Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be surprised by the names of the “posh kids” at DDs school

368 replies

marilee · 31/08/2025 02:55

Hi all, my DD just started primary 1. The catchment area for her new school is super mixed with all the nicest houses in the town but also 2 council areas so a real mix. We live in a council flat, I can’t say I’ve rubbed shoulders with the more middle class half of the town and I grew up in a firmly working class area so this is the first time in my life I’m properly mixing with this group (I know that’s awful but it’s just how life has been for me so far).

I don’t know why but I was expecting all the posh kids to have more extravagant names but almost every single one of them is just a very basic name (James, Harry, Anna, Clara, Emily, Emma etc.). While the names I’d normally have associated as being more “posh” are actually the names of the kids from my area (Rafferty, Arabella, Florence, Theodore).

AIBU to be shocked by this? Is this normal or a little regional quirk?

OP posts:
ManchesterLu · 31/08/2025 12:28

CherrieTomaties · 31/08/2025 03:00

Why are you even labelling names as “basic”
or “posh”?

Please don’t pass this mindset down to your children.

Yeah, completely this. What on earth? I can understand what you mean, and how things may have been viewed in the past - but the only way we can challenge views is by making sure our kids don't let us talk like this!

MrsSlocombesCat · 31/08/2025 12:33

R0ckandHardPlace · 31/08/2025 07:22

I remember being shocked when Princess Anne’s grandchildren were named Mia and Savannah, as both were very popular names in my northern working class town at the time.

Zara was very unusual too at the time she was born.

Cloanie · 31/08/2025 12:35

Moresettingspuzzles · 31/08/2025 12:18

Why do people take the opinions of people who don't actually know/care about royal history seriously when it comes to how classy a name is.
I always see Alfie Archie and Albie called low class names on here. They're literally short for Alfred Archibald and Albert.
Then said posters try and say "Rafferty" is upper class.

Just funny shit at this point no actual upper class person would name a child rafferty

Because people are talking about how names are used nowadays, not historically.

grrrlatrix · 31/08/2025 12:36

This tallies with my experience in education. We have a very mixed intake and the poorer areas tend to have the invented/inventive names, the double barrelling and the names shared with celebrity babies.

The newer trend is what I consider the “names of an English butler in a film” e.g. Grayson, Parker, Hudson, Trent, Oakley, Beauford etc.
Millions of those ATM.

MrsSlocombesCat · 31/08/2025 12:39

Heggettypeg · 31/08/2025 10:36

Wasn't "Lilibet" originally a royal family nickname for "Elizabeth"? I don't think it was used as a name in its own right before the present holder, though.

Yes it was how her sister pronounced it and it stuck. The same thing happened with my granddaughter, her sister couldn't say her name and all these years later she's stuck with KK.

ToWhitToWhoo · 31/08/2025 12:42

Well, I suppose the poshest people are the Royals, and they mostly have classic, non-'fancy' names: Elizabeth, Margaret, Philip, Charles, Anne, Andrew, Edward, William, Harry, etc.

Quite generally speaking, I don't think names are 'posh' or otherwise. They may develop 'class' associations, but these are terribly tied to specific to specific times and places. UK, 1970s: Olivia = unusual and rather 'fancy' sounding name. UK, 2020s: Olivia = one of the most standard names for a girl. UK, 1990s: Chelsea = looked down on as 'lower class' by name-snobs. USA, 1990s: Chelsea = name of President's daughter.

Heggettypeg · 31/08/2025 12:44

MrsSlocombesCat · 31/08/2025 12:39

Yes it was how her sister pronounced it and it stuck. The same thing happened with my granddaughter, her sister couldn't say her name and all these years later she's stuck with KK.

Ah, that was it. I couldn't remember exactly where it came from. Thanks.

blueflannel · 31/08/2025 12:55

Damnloginpopup · 31/08/2025 05:02

Fucking RAFFERTY???

wow.

Outrageous! I’d have gone for Raffa-Ti though

Moresettingspuzzles · 31/08/2025 12:55

Cloanie · 31/08/2025 12:35

Because people are talking about how names are used nowadays, not historically.

At the end of the day it's all subjective and I don't see why the opinions of people who dismiss history should be taken seriously when it comes to how "classy" a name is.

