Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Called Unsociable 10 year old a fat c*nt

538 replies

Herefortea2 · 12/06/2025 22:46

Ok, am I the worst person ever??
Last week I was at marks and spencers and there was this boy there, about 11 who was riding around on a electric scooter, whizzing past people and behaving in a passive aggressive way. When I past him he loudly made throwing up noises several times right in front of me, to scare/shock me and I said oh are you ok, maybe you need a doctor (because I don't like to be initimdated by youths). Anyway I do the shop and keep thinking about him, I was in a bad mood already and he really annoyed me, I'm fed up of little shits thinking they can terrorise people.
Anyway I saw him again on the way out and again he was whizzing past scaring people. He came past me again and then I said it.....I said 'fat cnt'!!! Now I actually do not use that word, I don't like it, I don't like it when it's used around me either but I was so pissed off that that's what I said!!!! Anyway he circled round and was like what did you say....I ignored him and he started insulting me and following me as I walked to my car, saying is this your car you fucking bitch, cnt, etc etc. I walked away saying I'm calling the police! Then this guy comes over who's his dad! He apologies and says he's trying to get him home (the kid had been in the car park for half an hour at least, maybe longer), the kid tells the dad what I called him and the dad says 'no she didn't' then the kid goes off at the dad for taking a strangers side. The dad is completely useless as the kid is still circling me where I actually have to push him away from me! Eventually he leaves after a lot of verbal abuse, from the kid. Now I'm thinking I shouldn't have done it and feeling guilty and also worried that I can't go back to M&S because he might be there and start abusing me and I have 2 young children. Thoughts? I am going to hell?

OP posts:
LeaderBee · 13/06/2025 12:36

Lavender14 · 12/06/2025 22:53

Does it actually matter?

Well yes, because if he wasn't overweight then OP would have been telling lies.

Slatterndisgrace · 13/06/2025 12:36

xILikeJamx · 13/06/2025 12:35

Is it unreasonable to call a child a fat cunt? Yes - no doubt about it.

Had I been there and saw what happened and then saw you calling him a fat cunt, would I have pissed myself laughing? Also yes.

So I'm on the fence.

😂😂

So concise.

SquashedSquid · 13/06/2025 12:37

Lavender14 · 13/06/2025 12:33

I disagree, kids need to be taught how to behave. If noone teaches them I'm not sure that's their fault. And obviously yes of course there needs to be consequences - how else do they eventually learn - but stooping to their level isnt it.

Don't be silly. Even children who haven't been taught to behave at home are learning what is acceptable and not acceptable at school, in public, in general daily life.

This child knew what he was doing and he knew it was unacceptable, else why would he be doing it? You can't tell me an 11-12 year old doesn't know that intimidating adults in a shop isn't the done thing.

Sometimes, on very rare occasions, an adult standing up to them is just what they need. On this occasion though, it made him even worse. Again, he obviously knew exactly what he was doing.

Slatterndisgrace · 13/06/2025 12:37

LeaderBee · 13/06/2025 12:36

Well yes, because if he wasn't overweight then OP would have been telling lies.

And then a lot of mumsnetters would be really angry.

AIAgent · 13/06/2025 12:37

I’m of an age where children used to ‘play out. When we were being too boisterous (although we didn’t intimidate anyone), we would be told off by the neighbours. We accepted it, our parents accepted it, our parents corrected other children etc. That sort of community oversight was a thing and children respected it.

No one was called a fat c**t and you went too far but addressing poor behaviour where it’s impacting you as it was in this case should happen more in my view. People don’t as they’re too scared of parents.

SwingTheMonkey · 13/06/2025 13:31

This sort of behaviour is a result of nobody ever telling this child their behaviour is fucking awful. If that was my child terrorising shoppers with his scooter, I’d have put it on the ground in the car park and reversed over it. Kids aren’t taught a lesson these days.

I’d not even give this situation another thought, op. The kid was indeed being a cunt.

ThreePointOneFourOneFiveNine · 13/06/2025 13:36

Lonelydave · 13/06/2025 11:42

it was not a child, it was a person above the age of criminal consent attempting to intimidate, to upset and cause a disturbance.
Section 4A - Intentional Harassment, Alarm or Distress

Section 5 - Harassment, Alarm or Distress

  • Causing a disturbance in a residential area or common part of a block of flats;
  • Persistently shouting abuse or obscenities at passers-by;
  • Pestering people waiting to catch public transport or otherwise waiting in a queue;
  • Rowdy behaviour in a street late at night which might alarm residents or passers-by; be Causing a disturbance in a shopping precinct or other area to which the public have access or might otherwise gather;

https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/public-order-offences-incorporating-charging-standard

Yes the op was wrong in the language she used, but the other party involved was attempting to cause harassment, alarm or distress.

Simple.

Yes a child. Very definitely, with no room for doubt whatsoever, a child. Above the age of criminal responsibility maybe, but still a child. Why on earth would you say not a child?

Lonelydave · 13/06/2025 13:40

ThreePointOneFourOneFiveNine · 13/06/2025 13:36

Yes a child. Very definitely, with no room for doubt whatsoever, a child. Above the age of criminal responsibility maybe, but still a child. Why on earth would you say not a child?

right a minor or a child, or just a feral individual who needs help, a minor who was causing offense, and if they weren't the op would not have used the language.
They were in the wrong and would know that they were.
Even when you have a 4/5 year old playing too rough at the playground or a play date, people step in to stop this behaviour.
Use your rose coloured spectacles, but in this case it was a minor (who the press cant name due to the age) who knownlingy was out and about attempting to cause distress.
To me a child is a nice term, this 'child' does know better and was attempting to cause distress.

MauriceTheMussel · 13/06/2025 13:47

“Longtime poster. Naice ham, penis beaker, Sistine Chapel, Fat Cunt.”

PointsSouth · 13/06/2025 13:49

wobblyewobbly · 12/06/2025 23:00

To put it shortly - it basically means going to that same shop wouldn't even cross someone’s mind again if I found out they’d called my child what this grown woman did.

Nope, still don't know what it is you're saying you'd do.

Pokemum76 · 13/06/2025 13:52

Oof, defo shouldn’t have said that but also YOU'RE MY HERO

ThreePointOneFourOneFiveNine · 13/06/2025 14:29

Lonelydave · 13/06/2025 13:40

right a minor or a child, or just a feral individual who needs help, a minor who was causing offense, and if they weren't the op would not have used the language.
They were in the wrong and would know that they were.
Even when you have a 4/5 year old playing too rough at the playground or a play date, people step in to stop this behaviour.
Use your rose coloured spectacles, but in this case it was a minor (who the press cant name due to the age) who knownlingy was out and about attempting to cause distress.
To me a child is a nice term, this 'child' does know better and was attempting to cause distress.

It’s nothing to do with “rose coloured spectacles “, the fact is that the individual in question is a child. A badly behaved child certainly, but still a child. It is ridiculous to say he is not a child. That was my entire point.

Lonelydave · 13/06/2025 14:38

ThreePointOneFourOneFiveNine · 13/06/2025 14:29

It’s nothing to do with “rose coloured spectacles “, the fact is that the individual in question is a child. A badly behaved child certainly, but still a child. It is ridiculous to say he is not a child. That was my entire point.

I'm not disagreeing, per se, but if in cases like this you use 'nice' words like child, youngster etc.., it is painting a false narrative, a child wouldn't deliberately attempt to intimidate and cause distress to an adult. Yes I'm slightly playing devils advocate, but we see this constantly - yes, the two people who murdered that elderly gentleman, were children - now they are guilty of manslaughter.
Perhaps if we didn't use the kinder terms and used the correct language?
We all know of the little darlings who wouldn't harm a fly, but are in fact a complete nightmare.
If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck" is a colloquial way of identifying something based on its characteristics
The child in the OP case, was a yobbo, a young thug, a wrong un, a potential criminal in the making, a feral youngster which no idea how to act in the real world.

zanahoria · 13/06/2025 14:41

Pokemum76 · 13/06/2025 13:52

Oof, defo shouldn’t have said that but also YOU'RE MY HERO

OP is getting a lot of support her and I do not think it is because people think she did the right thing, it is because she at least did something.

Most people would have ignored it, walked away and let the kid bother someone else, I probably would have done too, but frankly I think that is the worst thing someone can do.

OP stuck up for herself , not in an ideal way but who does think of exactly the right thing in the spur of the moment? She called it she saw it and told the kid a home truth.

Blessthismess2 · 13/06/2025 14:49

This thread is deeply disturbing

missmollygreen · 13/06/2025 14:56

wobblyewobbly · 12/06/2025 23:00

To put it shortly - it basically means going to that same shop wouldn't even cross someone’s mind again if I found out they’d called my child what this grown woman did.

Maybe all that energy would have been better spent bring up the child properly in the first place? Then no one would have to call it a fat cunt.

garlictwist · 13/06/2025 15:15

I’m sorry but this made me laugh. You just said what we would all have thought. The kids around me are little shits and eleven years old or not, you have to act in self defence to get anywhere. Was it ideal? No. You probably shouldn’t do it again. But it sounds like you just snapped in the moment and these things happen.

ThreePointOneFourOneFiveNine · 13/06/2025 15:41

Lonelydave · 13/06/2025 14:38

I'm not disagreeing, per se, but if in cases like this you use 'nice' words like child, youngster etc.., it is painting a false narrative, a child wouldn't deliberately attempt to intimidate and cause distress to an adult. Yes I'm slightly playing devils advocate, but we see this constantly - yes, the two people who murdered that elderly gentleman, were children - now they are guilty of manslaughter.
Perhaps if we didn't use the kinder terms and used the correct language?
We all know of the little darlings who wouldn't harm a fly, but are in fact a complete nightmare.
If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck" is a colloquial way of identifying something based on its characteristics
The child in the OP case, was a yobbo, a young thug, a wrong un, a potential criminal in the making, a feral youngster which no idea how to act in the real world.

I guess it’s never occurred to me that “child” is a “nice” term, it’s just a word describing someone younger than an adult to me.

Lonelydave · 13/06/2025 15:46

ThreePointOneFourOneFiveNine · 13/06/2025 15:41

I guess it’s never occurred to me that “child” is a “nice” term, it’s just a word describing someone younger than an adult to me.

completely agree, which is why we need to call these appalling individuals out, they are giving 'child' and 'children' a bad name! I'd say that 99% of children are relatively well behaved who would never even consider acting in this manner.
Therefore call them feral youths, or mindless thugs in the making or something similar, I can almost guarantee that this youth in the OP will be seeing the youth courts is the not too distant future.

ThreePointOneFourOneFiveNine · 13/06/2025 15:50

Lonelydave · 13/06/2025 15:46

completely agree, which is why we need to call these appalling individuals out, they are giving 'child' and 'children' a bad name! I'd say that 99% of children are relatively well behaved who would never even consider acting in this manner.
Therefore call them feral youths, or mindless thugs in the making or something similar, I can almost guarantee that this youth in the OP will be seeing the youth courts is the not too distant future.

Call them children, because that’s what they are.

Lonelydave · 13/06/2025 15:57

ThreePointOneFourOneFiveNine · 13/06/2025 15:50

Call them children, because that’s what they are.

we will have to agree to disagree, I just think that when children like this are put on the stand, for crimes and general anti social behaviour, calling them a child, paints a wrong picture. Yes they are by age a child, but by law, they are a suspect, a potential criminal who is being judged not by their peers but by adults without any criminal history.

MauriceTheMussel · 13/06/2025 15:57

Call them “juveniles” - correct black letter definition with an association of delinquent. Happy?

Eastie77Returns · 13/06/2025 16:04

Bundleflower · 13/06/2025 11:19

I’m always surprised with these type of topics where the holier than thou posters trot out the whole ‘oh, believe me, you wouldn’t speak to my son like that’.
Would your son behave like that? If so, you might be a bit of a cunt yourself.
I don’t have to worry about anyone speaking to my children like this as they’re not feral arseholes. And if they DID behave like this then they’d firmly be opening themselves up for a public dressing down.

This. If my child behaved like scooter-boy I would be absolutely mortified and an insult for a member of the public would be the least of my concerns. But it's unlikely to happen because my 11 year old would not be whizzing around on an electric scooter trying to intimidate members of the public.

The saving grace is the dad didn't take the boy's side so there is a possibility that at least one parent isn't a cunt and he might be disciplined.

Alucard55 · 13/06/2025 16:43

wobblyewobbly · 12/06/2025 23:00

To put it shortly - it basically means going to that same shop wouldn't even cross someone’s mind again if I found out they’d called my child what this grown woman did.

Would it cross their mind to go to the shops next to it though?

Blessthismess2 · 13/06/2025 17:16

Lonelydave · 13/06/2025 15:57

we will have to agree to disagree, I just think that when children like this are put on the stand, for crimes and general anti social behaviour, calling them a child, paints a wrong picture. Yes they are by age a child, but by law, they are a suspect, a potential criminal who is being judged not by their peers but by adults without any criminal history.

What are you on about?