Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Dangermoo · 07/06/2025 10:28

bombastix · 07/06/2025 10:26

But you have simply reverted to characterising me, which, may I suggest, speaks to your character.

No, I'm speaking from solid teaching experience and peer review.

PandoraSocks · 07/06/2025 10:29

JamieCannister · 07/06/2025 10:22

The view that TR is whit nationalist. If TR is white nationalist then the millions of people who support him are no longer afraid of being called white natioanlism. You are normalizing hard right extremism by claiming a big chunk of the country are, simply because they don't think islam and mass immigration are wonderful

Again, which country are you talking about?

JamieCannister · 07/06/2025 10:30

QurikySparrowHatrack · 07/06/2025 10:20

Again, being WORIADS is only one of the 5 criteria that must be satisfied for a belief to be protected. The 5 requirements to be met:

The belief must be genuinely held.

It must be a belief, not just an opinion or viewpoint based on current information.

It must relate to a weighty and substantial aspect of human life and behavior.

It must attain a certain level of cogency, seriousness, cohesion, and importance.

It must be worthy of respect in a democratic society, not incompatible with human dignity, and not conflict with the fundamental rights of others

Again, Islamophobia when associated with nationalism had previously been found not to be WORIDS, and Tommy Robinsion is, famously, both.

I don't really care how you personally feel about that.

"Islamophobia when associated with nationalism had previously been found not to be WORIDS," case please

Dangermoo · 07/06/2025 10:30

PandoraSocks · 07/06/2025 10:29

Again, which country are you talking about?

🙄

Menopausalsourpuss · 07/06/2025 10:30

BIossomtoes · 07/06/2025 10:13

I can’t take anyone who says “telly box” seriously.

Edited

Haha why should I care? I can't take anyone who can't take anyone who says telly box seriously seriously. Ffs.

JamieCannister · 07/06/2025 10:30

PandoraSocks · 07/06/2025 10:29

Again, which country are you talking about?

We are on a UK based website talking about a british person. If you can't draw your own conclusion then I am sorry

PandoraSocks · 07/06/2025 10:31

Dangermoo · 07/06/2025 10:30

🙄

Why the eyeroll?

Dangermoo · 07/06/2025 10:31

PandoraSocks · 07/06/2025 10:31

Why the eyeroll?

Ffs.

bombastix · 07/06/2025 10:32

Dangermoo · 07/06/2025 10:28

No, I'm speaking from solid teaching experience and peer review.

Then you should have put your expertise on the table. Instead, you simply looked like someone who uses the word “naive”.

so I’m interested in your experience and expertise on this issue, which would be more useful than tilting at each other. Could you bring this experience to the discussion?

PandoraSocks · 07/06/2025 10:34

JamieCannister · 07/06/2025 10:30

We are on a UK based website talking about a british person. If you can't draw your own conclusion then I am sorry

Well, the countries that make up the UK are all very different politically. Which is why I was asking.

But never mind. You carry on with your support of the odious criminal Yaxley-Lennon.

PandoraSocks · 07/06/2025 10:34

Dangermoo · 07/06/2025 10:31

Ffs.

🙄

Vivi0 · 07/06/2025 10:36

Caerulea · 07/06/2025 10:14

Not even close to the same. The overriding sentiment towards medics are that they are above you in that moment they are saving your life. They are trained to do something you cannot.

The overwhelming sentiment towards waiting staff is that they are beneath you, in a position of servitude. That they should serve you without complaint regardless cos their minimum wage job demands it. They can leave all self respect at the door, all conscience.

In this case they even have to ignore that they themselves could be a victim of the person/group they are acting in servitude to in another situation!

This thread is full of “it’s not the same” comments.

It doesn’t have to be exactly the same to observe that in reality there are people doing jobs every day that are helping the worst people in our society and/or actually being subject to, or putting themselves at risk, of violence and abuse, without complaint. Or worrying about their “conscience”.

As I said, serving staff could just put the steak down on the table, and get on with their lives.

MonTuesWeds · 07/06/2025 10:38

PandoraSocks · 07/06/2025 09:24

Wow. This thread is eye opening. But very useful.

Is it? Really?

Menopausalsourpuss · 07/06/2025 10:38

I have no idea whether it is OK to refuse someone service because of their opinions as I'm not a legal expert (like 99% of the people on here). In TRs case it is not based on his opinion but uninformed peoples opinion of his opinion as they believe everything they read in the media or see on the tellybox. So he may have a case. However, the legal system is also not what it was (impartial) and infiltrated with hard left activists like "Sir" Keir Starmer so he may not have a case.

Dangermoo · 07/06/2025 10:38

bombastix · 07/06/2025 10:32

Then you should have put your expertise on the table. Instead, you simply looked like someone who uses the word “naive”.

so I’m interested in your experience and expertise on this issue, which would be more useful than tilting at each other. Could you bring this experience to the discussion?

Why on God's earth would I waste my time sharing a series of events, which I've experienced while teaching? Specific situations where if you're not left leaning, you are ostracised? For then to be told well I must be a racist and fascist myself. Nope.

inkognitha · 07/06/2025 10:39

Ladamesansmerci · 07/06/2025 10:28

He's a known violent racist. No one is obligated to serve him.

People making the argument about gay ppl etc- that is a protected characteristic under the equality act. Being a racist twat isn't. Medical professionals are not obligated to treat racists either.

Also please stop making the argument that we've lost the ability to respect opinions. I respect that some people vote Tory. I respect that people hold different views on immigration. And whilst we'll never be friends, I even respect your right to vote Reform.

I do not respect far right extremism and never will. If you think anyone needs to respect someone who said he'd kick Muslims heads in, you're a twat. We wouldn't be telling people to respect the views of Nazis, would we?

When you say, I am tolerant of everything bar this thing, you are not tolerant.

« I like every race except [x] people », you’re racist.

If the Left wants a fair world for everyone, it must include TR. If the left doesn’t want a fair world for everyone, but only those who agree with them, it’s not the left anymore, nor can it claim to be fair or for everyone.

PandoraSocks · 07/06/2025 10:42

Menopausalsourpuss · 07/06/2025 10:38

I have no idea whether it is OK to refuse someone service because of their opinions as I'm not a legal expert (like 99% of the people on here). In TRs case it is not based on his opinion but uninformed peoples opinion of his opinion as they believe everything they read in the media or see on the tellybox. So he may have a case. However, the legal system is also not what it was (impartial) and infiltrated with hard left activists like "Sir" Keir Starmer so he may not have a case.

However, the legal system is also not what it was (impartial) and infiltrated with hard left activists like "Sir" Keir Starmer so he may not have a case

Do you have evidence of how and when this infiltration occurred?

Starmer is not hard left.🙂

JamieCannister · 07/06/2025 10:42

Ladamesansmerci · 07/06/2025 10:28

He's a known violent racist. No one is obligated to serve him.

People making the argument about gay ppl etc- that is a protected characteristic under the equality act. Being a racist twat isn't. Medical professionals are not obligated to treat racists either.

Also please stop making the argument that we've lost the ability to respect opinions. I respect that some people vote Tory. I respect that people hold different views on immigration. And whilst we'll never be friends, I even respect your right to vote Reform.

I do not respect far right extremism and never will. If you think anyone needs to respect someone who said he'd kick Muslims heads in, you're a twat. We wouldn't be telling people to respect the views of Nazis, would we?

He waas talking about "muslim extremists" in relation to "kick their heads in".

Personally I do not support violence AT ALL.

But anyone who threatens to "kick the heads in" of paedophiles, terrorists (islamic or otherwise), or people who believe that women should be covered head to toe and gay men in prison then I have no big problem, sorry.

But more importantly, lot of people agree with me. Including lots of people like me who have spent their entire life on the "progressive left". I am a classical liberal, and classical liberals believe in allowing peple to do what they want UNLESS IT HARMS OTHERS. Paedophilia and islamic extremism and mass immigration harm others, therefore they need to be stopped / controlled.

The people who are most responsible for the likes of Trump, TR, Farage etc etc having loud voices are those on the "progressive left" (actually a regressive woke intolerant authoritarian left) who are ignoring issues. I would like to vote for a party to the left of labour economically, and which is massively pro LGB and women's rights. As things stand I might vote reform because I don;t want to vote for a party that thinks everyone is an evil hard right racist because they don't think men should be in women's sport, or that the normalization of the niqab is a good thing or that mass immigration is wonderful

bombastix · 07/06/2025 10:42

Dangermoo · 07/06/2025 10:38

Why on God's earth would I waste my time sharing a series of events, which I've experienced while teaching? Specific situations where if you're not left leaning, you are ostracised? For then to be told well I must be a racist and fascist myself. Nope.

So these things did happen to you? What do you specialise in?

Dangermoo · 07/06/2025 10:44

bombastix · 07/06/2025 10:42

So these things did happen to you? What do you specialise in?

Now I know you're posting in bad faith. I reserve the right to engage with you further. Surely you respect that, right.

JamieCannister · 07/06/2025 10:44

PandoraSocks · 07/06/2025 10:34

Well, the countries that make up the UK are all very different politically. Which is why I was asking.

But never mind. You carry on with your support of the odious criminal Yaxley-Lennon.

I support free speech and freedom of expression, not TR.

It is your attitude, and the complete failure of labour to address the concerns of ordinary people that is causing TR to gain more and more popularity, not me

HeadDeskHeadDesk · 07/06/2025 10:44

MiloMinderbinder925 · 07/06/2025 09:37

I don't want to watch it. I watched the beginning which set out his agenda which was that it's all a big conspiracy against him and he needed to find 'the truth' of his persecution of a vulnerable child.

I understand that you're saucer eyed when it comes to Robinson's propaganda but don't assume others are. He was found guilty - yes I know, that's part of the conspiracy.

Well if you refuse to watch the film in its entirety then you'll never know whether there is anything in the 'he was stitched up by the establishment' conspiriacy theory, will you?

And that's fine. If you'd prefer to stay ignorant on certain subjects you are certainly allowed to. We can't all be expected to have an in depth understanding of everything that's going on.

But please, do us all a favour. If you know you don't know all the details, if you know you haven't spend time looking into a particular subject in enough depth, save yourself the bother of posting about that subject as if you do know. It makes you look silly.

bombastix · 07/06/2025 10:46

Dangermoo · 07/06/2025 10:44

Now I know you're posting in bad faith. I reserve the right to engage with you further. Surely you respect that, right.

I don’t think you do know. You are just saying you don’t want to take this conversation further, which is okay with me, but I think saying I’m bad faith is another example of your efforts to characterise me negatively, and it speaks to your character.

2dogsandabudgie · 07/06/2025 10:47

PandoraSocks · 07/06/2025 09:36

Get things in perspective. A restaurant decided they didn't want to serve a renowned, far-right activist who has a string of convictions to his name, including assault. That is their right.

How is that a dangerous path and where do you fear it would lead to? Will poor Yaxley-Lennon starve to death?

Now you're being silly. Where do you draw the line though, I don't agree that trans women are women, am I right to not serve them because I don't agree with their views. Someone doesn't agree with war so refuses to serve a soldier in uniform, the list is endless.

TR is a controversial figure and an odious man but this sounds like virtue signalling at its finest.

Edited for spelling.

Dangermoo · 07/06/2025 10:48

bombastix · 07/06/2025 10:46

I don’t think you do know. You are just saying you don’t want to take this conversation further, which is okay with me, but I think saying I’m bad faith is another example of your efforts to characterise me negatively, and it speaks to your character.

You're heckling now; the hallmark of a lefty. That's the last you're getting from me.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.