Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Donald Trump BBC

260 replies

Daygloboo · 15/11/2025 14:45

If Donald Trump gets compensation from the BBC to the tune of a million, which might affect our license fee payments, would it be appropriate to stop buying goods from US for a while. I think the BBC were wrong to misrepresent what Trump said, but effectively suing the population as a retaliation seems a step too far.

OP posts:
YarraValley · 15/11/2025 14:49

I thought it was too late for him to sue?

I think he’s right really, it was outrageous. The man is a lunatic, there’s no need to cobble together footage to make him look bad.

nomoreforks · 15/11/2025 14:51

Don't like the Donald one bit but the BBC were so stupid. What were they thinking?

ASeriesOfTubes · 15/11/2025 14:52

Man who wouldn't know the truth if it shot him in the ear sues broadcaster for manipulating things he said.

And they say Americans don't get irony.

Vaninees · 15/11/2025 14:53

The BBC being sued might possibly encourage them onto a path of more integrity, so that would be nice.

nomas · 15/11/2025 14:54

Have the BBC basically abridged what Trump
said? He did say those things, did they just miss out the ellipses?

Daygloboo · 15/11/2025 14:57

YarraValley · 15/11/2025 14:49

I thought it was too late for him to sue?

I think he’s right really, it was outrageous. The man is a lunatic, there’s no need to cobble together footage to make him look bad.

I agree completely. It was a stupid thing to do. But I think threatening to sue ...effectively the British people.... is an ugly form of bullying and we shouldnt stand for it. He only understands economic retaliation so maybe people shouldnt buy American stuff for a bit.

OP posts:
Genevieva · 15/11/2025 14:59

I think this is all grandstanding. He has a slam dunk case, but in a U.K. court, for libel at least, he’s too late. No idea about the US. It’s $5 billion apparently, which is absurd. I know American courts award higher sums than here, but that just reminds me of the beginning of Austin Powers when Dr Evil says he will hold the world to ransom and demand 100 billion dollars.

RingoJuice · 15/11/2025 15:01

nomas · 15/11/2025 14:54

Have the BBC basically abridged what Trump
said? He did say those things, did they just miss out the ellipses?

Said 50 fucking minutes apart and cutting the footage to imply it was said immediately after. You are supposed to indicate that time had passed by inserting something, usually a white flash as a transition.

Possibly it was made by a low-level producer and approved up the chain by those unfamiliar with the speech, but there’s no way you can make it through J-school and claim ignorance—it’s completely unethical behavior

Daygloboo · 15/11/2025 15:01

Genevieva · 15/11/2025 14:59

I think this is all grandstanding. He has a slam dunk case, but in a U.K. court, for libel at least, he’s too late. No idea about the US. It’s $5 billion apparently, which is absurd. I know American courts award higher sums than here, but that just reminds me of the beginning of Austin Powers when Dr Evil says he will hold the world to ransom and demand 100 billion dollars.

🤣

OP posts:
RingoJuice · 15/11/2025 15:02

Genevieva · 15/11/2025 14:59

I think this is all grandstanding. He has a slam dunk case, but in a U.K. court, for libel at least, he’s too late. No idea about the US. It’s $5 billion apparently, which is absurd. I know American courts award higher sums than here, but that just reminds me of the beginning of Austin Powers when Dr Evil says he will hold the world to ransom and demand 100 billion dollars.

Alex Jones was successfully sued for (at least) one billion dollars

Lou7171 · 15/11/2025 15:04

nomas · 15/11/2025 14:54

Have the BBC basically abridged what Trump
said? He did say those things, did they just miss out the ellipses?

I think he did say those things yeah. I'm not 100% sure what's going on with the BBC/Trump thing at the moment, I'm too distracted by all the Epstein stuff. I think maga is finally about to implode 🤞

Bagsintheboot · 15/11/2025 15:05

I highly doubt any lawsuit will be successful OP. I'd cross that bridge if it ever happens.

ArthriticOldLabrador · 15/11/2025 15:06

It’s time the BBC became a subscription service.
It’s no longer the beacon of impartiality it once was.

SeaAndStars · 15/11/2025 15:09

The anti BBC treads on here are as relentless as the anti dog ones.

Genevieva · 15/11/2025 15:10

RingoJuice · 15/11/2025 15:02

Alex Jones was successfully sued for (at least) one billion dollars

Interesting. That vaguely rings a bell. He’s the American who was into conspiracies about aliens or something wasn’t he? You see the headlines in British papers, but have no idea who the people are, so you absorb broken snippets.

Did the plaintiff ( I think they still use that term in the US) get the money? It’s one thing suing a corporation, quite another’s person. I’d imagine it reaches the point where the number is immaterial because you were bankrupt several hundred million earlier.

Branster · 15/11/2025 15:13

As much as I dislike Trump, I hope he does sue the BBC and I hope he wins.
He's not 'going after' the British public. And playing this ridiculous card of 'it all falls on the poor public when they had nothing to do with this', is a begging card which has no place in the real world.
They should have some sort of insurance for cases like this.
Otherwise just let them go bankrupt.
No amount of license fees would cover such a high payout.
And nobody would lend it to them. Unless, of course, the government would be stupid enough to contemplate bailing them out which they can't afford to do and it would be absurd.

Genevieva · 15/11/2025 15:13

Bagsintheboot · 15/11/2025 15:05

I highly doubt any lawsuit will be successful OP. I'd cross that bridge if it ever happens.

I’ve just looked online and in Florida (Trump’s home state) the limit for defamation is 2 years, not 1. Like British courts, US courts claim global jurisdiction for the consideration of such cases, so he can sue them and he would probably win. Though one wonders if the purpose is the pre-trial negotiation and an out of court settlement that may not be financial. Who knows. Maybe he doesn’t know himself. Rich men instruct lawyers to litigate as readily as poor men smoke cigarettes.

blurblebarb · 15/11/2025 15:13

I hope he is successful. The BBC are a disgrace. Any compensation should be paid from BBC funds, they have many billions.

tobee · 15/11/2025 15:17

The BBC should call his bluff. Or at very least stick to their guns. They are perpetually terrified by what the right wing media and previous right wing governments might do to them. And now Trump

SeaAndStars · 15/11/2025 15:18

blurblebarb · 15/11/2025 15:13

I hope he is successful. The BBC are a disgrace. Any compensation should be paid from BBC funds, they have many billions.

They have less than 2 billion pounds in assets.

Daygloboo · 15/11/2025 15:19

RingoJuice · 15/11/2025 15:01

Said 50 fucking minutes apart and cutting the footage to imply it was said immediately after. You are supposed to indicate that time had passed by inserting something, usually a white flash as a transition.

Possibly it was made by a low-level producer and approved up the chain by those unfamiliar with the speech, but there’s no way you can make it through J-school and claim ignorance—it’s completely unethical behavior

I think that the gap was significant and does rather distort what he said at the time. It was a bit naughty. You cant do things like that if you are the BBC. But in terms of what Trump's motivations are generally, l think we all know where his allegiances lie and what his intentions are. It's a bit rich suing the BBC though when you think of the sort of twists and distortions and manipulations of truth that go on in many news outlets.

OP posts:
Daygloboo · 15/11/2025 15:25

Lou7171 · 15/11/2025 15:04

I think he did say those things yeah. I'm not 100% sure what's going on with the BBC/Trump thing at the moment, I'm too distracted by all the Epstein stuff. I think maga is finally about to implode 🤞

They must implode because surely garbage has a sell by date.

OP posts:
blurblebarb · 15/11/2025 15:29

SeaAndStars · 15/11/2025 15:18

They have less than 2 billion pounds in assets.

Oh dear. Perhaps they'll have to declare bankruptcy...

NotForTheMoneyandNotForTheApplause · 15/11/2025 15:32

Would a successful lawsuit involve having to find someone who saw the original programme thinking Trump was a jolly good egg and changed their mind by the end?

Might need to look really really hard if so

SeaAndStars · 15/11/2025 15:34

blurblebarb · 15/11/2025 15:29

Oh dear. Perhaps they'll have to declare bankruptcy...

What would that gain?
Who do you think provides better, more impartial news?