Some home educators are braggy and seem to think that the only way they can discuss the benefits of home education is to discussing issues in the school system. They tend to be the louder types online. They equally frustrate many home educators.
Many aren't, including the categories of families already listed as well as those in areas where education has fallen apart.
Quite a few home educators also have school educated kid(s). Last data I saw, most home educators start with their kids in school and withdraw after a series of issues. There is some discussion that since COVID and the rise of some home educating influencers that there is an upswing in more parents withdrawing faster, but still more come from issues with schools.
As John Holt understood clearly (How Children learn) - it's about learning, not teaching. Once a child knows how to learn and given the wonders of the internet they only need resources and occasional help to learn whatever they need.
John Holt died in the 1980s, his arguments have little to do with the internet - but really - given a child the wonders of the internet? The wonders are the internet are just a representation of the wonders of the wider world - and the horrors of it.
John Holt was an ex-teacher turned American conservative libertarian who was against the state being at all involved in nearly anything because he became jaded it could be changed. His entire argument for 'unschooling' was to treat children as adults, it was part of his wider framework on 'children's rights' and ~freeing children from the constraints of childhood~ that included arguing for removing the age of consent and that children's rights included them being able to enter into sexual relationships with adults. I'm sure he'd love the idea of children having free rein to teach themselves on the internet where his kind now love to prowl.
Parents are responsible for their children's education, entirely when we choose to home educate. Putting a child's education all on their shoulders to learn, with or without the wonders of the internet, is to put adult responsibilities on a child. This may line up with Holt's point of view, but his view never had much regard for responsibility.
I'm interested to know how this works from the class teacher's point of view?
Most schools I know hate flexischooling/part time schooling and treat it as a temporary last resort for a child really struggling or has exceptional medical situation.
A few schools I know have leaned into it, but the ones I know are private and/or small schools in areas with declining numbers who have found ways to accommodate it to bring in more numbers. The type doing it online have gravitated to those types of schools because it requires a headteacher's permission.
I had one child who was part-time during his GCSEs for medical reasons. He took a reduced load of GCSEs to account for that. Years on, we agree it was making the best of a bad situation.