Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think rich people steal money all the time and that’s often why they’re rich?

647 replies

MyAmusedOpalCrab · 05/08/2025 16:48

We hear so much about “hard work” and “smart investments” but let’s be honest, so many rich people didn’t get wealthy by being ethical. From dodgy business practices to exploiting workers, tax dodging, insider deals and straight-up corruption, wealth often comes at someone else’s expense.

Governments bail out billionaires while ordinary people struggle to afford rent. CEOs cut wages and benefits while pocketing massive bonuses. Huge corporations find loopholes to avoid taxes while the rest of us get squeezed.

Obviously not every rich person is a thief but AIBU to think that a lot of them are? That the system is rigged in their favour and they keep getting richer by bending or outright breaking the rules?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
BassinBas · 07/08/2025 00:00

Just because one is less than the other, doesn't make it right.

But the material effects - the actual impact on societal resources which ultimately impacts us all - is much greater from the one than the other. So surely we should be directing our attention to that. Just as a question of expediency - there are only so many hours in a day where we can best use our energies.

And leave the pontificating about morals for a time when we have excess energy and resources to devote to it. Maybe then we can bring greater focus to Brenda claiming a higher rate of DLA than she should. For example. Once we've sorted out the multi million pound heists on covid money, post office systems, water company payouts, train operating company payouts, housing benefit funds to slumlords etc.

Wonderwendy · 07/08/2025 00:00

cardibach · 05/08/2025 18:01

Nope. The economy’s money is being sucked into the accounts of a small number of people who not only don’t pay much tax (because they’ve rigged the system) but also don't send the money round the economy. They outcompete us - including governments - for assets. A few more people on minimum wage will make no difference.

Exactly this. If you increase the wealth of poorer people they spend the money, putting it back into the economy and benefitting everyone. Increase the wealth of the rich and they hoard it. Benefitting nobody but themselves. Or they buy up more assets, inflating the costs for everyone else and making everything unaffordable for the rest of us.

PeachShaker · 07/08/2025 00:07

FenderStrat · 05/08/2025 16:49

I'm more upset about benefits cheats.

That’s what they want. The people who profit from your taxes I mean.

I’d rather help a few fraudsters to ensure those who are genuine claimants don’t go without (as many are now) than facilitate profit by fraud (pretending that fraudulent claims cost more than MP pay rises, perhaps).

BIossomtoes · 07/08/2025 00:31

Helpmeplease2025 · 06/08/2025 21:29

So they should just… give it away?

Why not? They won’t miss it. Look at Bill Gates.

Wonderwendy · 07/08/2025 00:34

BreakingBroken · 05/08/2025 18:51

these people are unlikely to be "stealing money" their accounts will have been scrutinized 100X over.
will they have created trust funds for children will they have received a tax break for buying their parents a home maybe but none of that is theft.
having money allows you to make money especially when others are desperate to sell.

warren buffet just gave away 6 billion usd to various charities on saturday, something he does annually having donated over 152 billion in his lifetime.

Warren Buffet and Bill and Melinda Gates are not your usual billionaires though.

BIossomtoes · 07/08/2025 00:37

Wonderwendy · 07/08/2025 00:34

Warren Buffet and Bill and Melinda Gates are not your usual billionaires though.

No, unfortunately they’re not typical. The world would be in better shape if they were.

Wonderwendy · 07/08/2025 00:39

Barbadossunset · 05/08/2025 19:45

ElizaMulvil · Today 19:29
70% of our land is owned by 1% of our population.

Whats your solution to this? Confiscate land off anyone who owns more than say 100 acres and divide it up into small holdings?

No. Tax assets. Simple.

Wonderwendy · 07/08/2025 00:42

Dingledongledell · 05/08/2025 20:22

So few people appreciate this! Get rid of the nil rate band and tax every penny of income, and start the high rates of income tax from the first penny of tax earned. That’s the Scandinavian way? Still keen for this? Because in the UK the high earners are already paying tax at ‘Scandinavian’ levels, it’s the low earners that aren’t pulling their weight. But that’s what you’d have to do to get Scandinavian services.

