Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

HR rejected grievance I made against Colleague

642 replies

RockNRoll25 · 30/06/2025 18:11

Looking for a bit of a hand hold. I submitted a grievance against a male colleague for a comment he made about me which was sexual in nature. HR have investigated and closed the case after speaking to him and accepting his explanation that his comment wasn’t sexual. It absolutely was an inappropriate innuendo and I’m really surprised by the response.

Has anyone been in a similar position - would you try to find another job, or ask to be moved teams?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Marinamay44 · 01/07/2025 10:46

HR made the right decision.

He could have meant it as a sexual innuendo, but you can't prove it.

He didnt say "she is going to have sex"

What he said is accurate to what you were doing

Choose one of his comments to report, that he can't deny is a sexual comment. Not this one.

Rosscameasdoody · 01/07/2025 10:52

prelovedusername · 01/07/2025 06:11

I’m shocked at how many people don’t see the potential for this as a sexual comment. It’s depressing actually, because when I was young women had to endure this stuff routinely and the reason it happens less is because people (women) bravely stood up against it. That doesn’t mean there aren’t still creeps who like to push their luck.

As a PP said, the way men talk about women when they think they are unheard is sobering. And that is in professional environments. I have never heard a man pull another one up for a crude or lascivious comment even if they wouldn’t make it themselves.

In this instance it would be difficult to prove but I would expect HR to ask around to see if anyone else felt the same about the comment in the context it was made.

edited for typo

Edited

There is no potential for sexual comment - it doesn’t meet the definition of sexual harassment however hard you try. And that’s the point. You can’t just ‘ask around’ to try to make it fit - which is why HR have dismissed it.

nomas · 01/07/2025 10:52

I think if he had said 'the surgeon is going to pump her lips' then that would have been a bit more suggestive.

ilexgranita · 01/07/2025 10:56

TempyBrennan · 30/06/2025 18:47

Sorry OP, in agreement with the majority so far - not seeing the issue.

I wouldn’t leave the team, I’d just avoid that person where possible.

He's the oldest member of the team and you think his age should mean he behaves differently to others - can he complain about age discrimination on that basis? I think you have discussed personnal business openly at work and someone probably judged you on it - did the lips mean lip or vaginal lips, we'll never know - it wasn't the first thing I thought of. I assume he'll avoid speaking to you again on such matters - you'd be best to do the same.
@TempyBrennan sorry I didn't mean to quote you and I can't delete it now.

Marinamay44 · 01/07/2025 10:57

I can understand if he has made a long line of sexual innuendos how, "getting your lips pumped", could be interpreted as a sexual innuendo.

However, it's not one that could be proven.

Choose one next time where there can be no mistake what he meant.

Rosscameasdoody · 01/07/2025 11:03

AnonymousBleep · 01/07/2025 10:28

It's not a stretch. That clearly was the innuendo he was making.

Disappointing that on a women's website, women are so quick to attack the OP because apparently the comment was absolutely fine (and because clearly some people have a problem with women getting lip filler). I'm just surprised nobody's called her a woke snowflake yet.

How do you know this was innuendo ? Were you there ? Because that’s the only way to know for sure, so that you have context. As a stand alone comment l think it says more about someone who would jump straight to sexual innuendo when the subject is lip filler - he described exactly what happens. And that MN is predominantly a woman’s website is irrelevant. The fact is that most posters didn’t see the connection because it’s a leap. The law on sexual harassment exists to prevent workplace colleagues from actual harassment, not imagined slights they’ve pretzeled themselves into making.

Ohtobemycat · 01/07/2025 11:08

I think youre being a bit silly here.
He describes what you said you were doing. You took it in a certain way. Maybe he was being crude but maybe he wasnt.
Big pumped lips do look very sexually suggestive though, like a fake boob cleavage on your face.

brunettemic · 01/07/2025 11:10

LittlleMy · 30/06/2025 18:27

The fact the colleague has form for this and answered on behalf of OP even though Q was not directed at him so he must have been pretty fast and so desperate to reply and the way that he termed it is clear innuendo wordplay for for vaginal (lips) intercourse (pumped).

However, yes technically that it was OP was having done but in the context of how it was said you can see why OP had an issue with it.

But I also see HR pov and he could argue nothing was meant by it so it’s difficult to be shocked by the outcome because of that.

Edited

I think that’s quite the reach to be honest.

Seventree · 01/07/2025 11:13

It took me a few minutes to work out what the innuendo would be to be honest. It's not an uncommon way to describe lip filler.

Kwean · 01/07/2025 11:14

nomas · 01/07/2025 10:52

I think if he had said 'the surgeon is going to pump her lips' then that would have been a bit more suggestive.

Would it?

Maybe it would is your misogynistic assumption that surgeon's are always male?

ExercicenformedeZ · 01/07/2025 11:16

Wow, serious overreaction on your part. You've made yourself look unprofessional and really rather foolish. If you're going to have your lips filled, then what do you expect people to say?! It sounds as if you've let your dislike of this man cloud your judgement.

ExercicenformedeZ · 01/07/2025 11:19

macaroonmayhem · 01/07/2025 07:42

Are you in Scotland OP? Because "getting pumped" is definitely sexual innuendo here. 😳

He didn't say 'getting pumped'. He said 'getting HER LIPS pumped'. One is sexual, the other is factual. I'm not surprised that HR threw this one out.

ExercicenformedeZ · 01/07/2025 11:21

Pinktreetop · 01/07/2025 08:33

I wouldn’t quit for it but it was certainly a malicious sexual comment and glad you complained to HR. Hopefully he will stop; otherwise keep pulling him on these sort of comments

How was it 'obviously a malicious sexual comment'? There is nothing obvious about it, it was a statement of fact.

curtaintwitcher78 · 01/07/2025 11:26

If OP is in Scotland it was definitely sexual and inappropriate.

Blondiney · 01/07/2025 11:30

HR departments really have their work cut out these days don’t they. 😐

pharmer · 01/07/2025 11:31

Huh? But that is literally what we're doing? I'm not surprised the grievance was not upheld. I am embarrassed for you, op!

Ohtobemycat · 01/07/2025 11:33

Its possible he also meant plumped, which is an industry term used in advertising.

At work once, one of the older guys came in and said 'just what I have seen, a sign for a brazillian blow dry at the salon downstairs' he was shocked and horrified at this sign as he had assumed the only 'brazillian' was a style of pubic hair... and we had a great laugh explaining to him the difference between brazillian wax and brazillian blow dry.

It was the type of work environment where there wad a lot of friendly banter and a close knit group so it wasn't weird. Just very, very funny 😂

brunettemic · 01/07/2025 11:36

curtaintwitcher78 · 01/07/2025 11:26

If OP is in Scotland it was definitely sexual and inappropriate.

Why? He didn’t say she was “getting pumped”.

ArabellaScott · 01/07/2025 11:36

Kwean · 01/07/2025 11:14

Would it?

Maybe it would is your misogynistic assumption that surgeon's are always male?

That poster makes no reference whatsoever to the sex of the hypothetical surgeon.

nomas · 01/07/2025 11:47

Kwean · 01/07/2025 11:14

Would it?

Maybe it would is your misogynistic assumption that surgeon's are always male?

I didn't say the surgeon was male, Maybe you've missed that the whole post is about MALE sexism?

Kwean · 01/07/2025 11:50

nomas · 01/07/2025 11:47

I didn't say the surgeon was male, Maybe you've missed that the whole post is about MALE sexism?

You didnt have to - it was unconsciously implied/assumed. Happy to concede I have missed something if you can explain how an imaginary female surgeon would be offensive?

Kwean · 01/07/2025 11:51

ArabellaScott · 01/07/2025 11:36

That poster makes no reference whatsoever to the sex of the hypothetical surgeon.

Exactly - its PP who is extrapolating.

nomas · 01/07/2025 11:52

Kwean · 01/07/2025 11:50

You didnt have to - it was unconsciously implied/assumed. Happy to concede I have missed something if you can explain how an imaginary female surgeon would be offensive?

The point is that OP is saying that her male colleague is saying OP is going to get her lips pumped (presumably by a male surgeon if as you say, a female surgeon would be harmless).

So why are you levelling an accusation of misogyny at me simply for addressing OP's assessment?

nomas · 01/07/2025 11:56

Kwean · 01/07/2025 11:51

Exactly - its PP who is extrapolating.

Edited

I believe Arabella is referring to me, so not sure who you think is extrapolating.

Arran2024 · 01/07/2025 11:56

curtaintwitcher78 · 01/07/2025 11:26

If OP is in Scotland it was definitely sexual and inappropriate.

Maybe OP is Scottish so took it as a sexual slur but the colleague is English and didnt know that.

Swipe left for the next trending thread