Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Tax increases imminent

1000 replies

Iwishicouldflyhigh · 04/07/2025 11:28

Heavy hints that taxes will rise in the next Budget after the recent climb down (as the ‘taxes won’t rise again’ was based on a 5 billion saving in benefits).

I can’t lie, I’m so pissed off about this. I don’t think anyone wants to see someone who is genuinely unable to work to be further penalised, but we all know there are thousands of people who could work but don’t.

this country is going to absolute shit . We pay more and more for less and less.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Rosscameasdoody · 04/07/2025 15:07

party4you · 04/07/2025 15:04

As upsetting as it is I think you’re right. I think the NHS needs to change too - means test, charged for wasted time (missed appointments, A&E visits for a bug bite etc).

You can’t means test the NHS, for the same reason you can’t means test universal benefits like PIP and child DLA - or even state pension as some have suggested here. The problem will always be where to set the threshold - those for benefits are always traditionally low. So you will always have those in need of services who miss out because they are a few pounds over the threshold. It’s a race to the bottom.

party4you · 04/07/2025 15:07

Rosscameasdoody · 04/07/2025 15:07

You can’t means test the NHS, for the same reason you can’t means test universal benefits like PIP and child DLA - or even state pension as some have suggested here. The problem will always be where to set the threshold - those for benefits are always traditionally low. So you will always have those in need of services who miss out because they are a few pounds over the threshold. It’s a race to the bottom.

Why can’t it be means tested?

rosecoloured · 04/07/2025 15:07

WunTooThree · 04/07/2025 15:04

Would you tell someone with a broken leg to just keep on running?
Mental health is very important. What goes on in our brains is just as important as what goes on on the rest of your body.
Some people push through their MH issues and end up having breakdowns that can take some people years to recover from.

I understand that. But there are also a lot of piss takers, if not you have a serious mental health problem in the UK with the amount of people who can’t seem to work at all because of it.

Spartahori · 04/07/2025 15:08

hamstersarse · 04/07/2025 12:02

We are 16th in Europe for income tax rates, out of 35 countries

Some countries have a 10% income tax.

We have the one of the very lowest basic rates of tax.

Rosscameasdoody · 04/07/2025 15:09

EasternStandard · 04/07/2025 15:00

So Labour pledged not to raise taxes but you want them to anyway, lying to the electorate is ok.

Of course it’s not, but they do it anyway.

Rosscameasdoody · 04/07/2025 15:09

party4you · 04/07/2025 15:07

Why can’t it be means tested?

Sorry, I thought I’d explained why.

WideawakeinSanDiego · 04/07/2025 15:10

HPFA · 04/07/2025 15:05

Ever since Thatcher we've had people in poverty being told how all they need is to "pull themselves up by their bootstraps".

If it was going to work it would have worked by now.

But if they don't even try it certainly isn't going to work.

indigovapour · 04/07/2025 15:12

HPFA · 04/07/2025 14:45

I presume the people who don't want to pay more tax are also in favour of rejoining the Single Market, looser planning regulations and most importantly, accept that reducing benefits means that YOU AND YOUR FAMILY MEMBERS won't receive help when they need it.

That means YOUR elderly parents should pay for their doctors appointments and their social care regardless of the fact "they've paid tax all their lives".

That means YOUR child who has ADHD/ASD etc and is in need of a full time Teaching Assistant shouldn't get one.

It means accepting also that keeping people in poverty has costs regardless of whether they "deserve" to be in poverty or not. That child who doesn't get child benefit because "people shouldn't have kids they can't afford" doesn't, in most cases, actually die. They're just less likely to get good qualifications, to be disruptive in school, to have mental health problems, to commit crime. And all these things have a cost.

Yep - in favour of all those things and I’m happy to accept that I wouldn’t receive benefits because I’ve spent my whole life fulfilling my end of the social contract and have made sensible provision for my family. Not everyone can do that, and those who can’t should be protected, but a great many more could do it and haven’t - I have no sympathy whatsoever for them.

HPFA · 04/07/2025 15:13

EasternStandard · 04/07/2025 15:00

So Labour pledged not to raise taxes but you want them to anyway, lying to the electorate is ok.

I do think we should pay more taxes, yes.

But the point of the post was just to point out that if you want lower taxes you have to accept the consequences of them. Stop complaining that public services are so poor when no-one wants to pay for them.

Norway was investing its oil revenues in the country's futures when Thatcher was handing out lower taxes. Guess which country is better off now?

user1492538376 · 04/07/2025 15:13

I think judging by this thread there is a lot of cynicism about whether higher taxes will translate into public services - and I get that because confidence in politics is very low. But Scandanvia and Germany manage it - and yes they are both better run. Its not a hunch - their childcare is cheaper, better parental leave, cost of living lower, better public transport, better deals for renters and owning a home, and an economy not based on London’s financial market! Its just hilarious to say we are better run!

myhightree · 04/07/2025 15:14

LeavesTrees · 04/07/2025 11:48

I agree with @NeedyOpalSquid that the state pension should be means tested. I know extremely wealthy pensioners who have exotic holidays once a month who receive state pension. They do not need it. And there are a lot in that position.

So what. If they have paid tax and NI all their working lives, with the assumption they will get a pension then that destroys the social contract and sends out a clear message that it's better to spend all your money and be entitled to all sorts of things rather than save and be prudent.

Also, if the state pension is means tested, does that mean all those that have never paid any tax or NI don't get it either? Why should someone who has never contributed be given the state pension when those that have could potentially not get it? That would be incredibly unfair and totally destroy the social contract and trust in government going forward.

We need to stop punishing people who do the right thing.

Jellycatspyjamas · 04/07/2025 15:15

Rosscameasdoody · 04/07/2025 15:07

You can’t means test the NHS, for the same reason you can’t means test universal benefits like PIP and child DLA - or even state pension as some have suggested here. The problem will always be where to set the threshold - those for benefits are always traditionally low. So you will always have those in need of services who miss out because they are a few pounds over the threshold. It’s a race to the bottom.

Actually means testing things like DLA and PIP isnt unreasonable, the problem is that they are both gateways to other non-government supports because they are used as evidence if a disability. I receive DLA for my DD, it pays for specialist tutoring that supplements a fairly shit state provision. More helpfully it gives access to community supports and services, allows carers access to things like the cinema, swimming pool etc and allows adjustments like quiet spaces at public events.

All the organisations that offer such things want evidence of her DLA to prove her disability. If there was a way to evidence disability and the need for necessary adjustments that didn’t need DLA, I wouldn’t claim it - our household income can absorb the additional costs associated with her disability. And yes, I know we’re in a privileged position, but I know we’re not the only ones. Setting a reasonably high threshold while also having an alternative means of evidence would take some people out of the pot.

Lioncub2020 · 04/07/2025 15:15

user1492538376 · 04/07/2025 15:13

I think judging by this thread there is a lot of cynicism about whether higher taxes will translate into public services - and I get that because confidence in politics is very low. But Scandanvia and Germany manage it - and yes they are both better run. Its not a hunch - their childcare is cheaper, better parental leave, cost of living lower, better public transport, better deals for renters and owning a home, and an economy not based on London’s financial market! Its just hilarious to say we are better run!

It won't translate into better public services. The government are even talking about increasing the level of service just how much less does it need to be cut to pay for the welfare bill. If I pay more I won't get better services, there will just be another person has the ability to play Xbox all day.

Spartahori · 04/07/2025 15:15

Lioncub2020 · 04/07/2025 14:12

I think they need to put up VAT. That would raise money from those with the money to spend.

cureently you do t have to register for VAT until your turnover is over £90k a year. So many people just stop working for the rest of the year when they near the threshold as if they have minimal expenses registering for VAT just means they lose 1/6th of everything they earn.

Drop the VAT registration threshold to £10k and the government would take so much more money in tax. It’s such an easy win I’m so disappointed that Labour stent implementing ideas like this.

Womblingmerrily · 04/07/2025 15:16

@Rosscameasdoody We've already got people going to private GPs, private dentists, private care in desperation because they cannot access care on the NHS.

The NHS is paying private providers to provide services - screening, testing and operations.

The NHS needs drastic change and we need to force people to be more responsible in how they access services - some people take enormous amounts of services that they do NOT need, multiple appointments for the same issue when they have been told what the issue is (usually that they need to actually do something like physio exercises that they don't want to do or that it is a self limiting illness that they can manage themselves).

Everyone needs to pay something for prescriptions - everyone. No issue if it's the annual charges but so many people are stockipiling medications that cost enormous amounts to dispense and these are then unused and finally disposed of - or even worse used unsafely and given out to family members.

Boohoo76 · 04/07/2025 15:16

LillyPJ · 04/07/2025 15:02

I wish they'd put taxes up, especially for higher earners and the rich. I wish they'd never said they wouldn't. We can't keep expecting the same or higher standards of health care, social benefits and services for more and more people for the same or less money. A few pence on income tax wouldn't make much difference to most people. It's a shame people are so selfish and short-sighted when they vote.

It’s not the higher earners who are paying low tax rates in this country. I have an effective rate of 60%. How high do you want it to go?!

Puzzledandpissedoff · 04/07/2025 15:17

crimsonlake · 04/07/2025 12:14

As someone who works in a nursing home as an activity coordinator I agree the NHS should stop spending money on people who have no quality of life whatsoever. It is simply prolonging their lives for what end, it is simply dragging out the inevitable.

I can see where you're coming from here, crimsonlake, but with the Assisted Dying Bill just being passed I do worry about the obvious connection

That said there's a difference between what's being legislated for and simply allowing nature to take its course when the very elderly become seriously ill, and I could certainly get behind that

Bananafofana · 04/07/2025 15:17

But you absolutely can means test access to public health - they do in NZ. You can means test the state pension - they do in Australia. All of these things ARE possible,

80smonster · 04/07/2025 15:18

Obviously. 🙄

Boohoo76 · 04/07/2025 15:18

user1492538376 · 04/07/2025 15:13

I think judging by this thread there is a lot of cynicism about whether higher taxes will translate into public services - and I get that because confidence in politics is very low. But Scandanvia and Germany manage it - and yes they are both better run. Its not a hunch - their childcare is cheaper, better parental leave, cost of living lower, better public transport, better deals for renters and owning a home, and an economy not based on London’s financial market! Its just hilarious to say we are better run!

What level of income does the 45% tax rate start in Germany?!

Rosscameasdoody · 04/07/2025 15:19

Jellycatspyjamas · 04/07/2025 15:15

Actually means testing things like DLA and PIP isnt unreasonable, the problem is that they are both gateways to other non-government supports because they are used as evidence if a disability. I receive DLA for my DD, it pays for specialist tutoring that supplements a fairly shit state provision. More helpfully it gives access to community supports and services, allows carers access to things like the cinema, swimming pool etc and allows adjustments like quiet spaces at public events.

All the organisations that offer such things want evidence of her DLA to prove her disability. If there was a way to evidence disability and the need for necessary adjustments that didn’t need DLA, I wouldn’t claim it - our household income can absorb the additional costs associated with her disability. And yes, I know we’re in a privileged position, but I know we’re not the only ones. Setting a reasonably high threshold while also having an alternative means of evidence would take some people out of the pot.

So a two tier system then ? Those who are expected to pay the extra cost and those who aren’t ? So where do you set the threshold. Disability is diverse and varies in cost. How do you tell a family with a very severely disabled member who have say, £250,000 in savings, or a high income, that despite the fact that the cost of disability is going to outstrip their resources in a couple of years, they will have to pay themselves until their resources run out and they’re on the bones of their arse ?

Bananafofana · 04/07/2025 15:19

oh and means test DLA. DH was earning £200k at the time and we were entitled to middle rate DLA for DD and I carers allowance (because it doesn’t look at household income, just the claimants income). Madness. There’s just not enough money NOT to means test these things.

Rosscameasdoody · 04/07/2025 15:21

Bananafofana · 04/07/2025 15:17

But you absolutely can means test access to public health - they do in NZ. You can means test the state pension - they do in Australia. All of these things ARE possible,

If there is the political will for it. Clearly, in the UK, there isn’t.

Rosscameasdoody · 04/07/2025 15:22

Bananafofana · 04/07/2025 15:19

oh and means test DLA. DH was earning £200k at the time and we were entitled to middle rate DLA for DD and I carers allowance (because it doesn’t look at household income, just the claimants income). Madness. There’s just not enough money NOT to means test these things.

Where would you set the threshold ? Someone who has a high income and a high level of disability related cost is going to be in the same position as someone with a lower income and a lower level of disability related cost. Where do you draw the line ?

Lioncub2020 · 04/07/2025 15:22

Rosscameasdoody · 04/07/2025 15:19

So a two tier system then ? Those who are expected to pay the extra cost and those who aren’t ? So where do you set the threshold. Disability is diverse and varies in cost. How do you tell a family with a very severely disabled member who have say, £250,000 in savings, or a high income, that despite the fact that the cost of disability is going to outstrip their resources in a couple of years, they will have to pay themselves until their resources run out and they’re on the bones of their arse ?

Because that is the responsibility of having a child. Too many people are happy to pop out the sprogs but not then pay for them. Any of us could have a disabled child, take should be taken into consideration when you choose to have children, you support them whatever happens.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.