Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Why Use Piss? Don't get it.

227 replies

ImConfusedDotComHelp · 20/04/2025 08:49

What's the significance?

How do they think this will help? Makes no sense to me at all.

https://reduxx.info/uk-trans-activists-stage-piss-filled-protest-in-front-of-londons-equality-and-human-rights-commission/

UK: Trans Activists Stage Piss-Filled Protest In Front of London's Equality And Human Rights Commission - Reduxx

Trans activists in London staged a urine-filled protest outside of the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) on Monday in response to proposed alterations to the Equality Act which would strengthen women’s sex-based rights. Members of the organiz...

https://reduxx.info/uk-trans-activists-stage-piss-filled-protest-in-front-of-londons-equality-and-human-rights-commission/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Ereshkigalangcleg · 20/04/2025 17:50

So why are you saying it’s a problem if “trans men” are using female spaces, if you don’t care? Don’t concern yourself on my account.

CalmTheFuckDownMargaret · 20/04/2025 17:54

Marking territory like dogs. Wankers.

DriveMeCrazyRoadRage · 20/04/2025 17:57

It's gross, territory marking animal behaviour.

To think some bloke/blokes actually sat at home in their one bed flat/mum's basement/etc.., pissing into a bottle multiple times til it was full, makes me feel sick to be honest.

Why are we listening to these men who are clearly very disturbed individuals that need help?

ImConfusedDotComHelp · 20/04/2025 18:05

Triselly · 20/04/2025 15:09

Yes. There is extensive evidence of trans identified (usually) males indulging in nappy wearing, urine fetishism etc on both Reddit and archived and discussed on the fruit farms. I am obviously not going to post pictures here as they are obscene but if you want evidence of this behaviour, it is really not hard to find.

For more public displays, see the earlier ‘protest’ by trans-identified males who poured bottles of piss over themselves outside the EHRC in September 2022.

You’re right in that there is no need to make shit up with these people as their behaviour extends far beyond anything I could possibly make up.

That's obscene
Not the 'face' of trans people we see on TV when they say how vulnerable they are.

OP posts:
DrPrunesqualer · 20/04/2025 18:08

Nextdoor55 · 20/04/2025 17:49

Yeah don't try to misconstrue what I'm saying here. People are fluid now, about time we all woke up & smell the coffee. The world is changing, so is the human race.
Not everyone wants to see you pee. Not all women feel negative about transwomen being in female toilets. It's ludicrous. The whole thing. And there are far far worse things going on.
I'm not one bit worried about a transwoman using the female toilet, not one bit. It doesn't worry me.
However people who marginalise, hate & segregated for no good reason except for their own prejudice absolutely do make me nervous.

Luckily the majority opinion, common sense and science has prevailed.

Women's rights have been upheld
No more invasions
We have our voice back and
We can speak again.

No one can take away the rights of women as a whole. Including other women who think they are ‘being kind’ ……because they aren’t, to women.

Shadowsunray · 20/04/2025 18:27

Seems like a massive own goal to me. It completely debunks the "we just want to pee" message and the "we are vulnerable little flowers that need the protection of the women's loos" line.

Nextdoor55 · 20/04/2025 18:32

DrPrunesqualer · 20/04/2025 18:08

Luckily the majority opinion, common sense and science has prevailed.

Women's rights have been upheld
No more invasions
We have our voice back and
We can speak again.

No one can take away the rights of women as a whole. Including other women who think they are ‘being kind’ ……because they aren’t, to women.

Em well firstly, it's not actually the majority, it was a legal decision. And we all know how flawed they can be.
And secondly, don't kid yourself that the decision will be "it" , because the pendulum will not stop. It will swing back again.
And thirdly, please don't patronise me. It's not about being kind. It's about fairness, respect for diversity & outrage that one group of marginalised are trying to victimise another equally vulnerable group.

I won't be part of that. It's going to reverse it's just a matter of time.

Maitri108 · 20/04/2025 18:36

Shadowsunray · 20/04/2025 18:27

Seems like a massive own goal to me. It completely debunks the "we just want to pee" message and the "we are vulnerable little flowers that need the protection of the women's loos" line.

The TRAs seem to have the police eating out of their hands. I remember a group of women who wanted to hold a meeting in a pub were kicked out and the police were called. Yet a group of TRAs vandalising a building with urine is a free pass.

Shadowsunray · 20/04/2025 18:38

Maitri108 · 20/04/2025 18:36

The TRAs seem to have the police eating out of their hands. I remember a group of women who wanted to hold a meeting in a pub were kicked out and the police were called. Yet a group of TRAs vandalising a building with urine is a free pass.

Hopefully change is coming, if not I'm hoping more law suits now that the law has been clarified will force change.

DrPrunesqualer · 20/04/2025 18:47

Nextdoor55 · 20/04/2025 18:32

Em well firstly, it's not actually the majority, it was a legal decision. And we all know how flawed they can be.
And secondly, don't kid yourself that the decision will be "it" , because the pendulum will not stop. It will swing back again.
And thirdly, please don't patronise me. It's not about being kind. It's about fairness, respect for diversity & outrage that one group of marginalised are trying to victimise another equally vulnerable group.

I won't be part of that. It's going to reverse it's just a matter of time.

  • the pendulum swinging back again….that’s delusional!
  • definition of patronising has not been met
  • fairness…agree…to all…agree. All means women too. So time for Stonewall to get those third and fourth spaces.
  • Using the laughing imoji on my post says everything!
  • those marginalised need to act respectfully as we do. Not incite violence and piss on everything. Literally and metaphorically !
Nextdoor55 · 20/04/2025 18:58

DrPrunesqualer · 20/04/2025 18:47

  • the pendulum swinging back again….that’s delusional!
  • definition of patronising has not been met
  • fairness…agree…to all…agree. All means women too. So time for Stonewall to get those third and fourth spaces.
  • Using the laughing imoji on my post says everything!
  • those marginalised need to act respectfully as we do. Not incite violence and piss on everything. Literally and metaphorically !

Ok. I'll just leave you thinking you've won an argument. It's not done. I know this.

Helleofabore · 20/04/2025 19:01

Nextdoor55 · 20/04/2025 18:32

Em well firstly, it's not actually the majority, it was a legal decision. And we all know how flawed they can be.
And secondly, don't kid yourself that the decision will be "it" , because the pendulum will not stop. It will swing back again.
And thirdly, please don't patronise me. It's not about being kind. It's about fairness, respect for diversity & outrage that one group of marginalised are trying to victimise another equally vulnerable group.

I won't be part of that. It's going to reverse it's just a matter of time.

I believe that the reference to the 'majority' is to the majority of the population of the UK not wanting male people to use female single sex spaces as per multiple polls (None lately show that it is a 'minority' at all). Would you like us to post some of them so you can see for yourself?

It is the same in other countries too when the general population polling is done.

So, yes. In that way, it is the 'majority' who agree that single sex spaces should be single sex.

Helleofabore · 20/04/2025 19:02

And I have had a few laughing reaction emoji on my posts on threads, just report them. That is what MNHQ recommend. They are gathering data on usage so that they can make decision.

They want to see abusive usage.

JHound · 20/04/2025 19:03

I think it tells you a lot about an individual that will gather their piss to do this kind of thing.

They are disgusting.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 20/04/2025 19:03

They’re wasted on me, I never check 🤷‍♀️

Ereshkigalangcleg · 20/04/2025 19:04

Nextdoor55 · 20/04/2025 18:32

Em well firstly, it's not actually the majority, it was a legal decision. And we all know how flawed they can be.
And secondly, don't kid yourself that the decision will be "it" , because the pendulum will not stop. It will swing back again.
And thirdly, please don't patronise me. It's not about being kind. It's about fairness, respect for diversity & outrage that one group of marginalised are trying to victimise another equally vulnerable group.

I won't be part of that. It's going to reverse it's just a matter of time.

it is actually the majority view in this country, sorry to disappoint.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 20/04/2025 19:06

Helleofabore · 20/04/2025 19:01

I believe that the reference to the 'majority' is to the majority of the population of the UK not wanting male people to use female single sex spaces as per multiple polls (None lately show that it is a 'minority' at all). Would you like us to post some of them so you can see for yourself?

It is the same in other countries too when the general population polling is done.

So, yes. In that way, it is the 'majority' who agree that single sex spaces should be single sex.

I think some on the thread might benefit from that. Stop them embarrassing themselves by saying something easily refuted.

DrPrunesqualer · 20/04/2025 19:08

Nextdoor55 · 20/04/2025 18:58

Ok. I'll just leave you thinking you've won an argument. It's not done. I know this.

It’s not about either ‘side’ winning

It about
EQUALITY

DrPrunesqualer · 20/04/2025 19:11

Helleofabore · 20/04/2025 19:02

And I have had a few laughing reaction emoji on my posts on threads, just report them. That is what MNHQ recommend. They are gathering data on usage so that they can make decision.

They want to see abusive usage.

Thanks for that advice.
I have contacted MN I just hope they read it and don’t take down my own post now and perhaps just get rid of the laughing emoji

Nextdoor55 · 20/04/2025 19:13

DrPrunesqualer · 20/04/2025 19:08

It’s not about either ‘side’ winning

It about
EQUALITY

It's about equity.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 20/04/2025 19:14

Nextdoor55 · 20/04/2025 19:13

It's about equity.

Women’s rights being trampled on by men isn’t “equity” though.

Iwantmybed · 20/04/2025 19:15

Because TW find it easier to piss in a bottle than actual women

Nextdoor55 · 20/04/2025 19:16

Ereshkigalangcleg · 20/04/2025 19:04

it is actually the majority view in this country, sorry to disappoint.

Like the majority wanted the conservative government or labour or Brexit you mean?
Yeah. Pendulum will swing back. Just got to wait for it. Sensible policies will proceed following this ridiculous debacle.

Katkins17 · 20/04/2025 19:18

It’s probably one of the most male centric protest they can make….not quite the flex these gits think it is.

but hey…. Just continue letting them speak, or protesting, let them wave their threatening placards and shouting in women’s faces….. we know what and who they are, and it ain’t women.

SugarPlumpFairyCakes · 20/04/2025 19:18

Because they went to piss all over women's rights and preferences.

Foul men.