Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Child surname

123 replies

Maggiem92 · 24/05/2025 19:31

Thoughts please…. son’s wife went behind his back and registered their baby with her surname despite him asking her not to

OP posts:
Colts627 · 24/05/2025 21:15

IButtleSir · 24/05/2025 20:31

Whose uterus did the baby grow in, out of interest: your son's or his wife's?

What relevance is that unless of course you would also be happy for the father to provide no funding for the child.

Willyoujustbequiet · 24/05/2025 21:16

Colts627 · 24/05/2025 21:13

Wise of you were stupid enough to have a baby with an inappropriate partner in which case the naming of the child is the least of your issues.

Of course you would blame the woman and not the man..... it's so tiresome when the misogyny comes from inside the house.

Mumof2wifeof1crazytimes · 24/05/2025 21:27

Why does the fathers wants and needs trump the mothers?

Poopeepoopee · 24/05/2025 21:30

Couldn't he have registered the birth himself? He could have used his name then.

IButtleSir · 24/05/2025 21:31

Colts627 · 24/05/2025 21:15

What relevance is that unless of course you would also be happy for the father to provide no funding for the child.

Er, no. They put equal effort into conceiving the baby, so they are equally financially responsible for it.

She put a lot more effort than he did into growing and birthing the baby, so if they can't agree on the baby's surname, she gets to choose.

Colts627 · 24/05/2025 21:32

IButtleSir · 24/05/2025 21:31

Er, no. They put equal effort into conceiving the baby, so they are equally financially responsible for it.

She put a lot more effort than he did into growing and birthing the baby, so if they can't agree on the baby's surname, she gets to choose.

Absolute nonsense and wildly contradictory.

Notlookingforwardtosummer · 24/05/2025 21:33

It’s traditional for babies to have the same name as Mum. Why doesn’t he change his name?

IButtleSir · 24/05/2025 21:33

Colts627 · 24/05/2025 21:32

Absolute nonsense and wildly contradictory.

Nonsense is in the eye of the beholder, but why is it contradictory, pray tell?

Colts627 · 24/05/2025 21:36

Willyoujustbequiet · 24/05/2025 21:16

Of course you would blame the woman and not the man..... it's so tiresome when the misogyny comes from inside the house.

Your original comment literally alluded to an issue in the relationship otherwise why would you care which name the child had? That has absolutely nothing to do with misogyny and everything to do with inappropriate couples having children.

Sporadica · 24/05/2025 21:39

Need more info. First, check what the registration actually is before worrying; for example in Scotland the entry will indexed under both names (assuming he has not been left off the birth certificate altogether, which is a different issue). Generally, though, if the parents have different surnames the mother's would be the default unless both parents agree on a different option, so her actions may not have been malicious.

BangersAndGnash · 24/05/2025 21:43

OP, what did your son want the baby to be called?

His name, or both their names?

Is his surname one that most people would be happy to have? Or one that is hard to spell, sounds like a euphemism, etc?

Willyoujustbequiet · 24/05/2025 21:45

Colts627 · 24/05/2025 21:36

Your original comment literally alluded to an issue in the relationship otherwise why would you care which name the child had? That has absolutely nothing to do with misogyny and everything to do with inappropriate couples having children.

You literally blamed them saying they was stupid enough to have a baby with an inappropriate partner simply because a woman chose her own name...blatantly misogynistic.

It makes far more sense for women to keep their own names and for any children to follow suit.

Shushmagic · 24/05/2025 21:50

It makes sense for a baby to have their mum's last name.

Pinty · 24/05/2025 21:53

Not at all I haven't been at the registration if either of my children

Willyoujustbequiet · 24/05/2025 21:54

Colts627 · 24/05/2025 21:32

Absolute nonsense and wildly contradictory.

It's absolute nonsense that she put a lot more effort into growing and birthing the baby?

Biology not your strongest subject by chance?

Colts627 · 24/05/2025 21:57

Willyoujustbequiet · 24/05/2025 21:45

You literally blamed them saying they was stupid enough to have a baby with an inappropriate partner simply because a woman chose her own name...blatantly misogynistic.

It makes far more sense for women to keep their own names and for any children to follow suit.

It does if you had a baby with an inappropriate partner and don’t expect the relationship to last. Less so otherwise.

Colts627 · 24/05/2025 21:57

Shushmagic · 24/05/2025 21:50

It makes sense for a baby to have their mum's last name.

If you expect the relationship to fail it does.

AirborneElephant · 24/05/2025 21:59

Don’t blame her, hell would freeze over before a child I carried and gave birth to didn’t have my surname. And don’t quote “tradition”, the tradition was always that children took their mother’s surname. If he wants the same name as his child he can always change his.

Willyoujustbequiet · 24/05/2025 22:01

Colts627 · 24/05/2025 21:57

It does if you had a baby with an inappropriate partner and don’t expect the relationship to last. Less so otherwise.

Women don't have crystal balls ....it's recognised thar domestic violence often doesn't start until pregnancy.

It can be many years before the mask slips.

Given the high number of divorces and absent fathers its far more practical for children to take their mother's name.

Littlemunchkinsmummy · 24/05/2025 22:01

Maybe her surname flows better with the first name they have decided?
Maybe your sons name is the baby’s middle name?
Why does a baby have to have a father’s surname if the parents are married? The child isn’t owned by the father and neither is the mother. It’s a beautiful concept if a woman wants to adopt her husbands surname but it’s not mandatory? She’s still an individual person as the child will be with their own identity. Their father’s name isn’t their sole identity. The child may grow up and decide they want an entirely different name and change is via deed poll.

TomatoSandwiches · 24/05/2025 22:02

I don't see the problem.

KimberleyMilkado · 24/05/2025 22:04

ZepherinDrouhin · 24/05/2025 19:37

He can add his surname to double barrel it before the baby's 1st birthday.

https://www.gov.uk/correct-birth-registration

Makes spurious claim including random reference to double barrelling. Provides link that says something else. Not very helpful.

ReadingSoManyThreads · 24/05/2025 22:06

I'd love to hear her side of this.

Colts627 · 24/05/2025 22:49

Notlookingforwardtosummer · 24/05/2025 21:33

It’s traditional for babies to have the same name as Mum. Why doesn’t he change his name?

I’m not sure it is. The only one I know who do this are ones who had kids following one night stands or something similar.

I don’t know anyone in an established relationship who didn’t use the fathers surname.

Colts627 · 24/05/2025 22:51

Willyoujustbequiet · 24/05/2025 22:01

Women don't have crystal balls ....it's recognised thar domestic violence often doesn't start until pregnancy.

It can be many years before the mask slips.

Given the high number of divorces and absent fathers its far more practical for children to take their mother's name.

It’s more practical not to have a child with a wrong ‘un.

Swipe left for the next trending thread