Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

It's ours not mine - or is it?

469 replies

ohthiscouldgetmessy · 25/11/2025 11:46

Help. This is more for advise than AIBU really. I have rented a house from a family member with my partner for many years, we have probably paid around 50% the current value of the house in rent. We have also spent money on a few bits that needed doing.

Now, here is the tricky bit. I am being gifted the house because we have paid so much in rent and what we have done to it. What we have done, we have done together and will have added value to the house. So essentially what we have paid in rent would have covered the initial purchase price of the property when we moved in. (Due to bad financial decisions by one party we were unable to get a joint mortgage so just continued renting).

Partner is under impression the house will be ours. It is only going to be put into my name as its my family member who owns it. Should I put the house into both our names as we have paid the same into it or would you be looking at the rental paid, expenses paid, take that away from current value and work out percentage? Or just keep it 50/50.

I think 50/50 but want other opinions.

OP posts:
Gettingdressed · 27/11/2025 17:41

Sugargliderwombat · 27/11/2025 10:36

She doesn't want to marry him! Not everyone wants to be married!

You misunderstand my point,
it doesn’t matter wether she wants to marry him or not.
my point was that he doesn’t want to marry her….therefore he doesn’t want to be financially tied to her legally, why would she share half a bloody house with someone who took this standpoint ?

Gettingdressed · 27/11/2025 17:43

Sunnydaystoday · 27/11/2025 09:29

Kindly meant OP, signing half a house over to a man with savings, who didn't want to marry, where you split things 50/50, would IMO, be yet another SHIT financial decision.

You have no business giving him anything.
He has had the benefit of 15 years cheap rent.
No one forced him to stay with you.

He's had a great deal.
Your children deserve good financial decisions from you.

It's a tough world out there.
Let YOUR children benefit from you learning from your mistakes.

Your financial mistakes cost you dearly.
Don't let this be ANOTHER stupid mistake.

Don't allow this to be ANOTHER huge regret.
Don't act in haste, and repent at leisure.

Men do not make these big, stupid, emotional gestures that cost them dearly.

Only women do it.

Your family, your inheritance, your house, your childrens inheritance.

I would break up with someone rather than ever put my childrens housing security at risk.

He has savings due to cheaper rent.
Really wishing you well.

Edited

Couldn’t agree more - sound advice, I hope the OP follows it

Sunnydaystoday · 27/11/2025 17:44

Doubledenim305 · 27/11/2025 17:34

He's made quite clear he doesn't want to be tied to you financially.
There's your answer surely.
Both bave your own stuff.
The house is yours. Keep it as such.

Don't be naïve and think by sharing it with him he will love you more or not leave you or want to marry you. You need that security for your own and your kids lives. Please don't be foolish. You may never get a windfall like this again.

Exactly.

This is what foolish women do, to show their commitment.🙄
Completely acting against their own, and their children's best interests.

Candlesandmatches · 27/11/2025 17:53

Your relative needs to do this legally using a solicitor. So it is clear who the house is being gifted to.
Then it will be clear who the house belongs to - you or you and DP together.
If it’s you only then you will have to make the decision bout putting DP on the deeds if the mortgage is paid off.
But he may have some legal rights anyway as such a long standing residence in the house.
So legal advice is probably a good idea.

Jux · 27/11/2025 19:38

He’s saving this whole time, whereas you’re a spender. He could buy his own place, I’m surprised he hasn’t.

SpinningaCompass · 27/11/2025 21:43

However, reading some of the comments on here I get your points about my children losing part of their inheritance. It's going to get signed over to me anyway in the first instance, I think I will just leave it at that and see what happens after that.

I think this is a good decision. You're not married, he's been paying rent, not a mortgage, and your relatives have a right to gift you what they want and exclude him. They're protecting you (and your children). Not him. As is their right.

Icecreamisthebest · 27/11/2025 22:10

Now that you have clarified that all other finances are separate, I think that is the best decision. He cannot expect to join finances on a home unless all other finances are joined. And the only way to do that properly is to get married.

Minjou · 28/11/2025 09:42

Candlesandmatches · 27/11/2025 17:53

Your relative needs to do this legally using a solicitor. So it is clear who the house is being gifted to.
Then it will be clear who the house belongs to - you or you and DP together.
If it’s you only then you will have to make the decision bout putting DP on the deeds if the mortgage is paid off.
But he may have some legal rights anyway as such a long standing residence in the house.
So legal advice is probably a good idea.

He will have no legal rights to his girlfriends house because they both rented it before she owned it.
Tenants don't acquire ownership rights to houses they rent,no matter how long they are there for.

Talltreesbythelake · 28/11/2025 10:24

Minjou · 28/11/2025 09:42

He will have no legal rights to his girlfriends house because they both rented it before she owned it.
Tenants don't acquire ownership rights to houses they rent,no matter how long they are there for.

There is a renters' rights bill going through Parliament now, I believe. This may be what is prompting the owner of the house to gift it to the OP to get ahead of any potential rights he could be anticipating.

secretrocker · 28/11/2025 13:48

Minjou · 28/11/2025 09:42

He will have no legal rights to his girlfriends house because they both rented it before she owned it.
Tenants don't acquire ownership rights to houses they rent,no matter how long they are there for.

Actually, an interesting point which I'm not sure anyone has picked up on.
If he is a legal tenant, with a signed contract, ownership of that contract has transferred from relative to OP, the contract can't just be torn up without his agreement, and he has tenant rights - no fault evictions, etc.
I'm sure it won't be an issue as he'll agree, for the free rent, but perhaps he could be awkward about it.

oviraptor21 · 28/11/2025 13:58

In general I agree with the principle that you should keep the house in your name. Except that your partner has been prevented for 14 years from paying into a mortgage and getting a place of his own (whether with or without you). If i was him I'd be pretty unimpressed that you can walk off into the sunset with a house and he gets nothing.

slowbam · 28/11/2025 14:05

You have already been through one divorce that left you financially precarious OP. Think of your children. Leave a will that gives your partner the right to stay in the property if you die but protect your asset.

Minjou · 28/11/2025 14:28

oviraptor21 · 28/11/2025 13:58

In general I agree with the principle that you should keep the house in your name. Except that your partner has been prevented for 14 years from paying into a mortgage and getting a place of his own (whether with or without you). If i was him I'd be pretty unimpressed that you can walk off into the sunset with a house and he gets nothing.

He hasn't been prevented at all. He's made his own choice not to do so. His own choice to rent with OP.
She's not walking off with a house, she's been given a house and he will get to live in it for FREE. How is that nothing? No housing costs at all is a huge win.

Sunnydaystoday · 28/11/2025 16:32

oviraptor21 · 28/11/2025 13:58

In general I agree with the principle that you should keep the house in your name. Except that your partner has been prevented for 14 years from paying into a mortgage and getting a place of his own (whether with or without you). If i was him I'd be pretty unimpressed that you can walk off into the sunset with a house and he gets nothing.

Who prevented him?
What gun was put to his head to prevent him?
Ridiculous.
He has had low rent for 14 years.
His choice.
What EXACTLY did she do to stop him making alternative plans to buy a home?

He could have walked away any time.
He has savings because of low rent.

Her inheritance is nothing to do with him.

RazorsAtDawn · 28/11/2025 21:38

Doubledenim305 · 25/11/2025 22:33

No I actually wouldn't feel aggrieved at all. Its her inheritance. Even the law basically lets married partners keep that as not marital asset.
If I was him and I wanted a house then I'd buy one and get a mortgage.
If I wanted to joint buy our family home then we could both go halfers on a different house.
If he wants to own half the house they are currently in he should give her half the value of the house she was gifted if she wants to.

I one hundred percent would not feel my partner owed me half of their inheritance. How awful!

You didn't read the OP's comments. The reason why they didn't buy together was due to OP's financial situation, so they were unable to.

As a result of this OP's partner chose to build a life with her in this house, paid his fair share, and they are still (by all accounts) in a long term commited relationship.

He may not be 'entitled' to anything by law, but this is not about entitlement, or who owes who what, it's about what is fair for all parties.

OP can of course chose to completely shaft him legally, but is that fair after 14 years? No. How awful.

Minjou · 28/11/2025 21:56

Nothing fair about handing him half her house

ZoggyStirdust · 29/11/2025 10:31

RazorsAtDawn · 28/11/2025 21:38

You didn't read the OP's comments. The reason why they didn't buy together was due to OP's financial situation, so they were unable to.

As a result of this OP's partner chose to build a life with her in this house, paid his fair share, and they are still (by all accounts) in a long term commited relationship.

He may not be 'entitled' to anything by law, but this is not about entitlement, or who owes who what, it's about what is fair for all parties.

OP can of course chose to completely shaft him legally, but is that fair after 14 years? No. How awful.

Exactly this

he would have every right to feel he’s been treated badly here and every right to end the relationship over it. If he posted here for advice (as a woman, obviously) he’d be told exactly that.

op is being encouraged to adhere to the letter of the law and posters don’t give a shit about the impact on her partner, or her relationship.

OneFineDay22 · 29/11/2025 13:31

Having read your latest update, I think you don’t need to rush into giving him anything. As others have said, he will benefit from living rent free and therefore he will be able to save more of his money thanks to you and your kind relative. If you were still together far into the future and things were different you could put an amount for him in your will and split the rest between your children if you wanted to.

KeepPumping · 01/12/2025 14:16

Sunnydaystoday · 28/11/2025 16:32

Who prevented him?
What gun was put to his head to prevent him?
Ridiculous.
He has had low rent for 14 years.
His choice.
What EXACTLY did she do to stop him making alternative plans to buy a home?

He could have walked away any time.
He has savings because of low rent.

Her inheritance is nothing to do with him.

Edited

And looks like now he will have No Rent? He is doing well, doesn"t need to get half of an inherited house.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page