Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To wonder if past trauma was a factor in the Renee Nicole Good murder and that, while not absolving agent, it shows ICE should select agents more carefully?

1000 replies

Carla786 · 11/01/2026 20:58

Reading this from the BBC, I wonder if the agent was suffering from previous trauma. They had earlier been in the Iraq War and then had huge number of stitches after being dragged by a car while arresting apparently a 'child sex offender' illicit migrant last March.

Thus I wonder if, because Renee Good clipped them with the car earlier(as The Times indicates), shooting at her car as she drove past was less a rational decision borne from evil and more an instinctive reaction from recent trauma with cars on the job?

This is NOT an excuse. But I wonder if it also shows that ICE are selecting traumatised agents who are too dangerous, due to this, to be in that position?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdx4qd4d16no

Person wearing tactical vest leans toward a car with shattered rear window, broken glass visible, trees and houses in background.

ICE agent in Minnesota shooting was dragged by car in June

The officer was injured in a separate case that also involved a car pulling away during an investigation.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdx4qd4d16no

OP posts:
Thread gallery
57
DdraigGoch · 12/01/2026 13:54

RingoJuice · 12/01/2026 13:48

It’s just guidelines. The only standard is whether he had a reasonable belief that he or someone else was at risk of serious injury or death.

It should be repeated endlessly so Brits do not howl because this guy is not prosecuted (and even if he was, no jury is going to convict so it’s a waste of time)

Is your name "Jack Sparrow"?

RingoJuice · 12/01/2026 13:54

Goldenbear · 12/01/2026 13:36

You find this whole functioning heart and conscience thing,.a real mental challenge don't you!

We already tried the ‘please go home’ route. They are largely still there, so we have to step up these efforts.

But yeah they should self-deport

DdraigGoch · 12/01/2026 13:56

RingoJuice · 12/01/2026 13:54

We already tried the ‘please go home’ route. They are largely still there, so we have to step up these efforts.

But yeah they should self-deport

Why should people who are visa holders, green card holders, or even US citizens (born or naturalised) "go home"?

ItWillWash · 12/01/2026 13:56

Goldenbear · 12/01/2026 13:36

You find this whole functioning heart and conscience thing,.a real mental challenge don't you!

It's not just a functioning heart and conscience missing from ideas like this. It's a complete lack of forethought and logic.

While you're attempting to justify the shooting of a woman because of her beliefs, you need to remember that political parties change. The people on "your side" won't always be in control. Your opinion on immigration might not always be the "right" opinion.

Using the fact that Renee was protesting for the wrong side, or getting in the way of someone doing a job you believe is rightful, as added justification for shooting her means you need to accept that when they come for you, when you're no longer on the right side, you accept that no one should speak out for your rights to be protected.

DdraigGoch · 12/01/2026 14:02

ItWillWash · 12/01/2026 13:56

It's not just a functioning heart and conscience missing from ideas like this. It's a complete lack of forethought and logic.

While you're attempting to justify the shooting of a woman because of her beliefs, you need to remember that political parties change. The people on "your side" won't always be in control. Your opinion on immigration might not always be the "right" opinion.

Using the fact that Renee was protesting for the wrong side, or getting in the way of someone doing a job you believe is rightful, as added justification for shooting her means you need to accept that when they come for you, when you're no longer on the right side, you accept that no one should speak out for your rights to be protected.

Worth noting that these people consider Ashli Babbit to be a martyr.

The far-right conspiracy theorist who joined a mob intent upon lynching the Vice President and who ignored multiple warnings as she climbed through a shattered window beside a barricaded door.

Yet apparently it's the mother with the soft toys in the glove compartment and a dog in the back seat who is the real danger.

It's insane.

ItWillWash · 12/01/2026 14:07

DdraigGoch · 12/01/2026 14:02

Worth noting that these people consider Ashli Babbit to be a martyr.

