Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Non-binary teacher?

1000 replies

Thompson198 · 04/07/2025 07:23

Name change.
I’ve got a 5 year old daughter due to go into year 2 in September. We’ve just been told that the teacher for next year is a non-binary/‘non-gender-conforming’ man who wants to be referred to by ‘Mx’ (pronounced mix) and they/them pronouns.
Quite a few of the parents have already complained and started looking for other places at local schools because of this.
what do you think?
My daughter has SEN and is one of the youngest in her class, I worry how she’s going to be able to keep up with the pronouns and understand this without us having to teach her about gender ideology at her age. My husband is extremely against teaching her gender ideology, especially so young, I’m not the most positive about it either but don’t feel as strongly as him. He also doesn’t want her being at the school in September but they have been very supportive for her so far and I’m concerned it might not be the same elsewhere.
Thoughts? How would you feel if this was your child’s teacher?

OP posts:
Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · 04/07/2025 11:00

MaggiesShadow · 04/07/2025 10:46

I don't get your point, sorry? I've never had an issue with telling my children 'I don't know' in answer to lots of their questions.

But you do know

OuterSpaceCadet · 04/07/2025 11:00

A grown man, especially a teacher, ought not need external validation from pupils about his internal beliefs on gender stereotypes. It is his business and his business alone if he a) identifies as NB and b) uses language commonly understood to refer to sex to refer instead to gender identity.

The problem isn't his identity or beliefs, it's the unreasonable demands placed upon others.

Pronouns are a courtesy and a personal choice IMO. They ought never be demanded, especially not from children.

"The new teacher is a fundamentalist Christian and all children are to declare whether they believe in God. Heretics will need to sit at the back of the class and the teacher will be exorcising the devil from within them Friday break times."

"The new teacher is a flat earther. No child is to use language which refers to a spherical planet. Australia cannot be "down under " for example. Science lessons will be adjusted accordingly".

"The new teacher has body dysmorphia and believes themselves to be extremely overweight. Children need to treat the teacher as though they are the size they believe themselves to be, remembering to leave wide spaces for the teacher to pass through, and never directly touching the teacher, always stopping a few centimetres before reaching them".

BorgQueen · 04/07/2025 11:00

A ‘good’ teacher wouldn’t push this hideously regressive ideology on young children.
How is gaslighting them into denying what their eyes and ears are telling them a positive thing?
Nobody who says they are a different Sex or is non binary 🙄 is fit to be a Teacher.

ButteredRadish · 04/07/2025 11:01

Please, please pull your DD out. Don’t subject a little 6yr old to this confusing and batshit nonsense! School is hard enough without this crap.

ManyATrueWord · 04/07/2025 11:03

I'd go to another school. Had a similar situation in Rainbows with a leader who claimed they were non binary. "It doesn't affect anything, they won't mention it" said a parent. They certainly did mention it, setting it out as a fact not a belief. It's like telling children they will go to hell if they don't get baptised, it is a lie.

Mumble12 · 04/07/2025 11:03

Leafstamp · 04/07/2025 11:00

It really won't be just about the title for this man! He will be infecting the school with gender ideology in all sorts of insidious, or not so insidious ways, including via other staff.

Jesus Christ, what a reach of an opinion based on knowing zero about this human

Babyswearing · 04/07/2025 11:03

TheKeatingFive · 04/07/2025 10:58

It is a fact that humans sex is binary and immutable. Seems extraordinary to me that you'd be prepared to teach your child something different.

But this is a rabbit hole you don't have to go down. "Some people prefer to be called Mx" is all you need here, which is true. It doesn't have to be a grand ideological battle unless you want it to be.

Leafstamp · 04/07/2025 11:03

Babyswearing · 04/07/2025 10:57

The pearl clutching on this thread, my goodness. Your child is there to learn. And it is a fact that some people prefer different pronouns, whether you agree or not. School seems as good a place as any to learn that.

It may be a fact that people prefer different pronouns, it's also a fact that they don't get to compel others to use them.

The whole idea of gender identities is nonsense and sexist, it has no place in schools for sure.

IanStirlingrocks · 04/07/2025 11:03

BallerinaRadio · 04/07/2025 07:33

If your child can handle Mr or Miss or Mrs then I'm sure Mx won't be a problem, you don't really need to go much deeper than that.

Jesus Christ just from your post alone I can feel the pitchforks being sharpened from here, no thought as to the quality of teaching this teacher may provide

Exactly this!
essentially it’s just a name, no need to “teach gender ideology” just treat them as you would any other teacher really and see how things develop.

Rivertrudge · 04/07/2025 11:04

Babyswearing · 04/07/2025 10:57

The pearl clutching on this thread, my goodness. Your child is there to learn. And it is a fact that some people prefer different pronouns, whether you agree or not. School seems as good a place as any to learn that.

a) "pearl clutching" is misogynistic. What parallel insult do you use for men?

b) Yes, some people prefer different pronouns. That doesn’t mean everyone else, especially young children, should be forced to comply with and thus validate that preference.

Slightyamusedandsilly · 04/07/2025 11:04

LegoNinjago · 04/07/2025 10:32

“You're risking your job if you take that bias into work with you.“

I’m not. Luckily for me, there’s Supreme Court ruling.

There’s no bias either - just biological reality and scientific facts.

I'm sure you supported Section 28 too. When it was legal.

Gone now.

TheKeatingFive · 04/07/2025 11:05

MaggiesShadow · 04/07/2025 10:57

That's a shame and I truly hope she gets well and healthy.

I don't personally think this situation falls into the category of activism. All OP knows is that her child's new teacher will be Mx and is non-binary. There's no reason to think they'll start trying to get six-year-olds to transition.

Potentially life long health issues involving her sexual function / bladder issues are bit more than 'a shame'.

But thanks for your concern.

I'd be much more worried about a teacher who's openly non binary. They've obviously drunk the kool aid. And I cannot for the life of me see how they could not bring gender ideology into the class. Their very presence will do that.

LegoNinjago · 04/07/2025 11:06

MaggiesShadow · 04/07/2025 10:42

I think you're choosing to view this in the harshest possible way. 'Gaslighting' has very negative and harmful connotations.

I truly don't see how a six-year-old will be negatively impacted or damaged by being told that someone's title is Mx. I see no harm in explaining that some people don't feel like a boy or a girl and so we use they instead of he or she.

It's not propaganda or gaslighting or anything like it to say that people's beliefs are different but unless it's harmful or dangerous, the kind thing to do is respect it.

I don't believe a lot of what most religions teach. I don't take it personally or see it as inherently evil if someone believes in a god that I don't think is real. It's not harming me, therefore tolerance is perfectly acceptable.

  1. Males and females don't present the same level of risk
  2. Making young children question the reality, giving them mixed messages and misrepresenting biological facts is indeed a very harmful thing to do.
borntobequiet · 04/07/2025 11:06

Mumble12 · 04/07/2025 10:59

This teacher isn't looking to change their sex

As far as I understand the meaning of “non binary” - and it doesn’t make any sense - it means “neither of one sex/gender nor the other” (conflating sex and gender).
So yes, they are claiming to have changed sex in some way.
If it’s “just” gender, it’s simply not conforming to societal sex stereotypes, so why does it demand a different title?

It’s all completely mad.

Slightyamusedandsilly · 04/07/2025 11:06

borntobequiet · 04/07/2025 10:38

Sounds to me as though she’s doing her job properly. People telling children untruths about their sex opens up all sorts of possible safeguarding issues.

I don't think I've ever had any experience, as a student or a parent or as a teacher, where a teacher has talked about their sex with their class.

Ddakji · 04/07/2025 11:06

Slightyamusedandsilly · 04/07/2025 11:04

I'm sure you supported Section 28 too. When it was legal.

