Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

School's punishment of all boys in year 6

605 replies

htdt · 16/05/2025 17:28

My son is in Year 6 and has done SATS this week, today was meant to be a fun day for them as they've finished all the papers.

But my son came back from school really upset as the teachers had separated the girls and boys and he says the girls got to do fun activities and given treats but the boys got told off and given a lesson on respect.

He's taken this badly and has said things like 'I must be bad because I'm a boy'.

It's such a shame because he's worked really hard and was otherwise enjoying SATS week, but now feels horrible about himself, the teachers who told them off and the girls getting rewarded when all the boys were punished.

I feel like I need to speak to the school next week and find out what's gone on and why. I also feel like making a complaint. But I'm not sure what they are going to do to make things better even if they did agree with me that it was not a great way to deal with some boy's bad behaviour and also very bad timing so should I just forget about it...?

OP posts:
Reliablesource · 17/05/2025 10:04

R3s3t · 17/05/2025 09:51

If it was so serious an ongoing situation( and you don’t know it was) why was there no collective email in the run up and about the punishment?You can criticise the TA but frankly the teachers should have taken them out instead of leaving somebody on a fraction of the salary to take the flack.

It’s really poor.

I agree that if it was a very serious ongoing issue, the school should have done a mail-out to parents. However, there’s no onus on schools to write to parents every time there’s is a disciplinary issue or punishment or they’d never have time for teaching. Day-to-day discipline is for the school to enforce as it sees fit.

We don’t know that the TA was ‘sent out’ to face the OP. It sounds like she took it upon herself. I have worked with many TAs over 20 years, many are wonderful, some are mediocre and some are a nightmare, and love to insert themselves in a drama. (This is my extensive experience before anyone piles on.) Whichever type of TA this lady was, she has no authority to discuss disciplinary matters with a parent and could cause more problems by doing this.

The OP needs to discuss this with someone of authority at the school, rather than take the word of a 10 year old or a TA as the gospel truth.

IkeaMeatballGravy · 17/05/2025 10:06

WildflowerConstellations · 17/05/2025 10:02

I don't see that it is necessarily any different to the lessons we had at school about periods, where the girls all had a separate lesson. These conversations are important for kids of this age.

Not at the end of SATs week in place of a treat. They have put it off purposefully so as not to affect the school's results which is unfair to the girls being bullied and the good boys.

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 10:07

Bigfatsunandclouds · 17/05/2025 09:01

I think this should be part of PHSE - teaching them about the dangers of this behaviour. It's terrifying to think of these young boys being radicalised, I have a son who is so loving and respectful at the moment, I have taught him about feminism and equality and men's role in that, but it's so addictive to be angry and blame others and driven by peer pressure.

It is in secondary. It is not in primary the required extent. And the fact that some parents think the majority of kids get phones in secondary says a lot.

WildflowerConstellations · 17/05/2025 10:11

IkeaMeatballGravy · 17/05/2025 10:06

Not at the end of SATs week in place of a treat. They have put it off purposefully so as not to affect the school's results which is unfair to the girls being bullied and the good boys.

If it was really a punishment then yes it should have been the boys who did something wrong. If it was a lesson about respect then I think it would be better to actually talk it through rather than react to "I must be bad because I'm a boy" by complaining to school.

R3s3t · 17/05/2025 10:11

Reliablesource · 17/05/2025 10:04

I agree that if it was a very serious ongoing issue, the school should have done a mail-out to parents. However, there’s no onus on schools to write to parents every time there’s is a disciplinary issue or punishment or they’d never have time for teaching. Day-to-day discipline is for the school to enforce as it sees fit.

We don’t know that the TA was ‘sent out’ to face the OP. It sounds like she took it upon herself. I have worked with many TAs over 20 years, many are wonderful, some are mediocre and some are a nightmare, and love to insert themselves in a drama. (This is my extensive experience before anyone piles on.) Whichever type of TA this lady was, she has no authority to discuss disciplinary matters with a parent and could cause more problems by doing this.

The OP needs to discuss this with someone of authority at the school, rather than take the word of a 10 year old or a TA as the gospel truth.

So I’ve reread the ops first posts. Apparantly it was about SOME boys behaviour to girls and SOME boys ( so those boys have had a double whammy) and football( many,many boys don’t like or play football).

There was nobody else available at the end of the day.

For something as serious as this the teacher or other senior staff should have been available and the boys not involved and most definitely those on the end of behaviour the same as girls should not have been included. There should have been correspondence previously if this was an ongoing problem, it should have been sorted prior to SATS and there most definitely should have been correspondence for such a serious punishment as no involvement in post SATS fun activities.

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 10:12

IfYouPutASausageInItItsNotAViennetta · 17/05/2025 09:29

So do people of colour, and disabled people - many of which in both groups are also female.

Do you believe that white, able-bodied girls are automatically a problem - and can always benefit from being brought into line by being punished for something that they didn't do - because of their inherent privilege over girls (and boys) who are not white, not able-bodied or both?

Or is it only boys who need to be punished for being boys?

Let’s rephrase that. Do I think white girls should be included in lessons about exclusion if along side white boys they’re actively excluding children based on race? Yes. If they’re actively excluding disabled children? Yes?

IfYouPutASausageInItItsNotAViennetta · 17/05/2025 10:13

Reliablesource · 17/05/2025 09:46

Teacher here. OP, there has to be a lot more to this than some boys stopping girls playing football. It will be a culmination of unkind behaviour by multiple boys over a long period. Parents need to remember that children give their own version of events when they have been in trouble and usually downplay their own role or mis-report the events leading to the punishment.

The TA shouldn’t have taken it upon herself to speak to you about it, TAs have no authority to speak to parents about disciplinary matters. You keep saying that she told you it wasn’t directed at your son, but she may well just have said that to be conciliatory rather than risk a confrontation. People in all sorts of life will take that approach in a tricky situation.

The school will not have taken this action lightly, there has obviously been a big problem for some time with the boys’ behaviour. You do not know that your son wasn’t involved, either as a culprit or by encouraging or being complicit with others. Peer pressure and herd behaviour are big factors. I’ve seen normally well-behaved children get sucked into mean/bullying behaviour many times, it does happen.

By all means contact the class teacher or pastoral leader on Monday and ask them what happened as that’s the only way you are going to get an accurate picture.

It will be a culmination of unkind behaviour by multiple boys over a long period.

Multiple boys is not the same as all boys.

You do not know that your son wasn’t involved, either as a culprit or by encouraging or being complicit with others.

Except that the TA who meted out the punishment admitted that OP's son wasn't one of the culprits...

If OP knows that her son has no interest at all in football, why on earth would he care about telling girls that they could or couldn't play?

How do you automatically know that none of the girls were guilty or complicit in the actions of others? What if some of them were on the sidelines, sneering at and bullying the girls who did want to play football for 'doing boy things'?

What if half of the boys were playing football and refusing to allow the half of the girls who wanted to play from joining in? Would you have randomly punished the half of the girls at the other side of the playground, with no interest in either playing football or from stopping anybody else from playing? If not, then why do the equally uninvolved half of the boys deserve punishment or are 'probably' guilty?

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 10:13

IfYouPutASausageInItItsNotAViennetta · 17/05/2025 09:43

Are you normally an advocate of guilty until proven innocent - even when the person doing the punishing has freely admitted his innocence?

Do you genuinely see all teaching staff as perfectly wise and never making foolish or unfair judgments?

Are you? Because you’ve assumed that what happened is as described without any context or understanding from the perspective of the school.

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 10:15

IkeaMeatballGravy · 17/05/2025 10:06

Not at the end of SATs week in place of a treat. They have put it off purposefully so as not to affect the school's results which is unfair to the girls being bullied and the good boys.

Or maybe it relates to behaviour that’s happened during the sats?

Mynewnameis · 17/05/2025 10:18

My child was subjected to a group telling off in year 6 which was way over the top. It really affected her. She mentioned to me this week that it was the 1 year anniversary of such event :(
I didn't complain as she was technically implicated in a very minor way (complicated). However, I did email to say it had affected her and asked if the punishment had ended. She didn't want to go back to school.

IfYouPutASausageInItItsNotAViennetta · 17/05/2025 10:21

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 10:13

Are you? Because you’ve assumed that what happened is as described without any context or understanding from the perspective of the school.

No, I most certainly am not.

Is the TA not part of the school staff, then, and thus unable to have any understanding from the perspective of the school for which she works?

Even if your answer to that is somehow "No", you still seem to be going from the assumption that guilty until proven innocent is a good thing.

Orangesinthebag · 17/05/2025 10:21

This has turned into a silly point scoring thread mainly based on semantics now.

I think there is a genuine problem at the moment that everything that happens in children's lives is being overblown and dramatised by adults.
Consequently we are creating a generation of confused, insecure, anxious children who lack resilience.
This thread is an example of that.

I honestly think we need to calm down with our "outrage" at things like this and help our children view things with perspective and roll with the punches.
Life is getting harder out there and this current young generation are going to face tough situations going forward.

I think we are constantly getting side tracked from what should be our purpose which is encouraging children to be strong, resilient and ready to face the future.

If this boy didn't like what happened, maybe he and his fellow pupils need to speak to the teacher or Head & express their feelings themselves. And they should ask for an explanation for the school's actions themselves. They are 10/11, not 6.

That's the lesson here, surely?

R3s3t · 17/05/2025 10:22

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 10:13

Are you? Because you’ve assumed that what happened is as described without any context or understanding from the perspective of the school.

Well unless they’ve got proof that every boy out of 100 was involved when many don’t play football and some of those that do were on the receiving end of the same behaviour but apparantly don’t count I’d love to hear what “ context” they can come up with. They had their chance at the end of the school day to give their context but chose to send a TA out.

R3s3t · 17/05/2025 10:26

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 10:15

Or maybe it relates to behaviour that’s happened during the sats?

You contact parents for serious behaviour when it happens. SATS have been running all week.

Calmdownpeople · 17/05/2025 10:28

SushiDisco · 16/05/2025 18:00

@He's taken this badly and has said things like 'I must be bad because I'm a boy'.”

This sounds like something my 5 year old would say…Is he quite younge for his age? I just can’t imagine any 10/11 year old saying that.

Totally agree and that was my first thought. No 10/11 yea told would say this and not have more context.

There is more to this story OP and we aren’t hearing it.

A one off girls can’t play isn’t what caused this.

IfYouPutASausageInItItsNotAViennetta · 17/05/2025 10:28

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 10:15

Or maybe it relates to behaviour that’s happened during the sats?

If it does, it's an extremely poor school ethos if they give out punishments without making it clear to those being punished what it is for.

How can you possibly hope to discourage bad behaviour in children if you don't make the link with their punishment clear? That's Disciplining Children 101.

Even the worst serial killers who are sentenced to life in prison are told in no uncertain terms by the judge exactly why they are receiving that punishment!

R3s3t · 17/05/2025 10:29

Calmdownpeople · 17/05/2025 10:28

Totally agree and that was my first thought. No 10/11 yea told would say this and not have more context.

There is more to this story OP and we aren’t hearing it.

A one off girls can’t play isn’t what caused this.

So parents should have been contacted before. It wasn’t just girls that the behaviour was aimed at.

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 10:31

IfYouPutASausageInItItsNotAViennetta · 17/05/2025 10:21

No, I most certainly am not.

Is the TA not part of the school staff, then, and thus unable to have any understanding from the perspective of the school for which she works?

Even if your answer to that is somehow "No", you still seem to be going from the assumption that guilty until proven innocent is a good thing.

No. I assumed nothing. I kno the following:

That unless the staff member spoken to delivered and decided the consequence she should not have commented.

That the OP should not have spoken to the TA about it at all. The TA should not have made any comment but I also understand why when confronted by a parent they did.

Sexism starts incredibly young and it must be addressed firmly and timely. Sexism can be passive.

Girls cannot be sexist against girls.

It is not the responsibility of girls to challenge sexism. They can choose to but it is not their job as victims.

We have one side.

This is the kind of consequence that will invite complaint on mass so something serious is going on for the teacher to do it. It’s a long shot off lazy teaching

jenrobin · 17/05/2025 10:36

R3s3t · 17/05/2025 09:51

If it was so serious an ongoing situation( and you don’t know it was) why was there no collective email in the run up and about the punishment?You can criticise the TA but frankly the teachers should have taken them out instead of leaving somebody on a fraction of the salary to take the flack.

It’s really poor.

The TAs in my school are well trained in behaviour and it's their job to keep parents informed. They call them daily. However I totally agree that the teacher who meted out the punishment should have been the one to speak to OP. Very lazy.

R3s3t · 17/05/2025 10:37

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 10:31

No. I assumed nothing. I kno the following:

That unless the staff member spoken to delivered and decided the consequence she should not have commented.

That the OP should not have spoken to the TA about it at all. The TA should not have made any comment but I also understand why when confronted by a parent they did.

Sexism starts incredibly young and it must be addressed firmly and timely. Sexism can be passive.

Girls cannot be sexist against girls.

It is not the responsibility of girls to challenge sexism. They can choose to but it is not their job as victims.

We have one side.

This is the kind of consequence that will invite complaint on mass so something serious is going on for the teacher to do it. It’s a long shot off lazy teaching

No it isn’t, it is lazy teaching. It wasn’t all boys doing it, it was some and was re football. Some boys were on the receiving end of the same behaviour too.

So the boys who received the same behaviour from the culprits don’t matter and should just suck up punishment on top?

Some schools use TAs as meet and greet with teachers coming out for serious issues. This was a serious issue. The teacher wasnt there and hadn’t arranged for senior staff to be there instead.

Lazy teaching all round.

jenrobin · 17/05/2025 10:38

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 10:13

Are you? Because you’ve assumed that what happened is as described without any context or understanding from the perspective of the school.

That's exactly what's so concerning. You don't deliver punishment without being able to explain why.

ButterCrackers · 17/05/2025 10:40

That’s wrong and no explanation either. Do contact the school for a full explanation and apology to your son. Involve your son in the process so he can see that you support him and how to deal with unreasonable people who are in charge.

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 10:43

jenrobin · 17/05/2025 10:38

That's exactly what's so concerning. You don't deliver punishment without being able to explain why.

We don’t know they didn’t. We only have the OPs perspective.

Pickingdates · 17/05/2025 10:44

I think it is very reasonable to email in asking for a meeting with the HT to explain what happened and was your son in any way involved in the behaviour that warranted the whole male student punishment.

I am very unhappy with group punishments.
Invariably a small number of students behave badly and if is convenient to the teacher the whole group get denied.

I have firmly pushed back on this several times when it occurred to my children years ago.

It is not acceptable IMO.

BusyMum47 · 17/05/2025 10:45

ClassySassyBonnieLassie · 16/05/2025 17:31

I think the first thing you need to do it understand why it was done, as there is no context as to why it happened. it is hard to know if a situation has been dealt with proportionally without knowing what the situation was/is

This, to start with! ⬆️

I'm a yr6 Teacher & I hate the whole 'punishment them all' approach when in reality it's usually just a few. So unfair.

Swipe left for the next trending thread