Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

300 children from Gaza to be brought to the UK for free specialist NHS care

1000 replies

Fragmentedbrain · 03/08/2025 01:33

According to the Sunday Times. That's nearly as many beds as there are in Great Ormond Street, where the average waiting time for paediatric surgery is 15 weeks (which is fairly typical nationwide).

Why is it mysteriously possible for government to deliver these showy, headline-grabbing measures (I know we already knew it could happen from COVID policy) but not to just make systems work well in an ordinary way?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
2boyzNosleep · 03/08/2025 16:44

The cost of treating the 300 children and potentially supporting their families to stay in the UK, is a fraction of the cost of the weapons the UK have supplied to Israel.

nearlylovemyusername · 03/08/2025 16:44

Hoppinggreen · 03/08/2025 16:39

Because you said that most Gazans support Hamas and implied that meant these children don't deserve help.
Apologies if I have mixed you up with one of the really unpleasant people on this thread

I did say that Gazans must support Hamas for Hamas to exist.

I did not say or imply that Gazan children don't deserve help.

I also tried to clarify that these children are being treated by NHS, in contrast with many posters saying that it's funded privately.

DuncinToffee · 03/08/2025 16:45

nearlylovemyusername · 03/08/2025 16:40

Read this again -

in the NHS. Not just NHS specialist, but in the NHS.

Private treatments happen in parallel.

Do you want to charge these children for their treatment?

Evaka · 03/08/2025 16:45

Some of you are seriously off your tits. Do you have any idea how unhinged it sounds to want to deny care to a few hundred kids who've have limbs blown off or had their entire health infrastructure leveled to dust? Jesus wept. I despair.

pointythings · 03/08/2025 16:47

nearlylovemyusername · 03/08/2025 16:35

More children from Gaza to be brought to UK for urgent medical treatment | Politics News | Sky News :

"children will be treated by specialists in the NHS"

"A parent or guardian will accompany each child, as well as siblings if necessary"

"It is understood this will happen "in parallel" with an initiative by Project Pure Hope, a group set up to bring sick and injured Gazan children to the UK privately for treatment."

Specialists in the NHS: specialist who work in the NHS. That doesn't mean the NHS is paying for it - doctors can and do donate their time. Just because you and your ilk on here do not understand the human talent for altruism doesn't mean it isn't a thing.

Gloriia · 03/08/2025 16:47

DuncinToffee · 03/08/2025 16:45

Do you want to charge these children for their treatment?

The point is there are rich countries closer to them who have taken many and can afford to take more. We can't afford to even with a charity 'working in parallel' with NHS Drs.

PersephoneSeethes · 03/08/2025 16:47

BIossomtoes · 03/08/2025 16:04

Quite right. That’s been pointed out umpteen times. There are none as deaf as those who refuse to hear.

I just don't think people believe it. We will have to pay in the end, we always do, someway or other. My compassion has been blunted with seeing this rinse and repeat over the years, there is a Govt inquiry and 'lessons learnt' but they aren't. So now I am just 'Nope!'.

PiggyPigalle · 03/08/2025 16:48

SoHereWeAre01 · 03/08/2025 10:39

Why can’t their neighbours help more? Some of the best medical facilities are in the Arab world… but somehow it makes sense to fly them half across the world to use facilities that are breaking point. The NHS is struggling to cope with the backlog of child operations and you need to wait 2-3 years for a simple ear grommet operation… (my son is half deaf and falling behind in his speech and social interaction) but somehow we can prioritise children from other countries….

Because once here, they'll stay, bringing the rest of their family to join them. We don't send anyone back to war zones.

DuncinToffee · 03/08/2025 16:48

Gloriia · 03/08/2025 16:47

The point is there are rich countries closer to them who have taken many and can afford to take more. We can't afford to even with a charity 'working in parallel' with NHS Drs.

It's up to 300 children, ofcourse we can afford it.

You just don't want the NHS to treat these children

Evaka · 03/08/2025 16:49

PiggyPigalle · 03/08/2025 16:48

Because once here, they'll stay, bringing the rest of their family to join them. We don't send anyone back to war zones.

Good god.

pointythings · 03/08/2025 16:49

PersephoneSeethes · 03/08/2025 16:47

I just don't think people believe it. We will have to pay in the end, we always do, someway or other. My compassion has been blunted with seeing this rinse and repeat over the years, there is a Govt inquiry and 'lessons learnt' but they aren't. So now I am just 'Nope!'.

That is what is generally known as 'a you problem'. Not everyone has lost their moral compass.

Panterusblackish · 03/08/2025 16:49

Fragmentedbrain · 03/08/2025 10:39

I tell you this kindly - you are not good at reasoning and should think about whether you can improve.

This thread is not in favour denying healthcare. It is against healthcare currently being denied on demonstrably optional grounds.

No one wishes to deny healthcare to the kids of Gaza, certainly no one with a shred of decency or humanity. No matter where your loyalties lie, no one can blame Israeli or Gazan kids for this situation. They are quite literally innocents.

However you're not wrong to wonder how extra capacity can suddenly be squeezed for one thing but not the other. It's not a question on where the extra help is going to, it's a question of how is extra help in any way feasible if services are at max.

They're clearly not, are they?

GrammarTeacher · 03/08/2025 16:49

PiggyPigalle · 03/08/2025 16:48

Because once here, they'll stay, bringing the rest of their family to join them. We don't send anyone back to war zones.

You say ‘we don’t send anyone back to war zones’ as if it’s a bad thing.

DuncinToffee · 03/08/2025 16:50

PiggyPigalle · 03/08/2025 16:48

Because once here, they'll stay, bringing the rest of their family to join them. We don't send anyone back to war zones.

And why would that be an issue?

GrammarTeacher · 03/08/2025 16:51

Panterusblackish · 03/08/2025 16:49

No one wishes to deny healthcare to the kids of Gaza, certainly no one with a shred of decency or humanity. No matter where your loyalties lie, no one can blame Israeli or Gazan kids for this situation. They are quite literally innocents.

However you're not wrong to wonder how extra capacity can suddenly be squeezed for one thing but not the other. It's not a question on where the extra help is going to, it's a question of how is extra help in any way feasible if services are at max.

They're clearly not, are they?

This is always true of government funding. No money for education, health and the police (last government) but can give an obscene amount of money to Rwanda on a scheme doomed to failure, or to their mates down the pub for inadequate PPE.
This is a really odd thing to pick to have a problem with. This is a good thing to do.

VaccineSticker · 03/08/2025 16:52

Gloriia · 03/08/2025 16:25

Of course it isn't one country I've lived and worked in a country in the ME. The rich countries all have plenty of massive hospitals and specialities.

The situation in gaza is grim i agree. I dont think sending people on an 8hr flight will be of benefit when there are plenty of facilities closer.

If you have lived in the Middle East, you’d know that Gaza is not an 8 hr flight to London.

You would also know that Gaza is on the Mediterranean and not that far from Cyprus.

In fact, if you travel 8 hours (middle) east bound from London, you would be completely past and outside the Middle East 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 probably somewhere over Pakistan or Afghanistan.

Gloriia · 03/08/2025 16:53

Evaka · 03/08/2025 16:45

Some of you are seriously off your tits. Do you have any idea how unhinged it sounds to want to deny care to a few hundred kids who've have limbs blown off or had their entire health infrastructure leveled to dust? Jesus wept. I despair.

Some posters will have sick kids on a 15 week wait.

Are you really suggesting their feelings don't matter and they should just wait their turn quietly? To suggest anyone is 'off their tits' is an appalling comment regarding such a highly emotive and contentious issue.

nearlylovemyusername · 03/08/2025 16:53

DuncinToffee · 03/08/2025 16:45

Do you want to charge these children for their treatment?

No! I never said that.

I quoted the article. Which states the fact that children are treated by NHS, whilst many posters here keep on pushing it's privately funded.

I don't believe 300 of them will make any difference to our healthcare situation.

PandoraSocks · 03/08/2025 16:53

Gloriia · 03/08/2025 16:13

If there is capacity for more treatment for UK residents either directly via the NHS or costs covered by charities then they should be treated rather than waiting 15 weeks.

Do you think if we had a crisis we'd be shipped to Qatar or Saudi? No. We'd be transferred to other countries closer by for logistical, cultural and family reasons.

We'd be transferred to other countries closer by for logistical, cultural and family reasons

Most of the children are being. Did you miss the figure which has been quoted several times?

We and other parts of Europe will be taking a few hundred for reasons explained by pp.

Honestly. You really have to a special kind of bastard to object to this. Or another b word.

LoremIpsumCici · 03/08/2025 16:53

Fragmentedbrain · 03/08/2025 10:18

To think it's outrageous that we can pay for 300 Gazan kids (it is the NHS paying for this - the philanthropic stuff is separate) but not British kids? The paediatric pain management services in NHS England has a waiting time of c17 weeks.

This isn't about not treating kids from Gaza (although I knew some people would choose to read it that way). It's about the political choice to make children in the UK wait months to have essential surgery or pain treatment. Why is nobody protesting about that?

Disgusting attitude to have. 300 children is a barest minimal effort- it is literally a drop in the bucket. No British child is going to end up waiting longer because of this.

Alltheyellowbirds · 03/08/2025 16:54

Ladamesansmerci · 03/08/2025 10:57

Sorry but if you really begrudge 300 children from a warzone where hospitals are being bombed and people are starving to death medical care, have a word with yourself.

Having a backlog is a separate issue and is a picture of wider issues in the NHS. It does not mean we should not support children who are victims of war crimes and genocide.

We have played a significant role in the tensions between Israel and Palestine and imo have a moral duty to help and also to stop supplying Israel with arms.

I'd also hope that if Scotland were bombing us, for example, that other countries would be willing to support our injured children if our medical infrastructure was being ravaged.

Yes, all of this.

We are a rich country (yes, we are), and privileged enough to have lived in relative peace for nearly a century. If we can’t help a few hundred children from somewhere suffering as badly as Palestine then we are utter arseholes.

Evaka · 03/08/2025 16:56

Tbh this is a really helpful thread for me to read. I have been confused by how disinterested a lot of people seem in what's happening in Gaza right now (yes, and Sudan before anyone makes that dense point).

Good to know that there's a good chunk of you who think Palestinians are a bunch of spongers looking for a meal ticket to the UK.

PandoraSocks · 03/08/2025 16:57

15-year-old Majd al-Shagnobi, arrived in the UK last week. He required complex facial reconstructive surgery after an Israeli tank shell destroyed his jaw when he was trying to access aid in February 2024. He was the first Palestinian child to be flown to the UK for treatment for war injuries.

If you object to this, there really is a special place in hell for you.

DuncinToffee · 03/08/2025 16:57

nearlylovemyusername · 03/08/2025 16:53

No! I never said that.

I quoted the article. Which states the fact that children are treated by NHS, whilst many posters here keep on pushing it's privately funded.

I don't believe 300 of them will make any difference to our healthcare situation.

I misunderstood then, I am glad to hear you welcome the governments plan to help these children.

PersephoneSeethes · 03/08/2025 17:00

pointythings · 03/08/2025 16:49

That is what is generally known as 'a you problem'. Not everyone has lost their moral compass.

I could equally throw the 'a you problem' right back at you. How about you fund and house all these children and their families. How about all the asylum seekers, too. We can't afford to do it anymore, if you want to house and feed and support people, that's on you.

I am struggling to find a suitable school for my child who has complex health and learning needs, among many other family and personal struggles that aren't helped with the extra strain of more and more people entering the country needing longterm, costly and complex help.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread