Polanski is a buffoon

[Bertiebiscuit]

How anyone can take the Green party leader Zac Polanski seriously is completely beyond me. He has zero grasp of economics, beyond conning women out of ££££s by pretending he could hypnotise them to increase their bust measurements. He is the worst representative of gay men who worship the men pretending to be women, with no regard for womens and girls' right to privacy, dignity and safety. The man is a 24 carat buffoon.

Where do you get the impression I care about these issues.

Oh, we KNOW you don't care about womens issues. We know that. You've said it often enough. You think womens rights are a 'distraction' from the meaty mens issues of economics. If women cannot participate in society, the economy will tank. But you have no critical thinking to understand that. Because, as you said, you don't care about womens issues. There is always something 'more important' than the rights of women to you.

This is 100% why we have Trump in power in America. The Democrats and their pro-trans stance just came across as mindless, hectoring, morally warped, pious idiots. If I was in America I would have voted Democrat every time, except for last time when I just wouldn’t have voted. The Greens, Lib Dem’s and SNP are digging themselves exactly the same hole.

You are the one that is wrong. You have no arguments at all to counter what people on here are saying. You refuse to engage with the arguments. And why? Why is that? Because your Ideology is a house of cards built on quicksand. And we all know it, including you.

Rape survivors like me having to share a change room with a fully intact male. Dare say to my face it has 'no effect on me'?

Males demanding women be sacked for saying no to them.

Male crimes being recorded as female crimes, thus skewing statistics and rendering them unreliable.

Males taking females sports places and medals.

The 'wHaT eFfeCt DoEs It hAve oN YoU?' line has been proven worthless and without foundation years ago. Do catch up. Further effects:

Absolutely. Dems own private internal polling company, BluePrint2024, showed that Trans Ideology/womens rights was the third major reason women voted for Trump. There is a reason Trump ran the 'Kamala is for They/Them' ad 10 times more in swing states than other ads.

You go around saying people who disagree with you are "wrong". How is that not arrogant?

Womens rights is a human rights issue, it is not a 'cultural' problem. Womens rights are MORE than economy policy and public administration. I think it is morally wrong to want women to self-exclude from participating in society, to not enter the workforce, and to return to the Urinary Leash era. You are morally wrong to want women to go backwards, to self-exclude from society and to leave the workforce to men only.

That's another place where you are wrong and in your Mens Rights echo chamber. Polls don't list womens rights as an option. But when they do, poll after poll after poll show that the overwhelming majority of women believe womens single sex spaces should remain, and remain female only. And, further, YouGov poll shows that the majority of people, basically two thirds, agree with the SC ruling.

You, are in an ever decreasing and diminishing fringe minority.

Ah yes, there is ALWAYS 'a more important issue' than womens rights. We'll get to rape survivors and dv survivors having female only spaces to change, ONLY when we solve the economy, global warming, homelessness, and EVERYTHING ELSE.

Which means womens rights will NEVER get a look in.

It is morally wrong to use the 'economy' to deflect from womens basic human rights to safety, privacy and dignity. Your views are heartless, abhorrent and morally repugnant.

Economy, taxes and poverty does not impact the lives of a RAPE SURVIVOR more than being safe and having privacy and dignity when venturing outside the home. Literally NOTHING is more important.

You remind me of the Mens Rights activists during the suffragette era who said women gaining the right to vote was 'not more important' than the economy and taxes. There was always something 'more important' than women gaining the right to vote. Always. In reality, they were saying womens would never get the right to vote because 'something was always more important'. I have zero doubt that if you were alive back then, you'd be throwing eggs and tomatoes at the suffragettes for 'distracting from more important issues'.

What has ECHR ever done for women.

When girls are missing school when on a period, when women are getting UTIs for not drinking fluids so they don't have to use work/public toilets, when women are leaving the workforce and excluding from activities like swimming because fully intact males are changing in the ladies change room, when women are self-excluding from participating in society and returning to the Urinary Leash, it impacts us for more than some 'economic policy' does or EVER will do!

What, you disagree that women care more about their safety, privacy and dignity than economy, unemployment and housing? Because if you don't have safety when participating in the workforce or society, you have NOTHING. NOTHING at all!

I despise the stupid tit whisperer. Anyone that can bang on about TWAW and open borders and Palestine is more important than this country, is clearly barking mad.

Polls to the contrary!

How old are you that you are not impacted by womens rights and VAWG? It seems to me you are a teenager or in your 20s who has absolutely no understanding whatsoever of how hard feminists fought to achieve our rights that you take for granted, and have no lived experience of how having safety, privacy and dignity is so VITAL to womens participation in society and in the workforce.

If you think the majority of women don't care about womens rights, yours is very much the balloon of delusion that needs popping. You live in a completely different world of privilege and delusion wrapped up in a bubbled echo chamber.

Yes I think women with mortgages and jobs care about their rights to safety, privacy and dignity when at work and in public. Several women have quit the workforce over this issue, and women not participating in the workforce hurts the economy. But you think surface level deep and don't have critical thinking capacity.

Or a bloke. So many men have absolutely no idea that nearly a million women are sexually assaulted each year in the UK. They are clueless as to why women could see men as a threat.

ANY male is a risk to woman. And Gender Ideology is entirely about dismantling every sex-based right and protection women FOUGHT DECADES to build up. How is making women self-exclude from society and return to the Urinary Leash times helpful to women?

I am beginning to suspect that poster is a bloke. No one could really be this clueless of how VAWG affects us.

If you think women don't deserve our hard won rights to single sex spaces for safety, dignity and privacy, you DON'T care about womens rights, and you are a Mens Rights activist. Your obsession with calling womens safety, privacy and dignity 'culture wars' says you're a Mens Rights Activist.

I can't believe US supporters seem to care more about stopping trans rights than women's abortion rights.

See this just goes to show that you have not paid ANY attention at all to this. It's not about stopping 'trans rights'. It's about RESTORING WOMENS RIGHTS.

And yes, the right of rape survivors like me to have safety, privacy and dignity when out in public in a womens toilet or change room IS a single issue for me.

I have had a conversation similar to this with my Labour MP (for whom I have voted in the past, before I started rethinking my position).

He proffered the ‘culture wars’ script, and I pointed out that if he was seriously suggesting that women’s human rights and children’s human rights to safeguarding were a matter of ‘cultural interest’, then he wasn’t the man I thought he was. (I’ve known him a long time.)

I do however want to keep Reform out. But I want my MP to listen. Oh and he’s wishy-washy on abortion too, though I think he’ll do what he’s told by the whips on that.

Have you finished with your stream of invective- 'male activist' is this a double bluff? Is anyone that disagrees with you a man. Your position on all mainstream left wing, liberal and centre left parties is pushing women towards voting against their own interests, towards the calvacade of right wing tub thumpers but I expect you know that.