Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Step kids have moved out, DH is still funding them

308 replies

Clayless · 02/06/2025 16:35

Hi, apologies if this gets long.

DH and I have been together 8 years, he is half British, half . He has 2 children, twins who are 17. I have 2 children who are 14 and 12, together we have a 6 year old.

Until last summer DHs children were living in France, for various reasons they have come to live with us and do their last 2 years of school. While in France DH would see them on all their holidays including a long stint with his parents in the summer and he paid for them to attend an international school. Their mother passed away when they were 13, but they continued to live in France with their maternal grandparents as they didn’t want to move and he couldn’t move due to work and our child together.

Anyway when they arrived here we immediately enrolled them in independent schools, we shifted rooms about including having my 14 and 12 year old share as we only have a 5 bedroom house. We were excited to have them and have enjoyed having them live with us.

However, things seemed to take a turn after Christmas, I think they struggled with our more structured approach to parenting vs the more laissez faire style they were used to. Little things like knowing where they were at any given time, no boyfriends/girlfriends in their room. They only turned 17 in the middle of May.

His DD was easier than his DS. She immediately got a part time job saying we didn’t give her enough money and she hated being in the house with us. She works Saturdays and Wednesday evenings in a restaurant. Through this she met a 22 year old lad and they started dating. We said under no circumstances could he stay in her room but on several occasions we’d come home from work to him and her cuddling in her bed. She would also lie to us and say she was sleeping over at a friends but actually be at his.

His DS on the other hand would swear at us, tell us we were controlling etc. He would leave his room a total mess, he refused to do any chores, occasionally skipped school and just generally had no respect.

Now about 5 weeks ago (so still 16). We had taken my children and our little one to see my parents for the day, his 2 didn’t want to come. We got back and everything more or less was gone from his DD’s room. All her clothes, her expensive keyboard we bought, her expensive tennis rackets, books everything. When we asked his DS where she was he said she’d decided to move in with her 22 year old boyfriend. He refused to give an address and said “don’t worry I’ll be out of here soon too”. Eventually we were able to talk to her and she said she would still go to school but she wasn’t coming back to live with us as it was depressing and made her miserable. She kept pointing out she was 16 and could legally move out. We have been able to find out she’s living with her boyfriend in a flat share (seriously doubt the landlord knows she’s there or her age). DH was devastated but has decided not to force it.

2 weeks later his DS moved in with his maternal cousin (sleeping on his sofa) and is refusing to come back too.

DH is insisting he will still pay for their school, and is sending them money for the tube/clothes/food. He said the only thing he won’t be providing for them is money for rent as if they can’t afford that they can always come back here. He said he also won’t be asking them to return any of them items they took.

AIBU to think if they want provided for they should live here and if they are happy to no longer live here then we shouldn’t provide for them anymore?
We are struggling to make everything work financially and it feels like he doesn’t see that our child together and my children are now going without so his kids can through a strop!

OP posts:
Rainbowpony6 · 02/06/2025 17:55

And if god forbid,your 6 year old ends up without a mum at age 13
At least you know how he will be treated by your DH .

Thenose · 02/06/2025 17:56

He's legally responsible for making sure all their needs are met - including their financial needs - until they're 18.

Their things belong to them.

Stop being horrid.

treesandsun · 02/06/2025 18:00

Thse poor children. Of course he should continue to pay for them its least he can do in fact it is the least he's done so far. I agree you need to have some rules in your house but having been absent from the children's life the majority of it i- nsisting on what they can and can't do was never going to go down well. Having an older boyfriend sounds like the daughter just wants somebody to look out for her and take care of her which she obviously been lacking in her life since her mum's death. Why shouldn't she her tennis racket - it was a gift .

I think you need to reflect on why both of them have moved out particularly as he is their only living parent , It illustrates how unhappy they must be. He's sleeping on the sofa rather than your house which I know you've said 'only' half 5 bedrooms.

Pinty · 02/06/2025 18:03

Purplebunnie · 02/06/2025 17:46

Gently OP kids are for life. I still financially support my adult children where I can (they shop at our house😂) and will continue to do so for as long as I can. Responsibility does not end in my view but I expect I will be flamed

I agree me too. My children are adults with their own homes.I will continue to help them out financially if I can for as long as they need it.
You don't suddenly stop being a parent

Zezet · 02/06/2025 18:03

Pinty · 02/06/2025 18:03

I agree me too. My children are adults with their own homes.I will continue to help them out financially if I can for as long as they need it.
You don't suddenly stop being a parent

To be fair this father kinda does. Apparently.

StillNotYou · 02/06/2025 18:03

Your post's made me feel quite anxious for your step kids. They sound really vulnerable, especially the girl with the much older boyfriend.

Of course your DH should be paying for them. And surely you're not suggesting that they should have left their expensive possessions behind... what for? If this is financial - would you have sold them?

I understand this is a stressful situation, and feel for you, but think you've gone down a bit of a rabbit hole here if you're suggesting his kids need less support after moving out, rather than more.

ByBlueMoose · 02/06/2025 18:04

TempestTost · 02/06/2025 17:48

how are you spinning that as the father abandoning them? The mother decided to move them away.

Move them away? From the UK where they'd only lived for 6 months?

Or as OP stated 'It’s complicated actually, they split when they were tiny, at that point the whole family was living in Canada. After the split they all moved to the uk, where mum only stayed for 6 months before taking the kids back to France'

Back to France means they all lived there before.

And DHs family live there but he apparently didn't want to go 'back to France' so stayed in the UK.

Nailedier · 02/06/2025 18:05

Foreverhappiest · 02/06/2025 17:54

He should never of left France. The kids their mother died. He should never of left ever. I wouldn’t.

I love that everybody on here knows exactly what they would have done, without the benefit of hindsight or a crystal ball - and almost none of the details.

PinkTonic · 02/06/2025 18:05

Foreverhappiest · 02/06/2025 17:54

He should never of left France. The kids their mother died. He should never of left ever. I wouldn’t.

He didn’t leave France. Read the thread properly.

What a vile pile on because the OP is a step, oh and somewhat comfortable financially apparently. The ex wanted to take the kids back to France. The husband made that work as it’s what they wanted. Now they want to be here and that’s been accommodated, apart from unlimited pocket money and freedom to shag in their parent's home where other younger children also live. I don’t know the full story any more than anyone else on this thread but I’d be shocked if all of you would be happy about a 16 year old shacking up with a 22 year old if she was yours. Other than that, yes he does need to carry on supporting them.

Grammarnut · 02/06/2025 18:06

I don't know why you mention the keyboard etc since those are their possessions, they were given them. And your DH does have to provide for his DC, they are his and they are in a foreign country and under 18 (which means they are still children so I wonder whether there is an issue of the DS living with a 22 year old - I worry about that more than about keyboards!). He will be financially supporting them for some years in the future too.
(I'd mutter about 'only having a five bedroom house' too, but they say those who live in glass houses should not throw stones - you are lucky to have such a large house.)

BIossomtoes · 02/06/2025 18:07

Now they want to be here and that’s been accommodated

Do they? I haven’t seen anything from OP that indicates why they left France.

Wynter25 · 02/06/2025 18:08

Yabu

O0ps · 02/06/2025 18:09

Poor kids. I HATE blended family crap. Poor poor kids.

You and the 'father' must be really awful for both teens to be so desperate to leave, and put themselves in precarious living situations.
Stupid man for shacking up with someone else's kids, and creating an extra kid, when he didn't even parent his first two. And you chose that (he sounds rich, so there's that).
Neither of you come across well here at all. He had the choice to stay where his kids were. His first two, that is. He owed them that.

YABVU

Miyagi99 · 02/06/2025 18:09

Grammarnut · 02/06/2025 18:06

I don't know why you mention the keyboard etc since those are their possessions, they were given them. And your DH does have to provide for his DC, they are his and they are in a foreign country and under 18 (which means they are still children so I wonder whether there is an issue of the DS living with a 22 year old - I worry about that more than about keyboards!). He will be financially supporting them for some years in the future too.
(I'd mutter about 'only having a five bedroom house' too, but they say those who live in glass houses should not throw stones - you are lucky to have such a large house.)

It’s legal for 17 year old to live with the 22 year old if she wants, I would have made more effort for her to want to stay at home but you can’t blame her for moving out when she has to share with her 17 year old brother.

DodoTired · 02/06/2025 18:11

Sorry YABU

if he stops it will make relationships with his children even worse
I understand you are upset your kid is going without but it isn’t different compared to them living at home

Nailedier · 02/06/2025 18:11

PinkTonic · 02/06/2025 18:05

He didn’t leave France. Read the thread properly.

What a vile pile on because the OP is a step, oh and somewhat comfortable financially apparently. The ex wanted to take the kids back to France. The husband made that work as it’s what they wanted. Now they want to be here and that’s been accommodated, apart from unlimited pocket money and freedom to shag in their parent's home where other younger children also live. I don’t know the full story any more than anyone else on this thread but I’d be shocked if all of you would be happy about a 16 year old shacking up with a 22 year old if she was yours. Other than that, yes he does need to carry on supporting them.

Yes I agree. The clamour to permit any behaviour - and fund any poor choices made by these kids - is quite frankly worrying. Yes, they are grieving, yes they have been uprooted, yes their lives sound pretty traumatic until now - but kids need boundaries and allowing them to do whatever they want isn't helping. It's a knee-jerk reaction to the fact their mum died but it's not sustainable going forward.

I'd be appalled if everyone on here genuinely would be fine with their 16-year-old living with a 22-year old with such encouragement as to give them as much money as they wanted to carry on doing it.

HoorayHarry88 · 02/06/2025 18:13

Miyagi99 · 02/06/2025 18:09

It’s legal for 17 year old to live with the 22 year old if she wants, I would have made more effort for her to want to stay at home but you can’t blame her for moving out when she has to share with her 17 year old brother.

She wasn't sharing with her Brother. The 14 and 12 year old were sharing. Way I read it anyway.

Digdongdoo · 02/06/2025 18:14

The very least he can do is continue to fund his 17yo children! What is wrong with you?

Elektra1 · 02/06/2025 18:14

Jesus I’ve read some bad things on this site but this one takes the biscuit. You want your husband to cut off his school aged kids financially because they’ve left his house? Their mother died. They were left living with grandparents while their dad formed a new family. They then came to live with you and understandably found the adjustment difficult and now you want him to cut them off? Unbelievable.

ByBlueMoose · 02/06/2025 18:15

ARichtGoodDram · 02/06/2025 17:51

It's not actually. It says "DH and I have been together 8 years, he is half British, half ."

It's called comprehension and knowing what a typo meant on the basis of all the other information.

Do you think OP was saying her DH is half-something not French when going on to talk about his French ex, French kids who lived in France his parents who live in France. That his ex took the kids 'back to France' after 6 months in the UK which very much suggests they were born there?

And how he could have chosen to live in France with his kids after their Mum died but would have to leave the OP and her kids and be temporarily out of work so it wasn't feasible in her opinion.

Do you know how immigration works? That you can’t just rock up in a country you're not a citizen of and decide to live there and get a job?

OP didn't say 'of course DH couldn't decide to live in France after their Mum died, he wouldn’t get a visa' did she?

No, she said it would be inconvenient to her.

deismevav · 02/06/2025 18:15

These poor children. They lost their mother a few years ago, their father lived in a different country and their stepmother clearly has no empathy for them. Of course your husband should still be supporting them. A bit of acting out and recklessness is totally normal in adolescence. You’re being very unfair.

Strangerthanfictions · 02/06/2025 18:15

Clayless · 02/06/2025 16:46

What was the alternative, they refused to move to the UK (maternal grandparents were fairly forceful on the “they can live with us don’t uproot them” at that point). I couldn’t move to France (50/50 co-parenting with my ex, he would never have allowed it). DH would have had to abandon our family and our child, not to mention be out of work at least temporarily. It wasn’t feasible.

How did he end up living in a different country to his children in the first place? Did he leave France or did he allow their mother to take them away from the UK? If it's the latter then those children really have been unsettled throughout their lives and have had no stability for any length of time at all

Elektra1 · 02/06/2025 18:17

I’d be focusing on getting them some help to address the issues they clearly have with the move to your household. They are teenagers. Still children. They must be feeling so lost.

ManchesterLu · 02/06/2025 18:19

School, food, clothes and tube. It's hardly as if he's giving them the earth is it? It's the bare minimum a father should be expected to provide, and YABU to expect him to stop.

Boredofchange · 02/06/2025 18:19

I’ll start by saying I’m a mum to teens and a step mum to an adult who is still being funded by us while she tries to build a career . These 17 year olds absolutely should be being funded by their dad . I’m really shocked that you think they shouldn’t . I’m actually hoping this post isn’t real . I really hope Dad is seeing them regularly even if they have moved out - they need way more than money from their remaining parent

Swipe left for the next trending thread