Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask whether anyone here has ever been investigated by DWP for “living with a partner”?

262 replies

Labradorlover987 · 22/09/2025 13:11

My friend has just been asked to attend a compliance interview at the job centre - she claims universal credit as a single mother to 2 kids, and single person council tax discount she has a boyfriend but they don’t live together full time - he lives with his father - he obviously stays over 3/4 nights a week.

Just wondered what the process was etc

OP posts:
herbalteabag · 22/09/2025 17:43

I had a letter many years ago when I was receiving tax credits saying they suspected someone was living with me. I was very surprised as I wasn't in a relationship at all and no one even came round. I later realised that my ex had used my address for a mobile phone contract. Nothing happened and I didn't hear anything else, but it was easy to prove as he lived permanently out of the country.

NuovaPilbeam · 22/09/2025 17:44

If you genuinely live separately its not an issue, and its not hard to prove either. Your partner will have bills, mortgage or rent contract somewhere else, debit card statements showing shopping deliveries to their own house, pets with that address registered with the vet, electoral records.

Where people get suss is when you have a 40 year old bloke saying he doesn't live with his UC claiming girlfriend, he lives with his mum/mate tom/sister, but he:

  • sleeps most nights with the gf
  • doesn't pay rent, mortgage or bills anywhere else
  • has "her" address on his tesco/amazon/deliveroo account

It doesn't add up.

JenniferBooth · 22/09/2025 17:46

Coconutter24 · 22/09/2025 17:41

I understand that but you didn’t report him so you can’t really complain about him receiving financial help

FFS im merely pointing out that the rules for single parents mostly women seem to be different than for men like my neighbour The misogyny is baked in.

ChicJoker · 22/09/2025 17:47

Didn’t even know this was illegal. Presumably she pays all the bills?

Labradorlover987 · 22/09/2025 17:49

ChicJoker · 22/09/2025 17:47

Didn’t even know this was illegal. Presumably she pays all the bills?

Yeah I think she does tbh - I know she gets her rent paid by UC and then gets the single person element of UC & council tax reduction

OP posts:
Coconutter24 · 22/09/2025 17:52

JenniferBooth · 22/09/2025 17:46

FFS im merely pointing out that the rules for single parents mostly women seem to be different than for men like my neighbour The misogyny is baked in.

They’re not different though, the same rules apply! I certainly haven’t said what he’s doing is ok

Burningbud1981 · 22/09/2025 18:00

Labradorlover987 · 22/09/2025 17:49

Yeah I think she does tbh - I know she gets her rent paid by UC and then gets the single person element of UC & council tax reduction

First of all is the compliance interview under caution ? If so then she’ll need urgent legal advice.
she would have had a message to say they have information to suggest she’s living with a partner. If she’s ignore that and not replied to UC the next step is compliance.

There are no set nights a partner can stay as long as they are not financially supporting and maintaining their own residence elsewhere. UC are looking to see if they are living together as a married couple (LTAMC). The guidance for UC decision makers is available on line

Puzzledandpissedoff · 22/09/2025 18:02

Coconutter24 · 22/09/2025 16:55

How is it unfair? If they didn’t investigate every report imagine the thousands of pounds that could potentially be fraudulently claimed.

A frequent narrative on here is "keep your beak out", "fraud is only a TINY % of benefit claims" and "what about Amazon" Coconutter ... to some we're not supposed to think than more than one thing can be wrong at the same time

The boyfriend who does groundworks for cash in hand sounds dubious too and the DWP have seen it all before, so good luck to the claimant trying to insist he doesn't really live there

Labradorlover987 · 22/09/2025 18:04

Burningbud1981 · 22/09/2025 18:00

First of all is the compliance interview under caution ? If so then she’ll need urgent legal advice.
she would have had a message to say they have information to suggest she’s living with a partner. If she’s ignore that and not replied to UC the next step is compliance.

There are no set nights a partner can stay as long as they are not financially supporting and maintaining their own residence elsewhere. UC are looking to see if they are living together as a married couple (LTAMC). The guidance for UC decision makers is available on line

Edited

I know she had a message online about a compliance interview which is next week - she’s asked me to accompany her to this

OP posts:
1clavdivs · 22/09/2025 18:05

JenniferBooth · 22/09/2025 16:17

This was posted by @LangClegsInSpace on a thread on the feminism board a couple of years ago and it resonates here.

There's a reason for this and if you've never been on benefits you won't know.
If you can meet your own housing costs and bills without relying on the state then you have the luxury of forming relationships gradually. You can take your time building trust, you can sleep together as many or few nights as you please, and nobody counts, and you can keep both properties so you have your own home to go back to if it all goes horribly wrong. You can move in together, part or full time, and keep some or all of your finances separate, for a while or permanently. You can take 6 months or 20 years to fully share everything. You can go at the pace of your mutual trust and it's no-one else's business.
Women on benefits are not afforded any of those luxuries. You are either single or in a couple and there is no inbetween. If you are in a couple then you must share your home and all of your finances straight away. If you are single then you must share nothing. Any relationship grey area that normal people enjoy will get you investigated and may result in loss of income, including your rent, and so your home.
Women on benefits are normal women and so have the same relationship aspirations as everyone else but they are in a much more risky and precarious position because the benefit system forces them at an early stage into an all or nothing situation with any potential partner.
It's not that 'these womwn have the worst taste in men', it's just that they get stuck with them, having been required to share everything at far too early a stage in their relationship.
This is a huge part of why women on low incomes are vulnerable.

These are good points. And it seems that the state is very ready to recognise you formally as a couple when it suits them to do so on the grounds that you do your laundry together or share food shopping, but if one of you dies and there might be inheritance tax up for grabs, you're only recognised as a couple if you're actually married.

Burningbud1981 · 22/09/2025 18:06

Labradorlover987 · 22/09/2025 18:04

I know she had a message online about a compliance interview which is next week - she’s asked me to accompany her to this

Double check the interview isn’t under caution.

As long as she can prove her partner isn’t financially supporting her and he maintains a residence elsewhere she should be fine.

if not…

Labradorlover987 · 22/09/2025 18:07

Burningbud1981 · 22/09/2025 18:06

Double check the interview isn’t under caution.

As long as she can prove her partner isn’t financially supporting her and he maintains a residence elsewhere she should be fine.

if not…

Edited

I will do, thank you

OP posts:
DiscoBob · 22/09/2025 18:08

I think if there are no bills or correspondence coming to the address under his name, and he has proof he lives elsewhere it should be ok?

Has she got kids with the bf?

They may want to visit the house. If his stuff is there and it looks like they're a couple that could be a red flag.

Labradorlover987 · 22/09/2025 18:10

DiscoBob · 22/09/2025 18:08

I think if there are no bills or correspondence coming to the address under his name, and he has proof he lives elsewhere it should be ok?

Has she got kids with the bf?

They may want to visit the house. If his stuff is there and it looks like they're a couple that could be a red flag.

She has two kids (12&10) but not with him

OP posts:
DiscoBob · 22/09/2025 18:13

Labradorlover987 · 22/09/2025 18:10

She has two kids (12&10) but not with him

Thank you. If he genuinely doesn't live there and they don't pay for eachothers bills, food, phone etc I hope it's be fine.

Trumpisacunt · 22/09/2025 18:21

I was investigated four years ago after some nosey person decided I shouldn't have a boyfriend .
Its a long distance relationship(see each other at weekends alturnating between mine and his) Anyway I could easily prove that we 'Maintained separate households ' by supplying his bank statements,tenancy agreement and copies of bills that proved he lived elsewhere .I was completely honest and told them we spent weekends with each other and went on holiday together but they closed the case with no further action. ..its probably quite easy to prove someone lives elsewhere when they are paying bills,council tax and are employed some distance away .

Hammy19 · 22/09/2025 18:43

Labradorlover987 · 22/09/2025 18:10

She has two kids (12&10) but not with him

I did but it was about 15 years ago. They had all my bank statements and asked me about some payments and checked that I was paying all my main bills myself

I think I took evidence of bills/electoral register etc that were addressed to my partner's actual address

Puzzledandpissedoff · 22/09/2025 18:45

If he genuinely doesn't live there and they don't pay for eachothers bills, food, phone etc I hope it's be fine

So do I, @DiscoBob, but once alerted they won't just take the claimant's word for it - they'll want bank statements too, and will be quite used to hearing "Oh they only paid my bill that one time", "They only send that to my address because it's safer" and so on

Labradorlover987 · 22/09/2025 18:52

Trumpisacunt · 22/09/2025 18:21

I was investigated four years ago after some nosey person decided I shouldn't have a boyfriend .
Its a long distance relationship(see each other at weekends alturnating between mine and his) Anyway I could easily prove that we 'Maintained separate households ' by supplying his bank statements,tenancy agreement and copies of bills that proved he lived elsewhere .I was completely honest and told them we spent weekends with each other and went on holiday together but they closed the case with no further action. ..its probably quite easy to prove someone lives elsewhere when they are paying bills,council tax and are employed some distance away .

Did you have to go to the job centre for the interview?

OP posts:
anytipswelcome · 22/09/2025 18:52

Together less than a year and he’s staying over half the week. And after they’ve already been around one abusive relationship previously so have witnessed unhealthy dynamics before. Poor kids 😔

Labradorlover987 · 22/09/2025 19:03

anytipswelcome · 22/09/2025 18:52

Together less than a year and he’s staying over half the week. And after they’ve already been around one abusive relationship previously so have witnessed unhealthy dynamics before. Poor kids 😔

I know, I don’t think it’s right either

OP posts:
LondonLady15 · 22/09/2025 19:28

It’s pretty straightforward. Ask her:

  • is he registered to vote at the property he owns with his dad
  • is his dad claiming single person council tax discount
  • does he pay the bills, gas, electric, water etc from his bank account at his own property
  • does he pay her any money regularly for staying there or pay any of her bills
  • has he changed to her address for GP, driving licence or bank

as long as he can show the 3 top things then it will be fine.
If he can’t prove the first 3 or the last two apply they are likely to sanction and or prosecute.

it’s a tough one because I agree you shouldn’t lose all benefits in the early days of a relationship, but if you are getting bills paid or regular money from a bf it’s a bit of a cheek to claim universal credit (and fraud)

anytipswelcome · 22/09/2025 19:31

Labradorlover987 · 22/09/2025 19:03

I know, I don’t think it’s right either

If you’re close friends then have you spoken to her about this? Are the kids girls? Bad either way but if they’re girls it’s also worth mentioning some pretty thought provoking stats to her re unrelated males being moved into the home.

Rosscameasdoody · 22/09/2025 19:41

If she can prove he’s not resident there and doesn’t contribute to the household she’ll be fine. DWP are looking for signs they are living together as would a married couple. One word of warning though. If this is an interview under caution, it’s wise to take a solicitor. She needs to check.

Burntoutandcantbebothered · 22/09/2025 19:49

As PPs have said they need to prove where his sole and main residence is. If the Dad has claimed Single Person Discount and given her address then it is a pretty open and shut case. They can check the electoral register at both addresses, his credit records. If he genuinely lives with his Dad he should have proof of credit, his driving licence, proof he is paying his Dad board, wage slips to his Dad's house etc.

Swipe left for the next trending thread