Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Labour are lifting the 2 child benefit cap

1000 replies

PuppyKeep · 30/09/2025 18:43

AIBU that this is a terrible decision?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
Pumpkinallspice · 30/09/2025 19:26

FoxRedPuppy · 30/09/2025 19:18

There is loads of research that doing this would immediately lift 100s of thousands of children out of poverty. Who wouldn’t want to do that?

I think it’s a great move. The biggest problem is rich people and corporations not paying enough tax.

Only statistically. If you have 3 kids and don't work or work 2 days a week in Tesco. Getting some extra money might mean you get more food and probably go a bit more overboard at Christmas, but it's unlikely to mean the children suddenly become well educated, aspirational and later on, contributing members of society.

These sort of people need support for relationships, budgeting, cooking, healthy eating, how to educate, stay off computer games and stop children becoming overweight. All the problems attached to poverty. I would far rather the money was spent addressing the family, parenting and health and education problems associated with poor families, rather than chucking a bit of extra money their way.

Also any money going in should be in voucher form so it can only be spent on healthy foods, uniforms, shoes etc.

ShanghaiDiva · 30/09/2025 19:26

Upstartled · 30/09/2025 19:21

Right, well Reeves had to borrow an additional and unexpected £11 billion in August to pay the bills but - yeah let's add some more to the party, see if we can race France to the IMF?

Edited

Exactly. Financial year to date borrowing is 83.6 billion which is 16 billion more than the same period last year.

TiredofLDN · 30/09/2025 19:27

BluntPlumHam · 30/09/2025 19:23

I honestly don’t know how I feel about this. I don’t want children in poverty but I agree with you this is going to incentivise certain cohorts to keep having more children because they know they can rely on state benefits. Benefits which will increase our taxes.

If anyone is incentivized to have more children for an extra £102 a month with housing, energy and consumables costs as they are, I’d LOVE to see it. I spend more than that a week on wraparound care.

Point me to one study that proves CB incentivizes pregnancy? And more pertinently one that proves it incentivizes pregnancy in this economy?

BluntPlumHam · 30/09/2025 19:27

Toodleleetoodleeo · 30/09/2025 19:23

I'm torn

On one hand, no child should live in poverty

But at the same time, 2 children is enough. If people want more than that then I do believe they should pay for the child themselves

My auntie had 5 children whilst on benefits. I suspect she wouldn't of had 5 if she didn't have benefits to rely on

I know two other women who have had 7 and 10 children each. I also believe they would not of had so many if they didn't have benefits to rely on

I agree with you. I have seen so many do this and it causes a benefits cycle.

MidnightPatrol · 30/09/2025 19:27

clipboardz · 30/09/2025 19:13

Child benefit is pretty much a universal benefit apart from the mega-rich.

The mega rich?! 😆😆

Yes any household with one earner on £60k+ are now ‘mega rich’.

Thats why they get away with some of these policies eg freezing of the 40% tax bracket - people believe these are the rich…

WhathappenedYesterday · 30/09/2025 19:27

PropertyD · 30/09/2025 19:25

Why are people having children they cannot afford bar the tax payer paying for them.

We made a decision to have two. Why is three plus an option for people who cannot afford it?

I’m a lot of cases yes this will be people having a lot of dc, some (like us) have a lot of children because we took on the dc of a friend who passed away , so this will really help us a lot.

OnePlumQuail · 30/09/2025 19:28

FoxRedPuppy · 30/09/2025 19:18

There is loads of research that doing this would immediately lift 100s of thousands of children out of poverty. Who wouldn’t want to do that?

I think it’s a great move. The biggest problem is rich people and corporations not paying enough tax.

immediately lift 100s of thousands of children out of poverty.

Not necessarily. There’s no guarantee that all parents will use the money in ways that directly benefit their kids.

CorneliaCupp · 30/09/2025 19:28

Brilliant idea, well done Labour!

MalinandGo · 30/09/2025 19:28

Horserider5678 · 30/09/2025 19:25

Vote Reform then and they will remove all your benefits!

Their policy is to lift the cap too.

Reform promise all sorts and some of it makes no sense when put together: luckily for them most people either don’t actually know their policies or are happy to hear only the bits they like.

Flopsy145 · 30/09/2025 19:28

If you need to rely on benefits to look after your multiple children maybe you shouldn't be having multiple children. It's a terrible decision, hopefully it will be revoked by the next party

Isthismykarma · 30/09/2025 19:28

I’m all for it.

As a side note, what happens if a first pregnancy is triplets? Are you only paid for two? My mind just wandered to it haha

Orangemintcream · 30/09/2025 19:28

Where will the money be coming from ? We certainly don’t seem to have any spare at the moment.

Horserider5678 · 30/09/2025 19:28

TiredofLDN · 30/09/2025 19:24

Rape
Change in circumstances after a child is born
Relationship Breakdown
Accidental pregnancy

And the good old tax payer picks up the tab! Firstly absentee fathers should be made to support their children, take the money at source! Secondly too many pregnancies are not accidental, people know they’ll get handouts from the government! It’s time to stop benefits being acceptable! When I left school it was embarrassing if you had to claim benefits and you did your hardest to find work!

WFHforevermore · 30/09/2025 19:28

Athreedoorwardrobe · 30/09/2025 18:46

The cap was always horrific. As someone who has fallen pregnant twice whilst on contraception absolutely no one should feel pressured to abortion because they'll be unable to feed the child. In this modern era in a wealthy western country, it's disgusting.
And the cap just entrenches poverty. As higher birthrate are linked to poverty. It makes the issues worse. Because those kids don't even stand a chance.

If you are reliant on CB to "feed" your kids, you shouldnt be having any, let alone more.

Gingernessy · 30/09/2025 19:28

clipboardz · 30/09/2025 19:16

They are supposed to be the party for working people, not the party of benefits.

🤦🏻‍♀️ you realise many working people get benefits?

Working people who don't work full time but should usually

PuppyKeep · 30/09/2025 19:29

TiredofLDN · 30/09/2025 19:24

Rape
Change in circumstances after a child is born
Relationship Breakdown
Accidental pregnancy

Rape is already an exception to the cap

OP posts:
clipboardz · 30/09/2025 19:29

Lifting people out of poverty doesn’t mean they’ll spend the money on giving their kids better lives.

Equally, it doesn't mean they won't.

TomatoSandwiches · 30/09/2025 19:29

mysoulmio · 30/09/2025 19:18

Great, another 3 kids I can claim for but not get any payment for because I work and so does my husband.

Do you not realise there are more people WORKING that claim UC than people who aren't.

cordeliabuffy · 30/09/2025 19:29

Athreedoorwardrobe · 30/09/2025 19:00

There's a difference between choosing to not have another one because you've talked it thru and don't think your finances can stretch to giving all your kids the lifestyle you think they should have if you have more... extra curriculars, days out, uni costs...
And being forced to abort a child you really don't want to because you literally wouldn't be able to basically feed and clothe it.
Surely you can see that?
I don't qualify fir any benefits. I have 3 kids and if I were wealthy I'd have another. But I'm not wealthy so I've taken permanent measures to avoid pregnancy now. This is not the same at all as some women living in poverty go through.
My argument stands that having or not having children should be as much a personal choice as possible rather than something forced on people.
I made the choice not to have more because I wouldn't be able to give them the type of childhood I'd want to financially.. I was never forced to abort a child purely for financial reasons because I absolutely would not be able to meet their basic needs.
I mean even if by some miracle I fell pregnant now despite my husband having had a vasectomy and me having the implant and being nearly 40... I'd still have the option to keep the baby if I made that choice because I absolutely would have the money to at least feed and clothe them as we both have decent jobs and own a home.
It's just not the same scenario that women on benefits are in at all.

It’s shit but it kind of is what it is
I have had to terminate as I can’t afford a child and my contraception failed. Yes I didn’t want to but there was no other option. Same as if I got pregnant now

PistachioTiramisu · 30/09/2025 19:29

No - if you can't afford to have a child, don't have one. Why should the state pay for your kids?

Wiltingasparagusfern · 30/09/2025 19:29

Good. No civilised country punishes children in babies in this way, and as a policy it’s been roundly condemned for the barbaric policy it is.

Our declining birth rate is going to fuck the economy, and this was a further deterrent. All the people who are anti-immigration and pro keeping the cap never seem to have any ideas about how exactly we are going to solve our birth rate crisis. They don’t want brown babies and they don’t want poor babies, they only want a certain kind of baby being born.

TiredofLDN · 30/09/2025 19:30

PuppyKeep · 30/09/2025 19:29

Rape is already an exception to the cap

If you can bring yourself or are in a position to tell the authorities that’s what it was.

PraisebetoGod · 30/09/2025 19:30

TiredofLDN · 30/09/2025 19:21

The 2 child cap does nothing except perpetuate entrenched cycles of poverty, and punish kids for their parents’ decisions. Research was released this week that showed socioeconomic disadvantage literally changes the structure of children’s brains. I don’t want that for any child, and would pay significantly more tax than I do now (and I pay a decent amount- squeezed middle and all that) to fund CB for all children if it helps break cycles of poverty, and give kids better life chances (which numerous studies have proven CB does do).

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/sep/30/study-links-greater-inequality-to-structural-changes-in-childrens-brains#:~:text=The%20research%20found%20that%20children,multiple%20regions%20of%20the%20brain.)

Do you think these parents will use the extra money on their children though? Or will these children still be in poverty but their parents have more money to smoke/vape etc etc?

Livelovebehappy · 30/09/2025 19:30

TiredofLDN · 30/09/2025 19:27

If anyone is incentivized to have more children for an extra £102 a month with housing, energy and consumables costs as they are, I’d LOVE to see it. I spend more than that a week on wraparound care.

Point me to one study that proves CB incentivizes pregnancy? And more pertinently one that proves it incentivizes pregnancy in this economy?

It’s not even £102 a month. Only for the first. After that it’s £17 per week.

MalinandGo · 30/09/2025 19:30

Hopefully they will buy them all a flat screen TV each.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread