Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Farage promises to deport people with ILR

1000 replies

Acidburn · 22/09/2025 12:21

Posting in AIBU for traffic.
Nigel Farage stated he would deport anyone with existing indefinite leave to remain. We are talking about millions of people.
This terrifying. If people live here, work here, have kids and mortgages - where are they supposed to go?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
Kisskiss · 22/09/2025 16:07

HelpMeUnpickThis · 22/09/2025 12:46

@Friendlygingercat

Did you read my post?

There should be a way to differentiate between non contributors and contributors.

What about the British people who are not contributors? Let’s have a chat about that. But you dont want to and you wont.

Most visa categories for skilled migrant visas have loads of restrictions about access to benefits etc.

Why don’t you focus on the numbers of British born people who dont work when they can? If you did it would be a little less racist.

I have ILR and have done for more than 10 years. I do think that they should tighten the ILR rules ( and they have so that’s good) in a lot of countries , getting permanent residency is much more difficult than it is here, and once you have ILr u do get access to the public purse via benefits etc so it makes sense they raised the bar to 10y residency before being eligible .

this deporting rubbish sends a real shiver of fear down my back though :( very worrying

Ireolu · 22/09/2025 16:08

Legal migrants from non EU countrys have NO recourse to public funds - no benefits/no taxfree childcare/no additionals. They also have to pay NHS fees per person in the thousands and visa charges. This only changes when they get ILR.

I have no idea what Farage is on about, as usual it's a load of uncorroborated waffle swallowed by those who are all to willing to agree that the immigrant (legal or illegal - because they don't look like them) is the cause of all their problems.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 22/09/2025 16:12

usernamealreadytaken · 22/09/2025 15:58

If I was in that situation I’d probably want to have the same nationality as my spouse and children.

Some people don't have a spare couple of grand knocking around. Some people don't want to have to renounce their original citizenship. Some people just haven't been in the UK for long enough to be eligible to apply.

Why should they not be entitled to respect for their family life? Why should their British children not be entitled to stability, knowing that their parents both have the right to be in the UK and won't be kicked out at a moment's notice?

eluned16 · 22/09/2025 16:12

BittyItty · 22/09/2025 15:37

The people pleased about this frighten me.

I guess people believe what they want to hear, rather than the truth. It frightens me too

DuncinToffee · 22/09/2025 16:12

caringcarer · 22/09/2025 15:45

1 in 6 claims for UC is from an immigrant. This is a fact.

A fact from where?

And how much would removing 1/6 raise? Remember many people on UC are in work and pay tax.

EarthlyNightshade · 22/09/2025 16:14

usernamealreadytaken · 22/09/2025 13:40

One in six UC claimants is foreign born. 15% of our UC bill potentially saved in one fell swoop. Do you think these claimants came here entirely altruistically, just for the nice weather?

Around 38% (2023 figure) people on universal credit work, so if you want to remove them, you would have to find British people to do those jobs and claim universal credit. So not a lot of saving there.
Most people have to be here for five years to claim UC and of course, illegal immigrants don't receive it.

Thinking you'd like to remove people with established lives who could have worked for years in the UK is a really grotty train of thought.

DuncinToffee · 22/09/2025 16:16

usernamealreadytaken · 22/09/2025 15:53

The whole point of this conversation is that once an immigrant has ILR, they CAN claim benefits.

Indeed they can, they can also pay tax.

So, about those numbers?

Jaichangecentfoisdenom · 22/09/2025 16:16

Clearinguptheclutter · 22/09/2025 15:46

He’s an idiot. And a liar. And says whatever he wants to get attention

i honestly despair at the amount of attention he gets compared with, say the LDs who have multiple times the amount of seats. But they don’t spout total nonsense so of course the press isn’t interested

The BBC is currently rightly being criticized for the disproportionate amount of air time they are giving Farage and his kind, without any opposing contributors. This was how Farage won the Brexit referendum - he was allowed to spout his nonsense all over the BBC and nobody who thought staying in the EU was a good thing was offered an opportunity to discuss it with him. I still don’t understand how he and the Beeb got away with it, but I’m been quietly boycotting the BBC since 2016 (their coverage of Trump was extreme, too, but at least it would have had no effect on the average US voter!).

FLOWER19833 · 22/09/2025 16:21

caringcarer · 22/09/2025 15:58

Have you not used services here for 20 years? No kids in schools or colleges, no NHS use?

No kids, just worked continuously and paid off my mortgage at 40, have been to gp maybe 8 times max

BloominNora · 22/09/2025 16:21

The left have so much influence and control over the U.K. that people seem to think it’s immoral to deport a young man who comes here illegally and then lives by crime or benefit fraud. I have seen people described as ‘far-right’ for wanting a rapist deported!! It’s insane.

@Dappy777

The left have been in power for only 14 of the past 45 years, whereas the right have been in power for 31 years. Because of that the right have implemented more laws and controlled the direction of education, housing policy, financial policy, health policy than the left.

The right own five of the major daily newspapers, including the one with the biggest circulation and most visited online presence, the left have two.

The right have control of our only national broadcaster with the board having being stuffed to the rafters with Tory donors and have their own dedicated TV channel.

The right have a much more powerful and homogenous social media ownership than the left. There is no-one on the left that has the same reach and influence as key right wing commentators.

The right have more billionaires who have a outsized influence on our politics through lobbying.

So without resorting to the argument that the Conservative party from Thatcher onwards were actually left leaning, when what you mean is they were not right wing enough for you, please enlighten us to how exactly the left have influence and control.

Flyingintotheunknown · 22/09/2025 16:22

UneFoisAuChalet · 22/09/2025 15:58

ILR doesn’t expire. That the entire point. You only lose it if you spend years outside of the country. Biometrics cards all expired on 31/12/2024. People had to create an eVisa account as your immigration status is now virtual.

this isn’t directed at the poster I’m quoting, but the misinformation on this thread is astonishing. Some of us have spent years studying and working in immigration law and I find it hilarious that people consider now themselves experts in a field after reading a Daily Mail headline.

I know what ILR means thank you as my hubby used to have ILR before he applied for citizenship so pipe down with your ridiculous accusations of me just reading the daily mail!!
What I’m saying is the biometric residence permit expired - you know the card they give you, was only valid for 10 years then you had to reapply for a new one before the last one expired. That doesn’t mean that you aren’t allowed to stay in the UK anymore.
A pp has now said that the government has changed this so that you now no longer need to apply to renew it after a 10 year period. Please get your facts correct about what I’m saying before jumping to conclusions about what I know and don’t know.

Wallaw1 · 22/09/2025 16:22

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 22/09/2025 14:12

Sneer all you like, but it's not actually very clever to make your country a hostile, unattractive place to live for well educated professionals who pay a lot of tax in order to pander to dimwits who think Nigel Farage is the best thing since sliced bread.

Yes, perfectly put. DH and I both came here as city lawyers. We're now citizens, but spent many years putting a shocking amount into the HMRC coffers with settled status, and were happy to do so because we believed it was a great place to live and raise a family. Then came Brexit, which was disheartening, and now this kind of rhetoric. I doubt we'd make the choice to come here now and we have very much been net contributors.

And, interestingly, we didn't come from the UK, and our ilr papers, as I recall, said, No Recourse to Public Funds.

Smilingintherain · 22/09/2025 16:23

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 22/09/2025 16:12

Some people don't have a spare couple of grand knocking around. Some people don't want to have to renounce their original citizenship. Some people just haven't been in the UK for long enough to be eligible to apply.

Why should they not be entitled to respect for their family life? Why should their British children not be entitled to stability, knowing that their parents both have the right to be in the UK and won't be kicked out at a moment's notice?

These potential new rules will be designed to no longer encourage low skilled people to come to the UK.

If you are still keen to stay you would save up?
Many countries expect you to jump through hoops if you want to emigrate there. It is not ground breaking .

