To think that Sadiq Khan needs investigated?

[Whatifitallgoesright]

Considering the ongoing disclosures of the extent of the Pakistani rape gangs in London and Khans refusal to even acknowledge them do we think he has bought the office of Lord Mayor into disrepute?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/news/uk/2123376/i-exposed-sadiq-khans-grooming/amp

Are you really concerned about defending abused girls? In that case why are you wasting everyone's time and effort by accusing random people? I don't think you care about abused girls at all. You are probably happy they exist so that they can fuel your racist hate campaign.

What do you think it means?

So what do you think of my answer? Why couldn’t Khan say that?

Forget Hall, focus on the issue. If you focus on Hall you’re admitting that issue isn’t as important as the politics of the person asking the question. Why couldn’t Khan focus on the issue? And if he hasn’t, and women and girls have suffered as a result, don’t you think that needs investigating?

Do you care about grooming gangs in London given that you think Sadiq Khan’s obfuscation is acceptable?

Why are you ignoring that he DID answer the question?

Bizarre.

Oh dear …
I’m notquite sure how to reply to someone who is more concerned about protecting the reputation of the Mayor of London than protecting vulnerable girls from sexual abuse.

Here is the exchange, people can decide if he is answering the question or not:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=noJCNh60lfk

@nomas so because someone asks a rhetorical question their opinion on any other subject has no value? How odd.

So, the definition of slander then? Nice one…

You can’t just whip an accusation out of literal thin air. As previously said, on what grounds.

Wild that people don’t worry about not having to adhere to facts in any way shape or form. We descend into swamp politics.

I’d love to know where the explosion of talking/writing like this has come from! It drives me INSANE!! It doesn’t even sound right, yet more and more people are doing it!

Needs to be investigated
or
Needs investigating

He didn’t answer the question in January 2025.
I take it you’ve seen the video?

Like the Catholic church?

You condemned that yet?

Whose rhetorical question do you mean?

And they're not condemning any of the white paedophiles I've posted about. That have, you know, actual evidence against them.

Does this mean we can accuse anyone of anything?

Shall we accuse Prince Charles or Prince William of abusing children then? Who is exempt from being accused, can you give us a list?

If people can accuse Sadiq Khan of being a nonce (as they have on this thread) then surely anyone is fair game?

I've ascertained that you can't call the racist accusers racist.

Otherwise they'll go out and vote reform, and we'll get what's coming to us.

Which is never clearly explained.

Just like any of the racist shit they say.

Gangs got away with abuse for years in large part because those who were supposed to protect them saw the victims as trash. AND in many (not all) cases the abuse was hushed up in .

It's too simple, and might make future abuse more likely, to see only the cover up as the problem. And those on the fringe who seem to believe that only or mainly Pakistani/muslims commit CSE make the world less safe for all young people.

Of course we should enquure into and understand what happened around the grooming gangs in Rotherham, Rochdale, Oxford etc in order to prevent future abuse and bring people to account where appropriate. Most people are sensible enough to understand an enquiry into grooming gangs is going to report on grooming gangs without saying all CSE is done in this way. (I am an optimist....)

No - we shouldn’t be able to accuse anyone of anything.
But I do think elected representatives are answerable to things that happen under their watch . ( Not that they’re responsible… just that they need to acknowledge that it’s happening and address it )

I’m objecting to Khan’s refusal to engage honestly with the question about grooming gangs .
He chose to frame the question as a racist dog whistle.
He should have been the bigger and better person and put vulnerable children first

Oh. It's you again.
🙄

I'm objecting to people who use racist dog whistles to then blame the people who don't answer their racist dog whistles.

Khan needs to be dropped can’t stand him.

And for those of you that like to keep throwing out the racist card. The grooming gang members were exactly that racists. Because let’s not forget that it works both ways believe it or not.

Why is it always on ethnic minorities to be the bigger person when confronted by people who have been openly racist to them?

He chose to frame the question as a racist dog whistle.

A bit victim blamey no?

What a weird question.
I’m Catholic. I would always put the safety of children and vulnerable adults before the reputation of the clergy of the church. I would like to think that most of us have learned something over the last few decades

I don’t see the Mayor of London as the vulnerable person in this situation. So yes - he should be the bigger person