Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Keir starmer is dead in the water

1000 replies

Bertiebiscuit · 04/02/2026 22:21

The UK cannot have a prime minister who gave a plum job to a man when all the time he knew that Mandelson was still close friends with an ex-con who was convicted for trafficking children for sexual abuse. Starmer is destroying the reputation of the UK, he is an embarrassment and shoukd resign, if not the Labour party should demand his resignation.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
cleverbutnice · 05/02/2026 10:40

NautilusLionfish · 05/02/2026 10:26

In all fairness Starmer did not ruin the uk's reputation. That happened between May 2010 and 2024, getting progressively worse. July 2019 it started becoming a joke. By 6 Sept 2022 it wasnt even funny. It was a tragedy. Starmer had the chance to change things but he just turned it from tragedy to meh. An improvement of sorts if you are an aggressive optimist.

I like the phrase agressive optimist.

I am trying to think of a good name for all the background diplomacy which goes on. In the past it has been called deep state or globalist but these terms are now seen as conspiracy theory or right wing rhetoric

"Secret diplomacy" sounds too wishy washy.
"Financier-backed backroom and total lack of morals and wisdom and don't tell the great-unwashed diplomacy" maybe

FOJN · 05/02/2026 10:41

Imdunfer · 05/02/2026 09:39

Yes Bill Gates is currently spending billions on philanthropic work.

He h has just applied for a licence to build the first commercial fusion reactor in Tennessee. Fusion power will bring limitless amounts of carbon free power to the world and the developers have all committed to sharing the knowledge of how to do it with the world for free.

I hope he's there to talk about something like that with Starmer.

Meanwhile can you answer my question instead of fielding it with one of your own?

I just noticed you asked about THIS government but I'm wondering why you don't understand that a small number of asset management companies owning a significant proportion of the stock market and having voting rights in the companies they own shares in isn't a problem. You seem to want a single example of a questionable deal rather than understanding the disproportionate influence these companies have.

Describing Bill Gates foundation as "philanthropic" suggests you are naïve beyond reason. You could Google "Gates Foundation criticism" to start with. Then you could perhaps look at BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, Oracle and Palantir and consider the influence they have.

I'm intrigued about how Palantir paid just 21 million in taxes globally in 2024 when they generated nearly 3 billion in revenue, most of it from defence and data management contracts with governments. Aren't you?

cleverbutnice · 05/02/2026 10:42

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 05/02/2026 10:31

If they were going to kick him out on that basis alone, then they would have done it ages ago. The fact that PM maintained a friendship with JE after his conviction has been in the public domain for ages. It isn't news, and we have known for a while that this fact was known to KS at the time the appointment was made.

Rightly or wrongly, KS remained in post despite all of that, having argued that he had not realised the depth or extent of PM's friendship with JE.

What will hopefully emerge from the documentation when it's published is a much greater degree of clarity about what exactly KS did actually know and what he didn't know; the extent to which any warnings may or may not have been given and whether or not these were acted upon or ignored; and indeed the extent to which it might be deemed that any "due diligence" that was done was sufficient and appropriate for the seniority and risk profile associated with the Ambassador role.

I think Starmer's survival as PM, at least in the short term, is probably dependent on the detail that emerges from those documents. If it turns out that he ignored clear warnings and/or that he knew much more than he has previously indicated, then he will have to go. If the evidence largely backs up his account to date and PM was given clearance after the vetting process, then he might cling on at least until the May elections or perhaps even longer.

Regardless of how things pan out for KS, I think this whole sorry saga highlights serious issues with how our systems are operating. If KS didn't know more about PM's previous behaviour, then it sounds like the vetting process is sorely inadequate - surely our intelligence services should have been able to find out enough to have been able to warn KS that PM was a significant risk? And if KS did know more details, was warned against appointing PM and then chose to appoint him anyway, why on earth are we allowing one individual to exercise so much power without having any proper checks and balances in place? Either way, the systems and processes don't appear to be serving us well.

I think this is right.

I agree with you that there is likely to be more detail coming out, some of which won't have been common knowledge even at higher levels possibly.

Happyjoe · 05/02/2026 10:42

Nanny0gg · 05/02/2026 10:19

Apparently he did

Oh, has that news just broken? I didn't hear it yesterday.

EasternStandard · 05/02/2026 10:43

cleverbutnice · 05/02/2026 10:42

I think this is right.

I agree with you that there is likely to be more detail coming out, some of which won't have been common knowledge even at higher levels possibly.

Edited

This is about politics and the party not that post.

nomas · 05/02/2026 10:43

EasternStandard · 05/02/2026 10:37

You should have seen mn at the time. The same posters asking for this PM to stay were happy to see that one go. They were happy for the media to do that and now facing the same for Starmer. Live by the sword and all that.

