Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Migrants get up to £2000 on bankcard after prison sentences

617 replies

Ihatetomatoes · 24/09/2025 22:14

Just watched 47 migrants being deported, costing hundreds of thousands, private flights, huge number of security guards, the migrants then get given cash cards! Back to Romania after committing crimes here including murder, sexual offences, pedophiles with money to help them resettle in their own country.

ITV news - our own go hungry and cold.

We are total mugs here in the UK.

On a separate story migrants having taxis to appointments, free NHS. I mean we have to get to our own way.

Mugs. No wonder many people are unhappy. These are convicted criminals, being pandered to.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
ninjahamster · 24/09/2025 22:58

I watched the report. Hence knowing it costs £52k a year to keep them in prison. I think that it is a price worth paying to remove criminals and to save court costs for deportation.

mirrorsandlights · 24/09/2025 22:58

Ihatetomatoes · 24/09/2025 22:55

You obviously didn't see the report since these 47 were convicted criminals including murderers, pedophiles, sexual offences and other serious crimes. None of that type of crime is trivia.

Yes, and they have been deported, which is what everyone wants. You are only complaining about the £2,000 payment to persuade them to go. What do you want, the government to spend more money to keep them here in society committing further crime?I think your outrage is faux and misplaced.

Anyahyacinth · 24/09/2025 22:59

Ihatetomatoes · 24/09/2025 22:53

That's great. Different people.

The ones being deported were convicted criminals NOT workers or carers that have done nothing wrong.

Its pretty obvious that few commenting actually watched the news report. It wasn't people employed in hospitals being deported, it was criminals at the end of prison sentences!

Approximately 33% of the UK male working age population has a criminal conviction - that’s 12 million people living here you need to worry about

Londonmummy66 · 24/09/2025 22:59

PleaseHelpIAmGoingToLoseIt · 24/09/2025 22:23

It doesn’t work when kicking people out of prison with no money, so how would this work?

We kick Brits out with the princely sum of £90 plus a travel warrant home - so why pay deportees more than that plus their trip home?

Costcogroupie · 24/09/2025 23:00

Ihatetomatoes · 24/09/2025 22:19

Crazy. Just deport with no money.

Because the f'ers all appeal deportation and it costs a fortune to fight each appeal and house them during the appeal process.

£2k is a bargain. Look at it another way, the govt is saving hundreds of thousands if not millions by bribing them to go quickly and quietly.

Ihatetomatoes · 24/09/2025 23:00

UneFoisAuChalet · 24/09/2025 22:56

Again another thread about immigration based on clickbait.
if you’re so interested in immigration why don’t you read the UK guidance. None of this is new, none of this is shocking, none of this is unique to the UK. Boats have been coming here for over 20 years. We take in the least amount of people - either to process or grant status.
You are only hearing about it because there’s an agenda. And the end goal is not to line the pockets of British citizens.
They are firmly going to put the blame on ‘immigrants’ when they privatise the NHS, cut your benefits, raise your taxes blah blah blah. Anyone else still waiting for the XZY billions we meant to be getting because of Brexit?
And it’s so easy, can’t believe they couldn’t find a Farage back in the early naughties. Think of how rich this country would be, everyone would be working, NHS would be thriving, housing would be plentiful. And best of all, no immigrants. Thank fuck Reform is here to sort it all out.

Another who didn't watch the programme. It wasn't about boats or people arriving on them!

It was about the costs involved in deportations of convicted criminals at the end of their sentences 🙄 and giving them extra cash to help them.out.

OP posts:
ninjahamster · 24/09/2025 23:01

Londonmummy66 · 24/09/2025 22:59

We kick Brits out with the princely sum of £90 plus a travel warrant home - so why pay deportees more than that plus their trip home?

Plus the costs of probation services, housing, benefits until they find work…

PGmicstand · 24/09/2025 23:02

Ihatetomatoes · 24/09/2025 22:27

Yes, then people wonder why Reform attract voters. The 2 main parties to date have been useless. These are all criminals. Romania is their country. They aren't our problem.

What we need to spend the money on is our citizens, our homeless our poor, our children's education, the NHS.

We SHOULD spend money on our people, but the fact is that those at the top are creaming off profits left, right and centre. Everything that can be done to line the pockets of the rich has been and is being done.
Landlords set extortionate rates.
Almost everything has been privatised for profit
Essential services have had staff cuts to allow for profit from the people who actually own it all.

The problem isn't migrants, although I'll concede that criminals who have come here from elsewhere do not help the situation.

keeptalkinghappytalk · 24/09/2025 23:03

NoSoupForU · 24/09/2025 22:31

This is the voluntary scheme, yes? They're incentivised to return home because it is far less complex, and subsequently far less expensive, for us to process.

They aren't illegal immigrants or asylum seekers. They are people who lived here with the right to remain.

The taxi costs for asylum seekers is due to health care provision not moving with the individual when they move them across the country and isn't the norm. Or do you think we should be expecting an asylum seeker to make their own way on a 250 mile trip to see a doctor, paying from their £9 a week?

er ... trains ?

Londonmummy66 · 24/09/2025 23:04

BrisPerm · 24/09/2025 22:42

You know what else is disgusting? Putting illegals up in hotels whilst British homeless sleep on the streets.

if they could come up with a solution to housing illegals, why couldn’t they come up with the same solution to getting British homeless off the streets? Why were hotels not used for them?

British veterans on the street - surely people who have put their lives on the line for their country deserve better treatment than people who have illegally come here in small boats, disposed of their documents so they can claim to come from Afghanistan/Syria etc whether or not that is true and now expect us to house them etc

Allthatshines1992 · 24/09/2025 23:04

StrawberryJangle · 24/09/2025 22:19

It's been repeatedly reported today that deportation and 2K is far cheaper than keeping them here.

What if they burn their papers and won't tell anyone where they're from? Where can they be deported to?

IstillloveKingThistle · 24/09/2025 23:04

Neodymium · 24/09/2025 22:32

2000 to not fight deportation sounds like a good deal for the gov to me. I imagine the costs involved with forcing someone to be deported would be way higher.

So why give them British tax payers money to wish them well on their merry way. Utter nonsense.

We don’t go to other countries and get free handouts. This country is absurd.

We are buying a property abroad . We have to prove earnings , our income, have an NI number and a bank account in that country. We also pay our own healthcare insurance and have to prove that.

This here, this country, it’s a joke.

It is indeed a laughing stock.

Ihatetomatoes · 24/09/2025 23:04

Costcogroupie · 24/09/2025 23:00

Because the f'ers all appeal deportation and it costs a fortune to fight each appeal and house them during the appeal process.

£2k is a bargain. Look at it another way, the govt is saving hundreds of thousands if not millions by bribing them to go quickly and quietly.

Nope, they didn't use bribes. They didn't want to go so were forcibly deported, that's not voluntary, it's against their wishes, being escorted by up to 7 security guards at the end of their prison sentences. The cash wasn't a bribe for volunteering to go. Just a little bonus.

OP posts:
IstillloveKingThistle · 24/09/2025 23:05

Allthatshines1992 · 24/09/2025 23:04

What if they burn their papers and won't tell anyone where they're from? Where can they be deported to?

That old chestnut..

That’s been going on for years.

Ihatetomatoes · 24/09/2025 23:05

IstillloveKingThistle · 24/09/2025 23:04

So why give them British tax payers money to wish them well on their merry way. Utter nonsense.

We don’t go to other countries and get free handouts. This country is absurd.

We are buying a property abroad . We have to prove earnings , our income, have an NI number and a bank account in that country. We also pay our own healthcare insurance and have to prove that.

This here, this country, it’s a joke.

It is indeed a laughing stock.

Exactly my point, which many have missed. These didn't volunteer to go, they were forced and still given money. They were all convicted criminals.

OP posts:
Mlddleoftheroad · 24/09/2025 23:06

Any chance to some kind of evidence for the claims?
Perhaps when these policies were introduced, how often this has happened, how much money spent in total?

Something to back your op.

Anyahyacinth · 24/09/2025 23:07

Ihatetomatoes · 24/09/2025 22:55

You obviously didn't see the report since these 47 were convicted criminals including murderers, pedophiles, sexual offences and other serious crimes. None of that type of crime is trivia.

As I said you’ve fallen for a “look over here” 12 million men with criminal convictions ALL around you…you’re being played to stress about 47 …for what agenda…??? You have not to be led but to think who benefits from this “look over here” nonsense…if you genuinely cared you’d want these offenders to be monitored but you don’t you are arguing for them to be removed….what to be free to commit more offences?

Ihatetomatoes · 24/09/2025 23:08

keeptalkinghappytalk · 24/09/2025 23:03

er ... trains ?

They see a doctor closer to their hotel. They don't get transport 400 miles away.

OP posts:
Ihatetomatoes · 24/09/2025 23:09

Anyahyacinth · 24/09/2025 23:07

As I said you’ve fallen for a “look over here” 12 million men with criminal convictions ALL around you…you’re being played to stress about 47 …for what agenda…??? You have not to be led but to think who benefits from this “look over here” nonsense…if you genuinely cared you’d want these offenders to be monitored but you don’t you are arguing for them to be removed….what to be free to commit more offences?

They aren't the problem of the UK, they are Romanias problems.

OP posts:
Anyahyacinth · 24/09/2025 23:09

PGmicstand · 24/09/2025 23:02

We SHOULD spend money on our people, but the fact is that those at the top are creaming off profits left, right and centre. Everything that can be done to line the pockets of the rich has been and is being done.
Landlords set extortionate rates.
Almost everything has been privatised for profit
Essential services have had staff cuts to allow for profit from the people who actually own it all.

The problem isn't migrants, although I'll concede that criminals who have come here from elsewhere do not help the situation.

We go to poorer countries to recruit NHS and care staff…we are asking people to come here 🤦‍♀️

rockstarshoes · 24/09/2025 23:09

I did watch it! They didn’t all get cards, just the ones who had agreed to go early!

They may be criminals but they had all come here legally, some had lived here for 10 years or more! Legally!

Anyahyacinth · 24/09/2025 23:10

Ihatetomatoes · 24/09/2025 23:09

They aren't the problem of the UK, they are Romanias problems.

Right so why post about it?

Clavinova · 24/09/2025 23:10

NoSoupForU · 24/09/2025 22:31

This is the voluntary scheme, yes? They're incentivised to return home because it is far less complex, and subsequently far less expensive, for us to process.

They aren't illegal immigrants or asylum seekers. They are people who lived here with the right to remain.

The taxi costs for asylum seekers is due to health care provision not moving with the individual when they move them across the country and isn't the norm. Or do you think we should be expecting an asylum seeker to make their own way on a 250 mile trip to see a doctor, paying from their £9 a week?

The taxi costs for asylum seekers is due to health care provision not moving with the individual when they move them across the country and isn't the norm

'According to The Sun, Home Office contractor Clearsprings Ready Homes spent nearly £350,000-a-month for 6,000 journeys at one firm.'

ninjahamster · 24/09/2025 23:10

Londonmummy66 · 24/09/2025 23:04

British veterans on the street - surely people who have put their lives on the line for their country deserve better treatment than people who have illegally come here in small boats, disposed of their documents so they can claim to come from Afghanistan/Syria etc whether or not that is true and now expect us to house them etc

That’s a whole different issue. I’ve worked with the homeless. There are temporary spaces available for those who are homeless but they are generally in hostels with difficult people. Veterans on the street often have severe MH issues and addictions that make holding down accommodation difficult. I really don’t think this should be an either/or situation. We can help both. We need yo stop all the division.
But back on topic, unfortunately there will always be SOME immigrants who commit crime. Removal to their home country seems a lot more cost effective than remaining in the uk, paying for accommodation, benefits etc.

Ihatetomatoes · 24/09/2025 23:10

Mlddleoftheroad · 24/09/2025 23:06

Any chance to some kind of evidence for the claims?
Perhaps when these policies were introduced, how often this has happened, how much money spent in total?

Something to back your op.

Watch the ITV programme

OP posts: