That is the figure produced by the BMA, who as a union have stretched the figure regularly although I note they seem to have abandoned the previous wild claims of 35-40% pay “cut”. Data was never the BMA leadership strength.
Pretty much every sector has seen stagnant pay (effective pay cuts) since 2008. Most sectors have also faced significant redundancies and indirect cuts such as reduced promotional and career opportunities (in the private sector at least - that wasn’t the case across all of the public sector - some parts used extra promos were used to retain the facade of a pay freeze). They have also had to address major workplace change and restructuring, retraining and relocations.
Doctors have not “lost their final salary pension scheme”. They still have a DBP, its just slightly less platinum plated than it used to be. Have you forgotten the chancellor actually changed tax law on pensions specifically to benefit doctors due to the huge value of their pension pots? Even amongst public sector pension schemes the doctors’ scheme is very generous.
Every professional spends many, many hours over standard at work, takes professional qualifications, is constantly uprating training etc - usually at their own expense. Everyone has seen the impact of the last 17 years on pay.
Doctors should be well rewarded for an important and demanding job. However most of the young juniors/residents in my family/circles talk more about conditions than pay. They talk about managing placements in the early years if they don’t have the connections to stay in preferred locations, nepotism, some of the staffing levels and poor operational management (especially if they have worked abroad in better structured systems).
Lets face it - given a blank sheet nobody would design the mess we have at the moment but in a messy system doctors are far from the worst done by. I would like to see some of the logistical and practical problems early career doctors face being addressed rather than blanket pay rises with no connection to productivity.