Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To not love my SC the same way I love my biological children?

526 replies

annasdltn · 14/06/2025 13:29

I have 7 yo twins. Sadly, their dad, my first husband, passed away when they just one.

My husband has two children from a previous marriage, aged 9 and 7. While the official custody arrangement is every other weekend, he has a good co-parenting relationship with his ex, so we usually see them more often—about half of the school holidays and most weekends, at least for a day. We’ve been together for four years, lived together for two, and got married this year, so I’ve known his children since they were small. They’re genuinely lovely—kind, polite, well-mannered.

I’m now pregnant with our first child together.

Here’s the honest part I’m struggling with: I often see stepparents saying they love their stepchildren the same as their biological ones, but I just don’t feel that way. I care about my stepchildren, I’m happy when they do well, and I want good things for them—but it’s not love, and it’s certainly not the deep, instinctive love I feel for my own children.

There’s another layer to this. My late husband was very successful and left a substantial inheritance to me, with the understanding it would go to our children. That includes a property portfolio which I still manage (same business he used to run but on a smaller scale) and other assets generating income. Because of this, my twins attend private school, have private healthcare, access to more expensive extracurriculars and a very comfortable lifestyle overall. Each of the twins will have access to a very substantial sum of money to buy their first house in their early 20s. They will not be taking a loan for university. These benefits do not extend to my stepchildren. Of course, I contribute to shared family time—holidays, outings, housing, weekends together—and the stepchildren do benefit in that sense.

So, AIBU for not feeling the same love for my stepchildren? Isn’t it biologically normal to feel more love for your own children? Or are other stepparents really managing to bridge that emotional gap in a way I just can’t?

OP posts:
wannabewitch · 15/06/2025 08:42

Why do people think the DH needs to address the situation. The attitude and words here are the OPs and hers alone . They are what is sad about this - nothing the DF or the EX has done, is relevant.
That she wants her twins to have a better relationship with her soon to be new child than her SDCs- who are as equally related as he twins - that sums up how sad this persons attitude is.

gannett · 15/06/2025 08:51

Kind of weird that apparently marriage means "all money goes into the family pot" for a lot of people... but not when there are pre-existing children.

I don't think anyone is under any obligation to feel anything for children they're not related to, it's understandable if you don't. But the correct thing to do if that's the case is avoid creating blended families in which some children are the poor relations in their own home. Is it that hard to find a new partner who doesn't already have kids?

Or at the very least in this case, given that the wealth disparity was pre-existing and this scenario was completely predictable, actually talk about how you'd navigate it before bringing yet another child into the situation?

Really just seems like two adults who should have thought deeply about the above factors utterly failing to do so, and the kids will be the ones affected. Whether the OP loves the stepkids or not is actually irrelevant, and kind of a leading question designed to get answers along the lines of "of course you don't need to".

Zippidydoodah · 15/06/2025 08:52

The stepchildren are going to grow up knowing that they were second best, and with way fewer opportunities than their step siblings and even half sibling. This is absolutely shitty, in my opinion.

Pinkflowersinavase · 15/06/2025 08:59

Your husband needs to be saving for his children at the very least. Sane gifts too. That's all I can add here. Don't have dh neglect to save for his own children. Don't be selfish.

caringcarer · 15/06/2025 09:15

I think as long as you are kind to your DSC and treat them well and are not being mean to them. That is fine. Think of yourself as a bonus adult in their life. They have their own Mum and Dad already. You'll probably find it harder with your child together. Will that baby also benefit from wealth left by your first husband or must to keep that exclusively for his biological DC? I foster DC. I have 3 DC of my own albeit grown into adults now and 1 FC who has lived with me since he was 5. He is almost 19 now. I treat him as family and he gets what ever my DC are given for birthday and Xmas. He's to gain in our will too but it's complicated because he has learning disabilities so he'll be a beneficiary of a trust we set up. Money and things he needs will be tricked to him rather than a large lump sum as he'd probably be scammed and/or give it all away. FC that live with us for 6 months or a year don't feel like family the same even though they are treated very well and we are always kind to them and often they get more of our time because they have need of it after often experiencing a dreadful past life.

rainingsnoring · 15/06/2025 09:16

BrickHare · 14/06/2025 19:52

You’re entitled to feel that way Op. Also I think a lot of people are missing the point that his children have two parents. What if the mother won the lottery? Would she be expected to give your twins money? No she wouldn’t. Your twins wealth have nothing to do with his children’s. Half siblings are different.

Obviously not because she isn't their step mother, living in the same household.
The OP isn't being made to feel guilty, she doesn't appear to feel guilty at all. Her behaviour is damaging to her innocent step kids, however.

rainingsnoring · 15/06/2025 09:19

Zippidydoodah · 15/06/2025 08:52

The stepchildren are going to grow up knowing that they were second best, and with way fewer opportunities than their step siblings and even half sibling. This is absolutely shitty, in my opinion.

Exactly. Neither of the adults in this relationship should have entered it if this was to be the agreement, as it is inevitably damaging for the innocent children.

MikeRafone · 15/06/2025 09:20

TaraRhu · 15/06/2025 08:08

Personally, I think you should at least offer to pay to se d them to private school. Even if that reduces the amount your own kids have long te. With education they will have the same chances. I'd be really sad if my new step sister was born with a massive advantage: You don't need to feel the same for step kids but as a family you should be giving all your kids a decent start. How would you feel if the situation was reversed? If your husband had lots of wealth and did not want to spend any of the family money on your kids?

There own mother can pay for private education for her dc.

the private schooling is from an inheritance and the father didn’t leave the money to the other children. The fact his business is doing well is down to him starting it

Whatafustercluck · 15/06/2025 09:41

In terms of love, I'm of the opinion that you can have different types of love. I love my dsd. I just love her in a different way to my own children. Even she knows this (she's now an adult and I've know her for 23 years) and has said she believes this is entirely normal and wouldn't expect any different. We're close and I'd run into a burning building for her. But I'm not her mum, nor have I ever tried to be one - she has one already!

In terms of inheritance, that's another matter and I'm not sure where I stand on that in relation to the op. In our situation, it'll be a direct split between dsd, dd and ds when the last of us dies. We discussed whether dh's 50% would be split 3 ways while mine is split 2 ways, but this would go against everything we've tried to instil in all three dc that they're equal (e.g. we've never differentiated that they're half siblings, and we've always emphasised that we're a family of five, despite dsd being grown up now and making her own way in life). Op's situation is a lot more complicated, financially speaking.

Jollyjoy · 15/06/2025 10:24

I’ll preface saying I don’t have SC so I don’t know what this is like from a personal pov. I think you feel how you feel, and that is how it is. But what I think I would struggle with if I was your SC or your DH, is that you don’t seem to have any desire or end goal to feel love for them as if they were your own. It’s like you believe you only have a certain amount of love in you and you won’t share it. And I don’t think love is like that. Yes it’s natural that your love for your own children is deeper, more protective, but for me I’d be wanting to work on that, really imagining the situation from their point of view, being more objective and seeing them as humans in their own right needing love exactly the same way yours do.

I fear if you don’t have this intention to develop your love for them, that the new baby will be a cat among the pigeons that really exposes the disparity in an ugly way for everyone.

Whatado · 15/06/2025 10:38

BrickHare · 14/06/2025 23:47

Well I suspect like you they may end up in therapy with all the kids, who knows. You’ve talked a lot about understand the kids feelings but you haven’t said if they were happy growing up? Which I take it, since you haven’t mentioned that, and due to therapy they weren’t. It’s really great you have self awareness now and have a good relationship with all the kids. But some stepkids don’t want a relationship with their stepparent and vice versa. Especially say if the step parent was involved in an affair. Some blended families work and some don’t. I definitely wouldn’t be judging op because I’ve had some therapy and now the kids are older they are more accepting. Just seems quite self righteous and smug.

Why my daughter was in therapy is none of an Internet strangers business.

But I will say, she need both of her parents support to deal with why and as a result of that, the differences in her parental relationships and her experience in two separate blended families became front and center, and for her other parent to be able to help her he needed to sit and listen to why she didn't particularly want his help and what he needed to rebuild his relationship with her.

Was she happy. Yeah in one home and not the other.

And anyway therapy isnt some dirty concept that indicates your a fuck up. Imo every one should do it. It pulls the blinkers of how you think, why you do and how you deal with people.

It wouldn't do the OP & her husband to do a bit and really consider what it is they are trying to build here.

thepariscrimefiles · 15/06/2025 10:40

To be honest, OP's original post sounded pretty reasonable. Of course step parents aren't expected to love their step-children as much as they love their biological children as long as they treat them kindly and fairly.

In subsequent posts, the OP has displayed some 'wicked step-mother' vibes in her complete refusal to do even some small things so that the disparity in wealth and privilege between her own children and her step-children wasn't as stark. This post, in response to a poster asking OP if she would be OK with her DH putting a bit less money in the pot for their joint child so that he could spend a bit more on her step-children, summed that up:

'No, I wouldn’t. Because that’s effectively me paying for his children? Mathematically him underpaying £1000 towards joint child’s expenses (which means me overpaying £1000) would be exactly the same as me just paying £1000 directly for his kids. Which I wouldn’t do.'

As she has also described how her DH is much more hands-on and involved with his step-children than she is with his children, it is very clear that his children are getting a very raw deal out of their dad's relationship with his second wife.

hididdlyho · 15/06/2025 10:41

Sounds normal. In your case your stepchildren have an Mum who is present in their life, so they're not missing out; you're a bonus parental figure in their life. Similarly, I would be surprised if your stepchildren loved you in quite the same way they love their Mum.

NormasArse · 15/06/2025 13:24

I know your children have lost their own dad, but I think you must also remember that your twins get to live full time with your SC’s dad. That must also be hard on the SCs.

annasdltn · 15/06/2025 13:28

Thanks so much for all the replies – honestly didn’t expect quite so many! I’ve read through them all, and while I might not reply to everyone, I just wanted to touch on a few things that came up a lot. If I’ve missed something big, just let me know and I’ll come back to it.

First – the Christmas presents thing.
So, to explain it a bit better: each child gets a present from their parent. For the twins, that’s me. For my stepkids, that’s one from their mum and one from their dad. Then there’s a small present from the stepparent – so DH gives the twins a little something, and I give something to his kids too. It’s never anything massive – just a token gift, like a Barbie or a small Lego set or whatever they’re into at the time. Probably the equivalent of what an aunt or grownup sibling would give.

The “main” present comes from the parent – usually something the child’s been asking for or something a bit more expensive. We’ve always done it this way and it works for us.

Second – is it fair?
No. But life isn’t fair. It’s not fair that my twins lost their dad when they were tiny. It’s not fair that I’ve had to handle every hard question and every emotional bit of that on my own. Its not fair than one of my SC is always selected for school teams and the other hardly ever has been. It’s also not fair that some families are better off than others, or that some kids grow up with more or less. But that’s just life, really.

My kids do have more financial security, yes. But they’ve also experienced loss in a way DH’s kids haven’t. And DH will need to have those chats with his children about money and the differences between households – just like I’ve had to talk to mine about grief and their dad, or like other parents have to talk about poor health or fleeing to a different country due to war at home. That’s part of being a parent. We each deal with what we’ve been given.

Third – the parenting roles.
DH is more involved with the twins just because they live here full-time, he spends more time with them and often he joins in because he wants to. His kids are mainly with their mum, so our role with them day-to-day is pretty light. We both take on more of a “fun adult” role with each other’s kids – not full-on parenting.

The twins wouldn’t go to him if they needed something sorted. They come to me. I do the school admin, dentist appointments, shopping for new shoes, dealing with meltdowns, homework, all of it. And that’s fine – I’m their mum. I don’t expect DH to do any of that, unless very specific occasions when he might volunteer to help with homework if it’s something he’s interested in or feels he’s good at, but it’s very rare and it’s always come from him because he’s wanted to. Just like his kids wouldn’t come to me if something needed doing – they’d go to their mum or him. We’ll never tell each other’s children what they are or aren’t allowed to do (except very obvious safety things like hold my hand and don’t run into the road), we’d never discipline them…

That’s not to say there aren’t nice little moments. I’ve done my stepdaughter’s nails and hair when she’s wanted that – just something we’ve bonded over a bit, especially because her mum’s not really into that kind of thing. And DH helped teach the twins to ride their bikes – we started together and he ended up taking the lead. So there are definitely connections there, but it’s not the same as being the main parent. And it’s “fun” things rather than laborious or difficult tasks. Again, think the kind of thing an aunt would do or what you’d agree to help your best friend’s kids with - it’s more likely to be riding bikes and doing manicures than speaking to their teacher about misbehaviour or explaining where babies come from.

And to be totally honest – if their actual dad was still alive and only did what DH does now, he would be classified as a terrible dad by most people. Showing up for the fun stuff but taking a backseat when there’s friendship issues, need to schedule or attend dentist appointments etc, never helping out with a difficult conversation or discipline. But DH isn’t their dad, he’s their stepdad, and the role is different. I’m not expecting more than that. I do feel that if I took on a more parenting role with the stepchildren, their mum might feel uncomfortable in that I’m trying to be a second mum?

Fourth – what about the baby?
A few people asked about how things will work with the baby I’m expecting. So just to be clear: yes, this child will go to private school, and yes, I’ll be using my own savings to support them.

I’ve continued running the business my late husband and I started, and it’s still doing really well. It was already successful when he passed away, and it’s carried on because I’ve kept it going. A lot of the credit goes to him, of course – he had the idea, and we built it together – but I’ve done the day-to-day work whilst he’s been alive along with him, I’ve kept it running since then for 6+ years and kept it strong. So yes, I do have significant savings, and I’ll be using them for this baby.

This child is mine so they’re my responsibility because I actively participated in bringing this child into the world. I don’t feel the same obligation to my stepkids – they already have two parents who are there for them, emotionally and financially.

OP posts:
Simonjt · 15/06/2025 13:31

annasdltn · 14/06/2025 13:49

@NormasArse this is part of it… I want a close family with my twins and I think we will be close. I want my twins to be close among themselves and I am absolutely sure they will be. I want my twins to be close with my youngest, although I know with an 8 years gap it might be difficult.
I don’t mind as much about the closeness between my children and SC. I am pretty sure the SC will be close to each other - they are now!

You don’t mind if your own child isn’t close to their siblings, thats a very sad out look.

Drangea · 15/06/2025 13:59

I think it all sounds fine and I don’t get anyone’s issue. You’re all happy together, you have fun with and support your SC. Obvs you pay for your own child’s schooling and house deposits and I am sure SCs parents will do what they can financially for them and they sound fairly nicely off anyway.

And the most important thing is that DH, their parent, is happy with it because he married you and is having another child with you. It’s his look out if he finds it unfair and I hope he would have raised it long before now.

NormaNormal · 15/06/2025 14:28

@Simonjt , OP didn't say that. She said "I don’t mind as much about the closeness between my children and SC."

Butchyrestingface · 15/06/2025 14:36

NormaNormal · 15/06/2025 14:28

@Simonjt , OP didn't say that. She said "I don’t mind as much about the closeness between my children and SC."

But she also indicated she was only concerned about the relationship between her twins and their younger half-sibling. Didn't express any desire for her youngest child to have a close relationship with its other half-siblings (her step children). I think that's what @Simonjt means.

Drangea · 15/06/2025 14:40

Well that relationship is for their dad to prioritise and foster isn’t it. It isn’t OPs job to do that.

RobertJohnsonsShoes · 15/06/2025 14:52

IMO you’re mixing love and money up

Whatado · 15/06/2025 14:57

annasdltn · 15/06/2025 13:28

Thanks so much for all the replies – honestly didn’t expect quite so many! I’ve read through them all, and while I might not reply to everyone, I just wanted to touch on a few things that came up a lot. If I’ve missed something big, just let me know and I’ll come back to it.

First – the Christmas presents thing.
So, to explain it a bit better: each child gets a present from their parent. For the twins, that’s me. For my stepkids, that’s one from their mum and one from their dad. Then there’s a small present from the stepparent – so DH gives the twins a little something, and I give something to his kids too. It’s never anything massive – just a token gift, like a Barbie or a small Lego set or whatever they’re into at the time. Probably the equivalent of what an aunt or grownup sibling would give.

The “main” present comes from the parent – usually something the child’s been asking for or something a bit more expensive. We’ve always done it this way and it works for us.

Second – is it fair?
No. But life isn’t fair. It’s not fair that my twins lost their dad when they were tiny. It’s not fair that I’ve had to handle every hard question and every emotional bit of that on my own. Its not fair than one of my SC is always selected for school teams and the other hardly ever has been. It’s also not fair that some families are better off than others, or that some kids grow up with more or less. But that’s just life, really.

My kids do have more financial security, yes. But they’ve also experienced loss in a way DH’s kids haven’t. And DH will need to have those chats with his children about money and the differences between households – just like I’ve had to talk to mine about grief and their dad, or like other parents have to talk about poor health or fleeing to a different country due to war at home. That’s part of being a parent. We each deal with what we’ve been given.

Third – the parenting roles.
DH is more involved with the twins just because they live here full-time, he spends more time with them and often he joins in because he wants to. His kids are mainly with their mum, so our role with them day-to-day is pretty light. We both take on more of a “fun adult” role with each other’s kids – not full-on parenting.

The twins wouldn’t go to him if they needed something sorted. They come to me. I do the school admin, dentist appointments, shopping for new shoes, dealing with meltdowns, homework, all of it. And that’s fine – I’m their mum. I don’t expect DH to do any of that, unless very specific occasions when he might volunteer to help with homework if it’s something he’s interested in or feels he’s good at, but it’s very rare and it’s always come from him because he’s wanted to. Just like his kids wouldn’t come to me if something needed doing – they’d go to their mum or him. We’ll never tell each other’s children what they are or aren’t allowed to do (except very obvious safety things like hold my hand and don’t run into the road), we’d never discipline them…

That’s not to say there aren’t nice little moments. I’ve done my stepdaughter’s nails and hair when she’s wanted that – just something we’ve bonded over a bit, especially because her mum’s not really into that kind of thing. And DH helped teach the twins to ride their bikes – we started together and he ended up taking the lead. So there are definitely connections there, but it’s not the same as being the main parent. And it’s “fun” things rather than laborious or difficult tasks. Again, think the kind of thing an aunt would do or what you’d agree to help your best friend’s kids with - it’s more likely to be riding bikes and doing manicures than speaking to their teacher about misbehaviour or explaining where babies come from.

And to be totally honest – if their actual dad was still alive and only did what DH does now, he would be classified as a terrible dad by most people. Showing up for the fun stuff but taking a backseat when there’s friendship issues, need to schedule or attend dentist appointments etc, never helping out with a difficult conversation or discipline. But DH isn’t their dad, he’s their stepdad, and the role is different. I’m not expecting more than that. I do feel that if I took on a more parenting role with the stepchildren, their mum might feel uncomfortable in that I’m trying to be a second mum?

Fourth – what about the baby?
A few people asked about how things will work with the baby I’m expecting. So just to be clear: yes, this child will go to private school, and yes, I’ll be using my own savings to support them.

I’ve continued running the business my late husband and I started, and it’s still doing really well. It was already successful when he passed away, and it’s carried on because I’ve kept it going. A lot of the credit goes to him, of course – he had the idea, and we built it together – but I’ve done the day-to-day work whilst he’s been alive along with him, I’ve kept it running since then for 6+ years and kept it strong. So yes, I do have significant savings, and I’ll be using them for this baby.

This child is mine so they’re my responsibility because I actively participated in bringing this child into the world. I don’t feel the same obligation to my stepkids – they already have two parents who are there for them, emotionally and financially.

Yeah you read them and didn't chance your position at all.

Ultimately it's the OPs husband fault for the inequality his children will experience in the marriage, because he has opted to bring them into this relationship, his decision to be less than a part time father to them, while living full time with other children.

And his decision to have another child with someone who won't value their role in his next childs life as anywhere near as important as the children he is opting raise with the OP.

rainingsnoring · 15/06/2025 15:05

Whatado · 15/06/2025 14:57

Yeah you read them and didn't chance your position at all.

Ultimately it's the OPs husband fault for the inequality his children will experience in the marriage, because he has opted to bring them into this relationship, his decision to be less than a part time father to them, while living full time with other children.

And his decision to have another child with someone who won't value their role in his next childs life as anywhere near as important as the children he is opting raise with the OP.

I agree the. The OP may have read the responses but she either hasn't understood them or just doesn't care about the effect of her actions on two young children.
There is a huge difference in stating and obvious truism such as 'life isn't fair' and actively and deliberately bringing unfairness into your own family, causing untold damage to relationships. The death of the first DH was undoubtedly not something that anyone involved had a choice over. What is being done now involves multiple, active choices. The fallout of these choices probably won't be obvious now but it is likely to be in a couple of decades. Don't be naive enough to think that it will only have a negative effect on the step children too.
Ultimately, as @Whatado says, this is very much the new DH's fault too. He has chosen to form a relationship with someone with this ungenerous and unloving attitude.

Butchyrestingface · 15/06/2025 15:15

Drangea · 15/06/2025 14:40

Well that relationship is for their dad to prioritise and foster isn’t it. It isn’t OPs job to do that.

I didn't see she needed to prioritise it.

But she has married a man with children, thus creating a blended family. Yet she appears to have no wish for her youngest child to form a bond with its other half siblings, who are in and out of the house on a regular basis. It was as if the thought had never even entered her head. I think that's a shame.

WeHaveTheRabbit · 15/06/2025 15:15

Your most recent post doesn't really address the issues that some PPs have raised. You essentially repeat what you've already written.

I am curious about how you view your stepchildren. Do you consider them part of your family? Do you think you now have a family of six (soon to be seven)? When planning holidays or days out with all the children, do you think about what each child would enjoy? Do you know much about your SC's interests and hobbies, do you talk to them about those things?

Also, do your SC consider their dad's house to be their home? Or do they feel like visitors? Do they have their own rooms?

The reason I ask these questions is that there is something rather cold and distant in the way you describe your setup, as though it is very much "us and them" or even "us against them." It doesn't sound like a blended family at all. Whether you like it or not, you are in a parental role to some degree. You are the stepmother to these children, not their aunt or a family friend.

As I wrote above, I don't consider biological connections to be superior to other relationships, although many people do. If my DH were to die (God forbid) or if we were to divorce (highly unlikely, but I suppose anything is possible), I would definitely continue the relationship with my DSC. They are older now and can make up their own minds about things, but the closeness and love we share is unshakeable. Again, if you don't feel that love for your SC, fair enough. However, you chose to marry a man with children. If you didn't want to create a blended family in which those children are as important as anyone else in the family, I wonder why you made that choice at all.

Swipe left for the next trending thread