And it’s not that I don’t find the theological answer ‘acceptable’ as such, I am not so uneducated that I don’t understand the concept of ‘we just don’t know’.
I am interested in how an individual can simultaneously confidently say god is omnipotent, is capable of answering prayers, is kind and loving AND refuses to answer the prayers specifically of a child victim of rape desperately begging him for help.
There’s a logical fallacy and cognitive dissonance required that to me falls outside of ‘just’ faith as it requires such a huge leap.
He can, but he doesn’t want to. I could not describe such an entity as kind and loving so I’m interested in how people who do justify it individually.
I find it fascinating, especially as someone who grew up in the church but never believed for reasons like that.