Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be really worried about Reform?

1000 replies

FiveHorse · 29/04/2025 13:09

Just that really. They’re predicted to gain the most from the upcoming elections, if this carries on could we see a reform government at the next general elections? Or is it press scaremongering as usual?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
23
User135644 · 30/04/2025 12:32

Maitri108 · 30/04/2025 12:18

So you think we should leave people to starve on the streets?

They wouldn't be coming here in the first place without all the incentives

PandoraSocks · 30/04/2025 12:33

BlakeCarrington · 30/04/2025 12:27

The insurance companies can be subject to additional regs stopping them from loading premiums in this way Pandora, or could all be made to contribute to a common fund to keep premiums down - similar models to Pool Re for flood cover, Terrorism Re for terrorist risks and the Motor Insurance Bureau for uninsured drivers. There are a number of different ways the insurance industry could tackle it and there are already the precedents I mention above.

You are assuming a government that would be right wing enough to introduce insurance based healthcare would want to legislate to help those with pre-existing conditions. Given the ableism that Farage has come out with, I wouldn't be very confident.

User135644 · 30/04/2025 12:33

RatalieTatalie · 29/04/2025 20:17

Absolutely. We need safe routes. The need for won’t disappear whoever is in charge.

There's plenty of safe routes. Visas.

DuncinToffee · 30/04/2025 12:34

User135644 · 30/04/2025 12:32

They wouldn't be coming here in the first place without all the incentives

What incentives?

EasternStandard · 30/04/2025 12:36

RatalieTatalie · 30/04/2025 12:29

Well if you can find a third country to agree to take more migrants, then of course. I can't see many queuing up for the privilege? Would involve a cost to us anyway wouldn't it.

Rwanda was exactly this wasn't it? And how did that pan out?

Edited

How much is it costing now? We pay on many levels including to o/s

We pay more pp granted than other G7 countries too

And yes a third country, get the mandate via a GE and it’ll be easier

RatalieTatalie · 30/04/2025 12:36

User135644 · 30/04/2025 12:33

There's plenty of safe routes. Visas.

Good lord.

📣 THERE IS NO WAY TO CLAIM ASYLUM IN THE UK FROM OUTSIDE THE UK. 📣

If you could 'just get a visa', why on earth would people risk their lives in the channel? You cannot be for real?

EasternStandard · 30/04/2025 12:39

RatalieTatalie · 30/04/2025 12:36

Good lord.

📣 THERE IS NO WAY TO CLAIM ASYLUM IN THE UK FROM OUTSIDE THE UK. 📣

If you could 'just get a visa', why on earth would people risk their lives in the channel? You cannot be for real?

There are ‘safe routes’ the pp is correct. On average we grant about 60k per year to families and other

Not everyone uses a crossing.

RatalieTatalie · 30/04/2025 12:41

EasternStandard · 30/04/2025 12:36

How much is it costing now? We pay on many levels including to o/s

We pay more pp granted than other G7 countries too

And yes a third country, get the mandate via a GE and it’ll be easier

A mandate via a GE? General Election? Sorry you've lost me.

In regards to how much it would cost, I have literally no idea. I assume any country willing to take all the asylum applicants the UK receive would want to be paid a substantial sum to process them all?

We spent hundreds of million implementing the Rwanda scheme and sent no one there.

Maitri108 · 30/04/2025 12:43

RatalieTatalie · 30/04/2025 12:28

Yes, I agree with you. If Farage managed to remove all the asylum seekers from the UK, build a 50ft wall around the coastline and stop anyone else entering, I absolutely think his fan club would go for anyone else not born here. But as long as there are Muslims in the country, I think that's where it's easiest for him to whip up hate.

It's not just about Farage. There's a far right movement that's been building for a long time, mostly on social media and people are being indoctrinated. This has been happening all over and most European countries now have far right political parties.

RatalieTatalie · 30/04/2025 12:44

EasternStandard · 30/04/2025 12:39

There are ‘safe routes’ the pp is correct. On average we grant about 60k per year to families and other

Not everyone uses a crossing.

Yes via refugee reunion visas, not for initial asylum applications. You can't use a refugee reunion visa if you have no one to be reunited with

RatalieTatalie · 30/04/2025 12:44

Maitri108 · 30/04/2025 12:43

It's not just about Farage. There's a far right movement that's been building for a long time, mostly on social media and people are being indoctrinated. This has been happening all over and most European countries now have far right political parties.

Yes, but this thread is talking about Reform.

EasternStandard · 30/04/2025 12:44

RatalieTatalie · 30/04/2025 12:41

A mandate via a GE? General Election? Sorry you've lost me.

In regards to how much it would cost, I have literally no idea. I assume any country willing to take all the asylum applicants the UK receive would want to be paid a substantial sum to process them all?

We spent hundreds of million implementing the Rwanda scheme and sent no one there.

GE is general election yes.

It costs Aus a lower figure than our expenditure.

It’s politically preferred by all but also makes sense on costs.

Maitri108 · 30/04/2025 12:46

User135644 · 30/04/2025 12:32

They wouldn't be coming here in the first place without all the incentives

People are making the journey because of family in the UK or because they can speak English. Some are coming because they think life would be better in the UK.

They're not coming because they want to live on £50 a week in a hotel.

Maitri108 · 30/04/2025 12:47

RatalieTatalie · 30/04/2025 12:44

Yes, but this thread is talking about Reform.

I understand that but thank you for the clarification. Reform is part of the far right movement.

RatalieTatalie · 30/04/2025 12:48

EasternStandard · 30/04/2025 12:44

GE is general election yes.

It costs Aus a lower figure than our expenditure.

It’s politically preferred by all but also makes sense on costs.

Well as I said to start with, if you can find a third country willing to take all of our asylum seekers and they actually make it there (unlike Rwanda), then fab. I think that will be a hard task, but my only desire is for people to live safely, wherever they were born, if the UK can't facilitate that, but can find another safe country who wants to do it on their behalf then lovely job.

Removing all asylum seekers, won't suddenly turn the country into a booming economy with excellent public services but will be interesting to see what the next straw man would then become? Back to the sick and disabled I imagine.

EasternStandard · 30/04/2025 12:51

RatalieTatalie · 30/04/2025 12:48

Well as I said to start with, if you can find a third country willing to take all of our asylum seekers and they actually make it there (unlike Rwanda), then fab. I think that will be a hard task, but my only desire is for people to live safely, wherever they were born, if the UK can't facilitate that, but can find another safe country who wants to do it on their behalf then lovely job.

Removing all asylum seekers, won't suddenly turn the country into a booming economy with excellent public services but will be interesting to see what the next straw man would then become? Back to the sick and disabled I imagine.

Great maybe it’ll be proposed at the next GE.

As for what’s after that I’d say it’ll be like Aus. Everyone will think yeh that is more secure and no politician will run on overturning the policy, even centre left govs who are in there now.

RatalieTatalie · 30/04/2025 12:52

Maitri108 · 30/04/2025 12:47

I understand that but thank you for the clarification. Reform is part of the far right movement.

I know. I honestly don't understand the points you're making to me, sorry if that makes me ignorant.

I believe, based purely anecdotally from listening to the rantings and ramblings of reform voters in the media, that their current fixation is asylum seekers. Get rid of asylum seekers, make the disabled all get full time jobs and give pensioners back the WFA and the country and economy will be booming.

I don't believe this is the case at all. I understand Farage takes influence from the far right in Europe and the USA but I'm not sure that reform voters are equating 'mass deportation' with the fact that if that really does mean all non-British born people, they'll be a lot worse off.

RatalieTatalie · 30/04/2025 12:53

EasternStandard · 30/04/2025 12:51

Great maybe it’ll be proposed at the next GE.

As for what’s after that I’d say it’ll be like Aus. Everyone will think yeh that is more secure and no politician will run on overturning the policy, even centre left govs who are in there now.

Perhaps. But that's all a bit pie in the sky isn't it? Reform aren't currently proposing that (or are they?), nor did they at the last election.

abracadabra1980 · 30/04/2025 12:54

I have no hesitation in voting Reform. Absolutely sick to death of the constant lying from the other two main parties.

cardibach · 30/04/2025 12:57

abracadabra1980 · 30/04/2025 12:54

I have no hesitation in voting Reform. Absolutely sick to death of the constant lying from the other two main parties.

But the constant lying from Farage and co doesn’t bother you?

RedToothBrush · 30/04/2025 12:57

Maitri108 · 30/04/2025 12:04

Interesting points. So what you're saying is that you don't vote for policies or strategies to improve the country, for example, improve public services, housing, education or the environment.

This is irrelevant. You ask someone why they don't like the main parties. They don't actually care what they're voting for or whether the party have a concrete plan - they just don't like those in power.

Sounds a bit patronising, don't you think?

You might think it's patronising and personally I do vote for policy but

  1. lots of people vote differently - the three main things are policy, personality and party - and often they don't vote based on more than one of these.
  2. it was literally the campaign strategy for Vote Leave to appeal to the disaffected and this idea of voting AGAINST rather than for. It's on record. Cummings said this numerous times.

So if you think it's patronising take it up with Cummings who ran the SUCCESSFUL Brexit campaign not me!!!

Maitri108 · 30/04/2025 12:58

RatalieTatalie · 30/04/2025 12:52

I know. I honestly don't understand the points you're making to me, sorry if that makes me ignorant.

I believe, based purely anecdotally from listening to the rantings and ramblings of reform voters in the media, that their current fixation is asylum seekers. Get rid of asylum seekers, make the disabled all get full time jobs and give pensioners back the WFA and the country and economy will be booming.

I don't believe this is the case at all. I understand Farage takes influence from the far right in Europe and the USA but I'm not sure that reform voters are equating 'mass deportation' with the fact that if that really does mean all non-British born people, they'll be a lot worse off.

Farage is the tip of the iceberg. He comes across as affable but he's the gateway to the far right.

If you look at social media at the moment, much of it is far right propaganda and people are coming out with far right theories.

Muslims are being used as the acceptable face of racism. It's not racist to dislike a religion and they're part of an invasion, a left wing conspiracy to replace white Christians with brown Muslims. This is a far right conspiracy theory called the Great Replacement.

Shakeoffyourchains · 30/04/2025 12:59

inkognitha · 30/04/2025 10:53

@Shakeoffyourchains

And please don’t pretend that the discussion isn’t rooted in racism and bigotry. Not once have I heard anyone complaining about the number of white and/or Christian migrants from Australia, America, or Europe. It’s always... always... about Muslims and brown people.

There are reasons for that, not a reason to tar all Muslim and brown people with the same brush, I hope my other replies in this thread have shown you I really do dislike blanket thinking, one way or the other.

The day the Left is ready to admit that cultural differences should be neutrally assessed for what they are (is it democratic? Is is sexist? Is it tolerant?), rather through the prism of post-colonial guilt, self-hatred, white saviour complex and the insidious racism of exoticism, this will be a good day.

Care to elaborate on these “reasons” and the specific cultural differences you think need to be neutrally addressed?

Because as far as I can see, “cultural difference” only ever seems to be a concern when it involves Muslims or ethnic minorities. I’ve never heard anyone on the right express alarm about welcoming religious, Republican Americans with their love of guns and deeply rooted misogyny, into the country.

I’m also unclear why this supposed reckoning is always the responsibility of “the left”. We had 14 years of a right-wing Tory government, and for nearly a decade they had a majority. At any point during that time, they could have implemented policies to address the concerns of the right, without needing to consult the left at all. And yet they didn’t. Why?

EasternStandard · 30/04/2025 13:00

RatalieTatalie · 30/04/2025 12:53

Perhaps. But that's all a bit pie in the sky isn't it? Reform aren't currently proposing that (or are they?), nor did they at the last election.

I didn’t vote for them and didn’t look up their policies so can’t say re last time.

I think the local elections will swing their way and all parties will look at why - immigration included. They’ll all realise it’s an issue and start to formulate policy for now and next GE.

DuncinToffee · 30/04/2025 13:03

EasternStandard · 30/04/2025 12:51

Great maybe it’ll be proposed at the next GE.

As for what’s after that I’d say it’ll be like Aus. Everyone will think yeh that is more secure and no politician will run on overturning the policy, even centre left govs who are in there now.

Without breaking internatiional law and restricting human rights?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-64898507

Former Australian PM Tony Abbott

How Australia wrote the 'stop the boats' playbook

The policy slogan used by Rishi Sunak is the same as that used 10 years ago in Australia.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-64898507

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread