Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Great article in the Guardian about wokeism

337 replies

inkognitha · 11/06/2025 08:51

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2025/jun/10/how-does-woke-start-winning-again

Good morning everyone.
Today, even the Guardian admits woke isn’t working.

« Yet Progressive Activists’ fatal flaw, the report argues, is that they’re further from mainstream public opinion on cultural issues than they realise. They’re the only group where a majority thinks that immigration should be as high or higher than it is now, and that protecting people from hate speech matters more than defending free speech (a key rationale behind “no debate” – the idea that trans identities aren’t up for discussion – and “no platforming”). They’re also the group most likely to think social change sometimes requires breaking the law, whereas two-thirds of Britons disapprove of protesters blocking roads or gluing themselves to things.
Tryl stresses that being outliers doesn’t invariably make Progressive Activists wrong – perhaps they’re just ahead of the curve, as the suffragettes once were – but it has important tactical implications. His polling shows that Progressive Activists overestimate by a factor of two to three how much others agree with their core beliefs, from abolishing the monarchy to letting children change gender. Consequently they tend to invest too little time on persuasion, focusing instead on mobilising the masses they wrongly imagine are on board. “If you’re reaching out to people, then you’re watering down,” is how Tryl describes this mindset.
While successful campaigns usually build the broadest base possible, Progressive Activists also tend to be purists, rejecting supporters who don’t endorse a complete worldview. (More than a quarter wouldn’t campaign alongside someone who believes – as a majority of Britons do – in Israel’s right to exist, for example.) Their yearning for grand systemic change means they can sound dismissive of other people’s small but well-meaning efforts, and they’re also unusually keen on correcting other people’s “mistakes” on diversity issues, something other groups consider likely to cause embarrassment. »

I hope some of the keyboard warriors/bullies roaming this board and the blue-haired, nose-pierced authoritarians will have a read, and at last, a think on how they do more harm than good.

How does woke start winning again? | Gaby Hinsliff

The long read: British progressives have suffered major setbacks in recent years, in both public opinion and court rulings. Was a backlash inevitable, and are new tactics needed?

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2025/jun/10/how-does-woke-start-winning-again

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
ChungkingDepressed · 12/06/2025 15:50

MiloMinderbinder925 · 12/06/2025 15:49

I thought you were another poster. You'd know about people who think they're moral and true if you vote Green.

I did say I’m a Green for my sins! The only reason I’m still a member is because my local branch do a lot of good stuff on the ground. I despair of the sanctimony and cancelling that is happening nationally! I probably won’t vote for anyone come the next election the way things are going!

MiloMinderbinder925 · 12/06/2025 15:51

Dangermoo · 12/06/2025 15:48

Why, because the OP used some hurty words?

There we go! This is fascinating as well. Apparently if you challenge Reform supporters you push them further towards Reform because they don't like it. I've never known people so sensitive.

WhereIsMyJumper · 12/06/2025 15:52

ChungkingDepressed · 12/06/2025 15:45

For one thing, I didn’t say anything about wanting g to engage with people. I’ve already said I don’t and won’t ever vote Reform - I’m a member of the Green Party, and yes, there is a subsection of the left who act like they’re the only ones who are right, moral and true and they are harming the cause massively. Calling them sanctimonious is nothing compared to what they say about people they don’t agree with.

See, this is kind of perfect. I’d always say greens were on the left. You’re a member of the Green Party. I have never voted for them. But I respect your opinion that they’re the party for you. Our politics are different from each other’s but I completely agree with every word you have said.

MiloMinderbinder925 · 12/06/2025 15:52

ChungkingDepressed · 12/06/2025 15:50

I did say I’m a Green for my sins! The only reason I’m still a member is because my local branch do a lot of good stuff on the ground. I despair of the sanctimony and cancelling that is happening nationally! I probably won’t vote for anyone come the next election the way things are going!

It's a shame because if they got their act together, they would be a viable alternative for many.

GuevarasBeret · 12/06/2025 15:53

Lostcat · 12/06/2025 14:14

You can of course dress, act, mimic what you think the opposite sex behave, feel, look like

this is transphobic.

You hold certain beliefs which you think are “factual”- actually they are the product of a set of narrow and partial assumptions. And based on these presumed to be “factual” claims you’ve drawn transphobic conclusions.

