I half agree with you.
I agree with this with reference to middle aged people who have managed to get to get a house, decent job, have kids, get married etc….
I feel like this new concept of ‘discovering ourselves’ can be good, however it dilutes the issues and problems faced by those, particularly children, who are significantly impacted in every aspect of life with their ADHD/ASD. This is where I disagree with you in that it’s not just a label, some kids are significantly impacted by it as their brains are wired differently. Their ADHD means they can’t learn properly because their concentration is so weak.
Those that have to go in to a special unit/class/school, those that are so impacted they will never be independent and will always need support. We all have our struggles and weakness but some struggle significantly more than others. Some children with ASD can’t speak or communicate yet an adult can live an independent life, as described above, and they still have the same diagnosis.
On the one hand I think it’s good that ND is being discussed more and more and it’s normalised, but then I worry that it will dilute the struggles of those who are most severely impacted and will never be independent, hold down a job, run a house or have kids.
Already benefits are getting cut back for those with disabilities. I’m concerned that those who are significantly impacted and need so much support will be told to get on with it and to ‘try harder’, after all how can someone live independently and a normal life, but the next person can’t, if it’s all the same diagnosis?! (I don’t think that but I’m worried people will) So I think there should be different words really, because it’s like saying I’m bleeding with a small cut or having half your finger hanging off, you’re bleeding in both instances but one is significantly worse.
I think it’s good to acknowledge everyone who have difficulties but the ‘umbrella term’ in my opinion helps no one.