Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To want Brexit be reversed

812 replies

BeKookySheep · 05/05/2025 10:59

I don’t normally post about politics, but this has been playing on my mind for a while. I wasn’t super political before the referendum — just a mum trying to do her best for her family. But now, years later, I really feel like Brexit hasn’t delivered what we were promised. And I think we should seriously start talking about reversing it.

My eldest is 16, really bright, and had dreams of studying languages and maybe doing a year abroad. We looked into Erasmus a while ago, but that’s gone now. And the cost and hassle of studying or working in Europe is so much higher now. She asked me, “Why is it so much harder for us than it was for you, Mum?” And honestly, I didn’t know what to say. It hit me hard.

Everything’s more expensive — our food shop has gone up loads, and don’t even get me started on getting certain things for school packed lunches! Little things, but they add up. My brother runs a small business and he's drowning in paperwork just to send stuff to Ireland. And a friend of mine left the NHS because she felt so overstretched — they can’t recruit enough staff anymore, especially from Europe.

Brexit hasn’t made anything better. It’s just made life harder in so many small but important ways. And if something clearly isn’t working — and is limiting our children’s futures — why shouldn’t we talk about changing it?

We tell our kids it’s okay to admit when something’s not right and make it better. Maybe it’s time we took our own advice.

Would love to hear if others are feeling the same. Has Brexit made life harder for your family too?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
TooBigForMyBoots · 07/05/2025 10:46

OonaStubbs · 07/05/2025 00:28

The problem with talking about "how Brexit damaged the UK economy" is that many of the people that voted for Brexit didn't get any benefit from the economy when it was good. Because most, if not all, of the benefits of being in the EU were for the middle and upper classes. For working-class people it just meant having to compete for jobs and houses and resources with the influx of EU migrants.

Repeating this lie does not make it true.

EasternStandard · 07/05/2025 10:47

StandFirm · 07/05/2025 10:36

Right. Rejoining the EU would require a referendum but not to start the negotiations - only once the negotiated deal is known. That's what should have happened with the Brexit vote. What should have been is this: Step1. advisory referendum. Ends up Pro leave -marginally, not the sweeping mandate that some would have us believe, there was less than a 2% difference between leave and remain- but ok, on to Step2. We negotiate the terms of departure BEFORE we set a ticking clock over our heads Step3. We know what Brexit looks like and we get British voters to confirm they're on board with whatever deal has been negotiated and its implications Step4. We're now in or out off the back of an informed popular mandate, for good, and we stop bitching about it either way.

I don’t think negotiations can happen without mandate.

If it was known that the plan was to rejoin, and I don’t see why that wouldn’t be known, people would rightly ask hang on who’s given you mandate for this?

TooBigForMyBoots · 07/05/2025 10:54

BatchCookBabe · 06/05/2025 23:49

I bet you can't find any 'report' on how Brexit has damaged the UK economy. You can't, because it didn't damage it. The economy in the UK - and the rest of the world - got fucked by the covid pandemic, and the cost of living rise. There is zero proof of Brexit doing anything negative to the UK economy... Any 'UK economy damage' was done by the lockdowns/covid/the cost of living crisis!

The only 'negative' of Brexit, is the fact you need to have 3 months on your passport now - to travel to Europe. Who cares? Any sensible and rational person would have made sure they had at LEAST 3 months on their passport, before travelling ANYwhere on it, (before we left the EU!)

Edited

You clearly didn't pay any attention to what happened to NI because of Brexit. We are only beginning to recover now.

Goldenbear · 07/05/2025 10:56

OonaStubbs · 07/05/2025 00:28

The problem with talking about "how Brexit damaged the UK economy" is that many of the people that voted for Brexit didn't get any benefit from the economy when it was good. Because most, if not all, of the benefits of being in the EU were for the middle and upper classes. For working-class people it just meant having to compete for jobs and houses and resources with the influx of EU migrants.

Oh do you mean like Nigel Farage kind of people?

BatchCookBabe · 07/05/2025 11:10

Walkaround · 07/05/2025 08:12

Over time, but conveniently excluding any inconvenient realities, like the way the country has been and is being run. Let’s exclude Liz Truss, too. And Covid. And Boris Johnson. And the invasion of Ukraine. And Trump. In a vacuum, how are we doing? 🤣

All of which have NOTHING to do with Brexit.

Nice try though. Smile

BatchCookBabe · 07/05/2025 11:11

TooBigForMyBoots · 07/05/2025 10:54

You clearly didn't pay any attention to what happened to NI because of Brexit. We are only beginning to recover now.

That was the EU that caused the issues for N.I. Not Brexit. HTH. Smile

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 07/05/2025 11:13

BatchCookBabe · 07/05/2025 11:11

That was the EU that caused the issues for N.I. Not Brexit. HTH. Smile

How exactly did the EU cause issues for Northern Ireland?

Odras · 07/05/2025 11:37

EasternStandard · 07/05/2025 07:53

Is it poor? Comparatively against say Germany or France? I mean outside short term Labour policies which might halve growth.

Over time where’s the EU v UK

@Clavinovathanks for those DA posts, it hadn’t made sense on these threads for a while, you’ve explained the report etc

Edited

Yes it is comparatively poor.

it’s really very clear that Brexit has been bad for the economy so far. Other things have happened to affect the world economy but the UK was in a worse position because it basically had created barriers to trade. I think it’s fairly undeniable - no genuine economists say otherwise. . But there are experts who argue it could ultimately work out better in the longer term.

Odras · 07/05/2025 11:59

BatchCookBabe · 07/05/2025 11:11

That was the EU that caused the issues for N.I. Not Brexit. HTH. Smile

I think that both the EU and the UK caused problems for Northern Ireland. From an Irish perspective I’m not sure either side really cared about the people of Northern Ireland that much. The UK made a deal and then broke it, and showed their complete ignorance and apathy towards N.I. and the EU was focused on ensuring it gave the UK government a hard time.

I think when it came down to it was mostly Ireland who actually cared about the people of Northern Ireland and protecting peace there. Obviously because the cost for us would be much greater if NI went down the plug hole.

TooBigForMyBoots · 07/05/2025 14:25

BatchCookBabe · 07/05/2025 11:11

That was the EU that caused the issues for N.I. Not Brexit. HTH. Smile

Yep, you paid no attention at all to the shit it caused here. It wasn't the EU that was the problem. It was purely UK made by the Conservatives and the DUP. But sure you don't seem overly bothered by facts.

HTHSmile

OonaStubbs · 07/05/2025 17:25

TooBigForMyBoots · 07/05/2025 10:46

Repeating this lie does not make it true.

But it is true, if people were happy with the way things were, with us being in the EU, Brexit wouldn't have won the vote.

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 07/05/2025 17:36

OonaStubbs · 07/05/2025 17:25

But it is true, if people were happy with the way things were, with us being in the EU, Brexit wouldn't have won the vote.

People were persuaded to believe that our membership of the EU was the source of their problems. That doesn't actually make it true that that EU was the source of their problems, it merely proves how very easy it is to manipulate people.

TooBigForMyBoots · 07/05/2025 17:51

OonaStubbs · 07/05/2025 17:25

But it is true, if people were happy with the way things were, with us being in the EU, Brexit wouldn't have won the vote.

People weren't happy. That wasn't the EU's fault. That was our government's fault. Austerity was a stupid idea that set off a chain reaction.

We're out of the EU now and have been for five years. Do you think people are happier now than they were in 2015?

Winter2020 · 07/05/2025 17:51

Walkaround · 06/05/2025 16:21

It’s not entirely true that we have no spare housing. There are plenty of empty investment properties, second homes, holiday lets, houses with minimal occupancy. Everything is a political choice, not just immigration.

As for paying care workers more to look after the elderly - with a rapidly ageing population and capitalism as a model, that’s not going to work, as there is too much demand and we have not quite yet resorted to telling people they will only get any care if they can afford to pay for it themselves. Making people spend their every last penny on care until they are destitute rather than protecting their houses for inheritance might help for a while, until that source of wealth dries up, too, but there comes a point when even the wealth of the wealthy retiree runs out. Of course, we could go back to telling women their role is in the home, caring for their children and elderly relatives without bothering the state and without expecting pay for it, because a good woman does it for love and duty? Would that appeal?

Edited

Of course immigration is not the only policy. No one is a bigger supporter of doubling and tripling council tax for second homes than me. I think second homes are selfish and hollow out communities and any legislation that reduces them is good with me.

That said there seems to be about 800,000 second homes on the UK. There are also around 700,000 derelict homes.

The scale of the numbers it is clear that we could give over all the second homes/derelict properties to new arrivals and in a few short years have none. What will the plan be then?

We need to get second homes back into use to relieve pressure on housing so that people/families already here can afford somewhere to live.

Winter2020 · 07/05/2025 17:59

Walkaround · 06/05/2025 18:06

Regarding your last paragraph, @Winter2020 , which you added with your edit, are you saying that it is an acceptable catch-all for all illegal migrants, that if they are young, lone men we send them home on the basis they can’t be fleeing danger, because they are men, so we can reject their claims for asylum or humanitarian protection without further investigation? And if they are women and children, we should be inclined to welcome them in and give their children school places, because they must be in danger to have taken the risk of travelling here? Do you think it’s that simple to tell between genuine claims and bogus claims? Or would the next argument be that those with children are just looking for a free education for their kids and are therefore clearly economic migrants?

Are you saying that they are in fear of their lives so they clear off and leave their female family members and children. Let's face it the women and children are safe at home and will be sent for later when the paperwork is in place.

Hwi · 07/05/2025 18:21

MumChp · 05/05/2025 16:37

Lots of people couldn't afford to study abroad before Brexit. We shouldn't fool ourselves.
But Brexit hasn't done any good. True.

Where my relatives live, there has been a huge influx of poor East Europeans who, after a year or two or three doing minimum wages job (or, like the residents of Victoria Road, Glasgow, never having worked) now live in council housing on benefits. All legal - they were entitled to it because we were in the EU.

Even if Brexit did not work out the way people hoped, just the very fact that the remainder of Eastern Europe and their uncle won't be able to do the same - move here and demand to sponge off the state without having contributed is a massive win. Some of those East Europeans in minim wage jobs, living in social housing, having their 3 children in state schools, enjoying tax credits and free NHS, have the gall to say 'Oh, but I am paying taxes'. Truly a slap in the face of every Brit net contributor.

Hwi · 07/05/2025 18:22

Winter2020 · 07/05/2025 17:59

Are you saying that they are in fear of their lives so they clear off and leave their female family members and children. Let's face it the women and children are safe at home and will be sent for later when the paperwork is in place.

This

Hwi · 07/05/2025 18:24

OonaStubbs · 05/05/2025 22:17

We don't need a high birth rate. We need fewer people in general. Bringing in more people to pay the pensions of the generation before is utter lunacy, as those people will then need pensions themselves. What do we do then, bring in even more people? You can't keep doing that indefinitely.

Bravo

Hwi · 07/05/2025 18:29

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 07/05/2025 17:36

People were persuaded to believe that our membership of the EU was the source of their problems. That doesn't actually make it true that that EU was the source of their problems, it merely proves how very easy it is to manipulate people.

What do you mean, persuaded? Do they not have eyes? Working class people who are working in trades did not see their wages drop, did not have their children's classes overfilled with non-native speakers from Eastern Europe? Did not see council houses filled with them? And child benefit payable to children in Eastern Europe who never set foot in the UK? Did not see health tourism from the new EU countries (I can't say obviously the same for non-former socialist block countries). Persuaded, my proverbial arse. People have eyes and brains.

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 07/05/2025 18:45

Hwi · 07/05/2025 18:29

What do you mean, persuaded? Do they not have eyes? Working class people who are working in trades did not see their wages drop, did not have their children's classes overfilled with non-native speakers from Eastern Europe? Did not see council houses filled with them? And child benefit payable to children in Eastern Europe who never set foot in the UK? Did not see health tourism from the new EU countries (I can't say obviously the same for non-former socialist block countries). Persuaded, my proverbial arse. People have eyes and brains.

By persuaded, I meant that they were misled.

But perhaps I am mistaken and they were right all along. How wonderful to know that all of their problems are now resolved as a result of leaving the EU. Thank you for clarifying that we are all living in the sunlit uplands now.

Overhaul54 · 07/05/2025 18:54

TooBigForMyBoots · 07/05/2025 10:46

Repeating this lie does not make it true.

There's a reason Brexit got more votes. This was one of them.

Walkaround · 07/05/2025 19:50

BatchCookBabe · 07/05/2025 11:10

All of which have NOTHING to do with Brexit.

Nice try though. Smile

Clearly you don’t try to understand the context of comments 🤣. I was laughing at the suggestion immediately before mine that we see how the UK is currently doing compared to France and Germany, whilst excluding any perceived consequences of the actions of the party currently in power. On that basis, I therefore jokingly suggested excluding everything else that has happened since Brexit to work out “how we are doing.” I mean, really - what on earth is the point in pretending we know how we’d be doing if we hadn’t had execrably bad leadership for the last decade or so? And in any event, a big part of the point of Brexit was to enable us to blame our own leaders for their astonishing mismanagement, rather than having a convenient EU bogeyman to blame, wasn’t it? So why exclude that mismanagement from any calculation of the effects of Brexit, when it is one of the main reasons for having Brexited (that we can now mismanage ourselves)?

Walkaround · 07/05/2025 19:55

Winter2020 · 07/05/2025 17:59

Are you saying that they are in fear of their lives so they clear off and leave their female family members and children. Let's face it the women and children are safe at home and will be sent for later when the paperwork is in place.

So, you would assume that if you were an immigration officer, then? Or only from the safety of your keyboard, without having had to meet the people you are talking about?

Walkaround · 07/05/2025 20:08

Winter2020 · 07/05/2025 17:51

Of course immigration is not the only policy. No one is a bigger supporter of doubling and tripling council tax for second homes than me. I think second homes are selfish and hollow out communities and any legislation that reduces them is good with me.

That said there seems to be about 800,000 second homes on the UK. There are also around 700,000 derelict homes.

The scale of the numbers it is clear that we could give over all the second homes/derelict properties to new arrivals and in a few short years have none. What will the plan be then?

We need to get second homes back into use to relieve pressure on housing so that people/families already here can afford somewhere to live.

And empty investment properties owned by overseas shell companies in vastly expensive cities like London? There’s a lot of murky international ownership of exceptionally valuable real estate and it all ensures the housing market remains unaffordable for people who need homes rather than wanting investments. It may be a feature of capitalism, but demonising those needing shelter so as to enable profitable investment by the wealthy to continue does highlight one of the flaws in the system.

TooBigForMyBoots · 07/05/2025 22:12

Overhaul54 · 07/05/2025 18:54

There's a reason Brexit got more votes. This was one of them.

Yep. Repeat the lie was the No1 scummy tactic used by the Leave Campaign.

You'd think, given the evidence, that Brexiteers would have learnt that by now. But, No.🙄

Swipe left for the next trending thread