A lot of people understand that the loss of juries is a bad thing. One of those people is Mr David Lammy who said, in 2020:
"Criminal trials without juries are a bad idea. You do not fix the backlog with trials that are widely perceived as unfair."
Andy Burnham has asked the government to pause
Richard Burgon, a Labour MP spoke for many-including judges when he said these plans sent, " a chill through his heart."
There are many more examples and they can all be found on the BBC.
You do not jettison a historic right in order to clear and administrative jam, especially when there is broad agreement that it won't even do that.
It is appalling and yes, of course Labour is against democracy....cancelling elections and having one man decide a case that could involve the loss of freedom.
Will people accused under the new Islamophobia laws be entitled to ask for any judge except a Muslim? I know it has now been re-worded to "anti Muslim hostility" , although Lord Khan said in October, the original wording should be kept.
What if you are a woman accused of being transphobic and the judge is sympathetic to men, like Lammy, who believe a man can grow a cervix. Will you be able to ask for another judge?
Of course, Labour have said it will all be fine as Judges are professional and they have all had diversity training. That's OK then,
Labour are pretty dangerous. I know many think they are just stupid but being stupid doesn't mean softness-stupidity can often be dangerous.