Income tax is inherently I fair anyway. As is VAT. because they're only paid on earnings not wealth (income tax) or purchases (VAT) or which poor people need to spend the bulk of their money. Whereas rich people just hoard it

BreakingBroken · 07/08/2025 00:42

well looking at the top 25, 18 are american and most of the top 25 do what could be considered philanthropy.
but there is reported to be over 3000 multi billionaires worldwide.
yes i'm sure of those some might be shady but are more of the 3000 shady vs public citizen 3000 who do cash in hand, dodgy tax fillings, "unique" family set up's etc which are tax burdens to the state.

CapnFlint · 07/08/2025 01:04

As Balzac said “Behind every great fortune lies a great crime”

SemiRetiredLoveGoddeess · 07/08/2025 01:04

Further to my last post.

Here is some information on BlackRock from official sources from Google and BlackRock.

Tedious to read. But gives you an idea about who is operating in the global economy and just how they ooerate

BlackRock is a global investment management corporation. They are the world's largest asset manager and a leading provider of investment, advisory, and risk management solutions. BlackRock manages trillions of dollars for clients worldwide and plays a significant role in the global financial system. Their purpose is to help people experience financial well-being.

Here's a more detailed look:
Global Reach: BlackRock has a presence in 36 countries with 78 offices.

Asset Management: They manage a vast amount of assets for a diverse range of clients, including institutional investors and individuals.

Financial Technology: BlackRock is also a provider of financial technology, notably the Aladdin platform, which is used by many financial institutions.

Influence: Due to the sheer volume of assets they manage, BlackRock has a significant influence on global markets and corporate governance.

Fiduciary Duty: They act as fiduciaries for their clients, meaning they are legally obligated to act in their clients' best interests.

Investment Stewardship: BlackRock Investment Stewardship engages with companies on behalf of their clients to promote sustainable business practices and corporate governance.

Key Figures: Laurence Fink is the co-founder, chairman, and CEO of BlackRock.

BlackRock Aladdin
Aladdin" in the context of investment management usually refers to the Aladdin platform, a sophisticated electronic system developed by BlackRock Solutions, the risk management division of BlackRock Inc., the world's largest investment manager.
Here's what you should know about Aladdin:
Comprehensive Investment Management Platform: Aladdin is more than just a risk management tool. It's an integrated platform covering the entire investment lifecycle, from portfolio management and trading to compliance, operations, and risk oversight.
Risk Management Focus: While encompassing the whole process, a key strength of Aladdin lies in its advanced risk analytics, providing transparency and facilitating informed decision-making for managing risk across various asset classes, <a class="break-all" href="https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=web&rct=j&url=www.cipfa.org/-/media/CB4D0B28D4C24CD3BB1220C824FF30AA.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwijnY7CsPeOAxULXUEAHZMOINMQy_kOegQIBhAC&opi=89978449&cd&psig=AOvVaw2keHPkNgvu5Y1CJt5T-cgM&ust=1754610743832000" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">according to CIPFA.
Wide Adoption: Aladdin is used by thousands of investment professionals worldwide, including BlackRock itself and over 200 other clients, handling trillions of dollars in assets. As of 2020, Aladdin managed $21.6 trillion in assets.
"Language of Portfolios": Aladdin aims to provide a common data language across investments, operations, and data, allowing for scalability, efficiency, and unified insights into the "whole portfolio," including both public and private markets.
BlackRock's Growth: Aladdin and its advanced risk management capabilities played a significant role in BlackRock's rise to its dominant market position today, particularly in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis when risk management became crucial for investments.
Aladdin Wealth: Aladdin also offers specialized solutions for wealth management firms through the Aladdin Wealth platform, which focuses on providing tools and analytics for advisors to better serve their clients, <a class="break-all" href="https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=web&rct=j&url=www.blackrock.com/aladdin/products/aladdin-wealth&ved=2ahUKEwijnY7CsPeOAxULXUEAHZMOINMQy_kOegQIBhAH&opi=89978449&cd&psig=AOvVaw2keHPkNgvu5Y1CJt5T-cgM&ust=1754610743832000" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">according to BlackRock.
In short, Aladdin is a powerful and widely adopted technology platform that serves as a cornerstone for modern investment management, particularly for large institutions and wealth management firms seeking comprehensive risk analysis, efficient operations, and data-driven decision-making across their investment portfolios.

Redirect Notice

https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.blackrock.com/aladdin/products/aladdin-wealth&ved=2ahUKEwijnY7CsPeOAxULXUEAHZMOINMQy_kOegQIBhAH&opi=89978449&cd&psig=AOvVaw2keHPkNgvu5Y1CJt5T-cgM&ust=1754610743832000

Chinsupmeloves · 07/08/2025 01:21

Absolutely, those at the top who know how to play it to reap more.

One of my personal examples...

Friend is an accountant at a high level and got a new job at top level within the care home sector. He was told immediately to put £1 into the shares scheme and months later he got a payout of £174 000. His manager got more and the executive manager gained over a million 😳

Absolutely true experience and I was disgusted. The top level have the know how and means to perpetrate this, meanwhile the carers dont get a lookin and the homes are run to maximum profit and minimum meal allowance!

The cost of these homes is phenomenal for those in them/their families or the state. So, to provide the cheapest meals, lowest amount of care staff, all to maximise profits and share it amongst the ones who already get a huge wage is diabolical.

My friend does have principles and sees it's wrong but while he's reaping the benefits he doesn't care that much.

FenderStrat · 07/08/2025 01:22

CapnFlint · 07/08/2025 01:04

As Balzac said “Behind every great fortune lies a great crime”

What was Bill Gate's crime?

Mrsbloggz · 07/08/2025 01:24

FenderStrat · 07/08/2025 01:22

What was Bill Gate's crime?

He's the exception that proves the rule!

BooneyBeautiful · 07/08/2025 01:45

BallerinaRadio · 05/08/2025 16:58

I don't know when we as a country began cowing to the people with power and money and turning on our fellow 'regular' citizens but it's pathetic to see. The men ( and it is mostly men) in power have got us all fighting amongst ourselves and blaming everybody else for our problems but them.

And we have people pathetically claiming we need these people or we'll be even poorer when they're keeping us poor and even on this post people thinking people on benefits is the real problem.

Until we lose this attitude we'll get nowhere.

It's definitely a 'divide and conquer' regime.

poetryandwine · 07/08/2025 02:33

Lockdownsceptic · 06/08/2025 22:33

Where did I say that squandering £15 billion was acceptable?

Just giving you something bigger and closer to home to focus your indignation on.

FenderStrat · 07/08/2025 02:59

Mrsbloggz · 07/08/2025 01:24

He's the exception that proves the rule!

The traditional cry of the desperate.

naranjanaranja · 07/08/2025 03:14

Is he though? There were loads of articles about Microsoft having anti-competitive practices and putting others out of business unfairly. Which was why they were trying for years/decades?? to break it up with the government lawsuits. It's just become such a complex subject though and they had so many lawyer and resources to throw at it they've probably managed to hide a lot of wrong doing or find ways to get away with it. Although that doesn't negate the huge amount of good done with the Microsoft foundation. That has to be applauded.

Wonderwendy · 07/08/2025 04:39

JayJayEl · 06/08/2025 20:14

Yes, but almost every one of those claimants is either working, looking for work, or cannot work. Benefit cheats make up such a small minority of the welfare budget that they're barely worth talking about.

Your eagerness to blame the poorer people in society rather than the disgustingly rich (whether what they do is legal or illegal) is incredibly sad.

I think you'll find most of it is pensions actually.

Sally20099 · 07/08/2025 06:03

BallerinaRadio · 05/08/2025 16:53

Oh yeah once someone has a sniff of money they want to keep it all for themselves and not share it.

It astounds me, genuinely, that people get so upset at the 'boat people' while the Tories lined their pockets and their mates pockets during a pandemic to muted public reaction. This should have been a huge people out in the streets protesting situation... But they got away with it. Because they always do.

You think Tory’s lined their pockets to the tune of £5b a year? Because that’s how much it costs to house, feed, provide gym membership etc to “asylum seekers”.

Figcherry · 07/08/2025 06:14

Chinsupmeloves · 07/08/2025 01:21

Absolutely, those at the top who know how to play it to reap more.

One of my personal examples...

Friend is an accountant at a high level and got a new job at top level within the care home sector. He was told immediately to put £1 into the shares scheme and months later he got a payout of £174 000. His manager got more and the executive manager gained over a million 😳

Absolutely true experience and I was disgusted. The top level have the know how and means to perpetrate this, meanwhile the carers dont get a lookin and the homes are run to maximum profit and minimum meal allowance!

The cost of these homes is phenomenal for those in them/their families or the state. So, to provide the cheapest meals, lowest amount of care staff, all to maximise profits and share it amongst the ones who already get a huge wage is diabolical.

My friend does have principles and sees it's wrong but while he's reaping the benefits he doesn't care that much.

And care home owners don’t have to declare profits.
It's exploitation of the most vulnerable.
Df’s care home is £2500. Per week. That doesn’t include what they get from the NHS.
if all 52 beds are filled that’s over £6 million a year.

Even after mortgage, staff, equipment etc they must be making over a million in profit, perhaps 2 million.

BallerinaRadio · 07/08/2025 06:46

Sally20099 · 07/08/2025 06:03

You think Tory’s lined their pockets to the tune of £5b a year? Because that’s how much it costs to house, feed, provide gym membership etc to “asylum seekers”.

Tories and their cronies yes I do hth. And it was the same Tories that spent such ridiculous amounts of hotels instead of fixing the asylum system.

Sally20099 · 07/08/2025 07:03

BallerinaRadio · 07/08/2025 06:46

Tories and their cronies yes I do hth. And it was the same Tories that spent such ridiculous amounts of hotels instead of fixing the asylum system.

Agree with the last part of your message - only Reform will sort that out properly I think

BallerinaRadio · 07/08/2025 07:06

Sally20099 · 07/08/2025 07:03

Agree with the last part of your message - only Reform will sort that out properly I think

Uncle Nigel would shit his pants if he got a whiff of power they're all in for the money too he'd get jack all sorted 😂😂😂

tramtracks · 07/08/2025 07:26

usernamealreadytaken · 06/08/2025 22:27

Bollocks, and it’s subjective anyway. I’d consider that we’re pretty well off now, with total assets (house, pensions) just over £1m. I was never presented with good choices to choose between. I came from a council estate, with one alcoholic mental ill parent and one in and out of depression. I knew I didn’t want my life to turn out like that, so I worked and married and we built together, saving and scrimping to almost pay off our mortgage and save; no debt other than mortgage, but also no fancy holiday until recently when finances have got easier. I’d consider us rich, if we realised all our assets.

@usernamealreadytaken - totally agree
It was possible and is possible to make good choices without privilege. I left a poor northern town to go uni and study. Then never went back home.

My school had been a good grammar school before the 80s and was now a left wing ideology style sink comprehensive with a catchment of the local massive council estate.

I trashed my 20s working extremely hard, taking post grad exams. Married had kids.
if you met me in rl you’d no doubt say I was privileged because you wouldn’t know my background. I don’t consider myself so - it was hard but I didn’t think about that at the time.

Infuriatingly - now, my children would be pretty much excluded from applying to civil service jobs because they would be deemed not poor enough etc.

The general feeling I have today - is that ‘work hard and pull yourself out of poverty’ - but don’t do too well otherwise we will tax you, label you as privileged and see any earned wealth, now that you are retired, as fair game for a tax raid.