Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To veto a double-barrelled first name

109 replies

londongirl5 · 11/05/2025 09:03

My wife is pregnant (we’re two mums). We’ve chosen a name we both like for the baby, say Ellie (I’m not using any real names here). She also wants to name the baby after her grandmother (say Peggy Sue, who was known as Sue). To honor her grandmother she’d like to name the baby “Ellie Sue” as a first name. I’d like the first name to be Ellie, with Sue as a middle name. Neither of us will budge.

I think double-barrelled first names sound silly and “common” and I don’t want my child to be judged at school, university/job applications, appointments etc. My wife thinks it’s offensive and classist that I feel this way. She also seems to think that because she’s carrying the baby she should have more of a say. I want to keep the peace but I feel like I’m always letting her have the final say in things and I can’t call my child a name I don’t like.

OP posts:
MyOliveHelper · 11/05/2025 09:33

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 11/05/2025 09:30

I'm sure lots of heterosexual mums do consider themselves to be the main parent, but I don't personally agree with that.

Re breast vs bottle.... that obviously has to be the mum's choice because it involves her body. Same for decisions around the birth, where she wants it to happen and how much pain relief she wants etc.

But stuff like the baby's name and how to raise them should be joint decisions imo. But then, I expected DH to step up and pull his weight as an equal parent so I didn't think it was appropriate to appoint myself as the one in charge. If you want the other parent to take a back seat and have less responsibility overall, then I guess it's fine for you to call all of the shots.

As for the name thing... the OP has suggested an alternative, which is to use the second half of the double barrelled name as a middle name. Seems fair enough to me.

This is what i said in another thread. You can't insist that you need to do all the bonding and the majority of the care and then expect your co-psrent to magically step up and parent a 2 year old well.

Hdjdb42 · 11/05/2025 09:33

Mainly the underprivileged white children at our primary school have double barrelled names. The children from wealthier backgrounds tend to have one name. The teachers and children never call these kids by their 2 first names, it's always the first name.

MyOliveHelper · 11/05/2025 09:35

Hdjdb42 · 11/05/2025 09:33

Mainly the underprivileged white children at our primary school have double barrelled names. The children from wealthier backgrounds tend to have one name. The teachers and children never call these kids by their 2 first names, it's always the first name.

How does that work when a wealthy celeb from a WC background calls their kids Tilly-Leigh?

thepariscrimefiles · 11/05/2025 09:35

MyOliveHelper · 11/05/2025 09:19

Lots of heterosexual mums feel this way and are supported in those beliefs by other women. Carrying the baby gives you more rights than simply providing the sperm. So if you only provided the egg, then you're essentially in the same boat as dad's. If you didn't even provide that...

You are completely denigrating and minimising OP's relationship to the baby. You talk about how awful some people are for being prejudiced about certain names if they denote a lower social class, but you are being equally awful about OP's connection to her unborn child. If they both go on the birth certificate, OP will have equal rights to the child. You seem prejudiced against same sex couples.

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 11/05/2025 09:37

MyOliveHelper · 11/05/2025 09:33

This is what i said in another thread. You can't insist that you need to do all the bonding and the majority of the care and then expect your co-psrent to magically step up and parent a 2 year old well.

Yes, exactly.

MyOliveHelper · 11/05/2025 09:37

thepariscrimefiles · 11/05/2025 09:35

You are completely denigrating and minimising OP's relationship to the baby. You talk about how awful some people are for being prejudiced about certain names if they denote a lower social class, but you are being equally awful about OP's connection to her unborn child. If they both go on the birth certificate, OP will have equal rights to the child. You seem prejudiced against same sex couples.

Or they consistently feel the pregnant party is the main parent and the other should play as assisting role to the CEO. It isn't like these attitudes aren't present when a man is the other parent. They are. I find it comforting that there is consistency (even though i still disagree) and that it isn't about sex.

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 11/05/2025 09:39

thepariscrimefiles · 11/05/2025 09:35

You are completely denigrating and minimising OP's relationship to the baby. You talk about how awful some people are for being prejudiced about certain names if they denote a lower social class, but you are being equally awful about OP's connection to her unborn child. If they both go on the birth certificate, OP will have equal rights to the child. You seem prejudiced against same sex couples.

Agreed. The baby will have two parents.

MyCyanReader · 11/05/2025 09:39

You're in a relationship, so if you don't like it, you're entitled to have your opinion heard, as is she.

Personally I don't like double barrelled first names. It always seems to be the same names chosen as the second bit. I teach a class where I have 5 double barrelled first names. Two of them X-Rose, and three X-May (or Mae or Mai).

(Obviously X being the first bit of the name which is different).

It's just a bit samey.

WindyAnna · 11/05/2025 09:41

londongirl5 · 11/05/2025 09:29

The admissions people at Cambridge? 😂

Considering how much more inclusive the top universities are trying to be you'd be better off double-barrelled than many other names.

BendingSpoons · 11/05/2025 09:42

I personally agree with you. I think 2 first names without a hyphen is a pain to explain all the time and I'm not fond of using hyphens in first names.

However more importantly I think everyone should be able to veto names they don't like.

Bobcat246 · 11/05/2025 09:43

In an ideal world double barrelled first names wouldn't be judged, but we don't live in an ideal world. Unfortunately they are widely considered either old-fashioned (my mum born in the early 50s has one and NEVER uses it- she just uses the first of the two names) or frankly lacking in class. I'm not saying it's right but I agree with you that the name will have negative associations and hold her back, especially in business, elite unis, certain social circles, and frankly any environment that you need to be able to manoeuvre in to improve your lot financially and socially. Names matter.

RosesAndHellebores · 11/05/2025 09:45

I don't get the hate for hyphenated names: my family tree is full of Mary-Anne's. My school had plenty of: Sarah-Jane's, Emma-Janes, Sally-Anns, etc.

What I couldn't stick would be two diminutives strung together. Eleanor Susan is a fine name. Ellie-Sue is not.

MyOliveHelper · 11/05/2025 09:50

I wonder if people who agree that these names sound poor and that's off putting to things like admissions offices, readily admit that "foreign" and particularly "black" sounding names have a similar outcome in these aspects of life and you could be rejected just because it's obvious you are foreign and/or black.

delightfuldweeb · 11/05/2025 09:52

Bobcat246 · 11/05/2025 09:43

In an ideal world double barrelled first names wouldn't be judged, but we don't live in an ideal world. Unfortunately they are widely considered either old-fashioned (my mum born in the early 50s has one and NEVER uses it- she just uses the first of the two names) or frankly lacking in class. I'm not saying it's right but I agree with you that the name will have negative associations and hold her back, especially in business, elite unis, certain social circles, and frankly any environment that you need to be able to manoeuvre in to improve your lot financially and socially. Names matter.

I agree with this, and don’t agree with posters who say it’s just a MN thing. It’s not. It shouldn’t be the case but unfortunately it is that names do have associations. Kayden v Barnaby. Ellie-Mae v Rosalind.
Ultimately, OP, you and your DW have to choose a name that you both love. Neither of my DC’s have the two names that I love the most as my DH didn’t like them. I was sad at the time but I’m over it now.

londongirl5 · 11/05/2025 09:53

thepariscrimefiles · 11/05/2025 09:35

You are completely denigrating and minimising OP's relationship to the baby. You talk about how awful some people are for being prejudiced about certain names if they denote a lower social class, but you are being equally awful about OP's connection to her unborn child. If they both go on the birth certificate, OP will have equal rights to the child. You seem prejudiced against same sex couples.

Thank you, I agree!! Awful!

OP posts:
Ddakji · 11/05/2025 09:56

I don’t actually think that in real life people do judge on names like this. I work with a young woman with a double-barrelled first name and I have never assumed she’s tacky or common or anything like that - she’s a colleague same as all the others.