Gone now.

There is zero correlation between Section 28 and the current situation.

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · 04/07/2025 11:06

Slightyamusedandsilly · 04/07/2025 11:04

I'm sure you supported Section 28 too. When it was legal.

Gone now.

Hi,
Which gay teachers demanded that the children in their classes validated their sexuality?

TimeFliesin2046 · 04/07/2025 11:06

Slightyamusedandsilly · 04/07/2025 11:04

I'm sure you supported Section 28 too. When it was legal.

Gone now.

What is this lie that all gender critical people are also homophobic? Where did it come from? Gay people weren't asking for anything different from what the rest of us had. They weren't asking us to lie or modify our speech or be less safe so they could get their way. It's a totally different thing. It's untrue. It's regressive, and it doesn't make anyone a bigot for saying so.

JimJimJam · 04/07/2025 11:06

FruityCider · 04/07/2025 10:34

It's not that hard though. There are other gender neutral titles out there - doctor and professor for example. There are gender neutral names like Alex or Sam. Is it a detriment not to think about or refer to sex when speaking about or to someone? Is that necessary and important? I don't think so.

I also think it's quite funny that both the teacher and lots of people on this site think that gender is bollocks, just expressing that in different ways. The teacher doesn't like/want gender and doesn't want it to be linked to their sex. It's really two sides of a coin in a way.

I work with someone non-binary who prefer to use "they/them" pronouns but is OK with "he" and is quite comfortable acknowledging they're of the male sex. They just prefer to identify in a non-gendered way. I've gone from finding non-binary quite a confusing identification to feeling it's actually quite progressive and liberating. Why do we need an announcement of our sex/gender built into how we are addressed day-to-day?

Mx seems not too dissimilar to the adoption of Ms rather than Miss or Mrs - I don't need to announce my marital status in my title, why do I need to announce my sex or gender? Mx is fine. They/them is fine.

Wasn't that long ago that you had to make quite an effort to be identified as Ms - it wasn't on every drop-down menu on forms, on the phone you'd be saying "No, not Miss, Ms, M-S Ms". And now it's entirely common and normal. I'm sure Mx will seem similar in time.

Took me a while at work when talking about our non-binary colleague not to assume when people were using "they" in conversation that they were talking about more than one person but honestly it's quite easy to get accustomed to.

Leafstamp · 04/07/2025 11:07

Mumble12 · 04/07/2025 11:03

Jesus Christ, what a reach of an opinion based on knowing zero about this human

How do you know I know nothing about him? I may know the school and know where this guy trained to be teacher.

If nothing else I know that he believes in nonsensical and harmful ideas about the nature of what being a human is.

Slightyamusedandsilly · 04/07/2025 11:07

LegoNinjago · 04/07/2025 10:38

“"Is Mx a boy or a girl?" "I'm not sure, sweetheart. We don’t know”

Dear Lord, I’ve heard it all now… 🤣
You do know. You choose to gaslight your child

We do know that there’re two sexes - male and female.

BUT you don't actually KNOW anyone's sex. You assume that a 'she' has a vag and grew her own boobs. She might not have either. I appear to have boobs but it's all foam and elastic 😂

TimeFliesin2046 · 04/07/2025 11:07

JimJimJam · 04/07/2025 11:06

I work with someone non-binary who prefer to use "they/them" pronouns but is OK with "he" and is quite comfortable acknowledging they're of the male sex. They just prefer to identify in a non-gendered way. I've gone from finding non-binary quite a confusing identification to feeling it's actually quite progressive and liberating. Why do we need an announcement of our sex/gender built into how we are addressed day-to-day?

Mx seems not too dissimilar to the adoption of Ms rather than Miss or Mrs - I don't need to announce my marital status in my title, why do I need to announce my sex or gender? Mx is fine. They/them is fine.

Wasn't that long ago that you had to make quite an effort to be identified as Ms - it wasn't on every drop-down menu on forms, on the phone you'd be saying "No, not Miss, Ms, M-S Ms". And now it's entirely common and normal. I'm sure Mx will seem similar in time.

Took me a while at work when talking about our non-binary colleague not to assume when people were using "they" in conversation that they were talking about more than one person but honestly it's quite easy to get accustomed to.

But we're talking about an autistic child here. People with autism often find it much harder to do this!

MaggiesShadow · 04/07/2025 11:07

PPPPikachu · 04/07/2025 10:59

But by respecting an individual’s want to be neither male nor female harms children.

Humans are only male or female, they cannot change sex under any circumstances. It’s not a case of “biology is a bit more complicated than you learnt as a teenager”, it’s actual
fact that whilst there are variations in how we look, we are still either male or female. Lying to children and gaslighting a population that this isn’t a big deal is not ok.

Children need to know who people are to keep safe. Over the last 15 years here I’ve read countless threads about “tell your child if they get lost to go to a woman, or a mother with children” because we all know that statistically men are much less safe than women. We’re into a bonkers era where too many children rely on stereotypes and that fucking nonsense gender to identify who people are. It’s not safe, it’s stupid, and it’s making our children either stupid, or they’re being told they’re basically homophobic bigots for knowing there are two sexes.

Please make it stop, I’m so beyond the point of thinking humans should just go extinct because so many are so fucking thick!

I don't teach my children that people's biological sexes can change. We've never had to have that conversation.

I DO teach them that some people, not all, believe that gender is a social construct and that some people don't subscribe to either. And that some people feel as though they were born into the wrong gender and take steps to change it.

I don't have to agree, I don't have to like it. I don't have to believe it. But my opinion on it won't change the fact that there are people out there who DO believe it. That's just fact. It won't change.

So me telling my child that someone sees themselves as non-binary and wants to be referred to as they is not the same thing as me saying that there aren't only two biological sexes. I don't get why people are struggling to understand that.

As for finding a woman when they're in danger, well, statistically if they go looking for a woman they'll find one because the trans community is a miniscule portion of society. So on the off-chance that they find themselves in a situation where they need to find a woman, I'm pretty confident that they'll find one. And if I tell them to find a mother, they'll find one. Perhaps it will be a transwoman, perhaps it will be a biological woman. Either way, it will be a mother and they'd be hedging their bets regardless if it's a total stranger.

LegoNinjago · 04/07/2025 11:08

OuterSpaceCadet · 04/07/2025 11:00

A grown man, especially a teacher, ought not need external validation from pupils about his internal beliefs on gender stereotypes. It is his business and his business alone if he a) identifies as NB and b) uses language commonly understood to refer to sex to refer instead to gender identity.

The problem isn't his identity or beliefs, it's the unreasonable demands placed upon others.

Pronouns are a courtesy and a personal choice IMO. They ought never be demanded, especially not from children.

"The new teacher is a fundamentalist Christian and all children are to declare whether they believe in God. Heretics will need to sit at the back of the class and the teacher will be exorcising the devil from within them Friday break times."

"The new teacher is a flat earther. No child is to use language which refers to a spherical planet. Australia cannot be "down under " for example. Science lessons will be adjusted accordingly".

"The new teacher has body dysmorphia and believes themselves to be extremely overweight. Children need to treat the teacher as though they are the size they believe themselves to be, remembering to leave wide spaces for the teacher to pass through, and never directly touching the teacher, always stopping a few centimetres before reaching them".

This 100%

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · 04/07/2025 11:08

Slightyamusedandsilly · 04/07/2025 11:06

I don't think I've ever had any experience, as a student or a parent or as a teacher, where a teacher has talked about their sex with their class.

Really? So you had male teachers entering the girls’ changing rooms, for example? You had male teachers escorting female students on school trips without a female member of staff?

You work and attended really terrible schools with no regard for safeguarding. They should be reported.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.