But I’ve no particular interest in ‘the actual truth’. I’m not Judge Judy or an investigative journalist. That’s Chloe Hadjimatheou’s job.
And I wasn’t someone who took a great deal of notice of Moth’s illness or miracle cure when I read TSP. And I didn’t think they seemed at all ‘nice’, so I’m really interested in how betrayed so many people feel by the revelations.
For me it was quite a strange book. For something being marketed as ‘feelgood’, it featured rather a lot of deep negativity and rage towards people met on the path (doesn’t someone encourage his dog to piss on their tent at one point? Or does someone actually piss on their tent?) and their benefactors. I put that down to bitterness about losing their home and the illness, but I thought it was interesting RW didn’t depict herself as nicer..
I was struck by how ‘alone in the world’ they seemed, with no friends or family stepping in to help them hire a lawyer or give them somewhere to stay.
I assumed that they were probably on bad terms with family and/or were people with few friends, doing the classic Mn thing of ‘retreating inside my little family’. In fairness, if they were actually farming a substantial farm as well as running a holiday let (which isn’t clear), it doesn’t leave much time for socialising. Or I wondered if they simply hadn’t integrated well locally in 20 years.
I suppose I’m interested in TSP as a literary construct with some (heavily mediated) relationship to reality. Im always really fascinated by how people alter real life events when they write about them, whether it’s Dorothy Wordsworth or Laura Ingalls Wilder.
I would absolutely love to see what the original MS of TSP which, if it was originally written for Moth alone, must have been very different to the published version. I’d live to know what RW is like to work with as an editor. Does she make or miss deadlines? Does she send in a clean MS or need heavy copy editing How does she deal with criticism? Were her agent and editor disappointed with the TWS?