that are already on their knees should face further cuts ?

It's slightly ecomonially illiterate as tax cuts rarely generate enough growth to offset lost revenue and tends to slow growth.

Cutting services saves money today but raises costs tomorrow, which is bad fiscal management from a long-term perspective while failing to fix deficits.

MissyB1 · 10/02/2026 14:53

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 14:44

I think we need to cut spending in most areas to be honest. Obviously I would really rather not but I don't see what alternative we actually have. There is no magic money tree.

You favour a return to Austerity? Well of course that worked so well for the Country last time didn’t it? I mean it truly fucked our public services but don’t worry about that 🤦‍♀️

NanFlanders · 10/02/2026 14:53

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 14:47

Interest rates are less likely to be cut now due to the increased unemployment. GDP predictions are being downgraded

https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/article-15532927/Cost-Labour-laid-bare-Bank-England-slashes-growth-outlook-holds-rates-warns-job-losses.html

I think the IMF is a rather more trustworthy and neutral source than a Daily Mail-owned website. Our financial position could be better admittedly (very much impacted by Brexit and US tariffs), but what really spooks the markets is unfunded commitments (see Liz Truss' mini-budget), not a modest growth in income tax.

EasternStandard · 10/02/2026 14:55

NanFlanders · 10/02/2026 14:53

I think the IMF is a rather more trustworthy and neutral source than a Daily Mail-owned website. Our financial position could be better admittedly (very much impacted by Brexit and US tariffs), but what really spooks the markets is unfunded commitments (see Liz Truss' mini-budget), not a modest growth in income tax.

The job warning and growth downgrade is from the Bank of England.

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 14:56

NanFlanders · 10/02/2026 14:53

I think the IMF is a rather more trustworthy and neutral source than a Daily Mail-owned website. Our financial position could be better admittedly (very much impacted by Brexit and US tariffs), but what really spooks the markets is unfunded commitments (see Liz Truss' mini-budget), not a modest growth in income tax.

Read the content for goodness sake! It was the first article I found that state the current position outlined by the BoE. This supercedes the IMflF report from January

OP posts:
Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 14:57

IamnotSethRogan · 10/02/2026 14:51

So you dont think we should tax those who can afford it more in order to improve services?

You think the services that are already on their knees should face further cuts ?

It's slightly ecomonially illiterate as tax cuts rarely generate enough growth to offset lost revenue and tends to slow growth.

Cutting services saves money today but raises costs tomorrow, which is bad fiscal management from a long-term perspective while failing to fix deficits.

I never mentioned tax cuts.

OP posts:
doonnaKay · 10/02/2026 14:57

Dorisbonson · 10/02/2026 14:48

The government spends 1.3 trillion a year. You don't think there are things that can be cut?

Perhaps amongst the 1.5m NHS workers there are opportunities to do things more cheaply and quickly and still achieve good patient outcomes.

Or maybe some of the extra 100,000 civil servants they have hired in the last 5 years aren't all necessary? Perhaps civil servants work hard on things which don't need doing and we can do without?

@Dorisbonson You think the best place to cut money would be in the NHS? Do you use the NHS?

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 14:57

doonnaKay · 10/02/2026 14:57

@Dorisbonson You think the best place to cut money would be in the NHS? Do you use the NHS?

Do you think there is no waste in the NHS?

OP posts:
ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 10/02/2026 14:57

Christ, I’m beyond sick of people whingeing about paying tax.

If we want services we pay tax. End of.