It is right and appropriate to point out that transphobia is transphobia and there’s nothing intolerant , woke, angry or authoritarian about doing so.

It isn’t transphobic. It’s just not sharing your world view.

Or to put it another way, if this opinion deserves the label Transphobe!, then frankly so what? Why should anyone care if it makes you angry that someone might have the audacity to say “It isn’t possible to change sex”? You know just as well as they do that it isn’t possible to change sex, and your BeKind or we’ll go all Sarah Jane Barker just doesn’t wash any more.

Me being an atheist is not anti-Semitic, Islamophobic, anti-Christian nor erasing Sikhs Buddhists and Buddhists!

If I were as given to hyperbole as you are, the mud I’d fling back (Paedophile enabler! supporter of Child genital mutilation! Misogynist! Stalinist!) would be much darker, but more likely to stick to how people view you.

You are living by a lie.

ChungkingDepressed · 12/06/2025 15:53

WhereIsMyJumper · 12/06/2025 15:52

See, this is kind of perfect. I’d always say greens were on the left. You’re a member of the Green Party. I have never voted for them. But I respect your opinion that they’re the party for you. Our politics are different from each other’s but I completely agree with every word you have said.

Oh, I’m despairing of my own party and how they are behaving nationally too. The thing is, most of the people in the party at local level don’t want much to do with how the party is being run right now. The way they are treating the trans issue is a case in point! We just want them to get back to caring about the bloody environment again!

WhereIsMyJumper · 12/06/2025 15:54

ChungkingDepressed · 12/06/2025 15:49

It’s not even what peoples views are for me, it’s the way they bully and berate anyone with different views. Disagreeing robustly is fine, but the vitriol thrown at, say gender critical women, for holding a perfectly reasonable view about biology, is not a good look and it’s pushing people further to the extremes.

Yep, fair point and totally agree

Dangermoo · 12/06/2025 15:54

MiloMinderbinder925 · 12/06/2025 15:51

There we go! This is fascinating as well. Apparently if you challenge Reform supporters you push them further towards Reform because they don't like it. I've never known people so sensitive.

No, I doubt that Reform voters care what you think of them - I know I don't. I said you're helping Farage because he's playing the long game and you can't even see it. Diversionary tactics.

Ohforpetersake · 12/06/2025 15:55

Sigh.

The problem with the right wing free speech brigade is their inconsistency.

It's - apparently - essential to free speech that we should be allowed to call transwomen men and trans-positive women handmaidens; but it's unacceptable to say thats TERFs are bigots or describe people as cis.

One or t'other.

GeneralPeter · 12/06/2025 15:58

MiloMinderbinder925 · 12/06/2025 15:51

There we go! This is fascinating as well. Apparently if you challenge Reform supporters you push them further towards Reform because they don't like it. I've never known people so sensitive.

As someone who has 0% chance of voting Reform, I’m curious what you think you are achieving here.

There are lots of people in the world who do support Reform.

What’s the value in taking people who aren’t Reform supporters and trying to persuade them that in fact they are?

ChungkingDepressed · 12/06/2025 15:58

Ohforpetersake · 12/06/2025 15:55

Sigh.

The problem with the right wing free speech brigade is their inconsistency.

It's - apparently - essential to free speech that we should be allowed to call transwomen men and trans-positive women handmaidens; but it's unacceptable to say thats TERFs are bigots or describe people as cis.

One or t'other.

Not really a good example because it isn’t bigoted to call a man a man. Trying to stop someone from saying something that’s objectively true is an assault on free speech.

WhereIsMyJumper · 12/06/2025 16:00

Ohforpetersake · 12/06/2025 15:55

Sigh.

The problem with the right wing free speech brigade is their inconsistency.

It's - apparently - essential to free speech that we should be allowed to call transwomen men and trans-positive women handmaidens; but it's unacceptable to say thats TERFs are bigots or describe people as cis.

One or t'other.

I kind of think that Free Speech is held dear to most on the political spectrum (apart from the extremes of both ends) or it should be.
I’ve heard far left people outwardly state that people shouldn’t be allowed to express an opinion unless it’s one they agree with.

I certainly believe in it. And I don’t like the hypocrisy of either side.

MiloMinderbinder925 · 12/06/2025 16:01

GeneralPeter · 12/06/2025 15:58

As someone who has 0% chance of voting Reform, I’m curious what you think you are achieving here.

There are lots of people in the world who do support Reform.

What’s the value in taking people who aren’t Reform supporters and trying to persuade them that in fact they are?

I'm not. You seem very keen to interpret everything I say from your own perspective.

ChungkingDepressed · 12/06/2025 16:02

And no one is saying you can’t call someone a bigot. What most of us object to is all the women who’ve been fired and cancelled and been on the receiving end of rape and death threats just for saying transwomen are men. That’s the problem.

MiloMinderbinder925 · 12/06/2025 16:04

Dangermoo · 12/06/2025 15:54

No, I doubt that Reform voters care what you think of them - I know I don't. I said you're helping Farage because he's playing the long game and you can't even see it. Diversionary tactics.

You give Farage way too much credit. You say Reform voters don't care, so why would what I say push them further towards Reform? Surely what I say doesn't matter. I've never known people less likely to listen to anyone, you're quite right.

Dangermoo · 12/06/2025 16:05

MiloMinderbinder925 · 12/06/2025 16:04

You give Farage way too much credit. You say Reform voters don't care, so why would what I say push them further towards Reform? Surely what I say doesn't matter. I've never known people less likely to listen to anyone, you're quite right.

You give Farage too little credit.

Ohforpetersake · 12/06/2025 16:06

Aargh. That's the point. What you think (transwomen are men) becomes True and so can be said. What others think (TERFs are bigots) becomes False and so can't be said. If you genuinely believe, as OP seems to, in absolute value of free speech then you have to accept both.

Helpfully, I don't. So I don't think there should be threats of violence against TERFs or gender crits or whatever the snowflakes want to be called this week.

Ohforpetersake · 12/06/2025 16:08

Also, as per Kathleen Stock 'cancelled' seems to mean 'gained lucrative media career'. You can make a very cosy living in the UK out of being anti-woke. Sort of a reverse cancelling.

Dangermoo · 12/06/2025 16:08

Shame nobody's listening to you - on the threats of violence, that is.

ETA @ohforpetessake

MiloMinderbinder925 · 12/06/2025 16:08

Dangermoo · 12/06/2025 16:05

You give Farage too little credit.

Sure. He's a cognitive giant.

soupycustard · 12/06/2025 16:10

I thought a transwoman was an individual who was biologically male who considers that they have the gender identity of a female, so surely the very essence of a transwoman is being both a transwoman and a male. I thought that it was the interface between those two things that causes the individual to require help, understanding and validation.

WhereIsMyJumper · 12/06/2025 16:11

Dangermoo · 12/06/2025 16:05

You give Farage too little credit.

People who are already wanting to vote for him already give him credit.
People who are vehemently anti-Farage are definitely not giving him enough credit, I agree.

The point being, if people don’t want him in power, they need to start taking him seriously. He’s gaining popularity. If people dont take him seriously he will be in no.10 come next GE in my opinion.

GeneralPeter · 12/06/2025 16:12

MiloMinderbinder925 · 12/06/2025 16:01

I'm not. You seem very keen to interpret everything I say from your own perspective.

That’s why I asked a question: I’m interested what you think you are achieving, from your perspective.

WhereIsMyJumper · 12/06/2025 16:12

soupycustard · 12/06/2025 16:10

I thought a transwoman was an individual who was biologically male who considers that they have the gender identity of a female, so surely the very essence of a transwoman is being both a transwoman and a male. I thought that it was the interface between those two things that causes the individual to require help, understanding and validation.

This in spades.

If Transwomen are genuinely women, why would they feel the need to convince everyone else.
I don’t need to convince anyone that I am a woman because I am one.

ChungkingDepressed · 12/06/2025 16:14

Ohforpetersake · 12/06/2025 16:06

Aargh. That's the point. What you think (transwomen are men) becomes True and so can be said. What others think (TERFs are bigots) becomes False and so can't be said. If you genuinely believe, as OP seems to, in absolute value of free speech then you have to accept both.

Helpfully, I don't. So I don't think there should be threats of violence against TERFs or gender crits or whatever the snowflakes want to be called this week.

Material reality is true, it’s not a matter of what someone thinks. You’re free to think GC people are bigots, but you shouldn’t be free to silence them, harangue them, get them fired or send rape threats to them with impunity. Call me a bigot all day long, fine, but some of that other stuff has a silencing effect and that is wrong.