Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Marriages don’t last anymore because..

386 replies

PictureImperfect · 24/10/2025 08:21

Had a debate with an colleague about why divorce seems so much more common now.

They said that in past generations, couples stayed together because they wanted to work through things and were more committed to making relationships last. I said I think it’s mainly because women have more freedom and independence now. Yes, most of the childcare still falls on women, but that was even more true in the past. Back then, loads of women didn’t have the opportunity to work full time and build careers like their husbands, so they relied on them for financial stability. Now that women can provide their own stability, they’re simply less likely to tolerate an unhappy marriage.

To me, that just seems like basic common sense but my colleague laughed and said I was completely wrong. According to them, people today just can’t be bothered to put in the effort and treat relationships as disposable. They also scoffed when I said women still don’t have the same opportunities as men.

It’s had me thinking, I honestly thought this was just obvious, but now I’m wondering what others think. AIBU, or is my colleague?

OP posts:
humptydumptyfelloff · 25/10/2025 09:23

alot of women are no longer stuck financially anymore as we have forged our way into good working careers.

women also have a lot more say and choice now

many years ago only men’s wages were used to calculate mortgages even if the wife worked part time.

also women are getting better at knowing their limits and what they want out of relationships.

men don’t rule the roost anymore as much as they used to although my in laws are a perfect example of why it was such an awful time for wives decades ago and it blows my mind that mil accepts things how the are. She has no say in anything,no backbone and is just quietly in the back ground doing everything while fil grands it around thinking he’s the dogs bollox.
not in my world 🌍

PictureImperfect · 25/10/2025 10:29

Rustymoo · 25/10/2025 08:18

He’s a Global,HSE director who’s normally home based. The company has offices worldwide. With some time differences it’s not possible to do meetings etc via teams. I guess in some instances it’s not crucial but he feels it supports his team if he visits them in person. He can also get a feel for what’s going on. They have staff on clients site too so he’ll go and see them.
I do agree with you that attitudes have to change after all parenting is a joint responsibility and of that means adopting the Nordic scheme then that’s not a bad thing.

I get that some travel is required, but from what you’ve said, it sounds like your husband’s company could have been more flexible. They could’ve suggested a shorter trip with the option to join essential meetings remotely. Even with time zones, I’m sure she’d have preferred the odd early call over being away from her kids for nearly a month. It’s that old ‘that’s how it’s always been!’ mindset, and they ended up losing someone who was, as you said, head and shoulders above the rest.

It’s nice that your husband values being present with his team, but that’s all it is.. nice. His visibility a handful of days a year isn’t essential to the success or safety of the work.

Maybe I see it differently because my dad was away with work for over half the year when I was growing up, and it just became normal that he wasn’t there. Whereas my DH and I split parental leave and both reduced our working hours to share childcare. When I mentioned my dad’s old working pattern my DH said he wouldn’t even consider a 4 week trip away from our DC, never mind several a year. It could be anecdotal but I think it’s because from the start, our kids have been just as much his responsibility as mine. Whereas for my mum, it all fell on her, my dad wasn’t around enough to grow attached to us in the first place to consider being separated from us an issue.

OP posts:
Neurodiversitydoctor · 25/10/2025 10:44

Badbadbunny · 24/10/2025 11:14

Yes, mine is just as my own mother's was, because we purposely delayed having children until our mid-late 30's to ensure we were in the "right" place career wise that we could go back to our respective careers after maternity leave. Can't speak for my mother, but for me, there was no way I was having a child in my 20's as I spent my 20's having fun as a childless person/couple and concentrating on my career. It's easier to keep and get back into your career if it's established before your maternity leave as you're really not going to be in a good position to do additional training, professional qualifications, etc once you're busy bringing up children.

Not the point of the thread but this blatently bollocks. I had dinner on Thursday with a group of professional women from my work, without exception they continued their professional training including exams with small children. This is a dangerous narrative which encourages women to postpone motherhood to the limits of their fertility window. There is actually a good argument to get on with it, so you can be hitting your stride in your late 30's/early 40's unencumbered with small children.

Rustymoo · 25/10/2025 11:09

PictureImperfect · 25/10/2025 10:29

I get that some travel is required, but from what you’ve said, it sounds like your husband’s company could have been more flexible. They could’ve suggested a shorter trip with the option to join essential meetings remotely. Even with time zones, I’m sure she’d have preferred the odd early call over being away from her kids for nearly a month. It’s that old ‘that’s how it’s always been!’ mindset, and they ended up losing someone who was, as you said, head and shoulders above the rest.

It’s nice that your husband values being present with his team, but that’s all it is.. nice. His visibility a handful of days a year isn’t essential to the success or safety of the work.

Maybe I see it differently because my dad was away with work for over half the year when I was growing up, and it just became normal that he wasn’t there. Whereas my DH and I split parental leave and both reduced our working hours to share childcare. When I mentioned my dad’s old working pattern my DH said he wouldn’t even consider a 4 week trip away from our DC, never mind several a year. It could be anecdotal but I think it’s because from the start, our kids have been just as much his responsibility as mine. Whereas for my mum, it all fell on her, my dad wasn’t around enough to grow attached to us in the first place to consider being separated from us an issue.

I totally get where you’re coming from. My husband has always worked away to a lesser or greater degree and like your mum the day to day childcare etc fell on me. I was a STAHM and pre school depending on where he went and for how long we’d join him. When he was home he was very hands on with the children and does accept he missed out on a lot especially once they started school and it was more difficult to travel with him. In the ex employees case the trip was to Australia to support the onsite team as there was problems.

Chiseltip · 25/10/2025 12:09

Ivelostmyglasses · 25/10/2025 08:05

And domestic violence? How do couples fix that together? Women have only been able to have their own mortgages for fifty years. In certain workplaces women were forced to leave their jobs when they got married & poor birth control limited women's choices further.
My clever funny grandmother had to give up her civil service job, never had a penny of her own again, no coat even, never sat to eat a meal, raised her children in her domineering violent husband's home and was not free until he died. No working it out together would have changed that.
Today she would be divorced, if married at all, back at wo rk and running her own household. Why shouldn't women have expectations, and leave if they don't work out? Yo u want them living like my grandmother until their eighties?

What part of my post was confusing?

Two people working together, as a team, wouldn't end up in your grandmother's situation.

pointythings · 25/10/2025 12:57

Chiseltip · 25/10/2025 12:09

What part of my post was confusing?

Two people working together, as a team, wouldn't end up in your grandmother's situation.

But when one person (often the man) doesn't work as a team but instead resorts to addiction/abuse/violence/infidelity - then what? Keeping off TikTok isn't going to protect women from men who sell themselves as something they are not and who wait until their wife is nicely tied down with kids before showing their true face...

No amount of teamwork can fix a relationship if only one part of the team is doing the work. You and people on this thread like you fail to acknowledge the real problem, which is that as a cohort, men have not adapted to the times we live in now - when women have their own funds, when women are able to live happily and independently, when in short men have to step up, do their share at home and not be lazy gaming obsessed man-children.

Chiseltip · 25/10/2025 13:22

pointythings · 25/10/2025 12:57

But when one person (often the man) doesn't work as a team but instead resorts to addiction/abuse/violence/infidelity - then what? Keeping off TikTok isn't going to protect women from men who sell themselves as something they are not and who wait until their wife is nicely tied down with kids before showing their true face...

No amount of teamwork can fix a relationship if only one part of the team is doing the work. You and people on this thread like you fail to acknowledge the real problem, which is that as a cohort, men have not adapted to the times we live in now - when women have their own funds, when women are able to live happily and independently, when in short men have to step up, do their share at home and not be lazy gaming obsessed man-children.

You didn't read my post did you . .

Avantiagain · 25/10/2025 13:36

"Divorce is easy. No shame or sigma anymore."

I am glad there is now no shame in leaving an abusive partner.

pointythings · 25/10/2025 13:43

Chiseltip · 25/10/2025 13:22

You didn't read my post did you . .

I read your original post where you ranted about TikTok and said people don't do working at it any more, and I didn't buy it then. I also don't buy it now.

I also read the post where you seem to believe that divorce is always bad for the children - I didn't buy that one either.

It's complicated, like life. But if the choice is between where we are now and where we were in 1950, I say kick that time machine into a ditch.

snowwhiteisfeelinggrumpy · 25/10/2025 14:34

@BoredZelda "Respect for women now is far better than it has ever been."

Really ?

Have you read the Relationship Boards lately ?

There are females being distressed because their husband spends a lot of time watching porn on his phone. Females feeling inadequate because they aren't prepared to engage in the acts seen on porn videos and wanting to know if they are "normal".

Guys getting unpleasant because females won't have a "Home Date" fast enough.

etc etc

Hotflushesandchilblains · 25/10/2025 15:07

BoredZelda · 25/10/2025 08:39

I take it neither of these comments come from someone who lived through the 70s /80s/90s? Respect for women now is far better than it has ever been. Men always had 24/7 access to porn. It was incredibly easy to get, you could walk into any shop and pick up a magazine and adult video stores were everywhere. As a child of the 80s, even in my tiny, rural area of Scotland, there were always kids who had access to their dad’s porn stash.

The most recent change in some attitudes, spread by the likes of Tate, has nothing to do with porn.

Having done that, I have to disagree. There are a lot of things which would not be tolerated any more (not safe in taxis senior managers for example), but I was never spoken to the way young women tell me they are. And hearing young men from the high school up the road when they are walking past is horrifying (they often dont see me if I me bent over weeding the garden). I have never been choked during sex, never asked for anal, never expected to do a lot of things which are presented as standard.

Horsie · 25/10/2025 15:08

snowwhiteisfeelinggrumpy · 25/10/2025 08:30

"But I firmly believe that access to 24/7 porn has greatly increased men's disrespect of women and the impunity with which they express it."

Agree 100%

When women are being portrayed as a collection of body parts for mens' amusement it isn't surprising that some unenlightened men have a bad attitude towards women.
Not only that, but when a women can't meet the standard of "designer body" that these young porn "stars" have, male disillusionment can set in.

Yup. One thousand percent. Porn has set women back by decades. Or made male attitudes towards women even worse than they've ever been. Remember the days when the only porn men could access was sealed top-shelf magazines? They had to have the nerve to ask for them. And what was inside them was really tame compared to today's online porn. Those days seem so innocent now. What's available online is utterly revolting and I am so sad that it's legal.

Themaghag · 25/10/2025 16:19

Growlybear83 · 24/10/2025 17:33

Not at all. People need to work hard to have successful and happy marriages. If they’re not prepared to commit to doing that, I don’t see the point in getting married.

Both people in a couple have to work hard though and if one of them can't be arsed, then it's not going to work over the long term. Sadly, there are still far too many men who think just being there and going to work is enough, and it really isn't. Women aren't wrong to expect more from their partner than that and to end things if he won't or can't deliver. Life is too short to spend it with a twat, especially a low-earning, miserable, sport/hobbies obsessed one, who's bad in bed and expects to be waited on hand, foot and finger!

Chiseltip · 25/10/2025 16:32

pointythings · 25/10/2025 13:43

I read your original post where you ranted about TikTok and said people don't do working at it any more, and I didn't buy it then. I also don't buy it now.

I also read the post where you seem to believe that divorce is always bad for the children - I didn't buy that one either.

It's complicated, like life. But if the choice is between where we are now and where we were in 1950, I say kick that time machine into a ditch.

What time machine?

Whyamiherenow · 25/10/2025 16:48

I think pay and earning is a big issue. I earn twice what my husband does (almost) and he hates it. I don’t care and view it all as our money but he gets upset about it.

Horsie · 25/10/2025 17:50

SliceofTosst · 24/10/2025 17:12

Some people are more interested in a big show off wedding than actual marriage.

Is that really true, though? Most people's marriages are very dear to them, and I don't think having a big wedding makes that less true.

Horsie · 25/10/2025 18:09

NewHome2026 · 24/10/2025 16:38

I actually think it’s both. Was talking about it recently with my mum as a family member has recently decided to end a marriage for what seem on the surface very weak reasons around not feeling a spark. My mum felt, as do I, that family member could have put in more of an effort to work on the relationship and rekindle the love rather than just throw it away as the first sign of things feeling a bit tedious.

I asked her if she had ever felt that way in her marriage to my dad (40 years) and she said of course, everyone experiences boredom and disconnection. But my dad is a kind man and she cares about her family so she always gave her head a wobble and thought about how things could be worked on, not abandoned.

However it is also the case that people aren’t trapped in marriages anymore so of course this gives people more options…which might be WHY people are less willing to see if things improve.

To be fair, though, the reason for the marriage ending might easily be something quite private and embarrassing, and they'd rather say there's no spark than tell you the truth. How do you say to your relatives "He can't get it up anymore unless it's for anal, and I can't put up with that?" or "He dresses in my underwear and it makes me feel sick" etc.

pointythings · 25/10/2025 18:25

Whyamiherenow · 25/10/2025 16:48

I think pay and earning is a big issue. I earn twice what my husband does (almost) and he hates it. I don’t care and view it all as our money but he gets upset about it.

Society hasn't caught up yet, has it? During the time that my marriage was crumbling, I did everything possible to support my husband - he was miserable in his job, so I suggested that he find something else, probably part time, because I was in a good job and earning well and we were financially fine. He openly admitted he would not and could not do that because he had been raised to be 'the provider'. That mindset needs to go.

Horsie · 25/10/2025 18:31

Growlybear83 · 24/10/2025 10:01

I agree with your colleague. I don’t think people take marriage seriously enough now. When I got married I took vows to stay with my husband for the rest of my life, through bad times as well as good, and I wouldn’t have married him if I’d not meant what I was promising. Of course there are exceptions, and I would never ever expect anyone to stay in a marriage where there was violence or infidelity, but I don’t think that’s the reason for the breakdown of most marriages. I think people just don’t take the commitment seriously now.

What evidence do you have for people not taking marriage seriously enough? What makes you think that most people's marriages aren't very dear to them and that they fight tooth and nail to keep them together before admitting defeat in utter exhaustion? Interested to know how you have come to this conclusion.

Horsie · 25/10/2025 18:59

Thepeopleversuswork · 24/10/2025 10:16

Here’s the thing though: I don’t believe in toughing out a relationship with someone which isn’t enhancing my life. It makes no sense to me that that should have a higher priority than my own happiness as an individual.

For me there are two good reasons to stay in a marriage: for economic security (which doesn’t apply to me) and to provide stability for children.

If you take those two things out of the equation there’s no other value in marriage other than “we made vows”. What’s the point of continuing to do something which makes you unhappy because you made vows a long time ago. Changing your mind is often the most rational way to behave if your circumstances change: why do we reward self denying intransigence?

I am not married and would not marry again but I don’t understand why society praises and rewards such rigid and irrational behaviour.

I suppose the answer to this is, if you divorce for personal happiness, it's seen as selfish because you're hurting the other person and putting yourself first at their expense. I suppose in the instance you're describing, people think you should be trying to rekindle the happiness you once had and are puzzled as to why you can't, if your partner is willing and is a good person with no issues.

I'm not sure how I feel about your reasons for divorcing. On the one hand, if you have a decent partner who is willing to put in the work, then it's hard to see why divorce is OK. But on the other hand, life is very short, and I don't think people should spend their one life feeling unhappy.

It's definitely a less clear-cut issue than when a spouse is clearly an utter twat in some way/ways who refuses to change.

Horsie · 25/10/2025 19:17

spoonbillstretford · 24/10/2025 10:29

The welfare state wouldn't have to pick it up so much if the CSA had more teeth, worked closely with HMRC and really went after fathers hiding their money or otherwise not meeting their financial responsibilities, or there were custodial sentences for it. It should be akin to defrauding the taxpayer, as they are, and more importantly their own children.

In the 1970s and 80s in the US, men who didn't pay child support had their photos put on the milk cartons! 🤣 Sometimes in newspapers and on public buildings, too.

Whyamiherenow · 25/10/2025 20:02

pointythings · 25/10/2025 18:25

Society hasn't caught up yet, has it? During the time that my marriage was crumbling, I did everything possible to support my husband - he was miserable in his job, so I suggested that he find something else, probably part time, because I was in a good job and earning well and we were financially fine. He openly admitted he would not and could not do that because he had been raised to be 'the provider'. That mindset needs to go.

It’s so strange isn’t it. DH says he isn’t upset I earn more but that I pay for more things. Which to me is the same thing really. We earned similarly until about 5 years ago when my career took off.

The mindset is definitely broken and as you say needs to change.

Crikeyalmighty · 25/10/2025 20:08

Horsie · 25/10/2025 18:09

To be fair, though, the reason for the marriage ending might easily be something quite private and embarrassing, and they'd rather say there's no spark than tell you the truth. How do you say to your relatives "He can't get it up anymore unless it's for anal, and I can't put up with that?" or "He dresses in my underwear and it makes me feel sick" etc.

I totally agree- how many women are going to say ‘I’m fed up of his secretive porn use ‘ or ‘he’s been sexting Random’s’ or ‘he leaves skid marks in his boxers’ etc etc - especially if kids still on the scene and even then some don’t want adult children to know the ins and outs of a split -

Unexpectedlysinglemum · 25/10/2025 21:36

I definitely don’t think that people worked harder at relationships in the past, as in actual work - like self reflection, reading books about relationships, going to therapy etc - that is all modern day stuff. I think people put much more effort into analyzing and making efforts to make changes these days in fact.
however in the olden days people had far lower expectations of their partners to make them happy and so they were more likely to plod on with an unhappy or unfulfilling partnership.

Horsie · 25/10/2025 22:11

Crikeyalmighty · 24/10/2025 18:18

@Horsie yep and how many of us would not have believed that our partners could turn into alcoholics, porn addicts, sex pests, chronic gamblers, work shy, totally useless at domesticity etc- or combinations of !! there’s a lot of very intelligent women on here with great jobs who have been knocked sideways, women who would have thought they made smart choices- the implication is often that we go round choosing complete losers when the reality is that people can change , whether that’s at 3 years, 13 years or 30 years into the relationship

Exactly. Some people really don't improve with age - quite the opposite. I think men really go through a reckoning as they age and lose strength and virility...and some take it out on their wives.

Swipe left for the next trending thread