The far-right conspiracy theorist who joined a mob intent upon lynching the Vice President and who ignored multiple warnings as she climbed through a shattered window beside a barricaded door.

Yet apparently it's the mother with the soft toys in the glove compartment and a dog in the back seat who is the real danger.

It's insane.

Agreed, with the added insanity that none of them appear to care that due process is not being followed.

Even if you believe the shooting was justified/self-defence, the fact that Trump is actively blocking an unbiased investigation should worry every American.

RingoJuice · 12/01/2026 14:16

DdraigGoch · 12/01/2026 13:56

Why should people who are visa holders, green card holders, or even US citizens (born or naturalised) "go home"?

You can be stripped of your GC if you’ve committed a crime. Which is a good thing—maybe you should try it.

RingoJuice · 12/01/2026 14:19

ItWillWash · 12/01/2026 13:56

It's not just a functioning heart and conscience missing from ideas like this. It's a complete lack of forethought and logic.

While you're attempting to justify the shooting of a woman because of her beliefs, you need to remember that political parties change. The people on "your side" won't always be in control. Your opinion on immigration might not always be the "right" opinion.

Using the fact that Renee was protesting for the wrong side, or getting in the way of someone doing a job you believe is rightful, as added justification for shooting her means you need to accept that when they come for you, when you're no longer on the right side, you accept that no one should speak out for your rights to be protected.

It isn’t because of her beliefs. She should have been arrested for obstruction.

Beyond that, she made a poor decision to drive toward an ICE officer. Nobody forced her to do that.

Has nothing to do with her political views

RingoJuice · 12/01/2026 14:24

ItWillWash · 12/01/2026 14:07

Agreed, with the added insanity that none of them appear to care that due process is not being followed.

Even if you believe the shooting was justified/self-defence, the fact that Trump is actively blocking an unbiased investigation should worry every American.

It’s not Trump’s call. It’s the DOJ. Federal has jurisdiction in this case, so if the DoJ believe he’s done nothing wrong (likely given a Supreme Court case that set the bar for use of deadly force) then they’ll not file charges.

Bobiverse · 12/01/2026 14:28

RingoJuice · 12/01/2026 14:24

It’s not Trump’s call. It’s the DOJ. Federal has jurisdiction in this case, so if the DoJ believe he’s done nothing wrong (likely given a Supreme Court case that set the bar for use of deadly force) then they’ll not file charges.

But the supreme also ruled that they cannot put themselves into the position which then threatens their life. The Supreme Court specifically ruled about standing in front of a vehicle which is a threat. Officers cannot walk up to a car they see as a threat, then walk in front of that car and then claim self defence when they shoot. They are not allowed to do that; they cannot create their own deadly threat.

Bobiverse · 12/01/2026 14:30

RingoJuice · 12/01/2026 14:19

It isn’t because of her beliefs. She should have been arrested for obstruction.

Beyond that, she made a poor decision to drive toward an ICE officer. Nobody forced her to do that.

Has nothing to do with her political views

Someone did though, possible. One ICE agent was shouting at her to move her car, to leave, drive away and get the car moved. The other was shouting at her to get out of the vehicle. But it depends on the reporters and how accurate that is.

An agent then walked in front of her car (which has been very clearly ruled as not allowed in their training; they must not put themselves in front of a car and then claim their life was in danger and shoot someone).

1dayatatime · 12/01/2026 14:34

DdraigGoch · 12/01/2026 13:56

Why should people who are visa holders, green card holders, or even US citizens (born or naturalised) "go home"?

I don't think any rational person would suggest that persons who are legally living in the US either on a visa, green card or US citizen (naturalised or born) should be deported.

Deportations should only impact those that are in the US illegally. In addition it's unfair on those migrants that have gone through the correct and timely process to enter the US legally to a) see illegal migrants cut the queue and b) to now feel at risk from the immigration raids by ICE.

RingoJuice · 12/01/2026 14:34

DdraigGoch · 12/01/2026 14:02

Worth noting that these people consider Ashli Babbit to be a martyr.

The far-right conspiracy theorist who joined a mob intent upon lynching the Vice President and who ignored multiple warnings as she climbed through a shattered window beside a barricaded door.

Yet apparently it's the mother with the soft toys in the glove compartment and a dog in the back seat who is the real danger.

It's insane.

Ashli was unarmed, so by your standards I guess you believe that she was unlawfully killed and the officer that killed her should be prosecuted?

RingoJuice · 12/01/2026 14:37

Bobiverse · 12/01/2026 14:30

Someone did though, possible. One ICE agent was shouting at her to move her car, to leave, drive away and get the car moved. The other was shouting at her to get out of the vehicle. But it depends on the reporters and how accurate that is.

An agent then walked in front of her car (which has been very clearly ruled as not allowed in their training; they must not put themselves in front of a car and then claim their life was in danger and shoot someone).

From the back, you can see he was not in front until the point she backed up her car.

1dayatatime · 12/01/2026 14:37

Bobiverse · 12/01/2026 14:30

Someone did though, possible. One ICE agent was shouting at her to move her car, to leave, drive away and get the car moved. The other was shouting at her to get out of the vehicle. But it depends on the reporters and how accurate that is.

An agent then walked in front of her car (which has been very clearly ruled as not allowed in their training; they must not put themselves in front of a car and then claim their life was in danger and shoot someone).

Whilst I have seen the video evidence of the ICE officers shouting at her to get out of the car (twice) I have yet to see any evidence of her being asked to drive off by ICE officers

The only person instructing her to drive off was her wife and perhaps that's where the confusion comes in.

DdraigGoch · 12/01/2026 14:40

RingoJuice · 12/01/2026 14:16

You can be stripped of your GC if you’ve committed a crime. Which is a good thing—maybe you should try it.

And all those who have committed no crime? The overwhelming majority of the people ICE abducts have committed no crime.

You know who has committed many crimes? The paedophile US president. Try locking him up or something.

DdraigGoch · 12/01/2026 14:41

RingoJuice · 12/01/2026 14:24

It’s not Trump’s call. It’s the DOJ. Federal has jurisdiction in this case, so if the DoJ believe he’s done nothing wrong (likely given a Supreme Court case that set the bar for use of deadly force) then they’ll not file charges.

Remind me who runs the DoJ and the FBI?

Pam Bondi and Kash Patel.

RingoJuice · 12/01/2026 14:42

1dayatatime · 12/01/2026 14:34

I don't think any rational person would suggest that persons who are legally living in the US either on a visa, green card or US citizen (naturalised or born) should be deported.

Deportations should only impact those that are in the US illegally. In addition it's unfair on those migrants that have gone through the correct and timely process to enter the US legally to a) see illegal migrants cut the queue and b) to now feel at risk from the immigration raids by ICE.

They will strip you of your GC if you commit a crime. That I support.

I’m not supportive of stripping college students of their visa just for joining protests unless it’s been demonstrated they’ve been violent. I know a few have been deported for just anti-Semitic speech and I don’t necessarily agree with that.

ffsnewusername · 12/01/2026 14:43

Wow this thread 😳

Bobiverse · 12/01/2026 14:44

RingoJuice · 12/01/2026 14:37

From the back, you can see he was not in front until the point she backed up her car.

You’re just proving my point. He walked in front of a car which was in the middle of a tense situation with a possible suspect in it. The Supreme Court ruling was very clearly; officers cannot walk in front of a car in this situation, then claim their life was at risk and then shoot the person. They absolutely cannot do that.

This has been told to you repeatedly but you keep ignoring it. He was acting against training, against court rulings and against reasonable behaviour. Which means he would fail the “reasonable officer” test so he can be protected, if Trump wasn’t in charge of appointing the heads of all the federal investigative services.

RingoJuice · 12/01/2026 14:48

Bobiverse · 12/01/2026 14:44

You’re just proving my point. He walked in front of a car which was in the middle of a tense situation with a possible suspect in it. The Supreme Court ruling was very clearly; officers cannot walk in front of a car in this situation, then claim their life was at risk and then shoot the person. They absolutely cannot do that.

This has been told to you repeatedly but you keep ignoring it. He was acting against training, against court rulings and against reasonable behaviour. Which means he would fail the “reasonable officer” test so he can be protected, if Trump wasn’t in charge of appointing the heads of all the federal investigative services.

The Supreme Court ruling was very clearly; officers cannot walk in front of a car in this situation, then claim their life was at risk and then shoot the person. They absolutely cannot do that

Supreme Court never said that. I think you are confusing it with those DoJ guidelines someone posted earlier.

Supreme Court set a different standard, whether or not they had a reasonable belief that they or someone else was at risk of imminent death or serious injury.

DdraigGoch · 12/01/2026 14:48

1dayatatime · 12/01/2026 14:34

I don't think any rational person would suggest that persons who are legally living in the US either on a visa, green card or US citizen (naturalised or born) should be deported.

Deportations should only impact those that are in the US illegally. In addition it's unfair on those migrants that have gone through the correct and timely process to enter the US legally to a) see illegal migrants cut the queue and b) to now feel at risk from the immigration raids by ICE.

Well there are clearly many irrational people in the US (circa 77 million I'd estimate) because ICE have been abducting citizens, green card holders and many more who are legitimately in the country on visas. They claim that your documents are "fake" and make access to a lawyer very difficult. If a judge orders them to stop then they'll just stick you on a plane and say "oops, can't get them back now".

ICE agents have been waiting outside citizenship ceremonies and green card interviews, targeting the very people who are going through the immigration process by the book.

1dayatatime · 12/01/2026 14:48

DdraigGoch · 12/01/2026 14:40

And all those who have committed no crime? The overwhelming majority of the people ICE abducts have committed no crime.

You know who has committed many crimes? The paedophile US president. Try locking him up or something.

But the US President is a born US citizen and not a green card holder. Plus I'm not aware of the claims you make against him- do you have any proof or links to this?

That said I have found references linking Trump and the Republicans to the sinking of the Titanic. So maybe that needs to be examined further.

https://theweek.com/cartoons/702506/political-cartoon-trump-communications-press-conferences-titanic

Political cartoon U.S. Trump communications press conferences Titanic

The latest Cartoons,/cartoons,,cartoons, breaking news, comment, reviews and features from the experts at The Week UK

https://theweek.com/cartoons/702506/political-cartoon-trump-communications-press-conferences-titanic

deargen · 12/01/2026 14:51

1dayatatime · 12/01/2026 14:34

I don't think any rational person would suggest that persons who are legally living in the US either on a visa, green card or US citizen (naturalised or born) should be deported.

Deportations should only impact those that are in the US illegally. In addition it's unfair on those migrants that have gone through the correct and timely process to enter the US legally to a) see illegal migrants cut the queue and b) to now feel at risk from the immigration raids by ICE.

Seeing ICE/Trump/MAGA defenders call Renee Good’s death a ‘logical, rational consequence’ shows the same pattern of distorted ‘rationality’ that fascist and authoritarian regimes use to justify state brutality.

RingoJuice · 12/01/2026 14:55

deargen · 12/01/2026 14:51

Seeing ICE/Trump/MAGA defenders call Renee Good’s death a ‘logical, rational consequence’ shows the same pattern of distorted ‘rationality’ that fascist and authoritarian regimes use to justify state brutality.

Renee was the anti-democratic one. I voted for Trump, Congress voted for ICE funding.

Who voted for Renee to insert herself and obstruct ICE operations? She has the right to peacefully protest, not disrupt ICE or put herself and others at risk.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread