Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Thread 22 : To feel disappointed - and now disgusted too - after reading this in The Observer about the author and her husband from The Salt Path book and film?

1000 replies

DisappointedReader · 05/01/2026 19:13

NO POSTS PLEASE UNTIL THREAD 21 IS FULL

The Observer's original exposé: The real Salt Path: how a blockbuster book and film were ...

First thread: To feel disappointed after reading this in The Observer about the author and her husband from The Salt Path book and film? | Mumsnet

Links to threads 2-16, the other 20 Observer articles and videos to date, Raynor Winn/Sally Walker's statement, our timeline and sources can all be accessed in the OP and first few posts of Thread 17: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5403285-thread-17-to-feel-disappointed-after-reading-this-in-the-observer-about-the-author-and-her-husband-from-the-salt-path-book-and-film?

Links to threads 18-20 can be found in the OP of Thread 21: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5460943-thread-21-to-feel-disappointed-and-now-disgusted-too-after-reading-this-in-the-observer-about-the-author-and-her-husband-from-the-salt-path-book-and-film?

Most recent:

New posters joining us in the genuine spirit of our civil discourse are welcome. It would be helpful to get the background from at least some of the Observer exposé items before posting.
To all - Please be extremely cautious when it comes to naming or implicating people and addresses not in the public eye or with no direct connection to the story, and around the understandable health speculations, especially where details are unclear or still emerging. Remember, even Hollywood rabbits attract the odd flea. Please do not engage with drive-by scolders and ploppers who seem to have their own agenda and seek to derail. Avoid @'ing and quoting them as - from experience - this will only encourage them back to the threads. Over 6 months we have done amazingly well together for 21 very interesting, very serious and very silly threads so far. I can't be here as much as I'd like so all help with keeping our discussion walking along in our usual reasonable and respectful fashion is very welcome.

After 21,000 posts there are still new things to look out for on the path ahead:

  • Observer Newsroom: The Real Salt Path Story, Thursday 8th January 2026 6.30-7.30pm. More information and to book via this link observer.co.uk/our-events/the-real-salt-path-story
  • Podcast series from The Observer's award-winning Investigative Journalist Chloe Hadjimatheou, 13th January 2026
  • BBC Podcast (NB Not involving Our Chloe)

Keep to the path, no saltiness, eat fudge and drink cider.

NO POSTS PLEASE UNTIL THREAD 21 IS FULL

OP posts:
Thread gallery
47
Vroomfondleswaistcoat · 07/01/2026 10:25

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

And she went to the trouble of changing characters' names (to avoid defamation we presume) but not altering locations sufficiently to prevent cafes etc from losing income because of her bad write up of their service there?

OnlyAfterwards · 07/01/2026 10:26

Vroomfondleswaistcoat · 07/01/2026 10:02

Before we knew about Sal's klepto leanings - was it ever raised that they seemed to have a large family between them, plus adult kids? I mean, when TSP first came out, did anyone say 'why didn't they just go and stay with a relative until they could get jobs? (Or A Job in Sal's case, presuming they had swallowed the 'Tim's too ill to work' line).

Because declaring that, because your house has been repossessed and you have a very ill husband, you are now completely without any support at all, or friends, or family and so you're off to walk the SWCP begins to look like a flounce.

Edited

I did think that when I first read it, not long after it came out -- I certainly registered the lack of family in the background (as well as being interested in enough in how unlikely the legal case sounded to have googled variants on 'Raynor Winn courtcase' quite a few times and noted that not only could I find nothing, there wasn't a single search result for Raynor Winn that predated the announcement of TSP...)

I think I concluded at the time that their families were probably small, complicated and/ or estranged, and that the Walkers' lives on the 'farm' were so isolated that they simply didn't have many friends or people they saw regularly, therefore there weren't many people they could ask for help.

Just like I (generously and wrongly) concluded that the amount of spite and resentment expressed towards virtually every other person in TSP, from the consultant to randoms on the path, was an understandable bitterness resulting from losing your home blamelessly and a terminal diagnosis.

BeaveringBrandy · 07/01/2026 10:27

Vroomfondleswaistcoat · 07/01/2026 10:02

Before we knew about Sal's klepto leanings - was it ever raised that they seemed to have a large family between them, plus adult kids? I mean, when TSP first came out, did anyone say 'why didn't they just go and stay with a relative until they could get jobs? (Or A Job in Sal's case, presuming they had swallowed the 'Tim's too ill to work' line).

Because declaring that, because your house has been repossessed and you have a very ill husband, you are now completely without any support at all, or friends, or family and so you're off to walk the SWCP begins to look like a flounce.

Edited

I think there was a collective holding to ransom over the health issue. We can't underestimate that.

TSP itself does thank some of Tim's siblings by name and Sal's niece with a pseudonym:

For all their patience and generosity as we sofa-surfed through their lives, I’ll always be indebted to Adi and Cara, Sue and Steve, Janette and of course Polly. Sorry to all of you – for loitering too long in your bathrooms and using all the teabags.

Highlighting this has made me wonder - are Sue and Steve = Ju and Dave? She always does things like that with names ....

SimonArmpit · 07/01/2026 10:28

Playing devil's advocate, it could be that Moth was indeed told in June 2013 that he was not ill enough to qualify for immediate social housing, because at that point in time he appeared relatively healthy and hadn't been diagnosed with a condition vaguely similar to CBS!

It could also be the case that what prompted them to see a neurologist two years later in June 2015 was to engineer a diagnosis that would qualify them for higher PiP to supplement Moth's student grant that would start in Sept 2015!

With Sal there is often a small kernel of truth which is then either twisted or massively exaggerated for dramatic effect. Others might call it pathological lying...

Vroomfondleswaistcoat · 07/01/2026 10:30

OnlyAfterwards · 07/01/2026 10:26

I did think that when I first read it, not long after it came out -- I certainly registered the lack of family in the background (as well as being interested in enough in how unlikely the legal case sounded to have googled variants on 'Raynor Winn courtcase' quite a few times and noted that not only could I find nothing, there wasn't a single search result for Raynor Winn that predated the announcement of TSP...)

I think I concluded at the time that their families were probably small, complicated and/ or estranged, and that the Walkers' lives on the 'farm' were so isolated that they simply didn't have many friends or people they saw regularly, therefore there weren't many people they could ask for help.

Just like I (generously and wrongly) concluded that the amount of spite and resentment expressed towards virtually every other person in TSP, from the consultant to randoms on the path, was an understandable bitterness resulting from losing your home blamelessly and a terminal diagnosis.

You're right, I am, perhaps, conflating what was known at the time when TSP came out and what subsequently became apparent. I think many people took TSP at face value because none of it sounded unbelievable. Maybe some bits sounded unlikely, but supposing details had been altered for anonymity, it could be skated over in an initial reading.

Which is how it all happened, I suppose.

OnlyAfterwards · 07/01/2026 10:33

BeaveringBrandy · 07/01/2026 10:27

I think there was a collective holding to ransom over the health issue. We can't underestimate that.

TSP itself does thank some of Tim's siblings by name and Sal's niece with a pseudonym:

For all their patience and generosity as we sofa-surfed through their lives, I’ll always be indebted to Adi and Cara, Sue and Steve, Janette and of course Polly. Sorry to all of you – for loitering too long in your bathrooms and using all the teabags.

Highlighting this has made me wonder - are Sue and Steve = Ju and Dave? She always does things like that with names ....

Though it's always struck me as deeply weird that she thanks 'Jan' and 'Polly' despite portraying them negatively in the actual text of the book! Polly in particular, though even Jan is depicted as being delighted they're leaving.

I mean, 'Polly' would be forgiven for thinking, I'd rather you left me out of the acknowledgements and just didn't depict me in your book as a slave driver who makes your dying husband work beyond his strength to live in a half-converted meat processing shed and then throws you out when it suited me!' (Especially if that was completely untrue!)

SimonArmpit · 07/01/2026 10:34

BeaveringBrandy · 07/01/2026 10:27

I think there was a collective holding to ransom over the health issue. We can't underestimate that.

TSP itself does thank some of Tim's siblings by name and Sal's niece with a pseudonym:

For all their patience and generosity as we sofa-surfed through their lives, I’ll always be indebted to Adi and Cara, Sue and Steve, Janette and of course Polly. Sorry to all of you – for loitering too long in your bathrooms and using all the teabags.

Highlighting this has made me wonder - are Sue and Steve = Ju and Dave? She always does things like that with names ....

I think Adi and Cara, Sue and Steve and Janette are Moth's siblings and partners while Polly is Sal's niece. Dave and Julie from up North are mentioned separately.

Vroomfondleswaistcoat · 07/01/2026 10:39

OnlyAfterwards · 07/01/2026 10:33

Though it's always struck me as deeply weird that she thanks 'Jan' and 'Polly' despite portraying them negatively in the actual text of the book! Polly in particular, though even Jan is depicted as being delighted they're leaving.

I mean, 'Polly' would be forgiven for thinking, I'd rather you left me out of the acknowledgements and just didn't depict me in your book as a slave driver who makes your dying husband work beyond his strength to live in a half-converted meat processing shed and then throws you out when it suited me!' (Especially if that was completely untrue!)

Presumably she thanked them because, in her slightly warped reasoning, if they complained about how they were portrayed she could turn around and say 'well, I thanked you, didn't I?'

BeaveringBrandy · 07/01/2026 10:54

SimonArmpit · 07/01/2026 10:34

I think Adi and Cara, Sue and Steve and Janette are Moth's siblings and partners while Polly is Sal's niece. Dave and Julie from up North are mentioned separately.

Edited

Apologies. I jumped on the similarities. I wouldn't want to spread a false narrative about her life ....

Raymothquestion · 07/01/2026 12:56

UpfromSomerset · 07/01/2026 09:38

Mention of "overgrown patches of land" reminds me of my first thoughts on first reading of TSP, long before the Observer revelations. I put myself in Moth's shoes and in that situation there's no way I would have attempted to continue on the path - after the first mile or so, that is!
(We walked that first section from Minehead harbour last year so I was reminded of my childhood in that town and of many walks undertaken - my personal favourites being up one coombe and returning down the adjoining one.) But in my - thankfully imagined - Moth's condition, I would have insisted on finding a remote part of the woods and rigged up a shelter there.

Although my comments so far have focused only upon the 2015 medical letter and how it is misrepresented in TSP, my interest in this whole issue was sparked by the walking angle. I walk regularly, have completed a number of National Trails (normally walking 20+ miles a day) and I have walked many stretches of the Cornish section of the SWCP. All carrying a reasonably heavy pack. I am getting on a bit now and there are many more experienced walkers out there than me but, personally, I have complete admiration for anyone who has walked the whole of the SWCP in one go. I think it is a really tough challenge. I certainly couldn't do it. But I also believe that, in a general sense, walking is really good for physical and mental wellbeing.

So, I was intrigued to hear that someone with serious physical infirmity had walked the whole path and had felt positive health benefits from it (i.e. the general promotional message linked to TSP). To be honest, I had mixed feelings. On the one hand I was pleased to see the positive message about the benefits of walking. On the other I became increasingly dubious about this story, suspecting that either Moth could not have done the 630 miles or his condition was not as severe as claimed. For example, I hadn’t read the book but some posters on here rightly pointed out that the increased calorie intake required to sustain such a physical effort over a long period of time just did not chime with the description of the Walkers diet during the walk. From what they said, it didn’t seem right.

Having now read TSP the calorie intake issue does not sit so badly with me. This is because they don’t seem to be walking in the same sense that I understand it. If we just look at the first few days of the walk description in TSP, they set off from Minehead at 3.30pm. They then find a camping spot. They set off the next day at 11.30am. The following day’s walking starts at 11am. After that there is not so much detail. I know this is a bit obscure for non-walkers but the first question I asked was, what were they doing in and around the tent between 5.30am (sunrise) and 11.30am? Just sitting around can be very boring and (depending on the weather) can feel very chilly until you get moving. Furthermore, when they actually do get going they only seem to be walking around 5-6 miles a day. So, I began to feel that maybe the calorie question was not so serious because it seemed to me that what they describe is closer to camping than walking.

But this took me to the question of how much of the SWCP was actually walked and whether they walked it at all in 2013. Of course, we cannot know for sure but in a strange way the description in TSP of the early stages of the walk in 2013 does ring true to me. This is because it is possible that at the time what they really wanted to do was escape from the recent past, from their neighbours, from potential creditors etc. and the best way to do that was to go completely ‘off-grid’. Just go wild camping where no-one could find them. Possibly slowly making their way down to their son in Newquay while the dust settled. Going ‘off-grid’ would be rather like what, in a different way, they are currently doing. Who knows, maybe it was a strategy they had used previously.

SimonArmpit · 07/01/2026 13:36

Raymothquestion · 07/01/2026 12:56

Although my comments so far have focused only upon the 2015 medical letter and how it is misrepresented in TSP, my interest in this whole issue was sparked by the walking angle. I walk regularly, have completed a number of National Trails (normally walking 20+ miles a day) and I have walked many stretches of the Cornish section of the SWCP. All carrying a reasonably heavy pack. I am getting on a bit now and there are many more experienced walkers out there than me but, personally, I have complete admiration for anyone who has walked the whole of the SWCP in one go. I think it is a really tough challenge. I certainly couldn't do it. But I also believe that, in a general sense, walking is really good for physical and mental wellbeing.

So, I was intrigued to hear that someone with serious physical infirmity had walked the whole path and had felt positive health benefits from it (i.e. the general promotional message linked to TSP). To be honest, I had mixed feelings. On the one hand I was pleased to see the positive message about the benefits of walking. On the other I became increasingly dubious about this story, suspecting that either Moth could not have done the 630 miles or his condition was not as severe as claimed. For example, I hadn’t read the book but some posters on here rightly pointed out that the increased calorie intake required to sustain such a physical effort over a long period of time just did not chime with the description of the Walkers diet during the walk. From what they said, it didn’t seem right.

Having now read TSP the calorie intake issue does not sit so badly with me. This is because they don’t seem to be walking in the same sense that I understand it. If we just look at the first few days of the walk description in TSP, they set off from Minehead at 3.30pm. They then find a camping spot. They set off the next day at 11.30am. The following day’s walking starts at 11am. After that there is not so much detail. I know this is a bit obscure for non-walkers but the first question I asked was, what were they doing in and around the tent between 5.30am (sunrise) and 11.30am? Just sitting around can be very boring and (depending on the weather) can feel very chilly until you get moving. Furthermore, when they actually do get going they only seem to be walking around 5-6 miles a day. So, I began to feel that maybe the calorie question was not so serious because it seemed to me that what they describe is closer to camping than walking.

But this took me to the question of how much of the SWCP was actually walked and whether they walked it at all in 2013. Of course, we cannot know for sure but in a strange way the description in TSP of the early stages of the walk in 2013 does ring true to me. This is because it is possible that at the time what they really wanted to do was escape from the recent past, from their neighbours, from potential creditors etc. and the best way to do that was to go completely ‘off-grid’. Just go wild camping where no-one could find them. Possibly slowly making their way down to their son in Newquay while the dust settled. Going ‘off-grid’ would be rather like what, in a different way, they are currently doing. Who knows, maybe it was a strategy they had used previously.

Fwiw for a number of reasons (IG photos/clothing changes/chronology/mieleages) I reckon they may have walked from MH to LE in 2 x14 day chunks from early Aug to mid Sept 2013 with a break in Newquay with their son. In 2014 they may have done another short (2 week?) walk from LE to beyond Porthallow. In 2015 another, possibly longer section of the SWCP from Plymouth back towards LE and then in July/Aug 2016 the section from Poole to Lyme Regis and then (possibly) some of the bits on to Plymouth. By their own admission they skipped the sections from Braunton Burrows to Westward Ho and from Dawlish to Brixham so I don't think they ever walked all 630 miles of the SWCP

AllFrothNoMoth · 07/01/2026 13:50

Raymothquestion · 07/01/2026 12:56

Although my comments so far have focused only upon the 2015 medical letter and how it is misrepresented in TSP, my interest in this whole issue was sparked by the walking angle. I walk regularly, have completed a number of National Trails (normally walking 20+ miles a day) and I have walked many stretches of the Cornish section of the SWCP. All carrying a reasonably heavy pack. I am getting on a bit now and there are many more experienced walkers out there than me but, personally, I have complete admiration for anyone who has walked the whole of the SWCP in one go. I think it is a really tough challenge. I certainly couldn't do it. But I also believe that, in a general sense, walking is really good for physical and mental wellbeing.

So, I was intrigued to hear that someone with serious physical infirmity had walked the whole path and had felt positive health benefits from it (i.e. the general promotional message linked to TSP). To be honest, I had mixed feelings. On the one hand I was pleased to see the positive message about the benefits of walking. On the other I became increasingly dubious about this story, suspecting that either Moth could not have done the 630 miles or his condition was not as severe as claimed. For example, I hadn’t read the book but some posters on here rightly pointed out that the increased calorie intake required to sustain such a physical effort over a long period of time just did not chime with the description of the Walkers diet during the walk. From what they said, it didn’t seem right.

Having now read TSP the calorie intake issue does not sit so badly with me. This is because they don’t seem to be walking in the same sense that I understand it. If we just look at the first few days of the walk description in TSP, they set off from Minehead at 3.30pm. They then find a camping spot. They set off the next day at 11.30am. The following day’s walking starts at 11am. After that there is not so much detail. I know this is a bit obscure for non-walkers but the first question I asked was, what were they doing in and around the tent between 5.30am (sunrise) and 11.30am? Just sitting around can be very boring and (depending on the weather) can feel very chilly until you get moving. Furthermore, when they actually do get going they only seem to be walking around 5-6 miles a day. So, I began to feel that maybe the calorie question was not so serious because it seemed to me that what they describe is closer to camping than walking.

But this took me to the question of how much of the SWCP was actually walked and whether they walked it at all in 2013. Of course, we cannot know for sure but in a strange way the description in TSP of the early stages of the walk in 2013 does ring true to me. This is because it is possible that at the time what they really wanted to do was escape from the recent past, from their neighbours, from potential creditors etc. and the best way to do that was to go completely ‘off-grid’. Just go wild camping where no-one could find them. Possibly slowly making their way down to their son in Newquay while the dust settled. Going ‘off-grid’ would be rather like what, in a different way, they are currently doing. Who knows, maybe it was a strategy they had used previously.

As a walker (not a Walker!) I had similar doubts about their account of the SWCP and also picked up on the very low daily mileage. Knowing how much daylight they had in August, I just can't understand how they were so slow, even with Moth's supposed severe foot dragging (which is not mentioned in the book). I also think that there would still be a calorie deficit on a diet of noodles and fudge even if only walking 6 miles. It is still hard work carrying packs up and down steep sections and in paper thin sleeping bags even more energy would burn to stay warm. Plus noodles, fudge and chips unlikely have enough calories for just an average person not doing any serious walking. Now we know they got supplies and lifts from the son it makes some sense...in that the TSP account is nonsense.

Raymothquestion · 07/01/2026 13:57

AllFrothNoMoth · 07/01/2026 13:50

As a walker (not a Walker!) I had similar doubts about their account of the SWCP and also picked up on the very low daily mileage. Knowing how much daylight they had in August, I just can't understand how they were so slow, even with Moth's supposed severe foot dragging (which is not mentioned in the book). I also think that there would still be a calorie deficit on a diet of noodles and fudge even if only walking 6 miles. It is still hard work carrying packs up and down steep sections and in paper thin sleeping bags even more energy would burn to stay warm. Plus noodles, fudge and chips unlikely have enough calories for just an average person not doing any serious walking. Now we know they got supplies and lifts from the son it makes some sense...in that the TSP account is nonsense.

You are probably right. I think TSP says their packs each weighed 8 kilograms but, who knows?

BeaveringBrandy · 07/01/2026 13:58

@SimonArmpit By their own admission they skipped the sections from Braunton Burrows to Westward Ho and from Dawlish to Brixham

Likewise as she says in TSP, they caught the bus into St Ives "covering a distance that would have taken us hours on foot in just a few minutes". They did not do any of Portland, either.

Added to that so many of the descriptions are copied from another book, misleading, inaccurate (remember the ferries), inauthentic and just plain made up.

BobGalaxy · 07/01/2026 14:02

I have lurked stowed myself away in the luggage compartment of the charabanc for all 22 threads. Thank you all for the most fascinating and entertaining ride! Now, I’m starving - where’s the fudge?! I can’t see that this has been posted yet but looked what popped up on my podcast notifications this morning! 🚨 https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/the-walkers-the-real-salt-path-tortoise-investigates/id1590561275 🚨
it’s just a trailer but not long to wait - begins on Tuesday 13th! Especially good for those of us who have not been able to watch the documentary

The Walkers: The real Salt Path | Tortoise Investigates

The Walkers: The real Salt Path | Tortoise Investigates

Documentary Podcast · Weekly series · Raynor Winn’s memoir The Salt Path was a bestseller and literary phenomenon with millions of people captivated by this true story of financial ruin, terminal illness, and healing through nature. Rayno…

https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/the-walkers-the-real-salt-path-tortoise-investigates/id1590561275

BeaveringBrandy · 07/01/2026 14:08

BobGalaxy · 07/01/2026 14:02

I have lurked stowed myself away in the luggage compartment of the charabanc for all 22 threads. Thank you all for the most fascinating and entertaining ride! Now, I’m starving - where’s the fudge?! I can’t see that this has been posted yet but looked what popped up on my podcast notifications this morning! 🚨 https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/the-walkers-the-real-salt-path-tortoise-investigates/id1590561275 🚨
it’s just a trailer but not long to wait - begins on Tuesday 13th! Especially good for those of us who have not been able to watch the documentary

Wow! Thanks the trailer for the podcast sounds amazing...

HatStickBoots · 07/01/2026 14:10

SimonArmpit · 07/01/2026 10:28

Playing devil's advocate, it could be that Moth was indeed told in June 2013 that he was not ill enough to qualify for immediate social housing, because at that point in time he appeared relatively healthy and hadn't been diagnosed with a condition vaguely similar to CBS!

It could also be the case that what prompted them to see a neurologist two years later in June 2015 was to engineer a diagnosis that would qualify them for higher PiP to supplement Moth's student grant that would start in Sept 2015!

With Sal there is often a small kernel of truth which is then either twisted or massively exaggerated for dramatic effect. Others might call it pathological lying...

Was going to say the same thing. You beat me to it!
Reading that email to the Big Issue… the gall of that woman!

Vroomfondleswaistcoat · 07/01/2026 14:44

HatStickBoots · 07/01/2026 14:10

Was going to say the same thing. You beat me to it!
Reading that email to the Big Issue… the gall of that woman!

Especially the assertation 'walking the whole 630 miles' when even by her own admission they didn't!

AllFrothNoMoth · 07/01/2026 14:47

Raymothquestion · 07/01/2026 13:57

You are probably right. I think TSP says their packs each weighed 8 kilograms but, who knows?

8kg is very light in my experience of long distance walking. Only possible to get that kind of weight with high end ultralight kit and clothes. The type of thick material style backpacks they used were prob 2kg alone. If they truely were carrying 8kg, which I can believe they did, it suggests to me a supported trip that enabled them to avoid carrying many of the things a normal self-sufficient journey would require....and yet it allowed SalRay to carry a heavy frying pan/pot.

SimonArmpit · 07/01/2026 15:14

AllFrothNoMoth · 07/01/2026 14:47

8kg is very light in my experience of long distance walking. Only possible to get that kind of weight with high end ultralight kit and clothes. The type of thick material style backpacks they used were prob 2kg alone. If they truely were carrying 8kg, which I can believe they did, it suggests to me a supported trip that enabled them to avoid carrying many of the things a normal self-sufficient journey would require....and yet it allowed SalRay to carry a heavy frying pan/pot.

8kg sounds a stretch. Rucksack weighing 2kg, the Vango Mirage 200 tent weighed 3kg + sleeping bag + mattress+ gas cooker+ pots & pans + food + clothes+ medication for Moth + medical supplies + torch used in tent + Beowulf + mobile phone + charger + radio + PD guide to SWCP + notebook + 1l water bottle + metal Scout mug....

Anythingbutheadlands · 07/01/2026 15:16

Seriously wondering how to get through 13th (a busy work day) in a calm, responsible and professional way…
How are we going to keep up with the threads AND the podcast content (some bingeing it all in one go and others waiting for the weekly release) and STILL have jobs and relationships and lives!!!? Exciting times ahead…!

SimonArmpit · 07/01/2026 15:18

Fully laden!

Thread 22 : To feel disappointed - and now disgusted too - after reading this in The Observer about the author and her husband from The Salt Path book and film?
BeaveringBrandy · 07/01/2026 15:29

Anythingbutheadlands · 07/01/2026 15:16

Seriously wondering how to get through 13th (a busy work day) in a calm, responsible and professional way…
How are we going to keep up with the threads AND the podcast content (some bingeing it all in one go and others waiting for the weekly release) and STILL have jobs and relationships and lives!!!? Exciting times ahead…!

I have had another email from the Observer team but still no result. This means I am hoping for a report from the attendees, in person or online, if they don't get me up and running by tomorrow night ....

BeaveringBrandy · 07/01/2026 15:34

Vroomfondleswaistcoat · 07/01/2026 14:44

Especially the assertation 'walking the whole 630 miles' when even by her own admission they didn't!

It is very telling that she says that in 2017, in print, with no qualms. No wonder she is able to trot it out so glibly in all the subsequent interviews. At least TBI were spared the x4 Everest embellishment ... yawn

Anythingbutheadlands · 07/01/2026 15:40

BeaveringBrandy · 07/01/2026 15:29

I have had another email from the Observer team but still no result. This means I am hoping for a report from the attendees, in person or online, if they don't get me up and running by tomorrow night ....

Well, at the moment I’ve received an email from the Observer team every 5 minutes since yesterday evening (the same email) with the link to join the meeting. Obviously a glitch in some software somewhere but it seems crazy that some of you can’t sign up while I’m literally being spammed with the joining info. I can’t imagine that there is a different link for each person - so I’m going to suggest that if anyone wants it, send me a private message here and I’ll pass on the joining link.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread