I've been thinking about the Izzy Winn Thomas book. Raymoth admitted that was them didn't they, in what identifies as their rebuttal?
By admitting that they're actually admitting to quite a few lies. Admitting the author name is them under another false name (ok pen names are common), but also the names of the publishing company people were all false, complete with fake mini bios. And the story of the raffle changed, I think between the small holder forum and somewhere else I can't remember where - in one they said they were an author with a great book and a publicist with a house to shift joining forces, in another that they'd scoured the countryside for the ideal house. Then the raffle itself was said to be for a house completely free of any charges, which was clearly a lie as it was both mortgaged and had a loan secured on it.
So Raymoth by admitting that they did hold that raffle are admitting to a minimum 3 lies in the administration of it, the biggest obviously that they were raffling a house saying it was free from charges when it wasn't. They outed themselves as people who constructed quite an elaborate con - not one part of the raffle scenario was actually truthful - who they were, why they were doing it, what they were offering. That wasn't 'mistakes being made' you don't create a fake publishing company owned by imaginary people raffling a mortgaged house as being free of charges by accident or on a whim. It was a con, and they've admitted they did it.