Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To say the £35k winter fuel threshold is way too high!

1000 replies

chocolateismyweakness4 · 09/06/2025 13:21

The threshold needed to be raised, but £35k?! I wish I earned that and I have a mortgage and commuting costs. It also doesn’t take into account savings (so they could have millions in the bank) or household income.

We all know it’s a bribe, but they still won’t get pensioners to vote for them.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
BIossomtoes · 10/06/2025 22:22

LuvACustardCream · 10/06/2025 22:20

I'll be paying tax so that people who have an income far higher than mine get a state handout. Bloody stupid.

Like every low earning taxpayer who funds child benefit.

BIossomtoes · 10/06/2025 22:23

EasternStandard · 10/06/2025 22:20

  • If your income (or your partner's income if you're married or in a civil partnership) exceeds £60,000 per year, you'll still receive the full Child Benefit but will have to pay a portion of it back through the High Income Child Benefit Tax Charge.

It does take into account partner’s income.

It doesn’t. You can have two parents earning £59k each and they get child benefit. Which is why it’s grossly unfair on single parents.

Rosscameasdoody · 10/06/2025 22:25

Bernardo1 · 10/06/2025 21:42

It does, in so far as the interest fm savings is 'income' so is counted towards the 35k.
Assuming 4% the income on 1 million would be 40k, so alone would deny the allowance.

If any one wants a really want a big moan, if that million was in ISAs then the interest is absolutely discounted.

Which banks are paying 4% on savings ? I’ve just had a letter from the Halifax saying the interest on my savings account is dropping to 0.002% !!

EasternStandard · 10/06/2025 22:26

BIossomtoes · 10/06/2025 22:23

It doesn’t. You can have two parents earning £59k each and they get child benefit. Which is why it’s grossly unfair on single parents.

Clearly it does as neither person gets it when it hits about £80k

That’s not the case with this benefit as below.

One will get it even if the other is high, there’s no threshold.

EasternStandard · 10/06/2025 22:27

It can’t even be that hard to administer. You answer an are you married etc question on tax returns.

Simple to do with CB so would be simple here. No idea why Reeves wouldn’t beyond generally messing this up.

MintChocCat · 10/06/2025 22:28

Rosscameasdoody · 10/06/2025 22:25

Which banks are paying 4% on savings ? I’ve just had a letter from the Halifax saying the interest on my savings account is dropping to 0.002% !!

Try fixed rate savings accounts.

FedupofArsenalgame · 10/06/2025 22:28

Rosscameasdoody · 10/06/2025 22:25

Which banks are paying 4% on savings ? I’ve just had a letter from the Halifax saying the interest on my savings account is dropping to 0.002% !!

Ybs

BIossomtoes · 10/06/2025 22:29

EasternStandard · 10/06/2025 22:26

Clearly it does as neither person gets it when it hits about £80k

That’s not the case with this benefit as below.

One will get it even if the other is high, there’s no threshold.

But a household can get child benefit with a joint income of £118k. If one partner qualifies for WFA and the other doesn’t they get half - £100.

EasternStandard · 10/06/2025 22:33

Lifestooshort71 · 10/06/2025 21:48

For the last time.....
1 person in receipt of state pension, with an income less than £35k a yr = £200

2 people at same address in receipt of state pension, both with an income less than £35k a year = £100 each (£200 in total)

2 people at same address in receipt of state pension, but only one with an income less than £35k a year = that one will get £200 (the other, with the higher income) will get nothing.

No half here for one over and one under.

Easy to do, Reeves is missing it.

ETA it shouldn’t be half it should be a household threshold and zero.

TheHateIsNotGood · 10/06/2025 22:34

Too high, but better than the blunt instrament of PC only used before. I'd place it more to £22k for a single pensioner and £28k for a 2 pensioner household. That would target the 'needs most' pensioners whilst not 'affronting' the working population earning and paying taxes on NMW who help to fund these payments.

As I near my dotage I do find that I feel the cold a lot more than I used to and I've got 4.5 years to go before I can get any pension. Those older than me probably feel the cold more than I do.

Livelovebehappy · 10/06/2025 22:35

Twinnybean · 10/06/2025 21:44

‘Or take charity from others…..’ What do you think a food bank is?

Definitely not a food bank. Charity as in depending on family or friends.

PandoraSocks · 10/06/2025 22:36

Rosscameasdoody · 10/06/2025 22:25

Which banks are paying 4% on savings ? I’ve just had a letter from the Halifax saying the interest on my savings account is dropping to 0.002% !!

Marcus is paying 4%. Get your money moved!

https://www.marcus.co.uk/uk/en/savings/online-savings-account

Whatevernext9 · 10/06/2025 22:37

THEP0PE · 09/06/2025 13:25

It’s ridiculous. £35,000 is loads especially with no mortgage or rent. They’re scared of the old voters

How do you work out that all pensioners don’t pay rent/mortgage?

cardibach · 10/06/2025 22:38

Livelovebehappy · 10/06/2025 22:35

Definitely not a food bank. Charity as in depending on family or friends.

I’d say getting help from family and friends isn’t charity - I wouldn’t think of it as charity if I helped one of my family or friends. Meanwhile Food Banks are literal charities.

Badbadbunny · 10/06/2025 22:40

EasternStandard · 10/06/2025 22:27

It can’t even be that hard to administer. You answer an are you married etc question on tax returns.

Simple to do with CB so would be simple here. No idea why Reeves wouldn’t beyond generally messing this up.

Edited

There is no married or not question on the tax return.

Whatevernext9 · 10/06/2025 22:44

Growlybear83 · 09/06/2025 13:42

But if you have millions in the bank, which the vast majority of people are unlikely to have, then you would be earning a lot of interest, which will increase your annual income significantly and probably take you over the £35,000 threshold.

Wouldn’t it also be declared on tax returns, and therefore the WFA would be paid back?

EasternStandard · 10/06/2025 22:44

Badbadbunny · 10/06/2025 22:40

There is no married or not question on the tax return.

On gov site

If you fill in a Self Assessment tax return each year

Claim by completing the Married Couple’s Allowance section of the tax return.

EasternStandard · 10/06/2025 22:47

If your income (or your partner's income if you're married or in a civil partnership) exceeds £60,000 per year, you'll still receive the full Child Benefit but will have to pay a portion of it back through the High Income Child Benefit Tax Charge.

@Badbadbunnythis too cites status

BIossomtoes · 10/06/2025 22:52

EasternStandard · 10/06/2025 22:33

No half here for one over and one under.

Easy to do, Reeves is missing it.

ETA it shouldn’t be half it should be a household threshold and zero.

Edited

That’s assuming that the household is a cohabiting couple with shared finances which isn’t necessarily the case.

Whatevernext9 · 10/06/2025 22:53

Badbadbunny · 09/06/2025 14:07

Starmer needs to sack Rachel. She's not got a clue. She caused the damage by bringing in the WFA changes and now backtracking on that for most pensioners, but the damage to the Labour party is huge. She's a liability. Heaven help us with what foul ups she's going to make with the public spending review and then we've got the Autumn Budget which will no doubt be another fiasco. We've had some incompetent Chancellors over the past 20-30 years but Rachel takes the prize for the most hopeless one!

Do you always refer to the Chancellors by their first name? It makes your criticism seem very personal, it’s curious.

Jollyjollyjollygoodie · 10/06/2025 22:57

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Whatevernext9 · 10/06/2025 23:01

Toujouravecmachienne · 10/06/2025 17:42

After all the comments and viewpoints on this long thread, my conclusion is that the state pension should just be higher and so this quite measly but seemingly highly controversial handout is just built in. From a cursory search of pension levels in Europe there are about 15 other countries paying more than the UK. Very poor.

people get to retirement with what they have managed to accumulate over their pre retirement life. Some good. Some not so. Some with houses paid in full. Some not. But when you are past a certain age, you can’t just work more or change jobs or whatever. Ageing comes to all of us. Speaking personally, I had no money for any holiday, eating out, a washing machine, new furniture, etc for several years after getting married. I was overdrawn and had to take out loans for stuff. Mortgage was priority (yes at a high %). My taxes at that stage were paying for my grandmothers generation pension. She, in turn, had saved what she could so her pension years were OK. She worked her socks off cleaning and what not when she worked.
Why would I, as a young, fit, able woman in my twenties, moan about my lot and that I was struggling while my granny was doing ok? Why the hell should I as a young person NOT have some struggle or doing without until I had worked enough to benefit from what I had achieved? I don’t remember whinging about going to the laundrette every week cos I couldn’t afford a machine and blame that my taxes were contributing to pensioners. That would surely have made me quite an entitled so and so!

As for life choices. If choosing not to have children is a life choice then of course choosing to have them is a life choice. Nothing wrong with either, but no one is forced into having kids. Each to their own!

So up the pension. Equalise taxation so that income from savings and other stuff is taxed same as income (which would higher taxes on anyone with such assets yes including pensioner) oh and get all those huge companies that pay minimum wages where their employees have to claim tax credits and such like, to have to repay these where their profits exceed a certain amount. If we’re going to talk about younger people being on shit wages, the benefits in kind these companies get from the government - effectively contributing to their profits - would surely be better to target than a measly 200 wfa.

Surely the main takeaway is that anyone earning under 35k can legitimately say they struggle to pay winter fuel costs. And since it’s entirely unaffordable to give everyone a winter fuel alllowance, the solution is to reduce the costs of fuel, and one big way to do that is to take the energy companies out of the hands of shareholders. So maybe Labour’s long term plan is to prepare for renationalisation of utilities. Which seems like a good thing overall.

Twinnybean · 10/06/2025 23:56

JenniferBooth · 10/06/2025 13:53

Until they want those older women to provide free childcare.

Because no previous generation has ever relied on family help of course

ViciousCurrentBun · 11/06/2025 00:59

No anecdotes from me.

All this thread has proven is inter generational fighting is at an all time high.
Labour have made so many appalling decisions it’s a gift to Reform and has increased their popularity more than even the Conservatives could have done as people expected Labour to ‘be better’.

The removal of the WFA was a test to see what the British public would tolerate, they did something that even the Conservatives wouldn’t touch.

I do not believe for a second that any pensioner will now vote Labour because of this U turn if anything they have proven themselves to be very inconsistent.

ViciousCurrentBun · 11/06/2025 01:09

@Rosscameasdoody its a good idea to have accounts with multiple banks. Some offer products to current clients only. I have one account currently paying 5% but you had to already be a member to be able to have this account.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.