I wouldn't procrastinate if that is you.

SuffolkSun · 22/09/2025 16:26

Dappy777 · 22/09/2025 15:20

Surely the priority should be deporting ‘undesirables’. And I have no shame in using that word. Some people really are undesirable - and that includes plenty of British people! Some of those louts who move to Spain, refuse to learn Spanish, fight and urinate in the street, and fly Union jacks outside their homes, don’t exactly enrich Spanish culture. I wouldn’t blame the Spanish for deporting them.

If I was a member of the Reform government, I would draw up a list for deportation, with those I most wanted to deport at the top. A list in descending order would look something like this:

  1. Illegal immigrants who have committed multiple serious crimes (rape, violence, house burglary, etc).
  2. Illegal immigrants convicted of just one serious crime or a series of petty crimes.
  3. Illegal immigrants who have never been convicted of a crime but have lived on welfare.
  4. Illegal immigrants who have not committed a crime or claimed welfare but who have no skills or training or education and cannot speak English very well.
  5. Legal immigrants who have been convicted of a series of serious crimes (rape, robbery with violence etc).
  6. Legal immigrants who have committed petty crimes.
  7. Legal immigrants who have committed no crimes but who live on welfare

…and so on, and so on.

My priority would be deporting illegal immigrants who have been convicted of serious crimes. The further down the list you go, the more sympathetic I would be. Obviously someone who came here legally and had worked and obeyed the law would be perfectly safe. But an illegal immigrant isn’t a hero. He is a criminal. I liked Australia and wanted to stay there. But I couldn’t. If I had sneaked back in, I’d have expected them to deport me. I wouldn’t scream and shout and accuse the Australians of persecuting me. It is insane that we even need to debate this. The clue is in the word ‘illegal’.

The left have so much influence and control over the U.K. that people seem to think it’s immoral to deport a young man who comes here illegally and then lives by crime or benefit fraud. I have seen people described as ‘far-right’ for wanting a rapist deported!! It’s insane.

Don’t worry though. Even if Reform do take power (which they won’t), the establishment will block and frustrate any efforts to deport people. It just won’t happen. Sleep easy in your beds. People who come here illegally and rape and steal and deal drugs and cheat the welfare system are quite safe.

Edited

You seem to be completely unaware that enforced (deportation) and voluntary returns of people lacking visas, offender returns and failed asylum claim returns have all increased, substantially, in the past year. How odd you didn't check before posting.

So, your view that "the establishment will block and frustrate any efforts to deport people. It just won’t happen" is provably untrue.

"The left have [sic] so much influence and control over the U.K." Bless.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 22/09/2025 16:27

Smilingintherain · 22/09/2025 16:23

These potential new rules will be designed to no longer encourage low skilled people to come to the UK.

If you are still keen to stay you would save up?
Many countries expect you to jump through hoops if you want to emigrate there. It is not ground breaking .

I wouldn't procrastinate if that is you.

Well all I can say is it will serve you right if you're no longer capable of wiping your own arse when you're 95 and there are not enough "low skilled people" around to do it for you.

And no, that is "not me". I'm literally the opposite of that person. I'm the highly skilled, highly paid British person who has voted with their feet and gone to live elsewhere.

DuncinToffee · 22/09/2025 16:29

Smilingintherain · 22/09/2025 16:23

These potential new rules will be designed to no longer encourage low skilled people to come to the UK.

If you are still keen to stay you would save up?
Many countries expect you to jump through hoops if you want to emigrate there. It is not ground breaking .

I wouldn't procrastinate if that is you.

Are you going to do these low skilled jobs?

Smilingintherain · 22/09/2025 16:30

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 22/09/2025 16:27

Well all I can say is it will serve you right if you're no longer capable of wiping your own arse when you're 95 and there are not enough "low skilled people" around to do it for you.

And no, that is "not me". I'm literally the opposite of that person. I'm the highly skilled, highly paid British person who has voted with their feet and gone to live elsewhere.

Edited

I heard carer salaries would increase. There would still be carers just not state funded ones.

Carers can still apply now before anything is law

usernamealreadytaken · 22/09/2025 16:30

BloominNora · 22/09/2025 15:58

That's just not factually correct - the majority of migrants earn the national average wage or above and in both the average earning age bracket and the higher earning age bracket are net contributors at higher rates that UK born citizens - only the lower wage earning migrants are not net contributors.

But actually, regardless of which study or methodology is used, the overall impact of migration is minimal as a percentage of GDP and higher net migration figures actually reduce government borrowing.

https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/the-fiscal-impact-of-immigration-in-the-uk/

Earning the national average wage does not make you a net contributor. The overall fiscal impact on GPD is positive overall, but negative per capita.

However, OBR noted in an earlier analysis, from 2013, that over an even longer time horizon these migrants would also retire and add to age-related spending pressures. It concluded that “higher migration could be seen as delaying some of the fiscal challenges of an ageing population rather than a way of resolving them permanently”. Basically, the lower government borrowing is just deferred, so our children and grandchildren will be subject to higher borrowing instead.

“Despite differences in methods, some key points emerge consistently across these studies. First, in all cases the impacts were found to be less than +1% or -1% of GDP. Second, recent migrants made a more positive impact than those who had been in the UK for longer.”

https://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/cp651.pdf
https://blogs.deloitte.co.uk/mondaybriefing/2024/12/in-praise-of-gdp-per-capita.html

https://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/cp651.pdf

Araminta1003 · 22/09/2025 16:32

Farage will tell the suckers robots will wipe their arses and they will believe it. It is what it is. All anyone can do is be prepared and vote for whichever party will most likely defeat Reform.

ReplacementBusService · 22/09/2025 16:32
  1. It is made up shite that won't happen
  2. I don't know why this would even appeal to the most steadfast racists out there
  3. It is made up shite that won't happen and our media could be a lot more clear on that
SleeplessInWherever · 22/09/2025 16:32

I work in education recruitment services, and have a special needs child. Our son has respite, staffed at least in part by migrants.

In one specialist school I currently have 7 personal care staff, all migrants. One school.

Believe me, I’m not withholding those jobs from the British unemployed. They don’t want it. They don’t apply, they won’t take it when offered, they’d rather sit at home.

It may be low skilled, but it’s absolutely necessary, and there will be vulnerable adults and children worse off because some of you don’t like “strangers.”

EasternStandard · 22/09/2025 16:33

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 22/09/2025 16:27

Well all I can say is it will serve you right if you're no longer capable of wiping your own arse when you're 95 and there are not enough "low skilled people" around to do it for you.

And no, that is "not me". I'm literally the opposite of that person. I'm the highly skilled, highly paid British person who has voted with their feet and gone to live elsewhere.

Edited

Where are you that carers for the elderly isn’t facing issues?

OrangeSlices998 · 22/09/2025 16:35

Why does anyone care what Farage says? The idiot will never be PM, honestly why are we giving this idiot any bloody airtime.

DuncinToffee · 22/09/2025 16:35

@Dappy777

Highest immigration was in 2023 overseen by that well known lefty Boris Johnson.

Boriswave was a result of that leftist Farage's Brexit.

Smilingintherain · 22/09/2025 16:35

SleeplessInWherever · 22/09/2025 16:32

I work in education recruitment services, and have a special needs child. Our son has respite, staffed at least in part by migrants.

In one specialist school I currently have 7 personal care staff, all migrants. One school.

Believe me, I’m not withholding those jobs from the British unemployed. They don’t want it. They don’t apply, they won’t take it when offered, they’d rather sit at home.

It may be low skilled, but it’s absolutely necessary, and there will be vulnerable adults and children worse off because some of you don’t like “strangers.”

Caring roles will become more attractive as the pay will be higher. Plus benefits will be slashed thus also encouraging people to take jobs.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.