Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

A double one on Rugby

163 replies

JamieCannister · 06/10/2025 09:03

AIBU to say that Mumsnet is putting girls at risk by allowing the promotion on rugby on this site?

AIBU to say that given the risks of head injuries children under 18 (or maybe people with not-yet-fully-developed brains under 25) should not be allowed to consent to play contact rugby?

OP posts:
Tigerbalmshark · 06/10/2025 13:53

TheLemonPeach · 06/10/2025 13:26

WHAT are your own children allowed to do exactly? out of curiosity?

I imagine “colouring in, quietly”, though they probably aren’t allowed to use a pencil sharpener unsupervised until sixth form.

lifeonthelane · 06/10/2025 13:58

Most things in life pose some level of risk. I have a suspected neurodiverse 8 year old. The rugby pitch is the only place I see him truly thrive - he's like a whippet out there and doesn't even glance in my direction for the hour each week he trains. We've tried other sports (football, martial arts, athletics, mountain biking) and nothing else comes close in terms of his engagement and enjoyment. To me, it's absolutely worth the risks to reap the benefits he gets from playing rugby.

1dayatatime · 06/10/2025 13:58

JamieCannister · 06/10/2025 13:20

I am quite happy to say I would never ever ever encourage a child of mine to get anywhere near a horse.

On that I would agree - horses are bloody expensive and time consuming and not conducive with studying hard as a teenager (talking from experience).

DottieMoon · 06/10/2025 13:59

You are being ridiculous.

Bananaandmangosmoothie · 06/10/2025 13:59

Surely it’s up to you as a parent to decide what level of risk is acceptable? I played rugby quite seriously for years. There was one serious concussion of a teammate in that time. I believe it cost her her degree because of the timing right before exams.

I would think carefully before signing my children up to play rugby, but it’s nothing to do with Mumsnet.

TheLemonPeach · 06/10/2025 14:02

JamieCannister · 06/10/2025 13:47

It's not inclusive of kids who don't like getting dirty or hate contact sports.

Which is no big deal - not everything has to be inclusive of everyone, so long as the partici[pants are fully aware (and old enough to be aware) of the risks. ANd even then there are some limits society places.

inclusive doesn't mean you HAVE to do it even if you hate it.

It means you CAN join in if you want to.

While you can't do ballet, or join so many other sports if you don't have the right body.

Yes, there's a risk, but there's a risk in everything and even more risk in not doing anything. Asking MN to stop promoting rugby is ridiculous. People have even died playing video games, that's hardly a sport.

Tigerbalmshark · 06/10/2025 14:22

PaellaPan · 06/10/2025 13:35

no cars, they probably wouldn't be able to get to rugby training anyway. And air quality would be substantially improved. A substantial reduction in car use would probably do far more for overall public health than stopping rugby, which only a small proportion of people ever play. And an even smaller proportion of them play vigorously, frequently enough and over enough years for it to be of any tangible risk.

We cycle to rugby! On the road, which is probably riskier than the 90 minute training session ever could be.

1dayatatime · 06/10/2025 14:32

TheLemonPeach · 06/10/2025 14:02

inclusive doesn't mean you HAVE to do it even if you hate it.

It means you CAN join in if you want to.

While you can't do ballet, or join so many other sports if you don't have the right body.

Yes, there's a risk, but there's a risk in everything and even more risk in not doing anything. Asking MN to stop promoting rugby is ridiculous. People have even died playing video games, that's hardly a sport.

I definitely don't have the right "body"
for ballet (not unless there is some serious reinforcement of the stage).

But I absolutely adore watching my DD play rugby which is much more inclusive of different body shapes.

Tigerbalmshark · 06/10/2025 14:40

1dayatatime · 06/10/2025 14:32

I definitely don't have the right "body"
for ballet (not unless there is some serious reinforcement of the stage).

But I absolutely adore watching my DD play rugby which is much more inclusive of different body shapes.

To be fair to ballet, in adult recreational classes there are actually a wide range of bodies.

It’s teenage “serious” classes that boot you out if your legs are too long or your foot isn’t the right shape, because there is no chance of becoming a professional if you “look wrong”. Which is ludicrous because very few teenage ballerinas will ever get as far as a ballet company, but they could still have fun dancing.

JamieCannister · 06/10/2025 14:59

lifeonthelane · 06/10/2025 13:58

Most things in life pose some level of risk. I have a suspected neurodiverse 8 year old. The rugby pitch is the only place I see him truly thrive - he's like a whippet out there and doesn't even glance in my direction for the hour each week he trains. We've tried other sports (football, martial arts, athletics, mountain biking) and nothing else comes close in terms of his engagement and enjoyment. To me, it's absolutely worth the risks to reap the benefits he gets from playing rugby.

If I was in your position I would feel very torn.

OP posts:
JamieCannister · 06/10/2025 15:00

Bananaandmangosmoothie · 06/10/2025 13:59

Surely it’s up to you as a parent to decide what level of risk is acceptable? I played rugby quite seriously for years. There was one serious concussion of a teammate in that time. I believe it cost her her degree because of the timing right before exams.

I would think carefully before signing my children up to play rugby, but it’s nothing to do with Mumsnet.

Have you not seen the promoted (paid advert) thread promoting rugby that I have seen for weeks / months on the homepage (it was posted late july and I saw it today, for the umteenth time)?

OP posts:
JamieCannister · 06/10/2025 15:02

TheLemonPeach · 06/10/2025 14:02

inclusive doesn't mean you HAVE to do it even if you hate it.

It means you CAN join in if you want to.

While you can't do ballet, or join so many other sports if you don't have the right body.

Yes, there's a risk, but there's a risk in everything and even more risk in not doing anything. Asking MN to stop promoting rugby is ridiculous. People have even died playing video games, that's hardly a sport.

You can't do rugby if you are blind or have a body that hates contact sports. It is opnly inclusive of some peopel who want to play rugby.

"Free cash" is about the only thing that is truly inclusive.

I am arguing against the nonsensical idea of "inclusive" in this post.

OP posts:
Randomchat · 06/10/2025 15:04

Ds loves rugby. He's out training or at matches 3 or 4 times a week. He never complains, even in the coldest and wettest of weather. I'm happy he's found a sport he loves.

At the same time I'm very aware of the risks. My dad played rugby for 15 years and knew Doddie Weir personally so there's no hiding from that in our family. Ds knows the risks too.

I don't have the answers though. It's a balancing act and a guessing game. Like much of life.

1dayatatime · 06/10/2025 15:07

JamieCannister · 06/10/2025 15:02

You can't do rugby if you are blind or have a body that hates contact sports. It is opnly inclusive of some peopel who want to play rugby.

"Free cash" is about the only thing that is truly inclusive.

I am arguing against the nonsensical idea of "inclusive" in this post.

WTF -"rugby is only inclusive to those that want to play rugby "

Is this a serious comment?

blueliner · 06/10/2025 15:10

Why girls?

Surely girls are far less likely to get serious head injuries that boys and men.

Scottishskifun · 06/10/2025 15:12

JamieCannister · 06/10/2025 15:02

You can't do rugby if you are blind or have a body that hates contact sports. It is opnly inclusive of some peopel who want to play rugby.

"Free cash" is about the only thing that is truly inclusive.

I am arguing against the nonsensical idea of "inclusive" in this post.

Clearly your not up to date with your para-sports either OP.
Visually impaired rugby is very much a sport like Visually impaired football.

Also wheelchair rugby is awesome and those players are amazing to watch.

TheLemonPeach · 06/10/2025 15:13

JamieCannister · 06/10/2025 15:02

You can't do rugby if you are blind or have a body that hates contact sports. It is opnly inclusive of some peopel who want to play rugby.

"Free cash" is about the only thing that is truly inclusive.

I am arguing against the nonsensical idea of "inclusive" in this post.

what on earth are you on about? I am not entering your nonsense comment about disability, it's offensive.

But tell us, what SPORT is open to any woman of any shape, and what podium show us a team (or opponents) of different abilities and body shape, go on?

Tigerbalmshark · 06/10/2025 15:14

JamieCannister · 06/10/2025 15:02

You can't do rugby if you are blind or have a body that hates contact sports. It is opnly inclusive of some peopel who want to play rugby.

"Free cash" is about the only thing that is truly inclusive.

I am arguing against the nonsensical idea of "inclusive" in this post.

Visually impaired rugby is a real Paralympic discipline. And generations of public school boys will confirm that you certainly can be made to do rugby even if you hate it/contact sports.

blueliner · 06/10/2025 15:15

Ban horse riding while you at it and ballet. Eating disorders are much more prevalent among ballet dancers can lead to premature death and a life time of misery. And the feet, neck and hip injuries. Ban ballet?

BeMellowAquaSquid · 06/10/2025 15:16

Need to ban tiddly winks too - finger strain and all that

Rustymoo · 06/10/2025 15:16

JamieCannister · 06/10/2025 13:44

Anything they want, because ours are very cautious - if anything it would be good if they took more risks.

Sorry this seems contradictory or perhaps I’m missing something. One the hand you don’t want them playing rugby etc but you say they can do anything they want and you say it would be good if they take risks! It doesn’t make sense

OneFootAfterTheOther · 06/10/2025 15:18

To quote the nurses at my DCs school “”I hate rugby season”. Thankfully once they get a certain age they can opt out.

I’ve had one DC concussed and one off school for 4weeks with a foot injury. The school they go it is academically selective - why rugby (and heading football) is deemed a suitable compulsory activity I have no idea.

Bonjamin · 06/10/2025 15:25

Anything they want, because ours are very cautious - if anything it would be good if they took more risks.

You don't say. Hmm

spoonbillstretford · 06/10/2025 15:25

HoppingPavlova · 06/10/2025 09:30

Dead right OP. Instead you should make them sit on a couch watching tv, or playing on a PlayStation or computer. Or, if you believe these are bad for them, then just make them sit and stare at the wall.

It’s all about risk. There’s virtually nothing in life risk free, trust me, I’ve seen pretty much enough to confidently say that. I believe they have modified rules in the junior sport to alleviate most of this risk. However, they could be running along, trip over their own feet, fall down with a direct head injury in the wrong place and die, seen a few of these over the decades. So, maybe they could just walk while they play and same for all other sports and people who jog/run🤣. Also, do t walk on pavements, I’ve had a few of these hit and killed by drivers who took their eyes off road/lost control. And a million other things.

But it doesn't have to be one extreme or another. Team sports can be modified to lower risk. In professional men's rugby a lot of the players towards the front in particular are much larger than is healthy for anyone. However fit they are it's huge strain on the heart to be tall and heavy. People don't have to play sport at all to be healthy, being active is the key.

1dayatatime · 06/10/2025 15:25

blueliner · 06/10/2025 15:10

Why girls?

Surely girls are far less likely to get serious head injuries that boys and men.

Actually there was an amusing incident in one of my daughter's rugby games where a girl was straightening her ponytail after a tackle. The referee saw her with hands to the head and immediately sent her off for a head injury impact assessment despite her protesting it was only her ponytail.

Meanwhile her team mates were pissing themselves laughing.

Swipe left for the next trending thread