I haven't suggested he was the first to expose it. I don't think anyone can actually claim this as there have been hundreds of people going back 20 years (including victims,) who reported these crimes to the authorities. We now know this fell on deaf ears and was actively covered up so as not to stir up 'racial tensions.'
Councillors, police, MPs and the media all had knowledge of this. I'd also point out having the power to expose something, because your voice counts, doesn't mean you were the first person talking about it!
'The grooming gangs were first exposed by Ann Cryer MP in 2002.' Odd that considering the despicable BBC was reporting on it in 2001! Except it was coming from a victim blaming angle. Of course they have since changed their tune and stopped calling these victims 'prostitutes.'
BBC News | UK | Child prostitution crisis
What a difference a decade or two makes.... and public opinion.
Child sexual exploitation: How the system failed - BBC News
From reading your comment I can see you've never bothered to watch any of the old or new TR interviews, which I always find strange for people who think they know so much about him, or causally write him off as nothing but a racist.
Whatever he is or isn't it doesn't change the fact he grew up seeing the grooming (his cousin was raped at 13) and has been speaking about it ever since. I go back to the point regarding having a voice that doesn't matter.
Only when the voices could not be ignored because he had joined a racist party that was making a lot of noise (BNP) they were given any type of media attention, the purpose of which was to highlight the racism within the party, but accidently touched on grooming gangs too. TR has openly admitted about his regret being in the BNP as an impressionable young man, he has said Nick Griffin is a 'racist wrong un' and realised his views didn't align. Strange bedfellows and all that.
Just have a look at the gaslighting and condescension in the Paxman interview in 2011 when he was finally given a platform.
Doesn't that just about sum up the BBC? A brief article on this very topic in 2001.
10 years later inviting TR on to speak, knowing he isn't eloquent and had undesirable history so they could easily ridicule him and present him as a liar.
Except he wasn't wrong was he!