I don't think you can compare BoJo with Starmer, BoJo was a special kind of awful.

EasternStandard · 05/02/2026 10:44

nomas · 05/02/2026 10:43

I don't think you can compare BoJo with Starmer, BoJo was a special kind of awful.

Well some still like Starmer on here but generally no he polls worse. And that was before McSweeney, Mandelson and Epstein.

cleverbutnice · 05/02/2026 10:44

FOJN · 05/02/2026 10:41

I just noticed you asked about THIS government but I'm wondering why you don't understand that a small number of asset management companies owning a significant proportion of the stock market and having voting rights in the companies they own shares in isn't a problem. You seem to want a single example of a questionable deal rather than understanding the disproportionate influence these companies have.

Describing Bill Gates foundation as "philanthropic" suggests you are naïve beyond reason. You could Google "Gates Foundation criticism" to start with. Then you could perhaps look at BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, Oracle and Palantir and consider the influence they have.

I'm intrigued about how Palantir paid just 21 million in taxes globally in 2024 when they generated nearly 3 billion in revenue, most of it from defence and data management contracts with governments. Aren't you?

This. And the reputed interest of Palantir, Gates in relation to Greenland explains some of the geopolitics going on there.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 05/02/2026 10:46

EasternStandard · 05/02/2026 10:35

His survival depends on his party and going by Karl Turner this morning there’s calls for McSweeney to go.

Given Starmer’s gushing about him getting him into power it’s a difficult decision. Wield the political knife to save his own skin or not. He answered that McSweeney question as he did because it’s the bit of truth he knows, he is there due to him.

Even if he does as wanted and gets rid of him he will look worse for turning and will be exposed and weakened that he may be out anyway.

It's hard to see how McSweeney can survive.

Whether or not his departure might be enough for KS to keep going, or whether KS will decide that he would rather fall on his own sword than sack McSweeney, only time will tell.

There is obviously serious unrest in the party right now, but I imagine most will want to see what comes out of the published documents before making any decisions.

Bromptotoo · 05/02/2026 10:47

Irren · 05/02/2026 10:32

God I'm so tired of people thinking we should change PMs every two minutes or have a general election whenever something happens someone doesn't like.

PMs are party leaders appointed by that party's membership. It was that process that put Johnson and then Truss in number 10. It came close to putting Corbyn there.

Whether he could have done better than either of those two is a question we'll never get answered.

Starmer was elected Labour leader in 2020. If I'd been a member at the time I'd almost certainly have voted for him. I was amongst those who hoped against hope that he'd stand in 2015.

He seemed the 'safe pair of hands' the country desperate needed in the midst of the Johnson shoot show. He still at that aura on the morning of 5/7/24.

Subsequently we've found he's just not good, nay he's pretty useless, at actually performing day to day politics. He needs to go and be replaced by somebody who can and that person needs to be in post soon so they can do their stuff before the next GE.

Burnham, albeit he's a political Chameleon in how he presents on the left/right sale, would probably be best but his road to a winnable seat is barred by insurmountable obstacles. As I said earlier if the consequence of his naked ambition is a Reform UK mayor of Manchester then I think a lot of party members would turn against him.

If it's Rayner or Streeting I'd be for Rayner.

EasternStandard · 05/02/2026 10:51

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 05/02/2026 10:46

It's hard to see how McSweeney can survive.

Whether or not his departure might be enough for KS to keep going, or whether KS will decide that he would rather fall on his own sword than sack McSweeney, only time will tell.

There is obviously serious unrest in the party right now, but I imagine most will want to see what comes out of the published documents before making any decisions.

His other issue is facing PMQs after refusing to go to the ISC and being overruled by his own MPs. He will struggle even more next week to answer to this.

EsmaCannonball · 05/02/2026 10:51

It's a bigger scandal than Profumo. Some are saying it's the worst betrayal of the British public since Kim Philby.

Mandelson was effectively spying on the government for the rich and powerful, and some of those people he was spying for were possibly Russian assets.

And that's before you even get into him enabling paedophilia and the sexual abuse of young women and seemingly having very young men procured for him by his criminal friend.

It's not only Starmer who has terrible values. So many journalists and political commentators thought Mandelson was a good appointment because he is a 'political genius' (and not just someone who gets things done because he is so corrupt and amoral). Turns out a lot of these people are close friends with Mandelson to the point where they are attending each other's weddings. They are all in the same club. It's bad for democracy when journalists are hand in glove with politicians.

Pineneedlesincarpet · 05/02/2026 10:52

DoIdriveaVauxhallZafira · 04/02/2026 22:47

Boris was still worse and he clung on for ages, its looking dire for Starmer but I wouldn't write him off just yet.

He wasn't "still worse" of course. Which is reflected in the polls that it is Starmer not Boris that is the most Unpopular Prime Minister of All Time.

Dragonscaledaisy · 05/02/2026 10:53

bonsconkers · 05/02/2026 10:34

No idea, any clues?

Southern Hemisphere - see their list in a different post on this thread. As it happens, the country where my DH is from and one in which I've lived and certainly no utopia.

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · 05/02/2026 10:54

If MN is any sort of barometer, it looks like the ranty left of Labour is gearing up to throttle Starmer too. Lots of “Starmer and his government too right-wing, shadowy cabals of international financiers, Boris was Satan, etc etc.”

We’ll see the likes of McDonnell and Burgon getting airtime soon enough. Labour will tear itself apart while it’s in free fall. All good.

Pineneedlesincarpet · 05/02/2026 10:54

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 05/02/2026 10:46

It's hard to see how McSweeney can survive.

Whether or not his departure might be enough for KS to keep going, or whether KS will decide that he would rather fall on his own sword than sack McSweeney, only time will tell.

There is obviously serious unrest in the party right now, but I imagine most will want to see what comes out of the published documents before making any decisions.

Keir S announced his full support for Morgan M at PMQs yesterday so we can assume Morgan M is on his way out.

EasternStandard · 05/02/2026 10:55

EsmaCannonball · 05/02/2026 10:51

It's a bigger scandal than Profumo. Some are saying it's the worst betrayal of the British public since Kim Philby.

Mandelson was effectively spying on the government for the rich and powerful, and some of those people he was spying for were possibly Russian assets.

And that's before you even get into him enabling paedophilia and the sexual abuse of young women and seemingly having very young men procured for him by his criminal friend.

It's not only Starmer who has terrible values. So many journalists and political commentators thought Mandelson was a good appointment because he is a 'political genius' (and not just someone who gets things done because he is so corrupt and amoral). Turns out a lot of these people are close friends with Mandelson to the point where they are attending each other's weddings. They are all in the same club. It's bad for democracy when journalists are hand in glove with politicians.

Agree. This will stick with Starmer and Labour.

Pineneedlesincarpet · 05/02/2026 10:56

EsmaCannonball · 05/02/2026 10:51

It's a bigger scandal than Profumo. Some are saying it's the worst betrayal of the British public since Kim Philby.

Mandelson was effectively spying on the government for the rich and powerful, and some of those people he was spying for were possibly Russian assets.

And that's before you even get into him enabling paedophilia and the sexual abuse of young women and seemingly having very young men procured for him by his criminal friend.

It's not only Starmer who has terrible values. So many journalists and political commentators thought Mandelson was a good appointment because he is a 'political genius' (and not just someone who gets things done because he is so corrupt and amoral). Turns out a lot of these people are close friends with Mandelson to the point where they are attending each other's weddings. They are all in the same club. It's bad for democracy when journalists are hand in glove with politicians.

Adam Boulton for one.

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 05/02/2026 10:56

Parentingconfusing · 05/02/2026 10:28

🤣 Yeah you’re right!

See that’s how little I cared which population/ country was descended from our colonisers. It’s not even embedded as a fact let alone a perpetual hatred.

TBH your reply doesn’t make any sense, either.

luckylavender · 05/02/2026 10:57

Meadowfinch · 04/02/2026 22:48

Rumours are already circulating tonight about KS resignation. Time will tell how long he lasts but I don't think he'll survive past the May elections.

Just not sure who will replace him. Burnham isn't an MP, so Jess Philips? Certainly not RR.

Let’s wait & see. But it certainly won’t be Jess Phillips.

EsmaCannonball · 05/02/2026 11:00

As someone who doesn't want either Reform or Corbynite Labour to be running the country, it is disturbing that the left wing of the Labour Party seems to be making capital from this. Who is about to be the next Prime Minister?

Pineneedlesincarpet · 05/02/2026 11:02

luckylavender · 05/02/2026 10:57

Let’s wait & see. But it certainly won’t be Jess Phillips.

It will be someone bad as they don't have anyone good.

They can't have Raynor as the rest of the term will be dedicated to focusing on her private life, actions as a trustee and tax affairs which will mean nothing will get done. Shes got a taint of dishonesty about her which is what we are trying to get away from surely?

If they decide to lurch left and make decisions that go against the manifesto they should call an election.

Iamacatslave · 05/02/2026 11:04

Starmer to give a speech shortly….

Collaborate · 05/02/2026 11:04

The fact that OP posts this about Starmer yet there's tumbleweed about Farage, who literally appears in the files, tells us all we need to know.

godmum56 · 05/02/2026 11:04

Pineneedlesincarpet · 05/02/2026 10:54

Keir S announced his full support for Morgan M at PMQs yesterday so we can assume Morgan M is on his way out.

yup. that phrase is like a rattlesnake's rattle

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.