But your real issue is your wife thinking she getting more say. Nope. Bit of a red flag there.

poetryandwine · 11/05/2025 09:58

londongirl5 · 11/05/2025 09:29

The admissions people at Cambridge? 😂

Former Russell Group admissions tutor here. I can assure you that names are the last thing anyone at Cambridge cares about.

Elitism is rampant but among staff it is strictly of the intellectual variety

londongirl5 · 11/05/2025 09:59

MyOliveHelper · 11/05/2025 09:19

Lots of heterosexual mums feel this way and are supported in those beliefs by other women. Carrying the baby gives you more rights than simply providing the sperm. So if you only provided the egg, then you're essentially in the same boat as dad's. If you didn't even provide that...

I completely disagree. I don’t like the way men/dads are often portrayed as useless from the very beginning simply because they didn’t carry/birth the baby. That’s not their fault. For two-mum families (and hetero families who adopt or do IVF) it’s a much more sensitive situation as they’ve been through so much to get to the pregnancy. Both of us wanted to be the pregnant one and provide the egg!

OP posts:
Ceska · 11/05/2025 10:00

MyOliveHelper · 11/05/2025 09:19

Lots of heterosexual mums feel this way and are supported in those beliefs by other women. Carrying the baby gives you more rights than simply providing the sperm. So if you only provided the egg, then you're essentially in the same boat as dad's. If you didn't even provide that...

Read this a couple of times, what do you mean by "So if you only provided the egg, then you're essentially in the same boat as dad's. If you didn't even provide that..." ?

Edit: ignore me, didn't read the op properly

Theunamedcat · 11/05/2025 10:02

I know someone who double barrelled all her children's first name in line with their fathers no-one uses it they all just use the first name so Peggy-sue would just be Peggy

londongirl5 · 11/05/2025 10:02

MyOliveHelper · 11/05/2025 09:50

I wonder if people who agree that these names sound poor and that's off putting to things like admissions offices, readily admit that "foreign" and particularly "black" sounding names have a similar outcome in these aspects of life and you could be rejected just because it's obvious you are foreign and/or black.

Unfortunately that is the case, and it’s awful.
However, fortunately times are changing so that foreign cultures are more respected and celebrated however I don’t think English working-class culture has got to that stage.

OP posts:
Butchyrestingface · 11/05/2025 10:05

londongirl5 · 11/05/2025 09:29

The admissions people at Cambridge? 😂

Your unborn child is going to Cambridge?

poetryandwine · 11/05/2025 10:06

londongirl5 · 11/05/2025 09:59

I completely disagree. I don’t like the way men/dads are often portrayed as useless from the very beginning simply because they didn’t carry/birth the baby. That’s not their fault. For two-mum families (and hetero families who adopt or do IVF) it’s a much more sensitive situation as they’ve been through so much to get to the pregnancy. Both of us wanted to be the pregnant one and provide the egg!

Great post, OP. I agree that mothers (in hetero situations) and birth mothers (in same sex partnerships) have agency on the question of breast v bottle.

And it is sadly true that sometimes partners prefer to shirk responsibility, especially for the boring and stressful bits. But when partners want to be enthusiastic, involved parents I like to see that encouraged.

Bumblerbum · 11/05/2025 10:07

CountryVic · 11/05/2025 09:30

My now adult daughter has a name, let’s say Sally, middle name May. From day one my parents insisted on calling her Sally May, I have never done this ever, nor has my husbands family but my whole family have done for the past 25 years and it just shits me but she now goes by Sally May !! So yeah, have a first and a middle and let it be a nick name and hope it doesn’t last forever 😣

I was going to say the same! DDs first and middle names could be double barrelled but aren't. Mil still double barrels them. You could have them as separate names on paper only? So your wife and who ever else can call her "Ellie-Sue" but her birth certificate will say "Ellie Sue"

londongirl5 · 11/05/2025 10:10

Butchyrestingface · 11/05/2025 10:05

Your unborn child is going to Cambridge?

I was poking fun at myself

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread