Cases where it is truly cut and dried are few and far between.
What does cut and dried mean? What evidence is needed? Who decides?
There will be outcry over other horrendous crimes that come exceedingly close to cut and dried but for whatever reason aren’t quite there.
It will leave the families of victims whose murderers are found guilty but not ‘cut and dried guilty’ in a limbo.
It suggests criminals who are found guilty but not ‘cut and dried guilty’ are deserving of lesser punishment.
It suggests we aren’t really sure about whether those criminals should be locked up at all.
… Just a few reasons why this is a ridiculous idea and is not going to happen. Sentencing is not, and should not be about, the strength of a conviction. We cannot have a multi-tier justice system based on how sure we are.