Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Starmer calling Refom and its supporters ‘racist’ is politically suicidal?

402 replies

SpottyAardvark · 28/09/2025 20:08

Starmer has called Reform’s policy of ending indefinite right to remain for non-EU immigrants ‘immoral’ & ‘racist’. Reform supporters, and people who are considering voting for Reform because of their concerns about immigration, will inevitably think the Prime Minister is calling them immoral racists, too. And that will infuriate millions of voters.

I understand that it’s Labour’s conference this week and because he is under a lot of political pressure from his own side, Starmer believes he has to throw some red meat to his party. That’s politics. But Starmer has obviously forgotten what happened to Hillary Clinton when she described Trump voters as ‘deplorable’. That didn’t work out well for her, did it?

YABU = Starmer is right. Reform and its supporters are racists and he should call it out.

YANBU = Starmer has just committed political suicide by falling into Farage’s trap and he has alienated working class voters.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
willstarttomorrow · 28/09/2025 22:14

Every radio phone in and now on this thread is clogged up with people wrongly stating that asylum seekers are not legally here because they passed through 'safe countries' to get here. If you are going to comment at least get your facts straight. There is also ate very good and well documented reasons the most able members of the family (often young men) make the journey-paying thousands of pounds. The UK take a tiny percentage of asylum seekers throughout Europe. We are not 'full' and the actual cost is miniscule compared to the other issues facing us. The propaganda fed by the right wing press is depressing but the fact that so many hard of thinking people accept it at face value when the actual facts are very easy to find is even worse. So KS is absolutely right to call out this bullshit and it should have happened long before now.

Mistyglade · 28/09/2025 22:14

It’s about f’n time he started telling the truth and stating facts. YABU.

EasternStandard · 28/09/2025 22:14

Zebedee999 · 28/09/2025 21:57

Gordon Brown started all this nonsence in 2010 by calling a poor old dear a bigot for saying she didn't like how her town was changing for the worse. Then Thornberry in 2014 mocked a white van man for having a St George's Flag. Now Starmer calls his opposition racist.

Labour need to appeal to voters not call them childish names (much as you are too). Grow up.

Both those politicians felt it politically.

FrippEnos · 28/09/2025 22:16

@ExtraOnions

When did it become wrong to point out when people were being Racist?

When people don't seem to understand what the term racist actually means.

What’s wrong with pointing out that, accusing all immigrants of being sex offenders is Racist ?

Its not, but then neither is calling those that are sex offenders racist.

What’s wrong with telling these “patriots” that you can be worried about immigrating without dehumanising individuals?

Nothing. As long as you can worried about immigration without being called a racist.

When did being Anti-Facist become a bad thing?

When a huge swathe of them stopped any form of discussion, and as bad as those that they hate.

When did “British people have had enough” become an excuse for violence?

Has it? the last/continuing way that these people are complaining is by hanging flags.

I would sooner Racists just said “yes, I’m racist, I don’t like Black & Brown people (unless they are playing football, serving me in a takeaway, or winning sporting medals), and I don’t think any should live here”.

I have no doubt that if they could without losing their livelihoods they probably would, but I doubt that you would be OK with that.

The never mention White immigration….

You seem to have forgotten the huge amount of complaints about eastern European immigrants.

I remember the NF in the 1970s.. and it morph into the BNP .. and now Reform. Same shit, different name.

Yup, just a rebrand.

janehopper · 28/09/2025 22:16

You can only be upset about people making judgements about reform voters if you're intending to be one already. No pushing towards anything required.

Abhannmor · 28/09/2025 22:17

Not really. He is correct that the policy of ending ILR is racist. A lot of people who claim to be Reform voters will revert to the Tories in four years. Some will vote Labour and some can't be arsed. Labour is leaking votes to the Greens , to Libdems, possibly to Corbyn and mostly to apathy.

It can't hurt Starmer to actually believe in something. Not that it matters if he can't improve housing health and education. That's what counts. If he can effect some improvement he will win . The end.

Labraradabrador · 28/09/2025 22:17

TY78910 · 28/09/2025 21:55

The trouble with this policy is that we already know means testing doesn’t work for the existing benefit programs. It’s either too harsh or too lenient because it’s easier and cheaper to have a one size fits all than assessing thoroughly individual circumstances.

So what happens in the scenarios where you have someone who pays in and works their way for 20+ years and then get terminally ill meaning they need to now be cared for by the state? Will reform say - you no longer meet the criteria so go back to your home country to die there?

How dramatic.

there is always the option of applying for citizenship for anyone with 1 year of ILR. Currently people don’t bother because it is a bit of a faff and also sometimes sentimentality, especially when their origin nation doesn’t allow dual citizenship. If it really mattered, more would seek citizenship. I speak as someone with ILR - I could apply for citizenship anytime, but it has never been worth the effort.

Lonelycrab · 28/09/2025 22:19

Livelovebehappy · 28/09/2025 22:09

Well they already are by some people aren’t they? It’s not like those against Reform aren’t speaking out. As far as I can see, people are very clearly calling them out if they feel a certain way about them.

That works both ways though.

We have reams upon reams of posts on mm now attacking KS (and with this thread as an example, for something he never actually said!) and yet any criticism the other way isn’t allowed?

One way freedom of speech, that kind of thing…

Labraradabrador · 28/09/2025 22:20

Abhannmor · 28/09/2025 22:17

Not really. He is correct that the policy of ending ILR is racist. A lot of people who claim to be Reform voters will revert to the Tories in four years. Some will vote Labour and some can't be arsed. Labour is leaking votes to the Greens , to Libdems, possibly to Corbyn and mostly to apathy.

It can't hurt Starmer to actually believe in something. Not that it matters if he can't improve housing health and education. That's what counts. If he can effect some improvement he will win . The end.

a lot of people claiming they will vote reform come from those who voted Labour in 2024

PreciousTatas · 28/09/2025 22:21

The true danger comes when society is so desensitised to being called racist that people just start turning round and saying 'Whatever, sure, I guess I am then'.

If people have been called racist for having legitimate concerns enough times (I'm an immigrant, and even I have concerns about the recent quality of legal migration) then that is what will happen. Self fulfilling prophecy.

And the white middle class wretches that enjoyed hammering away on their keyboards will suddenly keep their heads down while we pay the real life price for their dopamine rush crusade.

The same as people suddenly did en masse when they were called 'transphobic' for every stupidly imagined transgression.

We are so close to it, perhaps we are already there.

Livelovebehappy · 28/09/2025 22:22

willstarttomorrow · 28/09/2025 22:14

Every radio phone in and now on this thread is clogged up with people wrongly stating that asylum seekers are not legally here because they passed through 'safe countries' to get here. If you are going to comment at least get your facts straight. There is also ate very good and well documented reasons the most able members of the family (often young men) make the journey-paying thousands of pounds. The UK take a tiny percentage of asylum seekers throughout Europe. We are not 'full' and the actual cost is miniscule compared to the other issues facing us. The propaganda fed by the right wing press is depressing but the fact that so many hard of thinking people accept it at face value when the actual facts are very easy to find is even worse. So KS is absolutely right to call out this bullshit and it should have happened long before now.

Ah, very good and well documented reasons given by the men who come here, conveniently losing documents proving where they originate from, and lie about which country they’re escaping from. You mean those men? So of course we should believe their ‘well documented’ reasons…..Are you trying to have us believe that the men come here alone so that their families can safely wait for them in the countries they’ve escaped from? You know, those countries where their lives are in danger, but they think their families lives aren’t? Just think about it….

Labraradabrador · 28/09/2025 22:22

SeaAndStars · 28/09/2025 22:07

Reform would most likely bring back hunting. Farage is a huge fan.
Nothing would persuade me to vote for a party that supports blood sports.

Really? What a niche voting interest.

SeaAndStars · 28/09/2025 22:23

Labraradabrador · 28/09/2025 22:22

Really? What a niche voting interest.

Not really, not if animal welfare is important to you.

YorkshireGoldDrinker · 28/09/2025 22:23

CheeseyOnionPie · 28/09/2025 21:43

Speak for yourself. I still consider the word “racist” to mean being prejudiced against or antagonistic towards people on the basis of their racial or ethnic group.

I’m glad Starmer has called a spade a spade.

And you can keep doing that. It doesn't mean anything to those you use it on, if you do indeed use it. It has no power.

Underthinker · 28/09/2025 22:24

JustSawJohnny · 28/09/2025 22:11

Racist AND pig headed.

Nice.

It's just not how you persuade anyone of anything.

Labraradabrador · 28/09/2025 22:24

SeaAndStars · 28/09/2025 22:23

Not really, not if animal welfare is important to you.

Not really a top 10 issue for most of the electorate though. Thus, niche.

Livelovebehappy · 28/09/2025 22:25

Lonelycrab · 28/09/2025 22:19

That works both ways though.

We have reams upon reams of posts on mm now attacking KS (and with this thread as an example, for something he never actually said!) and yet any criticism the other way isn’t allowed?

One way freedom of speech, that kind of thing…

But tbh, there have been a lot of mis informed comments on Farage’s recent speech on MN, taking what he said out of context and, even worse, scaremongering amongst people with worries about what his statement actually means. There’s a lot of it going on on both sides.

SeaAndStars · 28/09/2025 22:26

Labraradabrador · 28/09/2025 22:24

Not really a top 10 issue for most of the electorate though. Thus, niche.

Over half of the population have a pet.
Millions of people are members/supporters of animal charities.

Many people won't be happy if Farage tries to bring back fox and deer hunting with dogs.

Labraradabrador · 28/09/2025 22:27

SeaAndStars · 28/09/2025 22:26

Over half of the population have a pet.
Millions of people are members/supporters of animal charities.

Many people won't be happy if Farage tries to bring back fox and deer hunting with dogs.

I have a pet, still okay with hunting.

SeaAndStars · 28/09/2025 22:27

This is the first time I've ever seen people trying to water down the word racist.

SeaAndStars · 28/09/2025 22:29

Labraradabrador · 28/09/2025 22:27

I have a pet, still okay with hunting.

That makes you one of the 10% of the UK population who are ok with hunting.
We're both niche.

Livelovebehappy · 28/09/2025 22:30

SeaAndStars · 28/09/2025 22:27

This is the first time I've ever seen people trying to water down the word racist.

That’s what happens when the word is thrown about in answer to everything and anything. It starts to mean nothing. It loses its meaning. It’s effect is diluted. It’s used just to close down debate and discussion. And here we are….

TY78910 · 28/09/2025 22:31

Labraradabrador · 28/09/2025 22:17

How dramatic.

there is always the option of applying for citizenship for anyone with 1 year of ILR. Currently people don’t bother because it is a bit of a faff and also sometimes sentimentality, especially when their origin nation doesn’t allow dual citizenship. If it really mattered, more would seek citizenship. I speak as someone with ILR - I could apply for citizenship anytime, but it has never been worth the effort.

I also hold an ILR and eligible for citizenship. For me it’s always been the upfront cost and the faff. There are better ways to spend 2k than a citizenship. I also don’t feel I need to be seen as ‘British’ on a piece of paper (because I am not British) for someone to see my worth for what it is.

SeaAndStars · 28/09/2025 22:32

Hunt supporter

To think Starmer calling Refom and its supporters ‘racist’ is politically suicidal?
Swipe left for the next trending thread