It's currently allowed and encouraged for stores, bars and other places to use AI facial recognition to prevent people previously known to cause issues even though it's known to have many false positives. I'm struggling to think how any business is going to get into trouble for making this choice.
Yeah, it sucks to be asked to leave, and I think in this case it should have been sooner, but it feels like he knew and is using this to become relevant again.
he’s just a man bringing to light what the mainstream media won’t
Everything he's 'brought to light' was known and being presented publicly in court. He just decided to ignore those pesky laws and reporting restrictions mainstream and every other form of media follow to allow the very critical for society right to a fair trial.
The media did a good job smearing him. I once vaguely thought the same until I investigated these "objectionable" views.
Even if we put aside any "objectionable views", his actions that have repeatedly put court cases, including some of the most vile kinds, at risk of having to be abandoned, putting the victims of those crimes through the fear that the perpetrators would be let free and they'd have to go through the process again, because of his choice to interfere with the court system is absolutely appauling. That's not smearing by the media, that's from court records that are all public domain.
His actions are not the actions of someone who, as he claims to be, cares about justice and truth. It's the actions of someone who wants the glory of "revealing the truth" of things that are already known - he's never reported on anything that wasn't already being presented in a court - and does it in a manner that if any journalist did it would have them blacklisted He's gotten off fairly lightly for repeated acts against the court system and has done a great job in his speeches at Oxford and elsewhere to make it seem like he's the victim.
Freedom of expression does not overrule the very important right to a fair trial, and his pursuit of glory does not overrule how much he has basically shat on the the victims of these crimes, the police, the solicitors and barristers, the court staff and security staff both working on these cases and who have had to confront him on his breaking the law repeatedly when they have far better things to be doing, and everyone else who has done far more to deal with crime in our community than he has ever done. He was done literally nothing to bring any of these cases to light - they were already in the system that he actively worked against and wants people to love him for it.