Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask whether anyone here has ever been investigated by DWP for “living with a partner”?

262 replies

Labradorlover987 · 22/09/2025 13:11

My friend has just been asked to attend a compliance interview at the job centre - she claims universal credit as a single mother to 2 kids, and single person council tax discount she has a boyfriend but they don’t live together full time - he lives with his father - he obviously stays over 3/4 nights a week.

Just wondered what the process was etc

OP posts:
Labradorlover987 · 22/09/2025 16:48

SirHumphreyRocks · 22/09/2025 16:44

Yeah, didn't get the answer a wanted last week so thought I'd give it a different spin and see if anyone can advise me on how to commit fraud without getting caught.

I have never posted about benefits 😆 not sure why people on here are so paranoid’ check my history if you need proof x

OP posts:
Praying4Peace · 22/09/2025 16:49

samplesalequeen · 22/09/2025 13:33

So her boyfriend likely stays with her more than half the time and she’s rinsing the state for the benefits of a single person?

id take the lot off her tbh. Top notch cheeky fucker.

I am aware of several people doing this. Claiming as a single parent and bf living there although not registered.
In these situations, those people are significantly better off than those who are working to pay their bills and rent.
All the while, the living and housing costs are being paid for by the tax payer
Very unfair

Labradorlover987 · 22/09/2025 16:53

Rainbows41 · 22/09/2025 16:42

I was a housing benefit officer for around twelve years. 3 nights a week is the threshold at which a partner can stay without being counted. 4 or more is deemed as being resident. However, a partner can only stay one or two nights a week and be classed as resident if they are using your home as their main residence.

Do they investigate every report they get? Seems a bit unfair when people may be reporting maliciously

OP posts:
Glitchymn1 · 22/09/2025 16:53

Fraud manager here- there are no set amount of days.

Glitchymn1 · 22/09/2025 16:53

Labradorlover987 · 22/09/2025 16:53

Do they investigate every report they get? Seems a bit unfair when people may be reporting maliciously

Ideally, yes.

Coconutter24 · 22/09/2025 16:54

Alittlefrustrated · 22/09/2025 16:43

Unlike most people in this thread, I have sympathy with your friend.
I stayed at my partner's house a lot (sometimes 2 whole weeks at a time when he was on leave) in my 20's, but I didn't live there. I didn't contribute financially in any way at all. I had my own home.
Are we saying someone on benefits can't have a partner who just stays over part of the week? Daytime sex only please? Unable to "test" or progress relationships without full commitment?
The alternative being people moving in together prematurely. That would mean many more vunerable women and children surely? Putting men on tenancy agreements before the woman or mother would want to? Children having no break from mum's relatively new partner,unless at Dad's?

As long as you weren’t paying for any food shopping or anything like that for your partners house then you weren’t doing anything wrong. I understand what you’re saying about people moving in prematurely but equally it shouldn’t be on the tax payer to foot the bill whilst someone decides if they’re ready for a partner to move in

Coconutter24 · 22/09/2025 16:55

Labradorlover987 · 22/09/2025 16:53

Do they investigate every report they get? Seems a bit unfair when people may be reporting maliciously

How is it unfair? If they didn’t investigate every report imagine the thousands of pounds that could potentially be fraudulently claimed.

JenniferBooth · 22/09/2025 16:57

Coconutter24 · 22/09/2025 16:54

As long as you weren’t paying for any food shopping or anything like that for your partners house then you weren’t doing anything wrong. I understand what you’re saying about people moving in prematurely but equally it shouldn’t be on the tax payer to foot the bill whilst someone decides if they’re ready for a partner to move in

The abusive alkie who lives underneath me gets his food shopping and rent paid for by his mum. So he can spend his UC on booze. Why is this allowed then?

Labradorlover987 · 22/09/2025 17:00

Coconutter24 · 22/09/2025 16:55

How is it unfair? If they didn’t investigate every report imagine the thousands of pounds that could potentially be fraudulently claimed.

I was just thinking if it was an abusive ex for example, out to cause trouble

OP posts:
Coconutter24 · 22/09/2025 17:02

JenniferBooth · 22/09/2025 16:57

The abusive alkie who lives underneath me gets his food shopping and rent paid for by his mum. So he can spend his UC on booze. Why is this allowed then?

Did you report it?

Coconutter24 · 22/09/2025 17:03

Labradorlover987 · 22/09/2025 17:00

I was just thinking if it was an abusive ex for example, out to cause trouble

As long as the claimant are doing it fraudulently then they can prove there is no wrong doing so it won’t cause any issues. Yeh it’ll be a pain getting documents to prove it but they can’t really cause serious trouble if there’s no wrong doing

TheChoiceWithinDestiny · 22/09/2025 17:03

I find the attitude towards this scenario ridiculous. Single parents should be able to have a relationship where they can take time to make sure the person is right for them especially as children are involved ?? As long as the partner can prove they legally live elsewhere have bills there etc why is it a problem? You can’t move every partner in straight away just because of UC !

JenniferBooth · 22/09/2025 17:05

Coconutter24 · 22/09/2025 17:02

Did you report it?

No because this is what hes like when he doesnt get his booze.

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/4877365-to-think-housing-associations-should-have-more-accountability-who-they-choose-to-allocate-homes-to

Deepbluesea1 · 22/09/2025 17:05

Labradorlover987 · 22/09/2025 13:28

It’s a fairly newish relationship - he isn’t the father of the kids - but yeah I think he stays a good few nights - guessing one of the neighbours reported her 🤷‍♀️

what is fairly newish? a few weeks? Couple of months tops?

OnlyMabelInTheBuilding · 22/09/2025 17:05

Labradorlover987 · 22/09/2025 17:00

I was just thinking if it was an abusive ex for example, out to cause trouble

If they’re not really doing anything wrong, then investigations based on malicious grounds would be found to be fine.

Only an issue if they really are gaming the system.

Nothing unfair about that

slashlover · 22/09/2025 17:06

Labradorlover987 · 22/09/2025 13:28

It’s a fairly newish relationship - he isn’t the father of the kids - but yeah I think he stays a good few nights - guessing one of the neighbours reported her 🤷‍♀️

So it's a new relationship and she lets him stay over half the time with her preteen kids?

janiejonstone · 22/09/2025 17:11

slowraindrop · 22/09/2025 13:34

From the Advice Now website:

“Just because your partner stays the night with you, even if they stay most nights, it doesn’t mean you are living together. If your partner still has a home somewhere else where they pay bills and keeps their things, and you make day to day decisions about your home and finances on your own, then they probably don’t count as living with you.

If you have been contacted by the benefits office because they believe you are living with your partner when they haven’t actually moved in, you will need to show them that your partner doesn’t live with you. Usually, the easiest thing to do is to prove they live somewhere else.”

This. Having a boyfriend who sleeps over is not at all the same as a partner who lives with you, shares income and is jointly responsible for rent/mortgage, bills etc. What they're checking is that she doesn't have another adult living with her who shares the financial responsibility of the household. Which she doesn't.

Being a single parent is hard enough without MN setting a limit on the number of times a week you're allowed to see your boyfriend before you're labelled a benefits scrounger.

Coconutter24 · 22/09/2025 17:11

Well you’ve answered your own question there,
So he can spend his UC on booze. Why is this allowed then?
He isn’t allowed but he wasn’t reported. Dwp can’t do anything about it if someone doesn’t tell them.

Im assuming by you bringing your neighbour into the thread when I said aslong as you weren’t buying food for partners place then you aren’t doing anything wrong and you didn’t answer that? Does that mean you were financially contributing to his place?

LakieLady · 22/09/2025 17:14

It was a few years ago now, but I did an appeal for a client who'd had their benefits stopped because they deemed her to be living with a partner.

She had dreadful neighbours who harrassed her, and was vulnerable because of mild learning disability. She would spend much of most days at either her boyfriend's or family members, to avoid the neighbours, and often cooked for and ate meals with her boyfriend because he had physical disabilities that made cooking challenging. However, she didn't often stay overnight at his, or he at hers.

At the tribunal, the members seemed most interested in the evidence we had of the harrassment, and where she kept her clothes etc.

The appeal was successful.

Labradorlover987 · 22/09/2025 17:15

slashlover · 22/09/2025 17:06

So it's a new relationship and she lets him stay over half the time with her preteen kids?

I think they’ve been together maybe 7 months? Just to caveat - this isn’t me and I don’t feel like she’s acting in the best way (she was married to an abusive man before so don’t think she has amazing judgement)

OP posts:
BadgernTheGarden · 22/09/2025 17:15

Labradorlover987 · 22/09/2025 13:11

My friend has just been asked to attend a compliance interview at the job centre - she claims universal credit as a single mother to 2 kids, and single person council tax discount she has a boyfriend but they don’t live together full time - he lives with his father - he obviously stays over 3/4 nights a week.

Just wondered what the process was etc

I knew someone doing this, basically the bf lived there full time with her and their children and literally jumped out of the window when SS turned up unexpectedly and ran back to his mother's, who he supposedly lived with nearby. At work he even bragged about how smart they were, and how they were getting all these benefits and were too clever for SS. It really annoyed me at the time and I hope your friends do get caught.

Gymbunny2025 · 22/09/2025 17:27

JenniferBooth · 22/09/2025 16:17

This was posted by @LangClegsInSpace on a thread on the feminism board a couple of years ago and it resonates here.

There's a reason for this and if you've never been on benefits you won't know.
If you can meet your own housing costs and bills without relying on the state then you have the luxury of forming relationships gradually. You can take your time building trust, you can sleep together as many or few nights as you please, and nobody counts, and you can keep both properties so you have your own home to go back to if it all goes horribly wrong. You can move in together, part or full time, and keep some or all of your finances separate, for a while or permanently. You can take 6 months or 20 years to fully share everything. You can go at the pace of your mutual trust and it's no-one else's business.
Women on benefits are not afforded any of those luxuries. You are either single or in a couple and there is no inbetween. If you are in a couple then you must share your home and all of your finances straight away. If you are single then you must share nothing. Any relationship grey area that normal people enjoy will get you investigated and may result in loss of income, including your rent, and so your home.
Women on benefits are normal women and so have the same relationship aspirations as everyone else but they are in a much more risky and precarious position because the benefit system forces them at an early stage into an all or nothing situation with any potential partner.
It's not that 'these womwn have the worst taste in men', it's just that they get stuck with them, having been required to share everything at far too early a stage in their relationship.
This is a huge part of why women on low incomes are vulnerable.

This isn’t true though. A relationship can develop slowly (more slowly) without spending most nights together. And that is also better for any kids involved. That is the opposite of saying you must invite a new partner to move in immediately.

where resources are finite taxpayers money is far better off funding schools and the NHS than single parents who are ‘testing’ relationships

WiddlinDiddlin · 22/09/2025 17:31

I had to battle DWP over this years ago when I had a bloody lodger and they decided he was my partner! I had all the right paperwork from the council, and we did eventually win, but it bloody infuriated me.

At the same time, my sister, shacked up with her actual girlfriend - no investigation into that because they were both women.

Anyway, thats by the by - if the boyfriend can prove he is registered as paying council tax and bills/rent/mortgage at another property, then it's fine, they're doing nothing wrong.

JenniferBooth · 22/09/2025 17:39

Coconutter24 · 22/09/2025 17:11

Well you’ve answered your own question there,
So he can spend his UC on booze. Why is this allowed then?
He isn’t allowed but he wasn’t reported. Dwp can’t do anything about it if someone doesn’t tell them.

Im assuming by you bringing your neighbour into the thread when I said aslong as you weren’t buying food for partners place then you aren’t doing anything wrong and you didn’t answer that? Does that mean you were financially contributing to his place?

WTF are you on about Hes just a neighbour the HA has stuck underneath me His elderly mum is using her pension to pay for him

Coconutter24 · 22/09/2025 17:41

JenniferBooth · 22/09/2025 17:39

WTF are you on about Hes just a neighbour the HA has stuck underneath me His elderly mum is using her pension to pay for him

I understand that but you didn’t report him so you can’t really complain about him receiving financial help

Swipe left for the next trending thread