Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Thread gallery
11
MiloMinderbinder925 · 25/07/2025 11:53

Zanoni · 25/07/2025 11:46

I’d be in favour of bringing the death penalty back for cases where there is zero chance that the jury might have got it wrong. No circumstantial evidence.
Lucy Letby.. No because even though I’m 99% sure she’s guilty there’s still room for doubt.
Roy Whiting.. No room for doubt so I’ve got no problem with the idea of him being given the death penalty. The same goes for the despicable scum who murdered Arthur Hughes and Star Hobson. In this case it seems black and white I wouldn’t be against the idea of death penalty.
I don’t know much about prisons and how they are run but I do remember reading that we don’t have a lot of prisoners with whole life sentences, Rose West is one and apparently she has changed her name, carpeted her cell and spends her days reading and watching nature documentaries. I think if true it’s pretty shocking considering her crimes that she is living with any sort of comfort.

You can't have a 100% certainty in evidence because there are many cases where evidence has been manufactured by corrupt cops. CCTV evidence can be doctored. Mistakes can be made.

People have been imprisoned for a very long time for crimes they didn't commit because of corruption.

daisychain01 · 25/07/2025 11:57

Tekknonan · 25/07/2025 11:40

Would you be willing for your child to be executed for a crime he or she did not commit?

If your answer is, 'No,' then you cannot support the death penalty. All systems are fallible. There will always be mistakes. If we have the death penatly, innocent people will be executed. They will be somebody's child or loved one.

not in all cases but in very many of them, a person who grows up to commit heinous crime was likely to have been neglected as a child so their parents don't give a shit and were abusive towards them, they had no blue-print of how it would be to behave as a responsible contributing citizen in society. That's the problem!

VickyEadieofThigh · 25/07/2025 12:05

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 24/07/2025 22:57

There will be miscarriages of justice. So you will be executing some innocent people. Maybe not this guy, but once you bring it back it’s an absolute certainty that some cases will be wrongly decided.

Also someone had to be the executioner. I don’t think we should be in the business of either putting someone in that position or encouraging anyone who is happy to do it.

Also it’s very much arguable that a whole life term is a worse punishment - but doesn’t fall foul of the above difficulties. Anyone wrongly convicted can be released when it comes to light, but they can’t if you have killed them.

All of this.

In addition, juries are less inclined to find a defendant guilty where the outcome might be the death penalty.

Allisnotlost1 · 25/07/2025 12:06

Zanoni · 25/07/2025 11:46

I’d be in favour of bringing the death penalty back for cases where there is zero chance that the jury might have got it wrong. No circumstantial evidence.
Lucy Letby.. No because even though I’m 99% sure she’s guilty there’s still room for doubt.
Roy Whiting.. No room for doubt so I’ve got no problem with the idea of him being given the death penalty. The same goes for the despicable scum who murdered Arthur Hughes and Star Hobson. In this case it seems black and white I wouldn’t be against the idea of death penalty.
I don’t know much about prisons and how they are run but I do remember reading that we don’t have a lot of prisoners with whole life sentences, Rose West is one and apparently she has changed her name, carpeted her cell and spends her days reading and watching nature documentaries. I think if true it’s pretty shocking considering her crimes that she is living with any sort of comfort.

I don’t know much about prisons and how they are run but I do remember reading that we don’t have a lot of prisoners with whole life sentences, Rose West is one and apparently she has changed her name, carpeted her cell and spends her days reading and watching nature documentaries. I think if true it’s pretty shocking considering her crimes that she is living with any sort of comfort.

We don’t have a lot of prisoners serving whole life sentences because, thankfully, we don’t have many of the most appalling crimes that attract them.

And I don’t know how you choose to live, but a carpeted cupboard with an uncovered toilet in the corner and a nature documentary on a tiny telly isn’t what I call comfort.

Whammyyammy · 25/07/2025 12:10

Rapists, murderers, paedophile should all receive the death penalty. Why keep vile scum like those alive?

LillyPJ · 25/07/2025 12:12

Whammyyammy · 25/07/2025 12:10

Rapists, murderers, paedophile should all receive the death penalty. Why keep vile scum like those alive?

Because killing people is barbaric. Surely you agree with that?

randomchap · 25/07/2025 12:13

Whammyyammy · 25/07/2025 12:10

Rapists, murderers, paedophile should all receive the death penalty. Why keep vile scum like those alive?

Again. Because of the chance of miscarriage of justice

Multiple cases have already been mentioned here. Including a man who was hanged for the murder of his own child when he was innocent. He went to the gallows knowing that he was innocent and that the actual murderer was out there unpunished

TheSeventh · 25/07/2025 12:15

Allisnotlost1 · 25/07/2025 08:48

Also Angela Cannings.

Not to derail the thread but I remember it clearly: Sally Clark was not horribly abused by other women in prison, she actually said on her release how much she’d been supported by other women and that it had surprised her to have made acquaintances and even close friends. I think it was obvious that she wasn’t guilty and women would be supportive of the fact she was bereaved, not guilty.

Some may have been supportive but unfortunately not all, she was very much targeted by certain types of people.

cestlavielife · 25/07/2025 12:16

The sad part of this case is the red flags were there. Yet hospital were unable to prevent his access to the baby :(

Death penalty after the fact would not have stopped him

Death penalty potentially kills innocent people and does not make the murderer reflect on their crime

TheSeventh · 25/07/2025 12:18

Whammyyammy · 25/07/2025 12:10

Rapists, murderers, paedophile should all receive the death penalty. Why keep vile scum like those alive?

Because you don't combat violence by normalising it.

OonaStubbs · 25/07/2025 12:22

Maybe we shouldn't lock people up either, because that just normalises people locking each other up?

randomchap · 25/07/2025 12:23

OonaStubbs · 25/07/2025 12:22

Maybe we shouldn't lock people up either, because that just normalises people locking each other up?

Locking people up is not permanent. Death is

Cherry8809 · 25/07/2025 12:26

WhereIsMyJumper · 24/07/2025 23:26

News stories like these whip up an incredible amount of emotion, of course everyone is horrified by the murderers actions and we can feel deeply disturbed and angry and upset for a long time afterwards. This is why I try and avoid this type of news story myself.

But, here is the thing, we cannot change laws in this country - especially ones as serious as reinstating the death penalty - on emotion. They have to be based on rational, logical thinking. With the emotion taken out.

This.

Thank goodness we don’t have emotionally charged people dictating and deciding the law.

There is no place for the death penalty in a modern, civilised society.

OonaStubbs · 25/07/2025 12:29

Japan has the death penalty. Are they not a modern civilised society?

ilovesooty · 25/07/2025 12:31

Absolutely45 · 25/07/2025 10:16

There are sentencing guidelines now for murder cases, we already have 3 outcomes - we have Not Guilty, Guilty and Guilty with a whole life order.

It would be the latter who could be considered for execution.

I do not see how anyone can justify Huntley or Bellfield being kept alive.

Huntley I think doesn't have a whole life order
Bellfield has two

Cherry8809 · 25/07/2025 12:31

OonaStubbs · 25/07/2025 12:29

Japan has the death penalty. Are they not a modern civilised society?

They’re all of the above, with outdated, archaic practices that need reform.

GreenGully · 25/07/2025 12:32

TheSeventh · 25/07/2025 12:18

Because you don't combat violence by normalising it.

The death penalty isn't about combating violence. It is about the ultimate punishment.

GreenGully · 25/07/2025 12:33

randomchap · 25/07/2025 12:23

Locking people up is not permanent. Death is

That's the point.

Thelnebriati · 25/07/2025 12:36

The problem with this case was that he couldn't be refused access to the baby because he had parental rights, despite the fact he was a known risk.

I might feel more sympathetic about the death penalty if it actually reduced the rate of murders, but it doesn't. And the baby would still be dead. IMO its better to prevent harm in the first place.

TheSeventh · 25/07/2025 12:40

GreenGully · 25/07/2025 12:32

The death penalty isn't about combating violence. It is about the ultimate punishment.

So you're not even going to pretend it is a deterrent? You just want to kill people.

Eskarina1 · 25/07/2025 12:41

It's disturbed not to want innocent people killed?

We covered Derek Bentley (a young man with severe learning difficulties who's execution contributed to the abolition of the death penalty) in English A Level. The way his statement was 'cleaned' to sound like an articulate adult.

If I'm disturbed for wanting no more Derek Bentleys or Jean Charles de Menezes, I'm OK with that. Human life doesn't stop being of value when someone turns 18.

randomchap · 25/07/2025 12:42

GreenGully · 25/07/2025 12:33

That's the point.

And for those wrongly convicted? Just accept that innocent people may be put to death?

Gowlett · 25/07/2025 12:43

I don’t think anyone would miss this guy…

naturalcrackle111 · 25/07/2025 12:49

Allisnotlost1 · 25/07/2025 08:54

About 4 death row prisoners are exonerated every year in the US. There are obviously many more where there are doubts over the conviction, but they are executed before exoneration.

There are no computers in prisons in the UK, and your idea of a warm and cosy place where there are games and fun is frankly bizarre.

Well that’s a big fat lie. I know quite a few people right now in prison with phones and PlayStations. Dd speaks to her best friend everyday on Snapchat. Bless you thinking prison is hard and prisoners don’t have nothing.

GreenGully · 25/07/2025 12:51

TheSeventh · 25/07/2025 12:40

So you're not even going to pretend it is a deterrent? You just want to kill people.

Some people need killing.

Swipe left for the next trending thread