Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Thread gallery
11
Robin67 · 25/07/2025 15:49

@LakieLady forensics are better now and the burden of proof is no longer "he said she said"

YouWillFindMeInTheGarden · 25/07/2025 15:54

naturalcrackle111 · 25/07/2025 15:04

What are you not getting? Cases like the Southport killer or Lee rugby or this case with the baby etc where there was no doubt who killed them. There is no miscarriage of justice to be considered so how could the wrong person be executed?

By getting the basics wrong…like their name….for a start..

GreenGully · 25/07/2025 15:54

BlankBlankBlank14 · 25/07/2025 15:25

But surely all life imprisonments are but and dried…. That’s what the great British justice system states.

One would hope so. Though some are more cut and dry than others. For example a blood spattered mad man walking own the street swinging a knife... multiple witnesses, CCTV, DNA, in some cases even admission, etc etc.

MorrisZapp · 25/07/2025 15:56

When Fred West took his own life, sparing the state the cost of lifetime incarceration and saving the cost and trauma of a trial, the pitchfork wavers were outraged that he wasn't man enough to face his punishment.

Do you really think the best punishment for this man is release from living with himself, instead of facing a court and the inside of a prison?

randomchap · 25/07/2025 15:56

NaiveDuck · 25/07/2025 15:47

It is permanent if the person is locked up for their whole life. What else would you call that, other than permanent?

I think for the cases where there is zero doubt the person did it, like in this case, the DP is warranted.

Perhaps those who expect the state to feed, house, clothe, medical care etc the person for life should pay for it? Do a poll, those who are against the death penalty (for cases like this) should have to pay tax in order to fund the inmates care. It shouldn't be put on those who don't want to pay for that person for life.

Someone can be released from incarceration if later found to be not guilty.

It's not a hard concept to grasp.

YouWillFindMeInTheGarden · 25/07/2025 15:56

Internaut · 25/07/2025 15:34

Even something that appears cut and dried isn't necessarily, in criminal law terms. For instance, someone who clearly committed the act isn't proved to have the requisite intent, or they have a defence such as self defence, insanity, automatism etc

What’s ‘automatism’?

GreenGully · 25/07/2025 15:56

ZamaZama · 25/07/2025 15:36

Cases where it is truly cut and dried are few and far between.

What does cut and dried mean? What evidence is needed? Who decides?

There will be outcry over other horrendous crimes that come exceedingly close to cut and dried but for whatever reason aren’t quite there.

It will leave the families of victims whose murderers are found guilty but not ‘cut and dried guilty’ in a limbo.

It suggests criminals who are found guilty but not ‘cut and dried guilty’ are deserving of lesser punishment.

It suggests we aren’t really sure about whether those criminals should be locked up at all.

… Just a few reasons why this is a ridiculous idea and is not going to happen. Sentencing is not, and should not be about, the strength of a conviction. We cannot have a multi-tier justice system based on how sure we are.

'Cases where it is truly cut and dried are few and far between.'

Yet they are usually the most heinous and deserve the death penalty.

BunnyRuddington · 25/07/2025 15:58

If you would like to do a little more reading OP I suggest you read The Unspeakable Acts of Zina Pavlou by Elena Kyriacou.

GreenGully · 25/07/2025 15:59

YouWillFindMeInTheGarden · 25/07/2025 15:54

By getting the basics wrong…like their name….for a start..

An obvious typo. U is next to I on the keyboard.

Did that make you feel special? Good for you.

Buxusmortus · 25/07/2025 16:00

LakieLady · 25/07/2025 15:47

Just in the last 50 years or so I could probably think of 20-odd off the top of my head: Guildford 4, Birmingham 6, Bridgewater 4, Maguire 7, Broadwater 3, Stefan Kiszko, M25 murderers (3), Judith Ward...

... over 20 already.

Edited

Derek Bentley
Timothy Evans
Mahmood Hussein Mattan
All wrongly executed.

Sally Clark, wrongly convicted of murder.

WitchesCauldron · 25/07/2025 16:01

bluewanda · 24/07/2025 22:52

Are you saying the Daily Mail report is untrue?

“The premature baby suffered ‘catastrophic injuries’ to his jaw, head, neck and legs at Yeovil District Hospital, Somerset.”

There’s no “complexity” about it.

I don't support the death penalty but in this case I could make an exception...

Broke my heart reading that story. Poor wee mite .

WitchesCauldron · 25/07/2025 16:03

BIWI · 24/07/2025 23:02

It is a horrible story. Perhaps you should use your intelligence to consider just how we end up with people who commit these crimes in our society?

I'd suggest in this case this man was just 100% evil. There's no redemption for someone who commits this kind of barbaric act.
I guess he has got a few years to deflect on his crime whilst trying to avoid his fellow inmates.

bumblecoach · 25/07/2025 16:06

WitchesCauldron · 25/07/2025 16:03

I'd suggest in this case this man was just 100% evil. There's no redemption for someone who commits this kind of barbaric act.
I guess he has got a few years to deflect on his crime whilst trying to avoid his fellow inmates.

Sadly, retribution in prison is a myth, An actual prison officer is more likely to be hurt standing between him potential violent criminals.

Quite unbelievably staff do put their life on the line to protect these idiots. I don’t know why.

RemusLupinsBiggestGroupie · 25/07/2025 16:07

PassingStranger · 25/07/2025 14:16

If you did cut people hands off for stealing, there would be a lot less theft around.
Another thing that's out of control.
People don't even go to.prison for stealing now.

The prison system is in crisis and needs substantial reform - but cutting people's hands off is not a kind of 'reform' most civilised people would condone.

caringcarer · 25/07/2025 16:08

I think the death penalty for very extreme cases of mass murder, murder of babies and young children including through starving them and terrorist who bomb innocent victims is not unreasonable. The tax payer should not to have to pay to support these people and they are often very difficult prisoners. Prisons are full and dangerous prisoners often get released early only to reoffend.

BoredZelda · 25/07/2025 16:08

Thatsalineallright · 25/07/2025 15:36

I'm not convinced by arguments that say severe punishment doesn't act as a deterrent. Why is Singapore so safe and clean then?

I'm against the death penalty because of the risk of innocent people being wrongly executed. I wouldn't lose a wink of sleep of it was only actual rapists and murderers being given the death penalty.

The statistics prove otherwise. States that have the death penalty have higher murder rates. Of the ten countries with the lowest murder rate, only 2 have the death penalty. Of the ten countries with the highest murder rate, only 2 have the death penalty, including Jamaica which has the highest murder rate in the world.

Captial Punishment has been proven over and over again not to be a deterrent.

YouWillFindMeInTheGarden · 25/07/2025 16:08

GreenGully · 25/07/2025 15:59

An obvious typo. U is next to I on the keyboard.

Did that make you feel special? Good for you.

No, it does show how humans make mistakes though…

GreenGully · 25/07/2025 16:09

YouWillFindMeInTheGarden · 25/07/2025 16:08

No, it does show how humans make mistakes though…

And?

BoredZelda · 25/07/2025 16:10

caringcarer · 25/07/2025 16:08

I think the death penalty for very extreme cases of mass murder, murder of babies and young children including through starving them and terrorist who bomb innocent victims is not unreasonable. The tax payer should not to have to pay to support these people and they are often very difficult prisoners. Prisons are full and dangerous prisoners often get released early only to reoffend.

It costs considerably more to put someone to death than it does to keep them in prison for life.

https://www.amnestyusa.org/issues/death-penalty/death-penalty-facts/death-penalty-cost/

Thatsalineallright · 25/07/2025 16:10

YouWillFindMeInTheGarden · 25/07/2025 16:08

No, it does show how humans make mistakes though…

Er, what? Are you seriously comparing a wrongful conviction to a typo??

YouWillFindMeInTheGarden · 25/07/2025 16:10

bumblecoach · 25/07/2025 16:06

Sadly, retribution in prison is a myth, An actual prison officer is more likely to be hurt standing between him potential violent criminals.

Quite unbelievably staff do put their life on the line to protect these idiots. I don’t know why.

Because if officers don’t act fast to de-escalate then some other person will get hurt as well…. End up losing the wing that way.

RemusLupinsBiggestGroupie · 25/07/2025 16:11

NaiveDuck · 25/07/2025 14:54

You indeed were suggesting it was untrue. Simply because it was in the DM. At least own it.

No. That is not what I was suggesting. I was suggesting that anybody who reads the Daily Mail is unlikely to be reasonable enough to consider the complexities of capital punishment. It's not my fault if you've chosen to misunderstand me.

YouWillFindMeInTheGarden · 25/07/2025 16:11

GreenGully · 25/07/2025 16:09

And?

Oh dear, you are annoyed with yourself

CurlewKate · 25/07/2025 16:13

There’s also the question of executioners. Do we really want to pay people to kill in our name?

Thatsalineallright · 25/07/2025 16:13

YouWillFindMeInTheGarden · 25/07/2025 16:11

Oh dear, you are annoyed with yourself

You're being utterly absurd.