Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Freedom of speech isn't tolerated by some

855 replies

WhatNextBanana · 10/09/2025 22:58

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/comment/2025/09/10/charlie-kirks-shooting-terrible-moment-american-democracy/

Political violence on the rise.

People are getting angry when people have Political views they don't agree with. Freedom of speech must be allowed not shutdown.

Tragic news of a young family man shot by someone today. Please remember he was a human with a family. Violence is never ok.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
Ladamesansmerci · 11/09/2025 00:16

Vivi0 · 11/09/2025 00:14

What has any of this got to do with Charlie Kirk?

Charlie Kirk had every right to hold the opinions he did. He has every right to express those opinions and to not be murdered for them.

Why are you going on about Hilter?

Because we are talking about freedom of speech...which some people believe that means you can say whatever the fuck you want.

Shakeoffyourchains · 11/09/2025 00:16

Vivi0 · 10/09/2025 23:58

Obviously you should not be murdered for your views. You are entitled to express what you please, but if you're going to spout horrible views, expect legal or social consequences. If you are going to use words that sound violent, perhaps consider you may also end up on the recieving end of it.

So it does seem then, that you do in fact believe that people should be murdered for their views. If they use “violent” words, they should expect violence in return.

You do understand don’t you, that words are NOT violence.

Violence is violence.

But words can and do provoke violence, as we don't live in a perfect word, and anyone speaking publicly has to be aware of the potential consequences of what they say.

Charlie Kirk knew full well that his words and views provoked strong reactions, he made a career out of it, and he did it in a country that is awash with weapons that make it all too easy for someone to kill indiscriminately and people who have no issues using them. His death isn’t right, but it was foreseeable.

cassandre · 11/09/2025 00:17

This has fuck all to do with the right wing.

Uh-huh. Apart from the minor detail that the US right wing is the reason that so many crazy people get their hands on guns in the first place.

It's because of right-wing gun legislation that tens of thousands of Americans die by guns every year. Regardless of his political views, Charlie Kirk is just another victim and another statistic.

Dangermoos · 11/09/2025 00:18

Ladamesansmerci · 11/09/2025 00:15

I'm using the above as an example. I don't believe it's acceptable for anyone to just say whatever the fuck they please in the examples above, despite political beliefs. You are completely ignoring what I'm saying. So under free speech did you think it was okay and perfectly acceptable for Hitler to demonise Jewish people?

No, as I don't think it's OK for white people to be called gammon, flagshaggers, belittled for loving their origins. There are two extreme sides to the political spectrum. I don't agree with racism and I don't agree with hypocrites, hiding under the guise of compassion when that compassion is selectively issued. I'm not the knly one that's had enough of the left giving it large with their sneery attitudes to anybody who doesn't agree with them

Dangermoos · 11/09/2025 00:20

cassandre · 11/09/2025 00:17

This has fuck all to do with the right wing.

Uh-huh. Apart from the minor detail that the US right wing is the reason that so many crazy people get their hands on guns in the first place.

It's because of right-wing gun legislation that tens of thousands of Americans die by guns every year. Regardless of his political views, Charlie Kirk is just another victim and another statistic.

It's got fuck all to do with the right wing, unless the shooter is found to be on that side. Kirk's views were not illegal.

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 11/09/2025 00:20

Ladamesansmerci · 11/09/2025 00:16

Because we are talking about freedom of speech...which some people believe that means you can say whatever the fuck you want.

What do you believe freedom of speech means?

cassandre · 11/09/2025 00:25

Dangermoos · 11/09/2025 00:20

It's got fuck all to do with the right wing, unless the shooter is found to be on that side. Kirk's views were not illegal.

It has everything to do with the right wing.

Ultimately, the shooter's views don't matter (they are probably mentally ill; they usually are). Kirk's views don't matter.

What matters is that pretty much anyone in America can get a gun and bring it everywhere. And that's because right-wing politics have made it that way.

Shakeoffyourchains · 11/09/2025 00:26

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 11/09/2025 00:20

What do you believe freedom of speech means?

Freedom of speech is about having the right to express your opinions and/or share information without interference from the state (within reason, limits have always been in place). Nothing more.

What do you think it means?

cassandre · 11/09/2025 00:29

Do you know that three students were critically wounded in a school shooting incident a couple of hours ago in Colorado as well? But that kind of thing happens so often, it's barely even newsworthy.

For every single person with extremist views who is murdered by a gun, like Kirk, there are thousands of innocent people (including kids) who get murdered by guns without ever getting a chance to express their views at all.

To focus on Kirk and say this is about free speech is a ridiculous distortion of the real problem. The real problem is right-wing gun laws.

Ladamesansmerci · 11/09/2025 00:30

Dangermoos · 11/09/2025 00:18

No, as I don't think it's OK for white people to be called gammon, flagshaggers, belittled for loving their origins. There are two extreme sides to the political spectrum. I don't agree with racism and I don't agree with hypocrites, hiding under the guise of compassion when that compassion is selectively issued. I'm not the knly one that's had enough of the left giving it large with their sneery attitudes to anybody who doesn't agree with them

I'm not even disagreeing with you 😂 I'm left-wing, but I truly do not believe it is helpful for either side to hurl insults at each other. Libtards isn't helpful. Nor is flagshaggers, etc. The reason there is so much civil unrest is because politicians have pitted the two ends of the political spectrum completely against each other. I'm very socialist tbh, but I'm absolutely happy to listen to people share their concerns around asylum seekers/immigration, the impact on the NHS, concerns around cultural integration, etc. I absolutely understand the concerns of predominantly working class communities and how immigration has affected those areas. I will not however sit and listen to people saying 'shoot the boats', 'burn the mosques', etc. There is a way to put your beliefs across. It's not helpful when left-wingers call right-wingers thick, uneducated, etc. It also absolutely does the right no favours to talk about shooting boats. Civilised debate around immigration (or any other topic) is very different from people just using it as an excuse to be overtly racist.

But on a side note, can we not compare calling someone a flagshagger or a libtard to the genocide of millions of people due to their ethnic origins. It's absolutely not comparable 🙈

FOJN · 11/09/2025 00:39

Shakeoffyourchains · 11/09/2025 00:16

But words can and do provoke violence, as we don't live in a perfect word, and anyone speaking publicly has to be aware of the potential consequences of what they say.

Charlie Kirk knew full well that his words and views provoked strong reactions, he made a career out of it, and he did it in a country that is awash with weapons that make it all too easy for someone to kill indiscriminately and people who have no issues using them. His death isn’t right, but it was foreseeable.

"What were you wearing?"

Was he asking for it?

Can you even hear yourself?

One could argue that saying, "freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequence" is a statement which could encourage someone of unsound mind to commit acts of violence.

FreeSpeech2025 · 11/09/2025 00:41

Well tonight has certainly opened my eyes to how wicked some of the tolerant ‘be kind’ left can be. I’ve never read such hateful bile, and on a parenting site no less. All because someone said some things they didn’t agree with they’re revelling in his murder. I despair.

cassandre · 11/09/2025 00:47

I really need to go to bed now, but absolutely no one on this thread is ‘revelling’ in this man’s murder. Sheesh.

Saying that he had abhorrent views and that he actively campaigned for unrestricted gun ownership is not the same as condoning his death.

Honestly the hyperbole and mischaracterisation sometimes make me despair. Are people even reading the thread?

NoKidsSendDogs · 11/09/2025 00:49

WhatNextBanana · 10/09/2025 23:02

I understand most images have been removed. Should never be allowed to be shared. Children shouldn't be exposed to that type of content.

It's all over social, it's not going anywhere

TinyIsMyNewt · 11/09/2025 00:49

Can we drop this notion that Kirk was a free speech advocate? Like many on the right, he wasn't pro free-speech, he was pro right-wing speech.

He and his organization published watchlists, to "name and shame" university professors who espoused left wing views.

He was a partisan hack, who sought to oppress views he didn't agree with.

He was, of course, also a prominent ally of Donald Trump, who has passed laws and sought to deport people over their Pro-Palestinian views, and has repeatedly attacked the free press.

By all means, mourn Kirk's death, be angry at his murder, but he was just one more of a long line of right wing gobshites who dishonestly hid behind the slogan of "protecting free speech" while stifling it.

DdraigGoch · 11/09/2025 00:50

FreeSpeech2025 · 11/09/2025 00:41

Well tonight has certainly opened my eyes to how wicked some of the tolerant ‘be kind’ left can be. I’ve never read such hateful bile, and on a parenting site no less. All because someone said some things they didn’t agree with they’re revelling in his murder. I despair.

Who is "revelling" in it? There's a quote function on this site, maybe you could provide an example.

NoKidsSendDogs · 11/09/2025 00:50

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

DdraigGoch · 11/09/2025 00:52

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

One gun death is a tragedy. 46,728 is a statistic. That's the mentality.

NoKidsSendDogs · 11/09/2025 00:53

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

1dayatatime · 11/09/2025 00:53

FreeSpeech2025 · 11/09/2025 00:41

Well tonight has certainly opened my eyes to how wicked some of the tolerant ‘be kind’ left can be. I’ve never read such hateful bile, and on a parenting site no less. All because someone said some things they didn’t agree with they’re revelling in his murder. I despair.

Tonight has confirmed to me that greatest threat to democracy and freedom of speech comes from the left and not the right.

FreeSpeech2025 · 11/09/2025 00:54

DdraigGoch · 11/09/2025 00:50

Who is "revelling" in it? There's a quote function on this site, maybe you could provide an example.

I was talking about Mumsnet in general tonight. I said it on this thread as all the others have been taken down.

And as I write this post as sure as night follows day someone posts “He just became one of his totally acceptable statistics 😀” with a fucking smiley face.

cassandre · 11/09/2025 00:57

FreeSpeech2025 · 11/09/2025 00:54

I was talking about Mumsnet in general tonight. I said it on this thread as all the others have been taken down.

And as I write this post as sure as night follows day someone posts “He just became one of his totally acceptable statistics 😀” with a fucking smiley face.

Well you might want to read this thread. Just an idea.

1dayatatime · 11/09/2025 00:58

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I'm not sure that his wife and two young children are finding it hilarious right now.

But you have confirmed that the greatest threat to democracy, freedom of speech and civil order comes from the left and not the right.

NoKidsSendDogs · 11/09/2025 00:59

FreeSpeech2025 · 11/09/2025 00:54

I was talking about Mumsnet in general tonight. I said it on this thread as all the others have been taken down.

And as I write this post as sure as night follows day someone posts “He just became one of his totally acceptable statistics 😀” with a fucking smiley face.

He did

DdraigGoch · 11/09/2025 01:00

1dayatatime · 11/09/2025 00:53

Tonight has confirmed to me that greatest threat to democracy and freedom of speech comes from the left and not the right.

What makes tonight different to when Democrats were shot in June?
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jun/16/republicans-trump-minnesota-lawmakers-killings