The occasional teacher on Mumsnet who claims to teach a naughty boy called Alfie doesn't mean the name is lower class.

Royal names will always be classier than bs like Rafferty 🤷🏻‍♀️real rich people know this

ToWhitToWhoo · 31/08/2025 13:02

anotherside · 31/08/2025 08:57

Boris was just his nickname though. Apparently he still goes by Al to those he was close to.

It's one of his middle names. At least he doesn't call himself De Pfeffel, which would definitely be (suitably!) silly.

Heggettypeg · 31/08/2025 13:07

Rafferty, oddly enough, has come full circle. It started off as an old Irish first name, then became a surname because many Irish surnames, like Welsh ones, were originally patronymics ("son of" understood). Now it's a first name again. But maybe it never stopped being a first name in Ireland too? Any Irish posters on here?

ToWhitToWhoo · 31/08/2025 13:09

Wishingplenty · 31/08/2025 07:15

I agree that posh kids can be snobby, but at the very worst they will just ignore, or perhaps some name calling without causing physical pain. They do bully different to working class kids, but the threat of physical harm is more real in the working class. Both forms of bullying is horrible, but let's not pretend the rough working class are capable of a lot worst with often the parents joining in.

Not true; some public school boys are the worst for physical bullying.

Cloanie · 31/08/2025 13:12

Moresettingspuzzles · 31/08/2025 12:55

At the end of the day it's all subjective and I don't see why the opinions of people who dismiss history should be taken seriously when it comes to how "classy" a name is.

The occasional teacher on Mumsnet who claims to teach a naughty boy called Alfie doesn't mean the name is lower class.

Royal names will always be classier than bs like Rafferty 🤷🏻‍♀️real rich people know this

It isn’t dismissing history, at all. It’s knowing that social history is an organic thing, and the current social situation is that those names are adopted by a certain class. Pretending a zeitgeist doesn’t exist really is delusional. Hence nobody calling their daughters Karen or Sharon,any longer. Perfectly good names, but out of sync with the times.

AtomHeartMotherOfGod · 31/08/2025 13:20

ShineLuceeeee · 31/08/2025 04:42

I have found this:

  • The genuinely posh people don't go for overly fancy names but traditional older names (eg James - lovely name btw)
  • The nouveau riche/upwardly mobile go for names that are OTT posh (eg Atticus, Hugo)
  • More working class tend to go for names that were normal posh but then have gone out of fashion (Arabella is a perfect eg)

Completely agree.

I saw an advert featuring 'Mollie-Mae' the other day. Don't know who she is - some kind of influencer I guess - and in it I'm pretty sure she said 'Bambi's things get everywhere'. I'm just going to leave those two crackers there.

I know a lovely Rafferty.

SemiRetiredLoveGoddeess · 31/08/2025 13:30

I don't think so. They have practically taken over the area. Mass and very swift gentrification, and "us locals" are very much in the minority. No more plebs a go go, you may be happy to hear.

Unbelieveable, silly, prices, for very unremarkable, rabbit hutch size apartments and drab, dingy little terraces.
Which they think are wonderful.
The new landed gentry? Ha ha ha !!!

Unfortunately, this is now commonplace through out the country . Such is the state of UK housing.

Leave you with Coriolanus and Medusa, or Corrie and Med for our latest cat and dog names.

Moresettingspuzzles · 31/08/2025 13:34

Cloanie · 31/08/2025 13:12

It isn’t dismissing history, at all. It’s knowing that social history is an organic thing, and the current social situation is that those names are adopted by a certain class. Pretending a zeitgeist doesn’t exist really is delusional. Hence nobody calling their daughters Karen or Sharon,any longer. Perfectly good names, but out of sync with the times.

Maybe there are some names only used by a certain class of people, you can list them if you want.
But some of the names listed on here as "low class" like Amelia and Alfie are just regular names used by all types of people.

caringcarer · 31/08/2025 13:46

Ponoka7 · 31/08/2025 06:20

It's Irish. It could be a family name. Hector was my FILs name, if we'd have had a boy, I'd have used it. Both of our families have Celtic roots.
Generations ago, Christian bible names were used, other names became classic and stuck with, within the middle classes. If you named your child after your Aunt/Uncle, you'd get a dropsy.

What is a dropsy?

SchnizelVonKrumm · 31/08/2025 13:46

SemiRetiredLoveGoddeess · 31/08/2025 13:30

I don't think so. They have practically taken over the area. Mass and very swift gentrification, and "us locals" are very much in the minority. No more plebs a go go, you may be happy to hear.

Unbelieveable, silly, prices, for very unremarkable, rabbit hutch size apartments and drab, dingy little terraces.
Which they think are wonderful.
The new landed gentry? Ha ha ha !!!

Unfortunately, this is now commonplace through out the country . Such is the state of UK housing.

Leave you with Coriolanus and Medusa, or Corrie and Med for our latest cat and dog names.

Wrong thread?

Medusa is a brilliant name for a cat though!

TeenLifeMum · 31/08/2025 13:47

Bambamhoohoo · 31/08/2025 11:59

That’s not a good comparator for this thread. Just because everyone judges doesn’t mean all judging is ok and you shouldn’t be aware of it and try and reduce it.

Judging others is essential - would my dc be safe in this nursery, do I trust the staff, is this a nice looking restaurant I want to go to, do I want to spend time with these people, do I trust this trader to do work in my home. All of it is judgments made in seconds. What people wear, their name, their background (which can be demonstrated in many ways) are all what is humans put together and categorise people. It’s important.

Parkhotel · 31/08/2025 13:56

Heggettypeg · 31/08/2025 13:07

Rafferty, oddly enough, has come full circle. It started off as an old Irish first name, then became a surname because many Irish surnames, like Welsh ones, were originally patronymics ("son of" understood). Now it's a first name again. But maybe it never stopped being a first name in Ireland too? Any Irish posters on here?

No it’s not used as a first name here in Ireland. Just looked up the stats and there are no records for it.

Drew79 · 31/08/2025 13:56

HarrietBond · 31/08/2025 09:29

My friend. Professional, fairly well off.

Re the name Bear.

Mum from gypsy family, both young parents, rough area.

So names really tell us nothing.

YankSplaining · 31/08/2025 13:56

tygertygers · 31/08/2025 05:08

I will never understand the English obsession with names and class. So glad I moved away and am free of that nonsense. “working class names” FFS

If I, an American, wrote a novel in which British characters acted like some of the people on this thread, it would probably be rejected on the grounds that I was using outdated, over-the-top stereotypes of snobby, class-obsessed Brits. “Oh, my, Harriet, look at all the silly little commoners with their upper-class pretensions! Imagine being so déclassé as to name one’s baby Arabella! Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha! Oh, I simply must tell Lady Snobbington when I see her later at Ascot!”

Parkhotel · 31/08/2025 14:07

Heggettypeg · 31/08/2025 13:07

Rafferty, oddly enough, has come full circle. It started off as an old Irish first name, then became a surname because many Irish surnames, like Welsh ones, were originally patronymics ("son of" understood). Now it's a first name again. But maybe it never stopped being a first name in Ireland too? Any Irish posters on here?

Just to add the Irish form of the now obselete first name was Rabhartach. Rafferty is an anglicised spelling/pronunciation of the surname form of the name.

Bambamhoohoo · 31/08/2025 14:10

TeenLifeMum · 31/08/2025 13:47

Judging others is essential - would my dc be safe in this nursery, do I trust the staff, is this a nice looking restaurant I want to go to, do I want to spend time with these people, do I trust this trader to do work in my home. All of it is judgments made in seconds. What people wear, their name, their background (which can be demonstrated in many ways) are all what is humans put together and categorise people. It’s important.

Surely you realise the nuance between what you’re saying and what’s happening on this thread?!

SemperIdem · 31/08/2025 14:10

teaandmarmalade · 31/08/2025 07:55

I do find the social aspect of names really, really interesting. It’s hard to discuss on here though because people get very snappy and defensive.

In general though it is funny to think that Iris, Edith and Winnie would have their days again. I can’t imagine newborns called Shirley, Jean or Maureen but I know it will come!

I have recently had a baby and she’s one of the names you mention having their day again. My grandmother comments often “never thought I’d see a baby one” because to her those names are “old lady” names. Which is quite funny because she is now an old lady herself, but more the Shirley/Patricia/Barbara/Pamela generation.

I expect I can look forward to grandchildren called Beverley and Gordon, based on how names cycle back!