Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask what you think of a proposal after 1.5 years aged 35+?

114 replies

Evilwasp2 · 09/09/2025 13:04

Let's assume you're that age or over, recently moved in together, would an engagement at that time be obscene if you're both ready?
I don't get when people say 'Oh you first need to see how they act in a difficult situation/in an argument'.
These things can come after years and people can change, hence people divorcing.

OP posts:
missmollygreen · 09/09/2025 19:03

Evilwasp2 · 09/09/2025 13:12

See i don't get this 'you need to see all their flaws' nobody is perfect, why can't someone just be loved and not constantly evaluated on a bloody scale

You have figured it out OP! We can cancel all the divorces now!

SaladAndChipsForTea · 09/09/2025 20:35

Someone2025 · 09/09/2025 18:59

She can be a good mum with or without a dad on the scene, plenty are.

Yeah, because that’s what every woman wants

Perhaps OP can answer.

Did you see my previous post?

Ps, we're literally on mumsnet, I think its a safe bet most users are women that have or want kids

Plastictreees · 09/09/2025 20:36

I think that’s a perfectly reasonable time frame.

AmyDuPlantier · 09/09/2025 20:41

Obscene? Are you mad 🤣

Its perfectly fine and normal.

Someone2025 · 09/09/2025 20:43

SaladAndChipsForTea · 09/09/2025 20:35

Perhaps OP can answer.

Did you see my previous post?

Ps, we're literally on mumsnet, I think its a safe bet most users are women that have or want kids

Not on their own!!

SaladAndChipsForTea · 09/09/2025 20:54

Someone2025 · 09/09/2025 20:43

Not on their own!!

Many women are already fudging it alone or would be happier and with happier kids of they were doing it alone.

Some kids have absolute arseholes for fathers.

Someone2025 · 09/09/2025 20:56

SaladAndChipsForTea · 09/09/2025 20:54

Many women are already fudging it alone or would be happier and with happier kids of they were doing it alone.

Some kids have absolute arseholes for fathers.

But very few set out with the intention of doing it on their own!

FuzzyWolf · 09/09/2025 20:56

Evilwasp2 · 09/09/2025 13:12

See i don't get this 'you need to see all their flaws' nobody is perfect, why can't someone just be loved and not constantly evaluated on a bloody scale

I’ve never known anyone say that is needed.

Hadalifeonce · 09/09/2025 22:17

Engaged after 6 months, married 3 months later. That was 26 years ago. I knew he was 'the one' as soon as he looked at me and smiled

cardibach · 09/09/2025 22:55

AzureCats · 09/09/2025 17:17

I came back to ask if @cardibach is from the area where this phrase is relevant. I am, that's why I recognised it. I think I saw you post on a Taylor Swift thread when I was using my old username ages ago too, which is why I remembered it.

Which phrase? My username indicates a place I lived for a long time, but I’ve moved now.

Rainbowqueeen · 09/09/2025 23:11

The time frame is perfectly reasonable.

The idea that you can love someone enough to ignore their flaws is a problem. Love is not enough for a successful relationship. You need to share values, especially in respect of finances, day to day life and future goals. You also need to have a successful communication style and each other's best interests at heart. You can know these things without living together but I think living together does help. Someone can say they believe in 50-50 chores but the reality may be different.

JennyWI · 09/09/2025 23:19

Just fine. I know people who got engaged faster than that. I know someone who got engaged after 21 days of dating, married around 4 month mark and married 3 years now... with a 14 year age gap..
Yep that someone is me.

Superscientist · 09/09/2025 23:29

For me it depends on how you have spent the 1.5 years. If it's been wined, dined and wooed I'd probably you say you want to consider making sure you aren't missing a flaw as it's possible to be a false person for that length of time.
If you have 1.5 y where you have been integrated in one anothers lives ideally with some cohabitation even if that is spending significant time at one anothers houses rather than a house you share.

Two things I think are crucial for a relationship is similar viewpoints on money and finances and a someone willing to care for the other. Financial pressures are hard enough on a relationship without a mismatch in views on spending and credit etc. Knowing some has your back when you need and for this I find how someone treats you when you are sick is often and indicator for how they would be when you have other needs. I hadn't been seeing my partner very long at all and a lot younger than 35 when I had cause to be in a and e one evening whilst he was revising for an exam. He spent the evening in a and e with me although did bring his revision notes with him. He's stood by me through all sorts of crises since and I have him. This was a small incident which just highlighted where his caring priorities lay.

Barnbrack · 10/09/2025 18:35

Evilwasp2 · 09/09/2025 13:12

See i don't get this 'you need to see all their flaws' nobody is perfect, why can't someone just be loved and not constantly evaluated on a bloody scale

Have you been in a long term relationship previously op?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread