Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Cycling Mikey doesn't deserve the hate he's getting

289 replies

ByDandyTurtle · 28/08/2025 20:35

He's not putting fumes in people's lungs from his car and sees people doing illegal activities that kill others or make our premiums go up.

OP posts:
ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 21:24

ConfusedSloth · 28/08/2025 21:17

Good for you? That's not relevant to what I said.

Nurses are trained and qualified to give vaccinations. I think that doing that is a good thing. It doesn't mean I should do it without training and qualifications to do it safely.

Plumbers are trained and qualified to plumb in gas cookers for families. I think that doing that is a good thing. It doesn't mean I should do it without training and qualifications to do it safely.

I never said this man was even being unsafe. I simply pointed out that OP's argument that an untrained, unqualified man pursuing a motorist is the same as police pursuing a motorist isn't a true comparison. I made no comment on this man in particular.

Except telling people to behave better isn’t something that requires a qualification, unlike plumbing. Just a dose of confidence and human decency. But of an odd comparison!

YanTanTetheraPetheraBumfitt · 28/08/2025 21:25

He totally threw his bike at the car, there’s a video taken by someone else which shows it a lot clearer. He shoved the bike infront of him as the car was approaching. He lost it and did it on purpose. Of course the motorist shouldn’t have been coming through a no entry sign but that’s no excuse for purposefully throwing your bike in front of a car.

Chompingatthebeat · 28/08/2025 21:25

Mikkymik · 28/08/2025 21:23

The overwhelming majority of people he dobs in aren't actually doing anything dangerous. While they might technically be breaking the law, that's because the law is inflexible and doesn't adapt to every person in every single situation.

Take for example a long line of stationary traffic, with cars inching forward a few feet every couple of minutes. It's true that it's still illegal for a driver to use his mobile phone in that situation, but in actuality it wouldn't be endangering anyone.

Yet these are the drivers he goes after. Same with most other offences. He picks low hanging fruit, people who are going about their day, not being a public nuisance or danger.

And before the smug holier than thou fuckers reply, please tell me you've never ever driven 21 mph in a 20 mph zone.

I guess its ok to go through red lights as well if no-one is coming the other way

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 21:25

TBH people being more offended about the fact that a man calls out dangerous drivers, than the dangerous driving itself, speaks volumes.

YouOKHun · 28/08/2025 21:25

I understand he feels strongly because his father was killed by someone driving dangerously (I think that’s right). I therefore understand his feelings as the same happened to me in my family. However, his understandable emotive response isn’t the best way to police dangerous driving, careless driving and errors and vigilantism has no place.

He needs to exorcise his demons in another way, for his own sanity and safety. The policing of driving needs to come from the police (which I know is a whole other conversation about resources etc). He isn’t a force for good or safer roads.

Mikkymik · 28/08/2025 21:25

ChattyGeePeaTea · 28/08/2025 21:18

I know him. He is one of the nicest and most supportive people you could hope to meet.

No he's not. He's a shitty egomaniac who thrives on causing misery.

XenoBitch · 28/08/2025 21:26

Mikkymik · 28/08/2025 21:23

The overwhelming majority of people he dobs in aren't actually doing anything dangerous. While they might technically be breaking the law, that's because the law is inflexible and doesn't adapt to every person in every single situation.

Take for example a long line of stationary traffic, with cars inching forward a few feet every couple of minutes. It's true that it's still illegal for a driver to use his mobile phone in that situation, but in actuality it wouldn't be endangering anyone.

Yet these are the drivers he goes after. Same with most other offences. He picks low hanging fruit, people who are going about their day, not being a public nuisance or danger.

And before the smug holier than thou fuckers reply, please tell me you've never ever driven 21 mph in a 20 mph zone.

No, it is dangerous for someone in stationary traffic to be using their phone.
I used to be a biker. So a car driver stuck in traffic and looking at their phone, is not going to notice me (and cyclists) filtering down the middle past them... and they should be.

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 21:26

gamerchick · 28/08/2025 21:20

Needing the clicks is he?

Doubt it, his videos wrack up about 5 million views

YanTanTetheraPetheraBumfitt · 28/08/2025 21:26

Chompingatthebeat · 28/08/2025 21:25

I guess its ok to go through red lights as well if no-one is coming the other way

Well he’s been caught on camera going through a red light 😁

ConfusedSloth · 28/08/2025 21:26

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 21:24

Except telling people to behave better isn’t something that requires a qualification, unlike plumbing. Just a dose of confidence and human decency. But of an odd comparison!

And pursuing motorists, which is what OP was talking about, does require training and qualifications.

UnicornMamma · 28/08/2025 21:27

That man is absolutely idiot on a power trip in a high vis.

He did a good act once but stopping someone, it have him an egoboost and hes become a pest.

He goes out of his way, everyday to create trouble, wind people up then behave like a blameless victim. There is no reason whatsoever for him doing the things he does. It's purely to annoy others a create content online.

ConfusedSloth · 28/08/2025 21:27

XenoBitch · 28/08/2025 21:26

No, it is dangerous for someone in stationary traffic to be using their phone.
I used to be a biker. So a car driver stuck in traffic and looking at their phone, is not going to notice me (and cyclists) filtering down the middle past them... and they should be.

Forgive my ignorance but, if the traffic isn't moving, why does it matter if a driver sees you filtering?

Mikkymik · 28/08/2025 21:27

Chompingatthebeat · 28/08/2025 21:25

I guess its ok to go through red lights as well if no-one is coming the other way

"OK" is a strong word. But yes, if a driver inched through a red light on an empty road say at 3am, with very clear views from all sides, I wouldn't class that as dangerous driving.

XenoBitch · 28/08/2025 21:28

ConfusedSloth · 28/08/2025 21:27

Forgive my ignorance but, if the traffic isn't moving, why does it matter if a driver sees you filtering?

The point is they don't see me filtering, as they are glued to their phone.

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 21:29

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

Is this the so called “Threw his bike at a car”???

Do people not know the meaning of the word “throw”

Interesting how nobody was offended by the fiat speeding on the wrong side of the road

ConfusedSloth · 28/08/2025 21:31

XenoBitch · 28/08/2025 21:28

The point is they don't see me filtering, as they are glued to their phone.

Yes. Like I asked, why does it matter if they don't see your filtering through non-moving traffic? You've said it's dangerous but I genuinely don't understand why.

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 21:31

Mikkymik · 28/08/2025 21:23

The overwhelming majority of people he dobs in aren't actually doing anything dangerous. While they might technically be breaking the law, that's because the law is inflexible and doesn't adapt to every person in every single situation.

Take for example a long line of stationary traffic, with cars inching forward a few feet every couple of minutes. It's true that it's still illegal for a driver to use his mobile phone in that situation, but in actuality it wouldn't be endangering anyone.

Yet these are the drivers he goes after. Same with most other offences. He picks low hanging fruit, people who are going about their day, not being a public nuisance or danger.

And before the smug holier than thou fuckers reply, please tell me you've never ever driven 21 mph in a 20 mph zone.

You don’t think driving down the wrong side of the road is dangerous?!

He doesn’t stop speeding cars.

Ive probably done 21 in a 20 but I’ve never used my mobile phone or driven down the wrong side of the road.

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 21:32

Chompingatthebeat · 28/08/2025 21:25

I guess its ok to go through red lights as well if no-one is coming the other way

As a cyclist AND a driver, other people’s shitty driving terrifies me.

TheNightingalesStarling · 28/08/2025 21:33

ConfusedSloth · 28/08/2025 21:31

Yes. Like I asked, why does it matter if they don't see your filtering through non-moving traffic? You've said it's dangerous but I genuinely don't understand why.

Because you aren't paying attention to the road.

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 21:33

XenoBitch · 28/08/2025 21:26

No, it is dangerous for someone in stationary traffic to be using their phone.
I used to be a biker. So a car driver stuck in traffic and looking at their phone, is not going to notice me (and cyclists) filtering down the middle past them... and they should be.

Yep, as a cyclist I always move away from stationery drivers on their phone. They are distracted, and that distraction means they are concentrating even when the phone is put down

Mikkymik · 28/08/2025 21:34

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 21:31

You don’t think driving down the wrong side of the road is dangerous?!

He doesn’t stop speeding cars.

Ive probably done 21 in a 20 but I’ve never used my mobile phone or driven down the wrong side of the road.

In stationary traffic it isn't actually dangerous to use your phone. Nor is it always dangerous to drive a couple of meters on the other side of the road (eg clear empty road, and you want to skip the queue to make a right turn).

If legality is your compass, then doing 21 in a 20 zone is illegal. But if it's common sense then most of CM's victims aren't actually doing anything dangerous.

The punishment of points and a fine certainly don't fit the crime of checking your phone is standstill traffic.

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 21:34

ConfusedSloth · 28/08/2025 21:26

And pursuing motorists, which is what OP was talking about, does require training and qualifications.

He doesn’t “pursue motorists”, he stops them and tell them to behave better. That doesn’t require training.

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 21:36

Mikkymik · 28/08/2025 21:27

"OK" is a strong word. But yes, if a driver inched through a red light on an empty road say at 3am, with very clear views from all sides, I wouldn't class that as dangerous driving.

If they killed someone crossing the road legally at 3am, would you class it as dangerous driving? Or is it just bad luck?

XenoBitch · 28/08/2025 21:36

ConfusedSloth · 28/08/2025 21:31

Yes. Like I asked, why does it matter if they don't see your filtering through non-moving traffic? You've said it's dangerous but I genuinely don't understand why.

Because they start moving and sometimes veer into the middle, or start to change lane.
Most of my near misses have been when I have filtered through heavy traffic, or past parked cars. People open their doors without looking.

Mikkymik · 28/08/2025 21:36

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 21:34

He doesn’t “pursue motorists”, he stops them and tell them to behave better. That doesn’t require training.

No, he dobs them in. The telling off is just a bonus ego boost. He is the worst kind of human, as his misanthropy is coated in slimy do-gooderism.

Swipe left for the next trending thread