Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think rich people steal money all the time and that’s often why they’re rich?

647 replies

MyAmusedOpalCrab · 05/08/2025 16:48

We hear so much about “hard work” and “smart investments” but let’s be honest, so many rich people didn’t get wealthy by being ethical. From dodgy business practices to exploiting workers, tax dodging, insider deals and straight-up corruption, wealth often comes at someone else’s expense.

Governments bail out billionaires while ordinary people struggle to afford rent. CEOs cut wages and benefits while pocketing massive bonuses. Huge corporations find loopholes to avoid taxes while the rest of us get squeezed.

Obviously not every rich person is a thief but AIBU to think that a lot of them are? That the system is rigged in their favour and they keep getting richer by bending or outright breaking the rules?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
MyLimeGuide · 08/08/2025 08:18

BIossomtoes · 08/08/2025 08:10

They know the far higher figures for tax evasion, why wouldn’t they just stop it?

Both should be stopped. There isn't any resources available to do so unfortunately.

MyLimeGuide · 08/08/2025 08:32

Great news! 😊

MyNameIsX · 08/08/2025 08:36

Pliudev · 08/08/2025 07:52

I was quoting the report by the Common Wealth think tank that was in The Guardian this week, which discussed the way Thatcher's policy contributed to the housing crisis and its true cost. But please don’t bother to reply. You are abusive and, in my opinion, that doesn't contribute to any form of debate.

You choose one data set from a left wing think tank, published by a left wing ‘newspaper’, for a policy that was introduced 45 years ago. Please, be serious.

And for context, within 12 months, Labour are facing a GBP 51 bn deficit (including fiscal headroom).

That’s from the NIESR, the UK’s oldest independent economic research unit.

MyNameIsX · 08/08/2025 08:37

MyLimeGuide · 08/08/2025 08:32

Great news! 😊

How many will be WFH?

Pliudev · 08/08/2025 08:47

MyNameIsX · 08/08/2025 08:36

You choose one data set from a left wing think tank, published by a left wing ‘newspaper’, for a policy that was introduced 45 years ago. Please, be serious.

And for context, within 12 months, Labour are facing a GBP 51 bn deficit (including fiscal headroom).

That’s from the NIESR, the UK’s oldest independent economic research unit.

So you bring us full circle. This was the point of the OP's initial post. So, how do you think it came about? And please don't blame a government that's only been in power for twelve months. What, in your opinion, happened in the previous 14 years?
You might also wish to expand on why there is no council housing available to those who need it and why landlords such as the recently departed housing minister can increase rents with impunity.

MyLimeGuide · 08/08/2025 08:47

MyNameIsX · 08/08/2025 08:37

How many will be WFH?

Lol! All of them probably 😂

BIossomtoes · 08/08/2025 08:58

MyNameIsX · 08/08/2025 08:37

How many will be WFH?

Their workplace is of no relevance if they increase Treasury revenue.

MyNameIsX · 08/08/2025 09:31

BIossomtoes · 08/08/2025 08:58

Their workplace is of no relevance if they increase Treasury revenue.

Not quite so simple is it.

Productivity home vs office.
Revenue collected vs headcount costs etc.

BIossomtoes · 08/08/2025 09:35

MyNameIsX · 08/08/2025 09:31

Not quite so simple is it.

Productivity home vs office.
Revenue collected vs headcount costs etc.

Obviously. The bottom line is clearly the amount of money recovered.

Magpie105 · 08/08/2025 09:37

usernamealreadytaken · 08/08/2025 08:06

Selling off council housing didn't reduce the number of homes, it just shifted the tenure. The housing crisis is largely due to not having enough homes, the change in family structure, and having too many people; net immigration is the primary driver of population growth, and while we’re told not to blame immigrants, if they are one of the largest reasons for the housing shortage, why are we blaming someone who died before high immigration became a thing? Labour were in power for 13 years prior to the last Conservative government, and they didn't see fit to reverse or change the policy. Owning something, having a stake in it, makes someone more likely to look after it and remove the enormous maintenance costs from the state.

farage always cites the population increase since Blair came into power. THE BIT HE MISSES OUT is that government tax revenue went from about £250bn to nearer £1 trillion in that time. Adjusting for inflation it is over a 60% increase. That is partly because immigrants add to the pot. You can blame population growth but maybe instead you should blame the lack of public investment with this money. Besides we need immigrants to fund an ageing population and last time I checked the people and corporations buying up the housing stock for profit were not people arriving on a boat in Dover.

MyNameIsX · 08/08/2025 09:37

BIossomtoes · 08/08/2025 09:35

Obviously. The bottom line is clearly the amount of money recovered.

I wonder if HMRC will be as successful at recruiting the 5,000, as the Labour government are at recruiting their promised 6,500 new state school teachers?

How’s that working out btw - please could you update us all?

usernamealreadytaken · 08/08/2025 09:45

BIossomtoes · 08/08/2025 08:10

They know the far higher figures for tax evasion, why wouldn’t they just stop it?

Two things can be true at once. I guess they know about tax evasion because the businesses are paying at least some tax. The benefit cheats are just taking, taking, taking; what do they actually contribute?

MyLimeGuide · 08/08/2025 09:47

usernamealreadytaken · 08/08/2025 09:45

Two things can be true at once. I guess they know about tax evasion because the businesses are paying at least some tax. The benefit cheats are just taking, taking, taking; what do they actually contribute?

So true 👏

Wonderwendy · 08/08/2025 12:15

FlyMeSomewhere · 08/08/2025 06:23

Do you always throw crazy accusations at people? No he's not a bloody multi millionaire! I said he built a career as did I! He's a senior IT engineer for an NHS trust and I'm a Health and Safety practitioner so no we don't earn huge pay packets and we earned it by ourselves!

How dare you attack my partner like that without asking what career has! He grew up with a violent piss head mother who never encouraged, his mates all became smack heads, never knew his biological dad and he got out of that shit and built a career, I'm very proud of him, he doesn't need to be a millionaire to be a guy that made something of himself!

Do you always make yourself look such a twat?

Calm down dear, you're embarrassing yourself 😂

Wonderwendy · 08/08/2025 12:20

FlyMeSomewhere · 08/08/2025 06:28

Says the person who massively punched my NHS worker partner down and accused him of being a lazy bastard millionaire who earned all his money by enslaving others! He earns less than 50k a year!

You should probably read the posts you're referring too before you go off on a crazy tirade.

siliconcover · 08/08/2025 12:21

BallerinaRadio · 05/08/2025 16:58

I don't know when we as a country began cowing to the people with power and money and turning on our fellow 'regular' citizens but it's pathetic to see. The men ( and it is mostly men) in power have got us all fighting amongst ourselves and blaming everybody else for our problems but them.

And we have people pathetically claiming we need these people or we'll be even poorer when they're keeping us poor and even on this post people thinking people on benefits is the real problem.

Until we lose this attitude we'll get nowhere.

I agree entirely. It's very entrenced though. Perhaps it's been going on since the Elizabethan Poor Laws or people being annoyed at others 'on the parish'. Victorian workhouses were certainly meant to be punitive. I do think that current politiicians of all colours (I have been disappointed at KS 'useless eaters' line) and legacymedia and social media whip it up for their own ends though so I don't see it getting better any time soon. I hoped there might be a re-set when 'critical workers' (bus drivers, shopfloor workers etc) were officially 'valued' during Covid but no, we've gone right back to where we were. And worse.

poetryandwine · 08/08/2025 12:44

Cottagecheeseisnotcheese · 07/08/2025 15:39

@poetryandwine there are 3 millionaires if you include the value of primary residence ie their home, if you exclude primary residence only (not second homes or BTL etc) then the number of millionaires drops to around 285,000 ie less than a 1 in 11 are millionaires in terms of actual wealth as opposed to owners of a valuable home as everyone has to live somewhere
so the 9500 leaving are actually out of 225,000 which is 3.3% as opposed to 0.3%

Okay.

How many of these departing millionaires are British born of British parents? How many are expats from somewhere else who landed up here for a while and are now moving on? Very different scenarios.

A few of the former will always have reason to move. Eg my British husband wanted to return here and we had a good opportunity. That will happen in reverse, there will be professional requirements, etc.

If people genuinely leave their hone country because of a relatively small rough patch, that is pretty damned unpatriotic and frankly to hell with them. I won’t go into detail but I know whereof I speak.

What we need is growth but who will provide it? The Tories never got beyond green shoots in nearly 15 years so please don’t tell me policies favouring their cronies again is the answer

usernamealreadytaken · 08/08/2025 12:53

poetryandwine · 08/08/2025 12:44

Okay.

How many of these departing millionaires are British born of British parents? How many are expats from somewhere else who landed up here for a while and are now moving on? Very different scenarios.

A few of the former will always have reason to move. Eg my British husband wanted to return here and we had a good opportunity. That will happen in reverse, there will be professional requirements, etc.

If people genuinely leave their hone country because of a relatively small rough patch, that is pretty damned unpatriotic and frankly to hell with them. I won’t go into detail but I know whereof I speak.

What we need is growth but who will provide it? The Tories never got beyond green shoots in nearly 15 years so please don’t tell me policies favouring their cronies again is the answer

Does it matter where people are from? The country is losing wealthy people; people who spend and invest in this country. Who do you think will pay for stuff when those with money leave?

poetryandwine · 08/08/2025 13:10

usernamealreadytaken · 08/08/2025 12:53

Does it matter where people are from? The country is losing wealthy people; people who spend and invest in this country. Who do you think will pay for stuff when those with money leave?

Can you please source the statement that the people leaving are investing in the country? I know there are a few mentions on this thread but I would like a statistic. Rich people don’t spend proportionately to their income.

The UK has the lowest private R&D (Research and Development) investment amongst major Western European nations, and correspondingly pays out a greater proportion of dividends. Our companies focus on short term shareholder gains rather than long term investment.

There are exceptions, of course. But at scale, we often look to foreigners to fund them.

Even Sir James Dyson is back, presumably because he and his family missed the place. I do think it matters whether you have deep ties or whether you landed up here because London in the 90’s and 00’s was a happening place, with not many questions asked about the source of your money. Easy come, easy go.

cardibach · 08/08/2025 13:10

Look around @usernamealreadytaken
They aren't paying for it now and everything is expensive. That’s at least partly because of wealth hoarding.

Cabinqueen · 08/08/2025 13:27

My dad used to explain it like this....

It's the chap (the boss) on £120k a year telling the chap (the line manager) on £60k a year to tell the chlap (the worker) on £25k a year that he won't be getting a pay rise because there isn't enough money to go around....

Seems about right still today I guess...

Magpie105 · 08/08/2025 13:28

usernamealreadytaken · 08/08/2025 09:45

Two things can be true at once. I guess they know about tax evasion because the businesses are paying at least some tax. The benefit cheats are just taking, taking, taking; what do they actually contribute?

That’s a nice bit of deflection and mental acrobatics. Ignore tax evasion because they pay a tiny % of tax. Why can’t we just say they should be paying the tax rate, end of, and if we find ourselves in a better fiscal position it can come down accordingly

Barbadossunset · 08/08/2025 13:33

If people genuinely leave their hone country because of a relatively small rough patch, that is pretty damned unpatriotic and frankly to hell with them.

Yes, I’m not sure what I think about that. Certainly, given we have elections in UK every five years it would seem quite a palaver for families to move countries with all the effort that would entail - new house, bank account, schools etc. - because they don’t like the new regime and then to return again five years later if a government they approve of returns to power.

On mumsnet there’s a popular view that if you leave because of reform or Brexit then we don’t blame you, but if you leave because of a labour government - well bugger off.

poetryandwine · 08/08/2025 13:49

Barbadossunset · 08/08/2025 13:33

If people genuinely leave their hone country because of a relatively small rough patch, that is pretty damned unpatriotic and frankly to hell with them.

Yes, I’m not sure what I think about that. Certainly, given we have elections in UK every five years it would seem quite a palaver for families to move countries with all the effort that would entail - new house, bank account, schools etc. - because they don’t like the new regime and then to return again five years later if a government they approve of returns to power.

On mumsnet there’s a popular view that if you leave because of reform or Brexit then we don’t blame you, but if you leave because of a labour government - well bugger off.

You were quoting me. We were and are highly against Brexit but never considered it a reason for moving countries.

Swipe left for the next trending thread